Abstract
Purpose
The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) has been applied in the construction sector since the 1990s and is now more and more embedded in European public policies, e.g., for Environmental Product Declaration regulation or for building labeling schemes. As far as the authors know, these initiatives mainly rely on background impact data of building products provided by different databases’ providers. The new product-specific and company-specific EPD data allow having more than one data for describing a building material. But are these new databases really displaying similar LCA results compared to generic databases? Does it depend on which impact category (e.g., global warming, acidification, toxicity) is considered?
Methods
To answer these research questions, this paper assesses numerical and methodological differences of two existing LCA databases for building LCAs: the ecoinvent generic database and one Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) database developed in France. After reviewing the main assumptions of these databases, numerical values of environmental impact are compared for 28 building materials using Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) indicators of the EN 15804 standard calculated based on cradle-to-gate ecoinvent and EPD Life Cycle Inventories (LCI).
Results and discussion
Global results at the database level indicate deviations of different magnitudes depending on the LCIA indicators and the building materials. While indicators correlated to fossil fuel consumption, such as the ADP, the GWP, and the primary energy demand, exhibit a small deviation (approximately 25 %), other indicators, such as the photochemical ozone formation (POCP), radioactive waste, and ADP elements, are found to be more variable between EPD and generic data (sometimes by more than 100 %). Three indicators are found to be systematically different between EPD and generic data (i.e., the EPD value being either higher or lower for all materials). Similarly, five building materials show systematic differences for all LCIA indicators. Specific deviations for one indicator and one material are also reported. The application of the two databases on three building LCA case studies (brick, reinforced concrete, and timber frame structures) identifies deviations due to the most influential materials.
Conclusions
Current generic and EPD databases can present very different values at the database scale which depend on the type of environmental indicator. For building LCA results, the situation is different as generally speaking a limited number of materials controlled the impacts. Finally, recommendations are presented for each environmental indicator to improve the consistency of the building assessment from generic to product- and country-specific information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AFNOR (2004) Norme NF P 01-010, Qualité environnementale des produits de construction. Agence française de Normalisation. 48 p
AFNOR (2006) FD P01-015 Qualité environnementale des produits de construction - Fascicule de données énergie et transport
ATILH (2011) Life cycle inventory of cement production in France (report in French), 28 pages
Baitz M, Albrecht S, Brauner E, Broadbent C, Castellan G, Conrath P, Fava J, Finkbeiner M, Fischer M, Fullana i Palmer P, Krinke S, Leroy C, Loebel O, McKeown P, Mersiowsky I, Möginger B, Pfaadt M, Rebitzer G, Rother E, Ruhland K, Schanssema A, Tikana L (2012) LCA’s theory and practice: like ebony and ivory living in perfect harmony? Int J Life Cycle Assess 17(6):1–9
CEN (2010) CEN/TR 15941: Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Methodology for selection and use of generic data, 16 p
CEN (2012a) EN 15804+A1: Sustainability of construction works—Environmental product declarations—Core rules for the product category of construction products. European Committee for standardization
CEN (2012b) EN 15978: Sustainability of construction works—Assessment of environmental performance of buildings—Calculation method. European Committee for standardization
Classen M, Althaus H-J, Blaser S, Doka G, Jungbluth N, Tuchschmid M (2009) Life cycle inventories of metals. Final report ecoinvent data v2.1 No.10. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland
COIMBA (2012) Knowledge on the environmental impact of buildings, Final report, 244 p. (in French)
Deutsches Kupfer Institut (2005) Life cycle assessment of copper products. Published by Life Cycle Centre, September 2005
Dones R, Bauer C, Bolliger R, Burger B, Faist Emmenegger M, Frischknecht R, Heck T, Jungbluth N, Röder A (2007) Life cycle inventories of energy systems: results for current systems in Switzerland and other UCTE countries. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0, No. 5. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, CH
EC (2010) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions on Resource Efficiency Opportunities in the Building Sector, European Commission, July 2014. Brussels, 10 p
European Commission—Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment and Sustainability (2014) International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook—General guide for Life Cycle Assessment—Detailed guidance. First edition March 2010. EUR 24708 EN. Luxembourg. Publications Office of the European Union; 2010
Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H-J, Doka G, Dones R, Heck T, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Nemecek T, Rebitzer G, Spielmann M, Wernet G (2007a) Overview and methodology: Ecoinvent report No. 1. Dübendorf: Swiss Centre for LCI, 68 p
Frischknecht R, Althaus H-J, Bauer C, Doka G, Heck T, Jungbluth N, Kellenberger D, Nemecek T (2007b) The environmental relevance of capital goods in life cycle assessments of products and services. Int J Life Cycle Assess 12(1):7–17
Frischknecht R, Wyss F, Büsser Knöpfel S, Lutzkendorf T, Baloutski M (2015) Cumulative energy demand in LCA: the energy harvested approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:957–969
Gomès F, Brière R, Feraille A, Habert G, Lasvaux S, Tessier C (2013) Adaptation of environmental data to national and sectorial context: application for reinforcing steel sold on the French market. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(5):926–938
Haapio A, Viitaniemi P (2008) A critical review of building environmental assessment tools. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(7):469–482
Habert G, Denarié E, Šajna A, Rossi P (2013) Lowering the global warming impact of bridge rehabilitations by using ultra high performance fibre reinforced concretes. Cem Concr Compos 38:1–11
Hauschild M, Potting J (2005) Background for spatial differentiation in LCA impact assessment: The EDIP03 methodology. 2005. Institute for Product Development Technical University of Denmark. Environmental Project No. 996, Denmark
Horvath A (2004) Construction materials and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:181–204
Horvath A (2006) Environmental assessment of Freight transportation in the U.S. (11 pp). Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(4):229–239
INIES (2013) The French database of reference on the environmental and health characteristics of building products. Available from: www.inies.fr (accessed 20.01.2013)
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040—Environmental management—Life Cycle Assessment—Framework and principles. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, 31 p
ISO (2006b) ISO 14025, Environmental labels and declarations, Type III environmental declarations, Principles and procedures. International Organization for Standardization, Genève, 35 p
ISOVER (2014) Déclaration environnementale de produit selon SN EN 15804 pour la laine de verre non revêtue, liant: biogénique (végétal), 9 p
JRC (2012) European Life Cycle Database. European Commission—Joint Research Centre. Available from: http://lca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/lcainfohub/datasetCategories.vm, (accessed 20.07.2014)
KBOB (2014) Liste de données d'écobilans pour la construction 2009/1: 2014, available online: https://www.kbob.admin.ch/kbob/fr/home/publikationen/nachhaltiges-bauen.html. Accessed 6 Aug 2015
Künniger T, Werner F, Richter K, (2001) Ökologische Bewertung von Kies, Zement und Beton in der Schweiz.Schweizerische Materialprüfungs- und Forschungsanstalt EMPA, Dübendorf, 2001
Lafarge (2010) Le plâtre et la démarche Haute Qualité Environnementale. Documentation, 8 p
Lasvaux S (2010) Study of a simplified model for LCA of buildings (in French). PhD thesis. MINES ParisTech, 434 p
Lasvaux S, Gantner J, Wittstock B, Bazzana M, Schiopu N, Suanders T, Gazulla C, Mundy J-A, Sjöström C, Fullana-i-Palmer P, Barrow-Williams T, Braune A, Anderson J, Lenz K, Takacs Z, Hans J, Chevalier J (2014a) Achieving consistency in life cycle assessmentpractice within the European construction sector: the role of the EeBGuide InfoHub. Int J Life Cycle Assesss 19:1783–1793
Lasvaux S, Schiopu N, Habert G, Chevalier J, Peuportier B (2014b) Influence of simplification of life cycle inventories on the accuracy of impact assessment: application to construction products. J Clean Prod 79:142–151
Lesage P, Boradbent C, Samson R (2013) Choice of background database in constructing cradle-to-gate LCI for public dissemination: case of the worldsteel datasets. LCM2013 International Conference, Gothenburg, August 2013
LoRe-LCA (2014) Low resource consumption buildings and constructions by use of LCA in design and decision-making, European project (FP7), 2014, deliverables available online: http://www.sintef.no/Projectweb/LoRe-LCA/Training/, accessed 25/04/2014
Modahl IS, Askham C, Lyng K-A, Skjerve-Nielssen C, Nereng G (2013) Comparison of two versions of an EPD, using generic and specific data for the foreground system, and some methodological implications. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):241–251
PasticsEurope (2014) Environmental Product Declarations, available online: www.plasticseurope.org/plasticssustainability/life-cycle-thinking-1746/environmental-product-declarations-epds.aspx (accessed 27.07.2014)
Peeredoom EC, Kleijn R, Lemkowitz S, Lundie S (1999) Influence of inventory datasets on life-cycle assessment results: a case study on PVC. J Ind Ecol 2(3):109e47
Peuportier B, Herfray G, Malmqvist T, Zalabza I, Staller H, Tritthart W, Wetzel C, Szalay Z (2011) Life cycle assessment methodologies in the construction sector: the contribution of the European LORE-LCA project. Proceedings of the International Conference of Sustainable Buildings, SB11 Helsinki, 18–21 October 2011
PRESCO (2014) Practical recommendations for sustainable construction, European project (FP7), 2011, deliverables available online: www.etn-presco.net/, accessed 25/04/2014
Shelie AM, Thomas LT (2006) Comparison of life-cycle inventory databases a case study using soy bean production. J Ind Ecol 10:133e47
Takano A, Winterb S, Hughesa M, Linkosalmia L (2014) Comparison of life cycle assessment databases: a case study on building assessment. Build Environ 79:20–30
Turconi R, Simonsen C, Byriel I, Astrup T, (2014) Life cycle assessment of the Danish electricity distribution network. Int J Life Cycle Asses 19:100–106
Van Oers L, de Koning A, Guinée JB, Huppes G (2002) Abiotic resource depletion in LCA: improving characterization factors for abiotic resource depletion as recommended in the new Dutch LCA Handbook, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Institute, 75 p
Winkler J, Bilitewski B (2007) Comparative evaluation of life cycle assessment models for solid waste management. Waste Manag 27:1021–1031
WorldSteel (2014) Life cycle inventory (LCI) data. available online: https://www.worldsteel.org/steel-by-topic/life-cycle-assessment/about-the-lci.html. Accessed 14 June 2014
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the French National Research Agency (ANR) through the COIMBA and BENEFIS projects for the intial fundings of this study. Sébastien Lasvaux also thank the Bouygues Construction Chair "Sustainable Buildings and Innovation" for its financial support. The authors would like also to gratefully thank one anonymous reviewer for his detailed review that contributes to the improvement of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Walter Klöpffer
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 90 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lasvaux, S., Habert, G., Peuportier, B. et al. Comparison of generic and product-specific Life Cycle Assessment databases: application to construction materials used in building LCA studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 1473–1490 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0938-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0938-z