Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State of the art in S-LCA: integrating literature review and automatic text analysis

  • SOCIAL LCA IN PROGRESS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) method lacks of standard and code of practice. The aim of the study is to classify the wide variety of contributions on S-LCA for tracking the development of different themes and for defining and classifying the main approaches in a systematic and reproducible way.

Methods

The research addressed to study a collection of 51 articles published between January 2006 and November 2014 using statistical criteria. We used automatic text analysis (ATA) tools related to lexicon analysis to identify keywords useful in tracing the main topics covered in articles published in different periods. We conducted principal component analysis (PCA) to classify the different approaches in the literature and to outline the orientations of the various research groups.

Results and discussion

The results from lexicon analysis showed a rapid succession of different topics covered in the analyzed period. This alternation is strongly affected by the introduction of UNEP/Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) S-LCA guidelines and methodological sheets. PCA analysis enabled to synthesize the information related to the numerous approaches. Results did not show a clear division into groups which indicates the absence of a dominant position on the subject in the literature.

Conclusions

This study attempted to map the state of art in S-LCA integrating literature review with multivariate statistical techniques. The analysis showed a highly fragmented field. These results confirm the existence of a variety of approaches that in part have already been identified by literature reviews on S-LCA. Alignment with the results in the literature confirms ATA to be a suitable instrument for the realization of reviews. Moreover, being systematic and reproducible allows ATA to be applied repeatedly, expanding the number of articles and topics analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi H, Willimas LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. WIREs Comput Stat 2(4):433–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aparcana S, Salhofer S (2013) Application of a methodology for the social life cycle assessment of recycling systems in low income countries: three Peruvian case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1116–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arcese G, Lucchetti MC, Merli R (2013) Social life cycle assessment as a management tool: methodology for application in tourism. Sustainability 5(8):3275–3287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arushanyan Y, Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2014) Lessons learned—review of LCAs for ICT products and services. Comput Ind 65(2):211–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than the airbag saves in traffic? J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoit Norris C, Aulisio D, Norris GA (2012) Working with the social hotspots database—methodology and findings from 7 social scoping assessments. In: Dornfeld DA, Linke BS (eds) Leveraging technology for a sustainable world. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 581–586

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît C, Norris GA, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T (2010) The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J Life Cycle Assess 5:156–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:682–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4(9):1946–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît-Norris C, Norris GA, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6:6973–6984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco S (2010) Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Carocci Editori, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco S (2013) L’ analisi automatica dei testi. Fare ricerca con il text mining. Carocci Editori, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolasco S, Pavone P (2008) Multi-class categorization based on cluster analysis and TFIDF. 9th JADT (2008): 209–218. http://lexicometrica.univ-paris3.fr/jadt/jadt2008/pdf/bolasco-pavone.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2015

  • Canzonetti A (2008) Information retrieval e analisi delle cooccorrenze per l’estrazione di informazione specifica da documentazione giuridica. 9th JADT(2008):277–284. http://lexicometrica.univ-paris3.fr/jadt/jadt2008/pdf/canzonetti.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2015

  • De Luca AI, Iofrida N, Strano A, Falcone G, Gulisano G (2015) Social life cycle assessment and participatory approaches: a methodological proposal applied to citrus farming in southern Italy. Integr Environ Assess Manag 11(3):383–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer L, Hauschild M, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010a) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):247–259

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010b) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Part 2: implementation in six company case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):385–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekener-Petersen E, Moberg Å (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 2: reflections on a study of a complex product. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:144–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekener-Petersen E, Höglund J, Finnveden G (2014) Screening potential social impacts of fossil fuels and biofuels for vehicles. Energ Policy 73:416–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feschet P, Loeillet D, Macombe C, Garrabé M (2010) Fruits and vegetables supply chains specificities and stakes as element of discussion on Social-LCA. In: 7th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (Vol. 2, pp 1–6). Aldo Moro University, Bari

  • Feschet P, Macombe C, Garrabé M, Loeillet D, Rolo Saez A, Benhmad F (2013) Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway: the case of banana industry in Cameroon. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:490–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner M, Schau EM, Lehmann A, Traverso M (2010) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 2(10):3309–3322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foolmaun RK, Ramjeeawon T (2013) Comparative life cycle assessment and social life cycle assessment of used polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles in Mauritius. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):155–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano L, La Rocca G (2008) L’analisi automatica e semi-automatica dei dati testuali—software e Istruzioni per l’uso. LED Edizioni Universitarie. ISBN 978-88-7916-382-8

  • Grießhammer R, Benoît-Norris C, Dreyer LC, Flysjö A, Manhart A, Mazijn B, Méthot AL, Weidema B (2006) Feasibility study: integration of social aspects into LCA. Ghent University. https://biblio.ugent.be/input/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=512499&fileOId=633083. Accessed 26 Jan 2015

  • Hauschild MZ, Dreyer LC, Jørgensen A (2008) Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective—lessons learned. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57(1):21–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinijou SA, Mansour S, Shirazi MA (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod 16:1688–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Hauschild MZ, Jørgensen MS, Wangel A (2009) Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:204–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010a) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):376–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010b) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Dreyer LC, Wangel A (2012) Addressing the effect of social life cycle assessments. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:828–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Herrmann IT, Bjørn A (2013) Analysis of the link between a definition of sustainability and the life cycle methodologies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1440–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde V, Macombe C (2013) Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Zschieschang E, Traverso M, Finkbeiner M, Schebek L (2013) Social aspects for sustainability assessment of technologies—challenges for social life cycle assessment (SLCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(8):1581–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macombe C, Leskinen P, Feschet P, Antikainen R (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. J Clean Prod 52:205–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social life cycle assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathe S (2014) Integrating participatory approaches into social life cycle assessment: the SLCA participatory approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(8):1506–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J et al (2015) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod 96:569–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris GA (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles: towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret JP (2012) Revisiting the role of LCA and SLCA in the transition towards sustainable production and consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1642–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitinger C, Dumke M, Barosevcic M, Hillerbrand R (2011) A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):380–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouillier J, Bansard JY, Kerbaol M (2002) Application de l’analyse statistique de données textuelles à une revue bibliographic de la litérature médicale. In: Morin A, Sébillot P (ed) 6th JADT-2002. pp 665–676

  • Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L (2011) Social life cycle assessment: methodological and implementation issues. In: Năstase C (ed) The USV annals of economics and public administration 11(1). Editura Universităţii Ştefan cel Mare, Suceava, pp 11–17. http://www.seap.usv.ro/annals/arhiva/ANNALS_vol.11,nr.1(13),2011_fulltext.pdf. Accessed 5 March 2015

  • Sanchez Ramirez PK, Ugaya CML, Vicoli RV, Vaira S, Petti L (2012) A tomato case study using subcategory assessment method. SETAC 18th LCA Case Study Symposium http://lcacopenhagen.setac.eu/embed/Copenhagen/programme_abstracts_book_31102012_v2.pdf

  • Sanchez Ramirez PK, Petti L, Haberland NT, Ugaya CML (2014) Subcategory assessment method for social life cycle assessment. Part 1: methodological framework. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1515–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring S, Gold S (2012) Supply chain management: an international journal emerald article: conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag 17(5):544–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith J, Barling D (2014) Social impacts and life cycle assessment: proposals for methodological development for SMEs in the European food and drink sector. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(4):944–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traverso M, Asdrubali F, Francia A, Finkbeiner M (2012) Towards life cycle sustainability assessment: an implementation to photovoltaic modules. Int J Life Cycle Assess 17:1068–1079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP/SETAC Life-Cycle Initiative (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nation Environment Programme, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia S, UgayaCML HJ, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2013) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1673–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Yang D, Chen J (2014) Social life cycle assessment revisited. Sustainability 6(7):4200–4226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Studies, Roma Tre University, Via Silvio D’Amico, Rome, 77-00145, Italy

    Gabriella Arcese & Maria Claudia Lucchetti

  2. Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, Via del Castro Laurenziano, 9-00161, Rome, Italy

    Ilaria Massa

  3. Østfoldforskning AS, Stadion 4, 1671, Kråkerøy, Norway

    Clara Valente

Authors
  1. Gabriella Arcese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Claudia Lucchetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ilaria Massa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Clara Valente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriella Arcese.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Marzia Traverso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arcese, G., Lucchetti, M.C., Massa, I. et al. State of the art in S-LCA: integrating literature review and automatic text analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 23, 394–405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1082-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1082-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation