Attesting the Aristotelian Future
- Michael J. Raven
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Aristotelian relativism about the future (as recently defended by MacFarlane (2003)) claims that a prediction made on Monday, such as ‘It will rain’, can be indeterminate on Monday but determinate on Tuesday. A serious objection to this intuitively appealing view is that it cannot coherently be attested: for if it is attested on Monday, then our blindness to what the future holds precludes attesting that the prediction is determinate on Tuesday, and if it is attested on Tuesday (when, suppose, it rains), then the fact that it rains precludes attesting that the prediction is indeterminate on Monday. In this paper, I focus on Moruzzi and Wright (2009)’s recent development of this objection and argue that it fails. This result removes a major obstacle to defending the Aristotelian view.
- Aristotle. (1984). De Interpretatione. In J. Barnes (Ed.), The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- MacFarlane, J. (2003). Future contingents and relative truth. The Philosophical Quarterly, 53, 321–336. CrossRef
- MacFarlane, J. (2008). Truth in the Garden of Forking Paths. In M. Kolbel & M. Garcia-Carpintero (Eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Moruzzi, S., & Wright, C. (2009). Trumping assessments and the Aristotelian future. Synthese, 166, 309–331. CrossRef
- Attesting the Aristotelian Future
Volume 39, Issue 4 , pp 751-757
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Open future
- Relativism about truth
- Michael J. Raven (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada