Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A multi-agent model of a low income economy: simulating the distributional effects of natural disasters

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper develops an agent-based model of a stylized low income region in order to study the impact of natural disasters on population displacement, income, prices, and consumption with a focus on distributions and coping strategies of low income groups. Key features of the model include the integration of decentralized markets into a full economy in a spatially explicit way and the analysis of short-run adjustment processes. The model is calibrated to a low income region of rural agrarian Pakistan that faced severe floods in 2010. Dynamic adaptation by agents in response to falling income includes migrating and running down savings. Despite these consumption smoothing strategies, some low income groups are vulnerable to starvation. The paper showcases two hypothetical policy scenarios, a cash and a food transfer program, and tracks their effects on the welfare of low income groups in the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See also Naqvi (2012b) and Naqvi and Rehm (2014).

  2. The tradeable good is assumed to have no minimum consumption level and therefore depends only on income with a low value of \(\bar{\alpha }_{G}\), the marginal propensity to consume the tradeable good.

  3. Endogenous risk preference is explored in Naqvi (2012a) in an extension of the SHELscape model.

  4. An agent-based framework incorporating spatial family networks and various determinants of migration are explored in Rehm (2012).

  5. See Appendix 2 for details on the normalized distance matrices.

References

  • Ahmad M, Farooq U (2010) The state of food security in Pakistan: future challenges and coping strategies. Pak Dev Rev 49(4):903–923, http://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v49y2010i4p903-923.html

  • Albin P, Foley D (1992) Decentralized, dispersed exchange without an autioneer: a simulation study. J Econ Behav Organ 18:27–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfarano S, Lux T, Wagner F (2008) Time variation of higher moments in a financial market with heterogeneous agents: an analytical approach. J Econ Dyn Control 32(1):101–136 (2008). http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/dyncon/v32y2008i1p101-136.html

  • Amin S, Goldstein M (2008) Data against natural disasters: establishing effective systems for relief, recovery and reconstruction. The World Bank, Washington, DC

  • Angus SD, Parris B, Hassani MB (2009) Climate change impacts and adaptation in bangladesh: an agentbased approach. In: 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia

  • Arthur WB (1994) Bounded rationality and inductive behavior (the el farol problem). Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 84:406–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell R (2000) Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. In: Center on social and economic dynamics, brookings institute working paper no. 17

  • Baland J-M, Dreze J, Leruth L (1999) Daily wages and piece rates in agrarian economies. J Dev Econ 59(2):445–461. doi:10.1016/S0304-3878(99)00020-6. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304387899000206

  • Borrill PL, Tesfatsion LS (2010) Agent-based modeling: the right mathematics for the social sciences? In: Working paper no. 10023, Iowa State University

  • Carter MR, Little PD, Mogues T, Negatu W (2007) Poverty traps and natural disasters in ethiopia and honduras. World Dev 35(5):835–856. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v35y2007i5p835-856.html

  • Cavallo E, Noy I (2010) The economics of natural disasters: a survey. In: IDBWorking paper series no. IDB-WP-124

  • Chaudhuri S, Paxson C (2002) Smoothing consumption under income seasonality: buffer stocks versus credit markets. In: Discussion papers 0102–54, Columbia University, Department of Economics, http://ideas.repec.org/p/clu/wpaper/0102-54.html

  • Cochrane HC (1974) Predicting the economic impact of earthquakes. In: Cochrane HC, Haas JE, Bowden MJ, Kates RW (eds) Social science perspectives on the coming San Francisco Earthquakes—economic impact, prediction, and reconstruction. Natural Hazard Working Paper, Boulder and CO, pp 1–42

  • Currie J, Gahvari F (2008) Transfers in cash and in-kind: theory meets the data. J Econ Lit 46(2):333–83, doi:10.1257/jel.46.2.333. http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/jel.46.2.333

  • Dacy DC, Kunreuther H (1969) The economics of natural disasters. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JS, Gumerman GJ, Epstein JM, Axtell RL, Swedlund AC, Parker MT, McCarroll S (2000) Understanding anasazi culture change through agent-based modeling. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 179–205. 0–19-513168-1. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=344758.344768

  • Dercon S, Krishnan P (2003) Food aid and informal insurance. In: Working papers UNU-WIDER research paper, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER), http://ideas.repec.org/p/unu/wpaper/dp2003-09.html

  • Dijkstra EW (1959) A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer Math 1:269–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorosh P, Salam A (2008) Wheat markets and price stabilisation in pakistan: an analysis of policy options. Pak Dev Rev 47(1):71–87, http://ideas.repec.org/p/pid/wpaper/20065.html

