Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Environmental and economic impact of furfuralcohol production using corncob as a raw material

  • LCA FOR AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES AND BIOBASED INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Corncob as agricultural waste has dramatically increased in recent years. Some corncobs are recycled and reused as bioproducts, whereas a large amount remains unused and burned in the fields. Currently, furfural production technology is one of the most commonly used technologies for corncob valorization because furfural is one of the most promising chemicals for sustainable chemical production. However, very few studies have analyzed the impact of furfural and furfuralcohol production on the environment and economy via life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). This study aims to quantify the environmental and economic impacts of furfural and furfuralcohol production, identify the main pollution processes and substances, improve potentials, and build a database on the furfural industry.

Methods

Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing were carried out to estimate the environmental and economic impact of corncob-based furfural and furfuralcohol production.

Results and discussion

The corncob production, transport, and electricity consumption stages had the greatest impact on the environment because of direct heavy metal, phosphate, and phosphorus emissions. The overall economic impact was mainly attributed to tax, corncob, transport, electricity, and infrastructure investment. Optimizing corncob transport, raw materials and consumption efficiency, and waste disposal is highly important in reducing both environmental and economic burden.

Conclusions

The key factors that contribute to reducing the overall environmental and economic impacts are increasing electricity consumption efficiency and furfural product yield, decreasing transport distance from corncob buyers to suppliers, choosing the appropriate corncob compression technology, and optimizing the wastewater reuse system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bhaumik P, Laxmikant Dhepe P (2014) Exceptionally high yields of furfural from assorted raw biomass over solid acids. RSC Adv 4:26215–26221

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bozell J, Petersen G (2010) Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited. Green Chem 12:539–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Xu C, Hong J (2014) Pollutants generated by cement production in China, their impacts, and the potential for environmental improvement. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.048

    Google Scholar 

  • China Energy Statistic Yearbook (2013) National Bureau of Statistics of China. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/2013/indexeh.htm

  • Cook R (2014) World corn production (1960–2014). http://beef2live.com/story- world-corn-production-1960-2014-130-108618

  • Cui X, Hong J, Gao M (2012) Environmental impact assessment of three coal-based electricity generation scenarios in China. Energ 45:952–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan C, Qi K, Xia X, Zhong J (2013) Efficient ethanol production from corncob residues by repeated fermentation of an adapted yeast. Bioresour Technol 136:309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht RS, Jungbluth N, Althaus HJ, Doka G, Dones R, Hellweg S, Hischier R, Humber S, Margni M, Nemecek T, Spielmann M (2007) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods, final report. Ecoinvent Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. Dubendorf, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop M, Heijungs R, Huijbregts M, De Schryver A, Struijs J, Van Zelm R (2009) A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonized category indicators at the mid-point and the end-point level, first ed. ReCiPe. Report I: characterisation

  • Hong JL, Hong JM, Otaki M, Olivier J (2009) Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan. Waste Manage 29:696–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hong JM, Zhou J, Hong JL, Xu X (2012) Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of aluminum-silicon alloys production: a case study in China. J Clean Prod 24:11–19

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14040 (2006a) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—general principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland

  • ISO 14044 (2006b) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jong W, Marcotullio G (2010) Overview of biorefineries based on co-production of furfural, existing concepts and novel developments. Int J Chem React Eng 8:A69

    Google Scholar 

  • Lei C, Zhang J, Xiao X, Bao J (2014) An alternative feedstock of corn meal for industrial fuel ethanol production: delignified corncob residue. Bioresour Technol 167:555–559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li N, Xiong X, Shao C, Chen S (2011) Adsorption of p-chlorophenol from aqueous solution on modified corncob. Fresen Environ Bull 20:747–753

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu W (2010) Investigation and assessment on major crop’s energy consumption of Changyi City in Shandong. Master Dissertation Chinese Academy Agricultural Science

  • Mao L, Li A (2010) Life cycle assessment of furfural production and its pollution controlling. Chem Eng Prog 29:226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotullio G (2011) The chemistry and technology of furfural production in modern lignocellulose-feedstock biorefineries. Published by Arkhé Edizioni - L’Aquila, Italy. ISBN 978-88-95207-49-0

    Google Scholar 

  • RIRDC (2006) Furfural chemicals and biofuels from agriculture. A report for the Australian Government Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Publication No 06/127

  • Rong C, Ding X, Zhu Y, Li Y, Wang L, Qu Y, Ma X, Wang Z (2012) Production of furfural from xylose at atmospheric pressure by dilute sulfuric acid and inorganic salts. Carbohyd Res 350:77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schryver A, Brakkee K, Goedkoop M, Huijbregts M (2009) Characterization factors for global warming in life cycle assessment based on damages to humans and ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol 43:1689–1695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao F, Song H, Chou L (2011) Efficient process for the conversion of xylose to furfural with acidic ionic liquid. Can J Chem 89:83–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wegener Sleeswijk A, Van Oers L, Guinée J, Struijs J, Huijbregts M (2008) Normalisation in product life cycle assessment: an LCA of the global and European economic systems in the year 2000. Sci Total Environ 390:227–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan K, Wu G, Lafleur T, Jarvis C (2014) Production, properties and catalytic hydrogenation of furfural to fuel additives and value-added chemicals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 38:663–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 41101554); SRF for ROCS, SEM (grant no. 2011-1568); and the National High-Tech R&D Program of China (863 Program, grant no. 2012AA061705).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinglan Hong.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Seungdo Kim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, J., Zhou, J. & Hong, J. Environmental and economic impact of furfuralcohol production using corncob as a raw material. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 623–631 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0854-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0854-2

Keywords

Navigation