Permissibility and Violable Rules Authors
First Online: 29 January 2008 Received: 07 May 2007 Accepted: 27 November 2007 DOI:
10.1007/s11406-007-9113-5 Cite this article as: Rowbottom, D.P. Philosophia (2008) 36: 367. doi:10.1007/s11406-007-9113-5
From a logical point of view, permissibility can be reduced to possibility by introducing demands which can be met. The alleged reduction is circular from a philosophical perspective, however, because demands are fundamentally deontic. This paper solves this problem by replacing demands which can be met with rules which can be satisfied
Anderson, A. R. (1956). The formal analysis of normative systems. In N. Rescher (Ed.)
The logic of decision and action pp. 147–213. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Anderson, A. R. (1958). A reduction of deontic logic to alethic modal logic.
Fine, K. (2002). The varieties of necessity. In T. S. Gendler, & J. Hawthorne (Eds.)
Conceivability and Possibility pp. 253–282. Oxford: Oxford University Press Reprinted in Fine, K. 2005, Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 235–260.
Kanger, S. (1971 ). New foundations for ethical theory. In R. Hilpinen (Ed.)
Deontic logic: introductory and systematic readings pp. 36–58. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Lowe, E. J. (1998).
The possibility of metaphysics: substance, identity and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McNamara, P. (2006). Deontic Logic. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.),
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(Spring 2006 Edition). Retrieved from
Prior, A. N. (1962 ).
Formal logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, J. (1955). Two concepts of rules.
The Philosophical Review
Ruben, D. -H. (1997). John Searle’s
The Construction of Social Reality, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
von Wright, G. H. (1951). Deontic logic.
von Wright, G. H. (1968).
An essay in deontic logic and the general theory of action. Amsterdam: North Holland. Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008