Abstract
Purpose
An organization has to consider the influence from an environmental change, such as climate change, to its business activities. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) evaluates an impact to the environment; however, there is no LCA method to evaluate an impact from the environment. This study aims to develop a method for evaluating a relative potential impact from climate change to a product system using an LCA framework and to support adaptation planning.
Methods
This paper proposes LCA framework adaptation planning (LCA-AP) that can be applied to climate change. First, it identifies environmental drivers induced by climate change that impact human health and social assets. Second, an elementary flow from each environmental driver with potential impacts, such as freshwater use, is identified. Third, an activity requiring a large amount of the elementary flow is identified. The identified activity is a hotspot potentially impacted by climate change, and possible improvements are considered. LCA-AP is demonstrated by a case study of printing paper production.
Results and discussion
The current life-cycle impact assessment methods, such as water footprints and land use, evaluate impacts to the environment. In contrast, LCA-AP evaluates an impact from the environment, and the environmental mechanism is different. In LCA-AP, a practitioner has to calculate the impact for each country and has to do the same for the water footprint method. After hotspots are identified, the next step is to scrutinize an actual risk of climate change to a company’s own product supply chain. Collaboration with a business partner may identify a risk and its countermeasure.
Conclusions
Application of LCA-AP to climate change was proposed, and its effectiveness demonstrated through a case study. LCA-AP evaluates a relative potential impact from climate change to a product system in an LCA framework at the product design stage. Existing LCA databases and software can be used to implement LCA-AP. The author recommends expanding the method to other environmental impact categories and developing a way to prioritize impact categories through damage assessment and weighting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison EH, Perry AL, Badjeck M-C et al (2009) Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on fisheries. Fish Fish 10:173–196
Baan L, Alkemade R, Koellner T (2012) Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1216–1230
Boulay A-M, Motoshita M, Pfister S et al (2015) Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:139–160
DARA (2012) Climate vulnerability monitor 2nd Edition. A guide to the cold calculus of a hot planet. Fundación DARA Internacional, Madrid and Geneva
Esty DC, Levy M, Srebotnjak T, de Sherbinin A (2005) 2005 Environmental sustainability index: benchmarking national environmental stewardship. Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy, New Haven
Flemstrom K, Carlson R, Erixon M (2004) Relationships between life cycle assessment and risk assessment—potentials and obstacles. Naturardsverket, Stockholm
Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17:155–167
Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M et al (2012) ReCiPe 2008 Report I: Characterisation. Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en Milieubeheer, Den Haag
Hellmann J, Chen C, Noble I (2014) University of Notre Dame global adaptation index detailed methodology report. Notre Dame Global Adaptation Index. http://index.nd-gain.org:8080/documents/methodology_2014.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2014
Henigan M, Wührl K (2013) Revision of ISO 14001 environmental management systems—requirements with guidance for use. ISO/TC 207SC 1. ISO. http://www.iso.org/iso/1n1000_iso_14001_revision_information_note_update_november2013.pdf. Accessed 7 December 2014
Hillary R (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod 12:561–569
IPCC (2014a) Summary for policy makers. In: climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, summary for policymakers. part A: global and sectoral aspects. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
IPCC (2014b) Ocean systems. In: climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. part A: global and sectoral aspects. contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
Irving S, Mùller F, Hauschild M et al (2001) Life cycle impact assessment and risk assessment of chemicals—a methodological comparison. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:385–404
ISO (2004) ISO 14001. Environmental management systems—requirements with guidance for use. ISO, Geneva
ISO (2006) ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva
ISO (2014) ISO 14046. Environmental management—water footprint—principles, requirements and guidelines. ISO, Geneva
Itsubo N, Inaba A (2012) LIME2 life-cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling introduction. JLCA News Engl Ed 13:1–43
Kaly U, Pratt C, Mitchell J (2004) The environmental vulnerability index (EVI) 2004. South Pacific Applied Geosciences Commission, Suva
Kikuchi Y, Hirao M (2008) Practical method of assessing local and global impacts for risk-based decision making: a case study of metal degreasing processes. Environ Sci Technol 42:4527–4533
Kikuchi Y, Hirao M (2009) Hierarchical activity model for risk-based decision making. J Ind Ecol 13:945–964
Kounina A, Margni M, Bayart J-B et al (2012) Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:707–721
Kreft S, Eckstein D (2013) Global climate risk index 2014. Germanwatch e.V, Bonn
LCA forum of Japan (2013) JLCA database, 2013-3 edn. LCA forum of Japan. http://lca-forum.org/database/. Accessed 7 December 2014
Lewandowska A, Matuszak-Flejszman A (2014) Eco-design as a normative element of Environmental Management Systems—the context of the revised ISO 14001:2015. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19:1794–1798
Lewandowska A, Matuszak-Flejszman A, Joachimiak K, Ciroth A (2011) Environmental life cycle assessment as a tool for identification and assessment of environmental aspects in environmental management systems (EMS) Part 2: case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16:247–257
Lewandowska A, Kurczewski P, Kulczycka J et al (2012) LCA as an element in environmental management systems—comparison of conditions in selected organisations in Poland, Sweden and Germany. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:472–480
Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF (2009) Forest transition in Vietnam and displacement of deforestation abroad. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:16139–16144
Milà i Canals L, Romanyà J, Cowell SJ (2007) Method for assessing impacts on life support functions (LSF) related to the use of “fertile land” in life cycle assessment (LCA). J Clean Prod 15:1426–1440
Motoshita M, Ono Y, Pfister S et al (2014) Consistent characterisation factors at midpoint and endpoint relevant to agricultural water scarcity arising from freshwater consumption. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0811-5
Nakano K, Hirao M (2011) Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA. J Clean Prod 19:1189–1197
New Earth (2014) Social Hotspots Database. http://socialhotspot.org/. Accessed 7 December 2014
Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G (2012) Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:1946–1965
Norris C, Norris G, Aulisio D (2014) Efficient assessment of social hotspots in the supply chains of 100 product categories using the social hotspots database. Sustainability 6:6973–6984
PE international (2014) GaBi LCA database documentation. In: PE Int. http://database-documentation.gabi-software.com/. Accessed 7 December 2014
Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43:4098–4104
Ridoutt BG, Pfister S (2010) A revised approach to water footprinting to make transparent the impacts of consumption and production on global freshwater scarcity. Glob Environ Chang 20:113–120
Rodríguez C, Ciroth A, Srocka M (2014) The importance of regionalized LCIA in agricultural LCA—new software implementation and case study. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Life Cycle Assess Agri-Food Sector. San Francisco, pp 1120-1128
Tahara K, Onoye T, Kobayashi K, et al (2010) Development of inventory database for environmental analysis (IDEA). Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Ecobalance. Tokyo, p 119
Van Oel PR, Hoekstra AY (2011) Towards quantification of the water footprint of paper: a first estimate of its consumptive component. Water Resour Manag 26:733–749
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, et al (2013) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodology, data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. ecoinvent centre, http://www.ecoinvent.org/. Accessed 11 Nov 2014
Wheeler D (2011) Quantifying vulnerability to climate change: implications for adaptation assistance. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC
Wiedmann TO, Schandl H, Lenzen M, et al (2013) The material footprint of nations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1220362110. doi:10.1073/pnas.1220362110
Zhang Y, Baral A, Bakshi BR (2010) Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. Environ Sci Technol 44:2624–2631
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Adisa Azapagic
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakano, K. Life-cycle assessment framework for adaptation planning to climate change: linking regional climate impact with product design. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 819–828 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0867-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0867-x