  • Dosi G, Fagiolo G, Roventini A (2010) Schumpeter meeting keynes: a policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. J Econ Dyn Control 34(9):1748–1767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EM-DAT, The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database. Universit Catholique de Louvain, Brussels (Belgium). www.emdat.be

  • Epstein J, Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social sciences from the bottom up. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Fafchamps M, Shilpi F (2009) Determinants of the choice of migration destination. In: CEPR Discussion papers 7407, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. http://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/7407.html

  • Fafchamps M, Udry C, Czukas K (1998) Drought and saving in west africa: are livestock a buffer stock? J Dev Econ 55(2):273–305. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/deveco/v55y1998i2p273-305.html

  • FAO (2010) Minimum dietary energy requirement. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) statistics division. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/documents/food_security_statistics/MinimumDietaryEnergyRequirement_en.xls

  • FAO (2013) Pakistan: review of the wheat sector and grain storage issues, Technical report, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), World Bank

  • FAO (2014) Food and agriculture organization statistical database. http://faostat.fao.org

  • FBS (2010a) Agriculture census, Technical report, Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan

  • FBS (2010b) Household integrated economic survey, Technical report, Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan

  • FBS (2010c) Labor force survey, Technical report, Federal Bureau of Statistics, Government of Pakistan

  • Foley DK (1994) A statistical equilibrium theory of markets. J Econ Theory 62(2):321–345. http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jetheo/v62y1994i2p321-345.html

  • Friedman J, Hong SY, Hou X (2011) The impact of the food price crisis on consumption and caloric availability in Pakistan: evidence from repeated cross-sectional and panel data. World Bank, Technical report, Washington, DC

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (2001) The spatial economy: cities, regions, and international trade, vol. 0262561476 (The MIT Press, Cambridge). http://ideas.repec.org/b/mtp/titles/0262561476.html

  • Gilbert N, Terna P (2000) How to build and use agent-based models in social sciences. Mind Soc 1(1):57–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon P, Moore JE II, Richardson HW, Shinozuka M, An D, Cho S (2004) Earthquake disaster mitigation for urban transportation systems: an integrated methodology that builds on the Kobe and Northridge experiences. In: Okuyama Y, Chang SE (eds) Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters. Springer, New York, pp 205–232

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood MJ (1975) Research on internal migration in the united states: a survey. J Econ Lit 13(1):397–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood MJ (1985) Human migration: theory, models, and empirical studies. J Reg Sci 25(4):521–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2014) Modeling the role of inventories and heterogeneity in the assessment of the economic costs of natural disasters. Risk Anal 34(1):152–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems: an introductory analysis with applications to biology, control, and artificial intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0262581116. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike07-20&path=ASIN/0262581116

  • Hossain AA (2008) Rural labour market developments, agricultural productivity, and real wages in bangladesh, 1950–2006. Pak Dev Rev 47(1):89–114. http://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v47y2008i1p89-114.html

  • IFAD (2011) Rural Poverty Report 2011, Technical report, International Fund for Agriculture Development Policy Report

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, New York

  • Kahn ME (2005) The death toll from natural disasters: the role of income, geography and institutions. Rev Econ Stat 87(2):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniveton DR, Smith CD, Black R (2012) Emerging migration flows in a changing climate in dryland africa. Nat Clim Change 2(6):444–447. doi:10.1038/nclimate1447. http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n6/full/nclimate1447.html

  • Kurosaki T, Fafchamps M (2002) Insurance market efficiency and crop choices in pakistan. J Dev Econ, pp 419–453

  • Lebaron B (2002) Building the Santa Fe artificial stock market. Physica a, Brandeis University

  • Lewis WA (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manch Sch Econ Soc Stud 22:139–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JH, Page SE (2004) The standing ovation problem. Complexity 9:8–16. doi:10.1002/cplx.20033. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1035783.1035785

  • Morduch J (1995) Income smoothing and consumption smoothing. J Econ Perspect 9(3):103–14. http://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/jecper/v9y1995i3p103-14.html

  • Morrow DT (1980) The economics of the international stockholding of wheat, research reports 18. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/resrep/18.html

  • Naqvi AA, Rehm M (2014) Simulating natural disasters—a complex systems framework. In: IEEE Conference on computational intelligence for financial engineering and economics (CIFEr) proceedings, London, UK, pp 414–421

  • Naqvi SAA (2012a) Coping mechanisms and inequality in a multi-agent framework. In: Proceedings of the 2012 young scientists summer program (YSSP), International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)

  • Naqvi SAA (2012b) Simulating shocks in regional economies: application of agent-based models in understanding natural disasters, PhD thesis, Economics Department, New School University, New York

  • Naschold F, Walker TF, Barrett CB, Osei R (2011) Idiosyncratic shocks, risk management and welfare dynamics in rural Ghana, 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24–26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 109646, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea11/109646.html

