Debating Forgiveness: A Reply to My Critics
- Charles L. Griswold
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
In this essay I offer a detailed reply to three critics (whose commentaries are included in this issue of Philosophia) of my Forgiveness: a Philosophical Exploration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). The topics explored include the nature and limits of forgiveness; its unconditional or conditional character; the problem of distinguishing between central and marginal cases; the analysis of political apology; and questions of philosophical methodology.
- Bash, A (2007) Forgiveness and Christian ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge CrossRef
- Butler, J. (1896). The works of Joseph Butler, D.C.L. W. E. Gladstone (Ed.), 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kraybill, DB, Nolt, SM, Weaver-Zercher, DL (2007) Amish grace: How forgiveness transcended tragedy. J. Wiley & Sons, San Francisco
- Murphy, J. (2003). Getting even: Forgiveness and its limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Murphy, J. G., & Hampton, J. (1998). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Smith, N. (2008). I was wrong: The meanings of apologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Strawson, P. F. (1980). Freedom and resentment. In Freedom and resentment and other essays (pp. 1–25). New York: Methuen.
- Debating Forgiveness: A Reply to My Critics
Volume 38, Issue 3 , pp 457-473
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Unconditional forgiveness
- Conditional forgiveness
- Paradigm cases
- Moral ideals
- Virtue theory
- Secular and religious approaches
- Analytical strategy
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA