Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Individuelle Adenomdetektionsrate des Untersuchers

Wichtiger Parameter für die Langzeitprognose der Patienten bei der Vorsorgekoloskopie

Individual adenoma detection rate of the examiner

Important parameter for long-term prognosis of patients by screening colonoscopy

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Der Gastroenterologe Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al (2014) Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 370:1298–1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C (2012) Screening for colorectal cancer with immunochemical faecal occult blood tests. Dig Liver Dis 44:967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Seiler CM et al (2011) Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based case-control study. Ann Intern Med 154:22–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gralnek IM, Siersema PD, Halpern Z et al (2014) Standard forward-viewing colonoscopy versus full-spectrum endoscopy: an international, multicentre, randomised, tandem colonoscopy trial. Lancet Oncol 15:353–360

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee RH, Tang RS, Muthusamy VR (2011) Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc 74:128–134

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou IS et al (2008) A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 57:59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al (2010) Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1795–1803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. R. Jakobs gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Klinik C, Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67063, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland

    R. Jakobs

Authors
  1. R. Jakobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Jakobs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jakobs, R. Individuelle Adenomdetektionsrate des Untersuchers. Gastroenterologe 9, 383–384 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-014-0912-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11377-014-0912-5

Search

Navigation