  • Okuyama Y (2007) Economic modeling for disaster impact analysis: past, present, and future. Econ Syst Res 19(2):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik U, Narayanan K (2010) Vulnerability and coping to disasters: a study of household behaviour in flood Prone Region of India, MPRA Paper 21992, University Library of Munich, Germany. http://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/21992.html

  • Raberto M, Teglio A, Cincotti S (2012) Debt, deleveraging and business cycles: an agent-based perspective. Econ Open-Access Open-Assess E-J 6(27):1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray D (1998) Development economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Rehm M (2012) Migration and remittances: an agent-based model, PhD thesis, Economics Department, New School for Social Research

  • Rose A (1981) Utility lifelines and economic activity in the context of earthquakes. In: Isenberg J (ed) Social and economic impacts of earthquakes on utility lifelines. American Society of Civil Engineers, Construction Division, New York, pp 107–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose A, Oladuso G, Liao S-Y (2007) Business interruption impacts of a terrorist atttack on the electric power system of los angeles: customer resilience to a total blackout. Risk Anal 27(3):513–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelling T (1978) Micromotives and macrobehavior. W. W. Norton and Company, New York

  • Sen A (1982) Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

  • Shen X, Downing TE, Hamza M (2010) Tipping points in humanitarian crisis: from hot spots to hot systems, studies of the university: research, councel, education publication series 13/2010, United Nations University Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS)

  • Todaro M (1980) Internal migration in developing countries: a survey. In: Population and economic change in developing countries. NBER Chapters (National Bureau of Economic Research Inc), pp 361–402. http://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/9668.html

  • Toya H, Skidmore M (2007) Economic development and the impacts of natural disasters. Econ Lett 94(1):20–25. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2006.06.020. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V84-4MBBYK0-6/2/70c8c9c74006a9308637983708fd5acb

  • Tsuchiya S, Tatano H, Okada N (2007) Economic loss assessment due to railroad and highway disruptions. Econ Syst Res 19(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda T, Koike A, Iwakami K (2001) Economic damage assessment of catastrophes in high speed rail network. In: Proceedings of the 1st workshop on ‘comparative study of urban earthquake disaster management’, pp 13–19

  • UN-OCHA (2014) Pakistan floods 2010—total humanitarian assistance per donor as of May 2014. United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN-OCHA) Financial Tracking Service. http://fts.unocha.org/reports/daily/ocha_R24_E15913___1405011207.pdf

  • Wilensky U (1999) Netlogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo

  • World Bank (2010a) Food price increases in South Asia (2010) National responses and regional dimensions, Technical report, The World Bank, South Asia Region, Sustainable Development Department, Agriculture and Rural Development Unit

  • World Bank (2010b) Pakistan floods 2010: preliminary damage and needs assessment, Technical report, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Government of Pakistan, http://go.worldbank.org/1S6H97LVK0

  • Zaidi S, Kamal A, Ishaque MA, Khalil H, Sehgol A, Shafi N, Sharif Z (2008) Ruins to recovery. Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the editor and three anonymous referees, Duncan Foley, Robert Axtell, and conference participants at IEEE CIFEr, EEA, FMM, EAEPE, IIASA, and the Crisismappers for their feedback and comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Asjad Naqvi.

Appendices

Appendix 1: List of symbols

See the Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 Variables
Table 6 Parameters

Appendix 2: Distance matrix

Table 7 shows the normalized distance matrix used in the behavioral rules selling (Sect. 3.5) and migration (Sect. 3.6). The distance \(\chi \) between two locations is calculated using Dijkstra (1959)’s shortest distance algorithm on a network where the distance to self is assumed to be 0. Since the network is bi-directional, the distance matrix is square and symmetric; we only show the lower triangle here. Distances are normalized by the maximum distance in the matrix \((\bar{\chi })\). In the model layout shown in Fig. 10, this maximum distance is between Village 5 and Village 7. The normalized distances are thus \(\hat{\chi }=\chi /\bar{\chi }\).

Table 7 Normalized distance matrix

Appendix 3: Sensitivity analysis

In order to assess the sensitivity of the model to various shock levels, we perform multiple simulation runs for food production shocks ranging from 50 to 75 % in steps of 5 %. Sensitivity bands are generated from 10 simulation runs per shock. The values of variables reported refer to one year after the shock (Fig. 20).

Fig. 20
figure 20

Sensitivity analysis. a Real income, b food prices, c percentage rural, d average wheat consumption, e average savings, f percentage starving, g consumption from savings, h proportion income saved, i consumption Gini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naqvi, A.A., Rehm, M. A multi-agent model of a low income economy: simulating the distributional effects of natural disasters. J Econ Interact Coord 9, 275–309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-014-0137-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11403-014-0137-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation