Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis

  • LIFE CYCLE SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A bibliometric analysis of life cycle assessment (LCA)-related research literature is reported in this study. Based on databases of Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Conference Proceedings Citation Index—Science (CPCI-S), and Conference Proceedings Citation Index—Social Science & Humanities (CPCI-SSH), this study aims to evaluate the research trends of LCA-related research literature from 1998 to 2013 by using bibliometric techniques.

Methods

The documents were analyzed according to their type, language(s), subject(s), journal(s), citation analysis of articles, authors’ address information, and keyword distribution, etc. H-index and impact factor (IF) were applied to characterize the LCA publications. Furthermore, co-word analysis and social network analysis (SNA) were employed to evaluate the interactions in this research field. The findings showed that the pace of publishing in this field increased exponentially over past 16 years.

Results and discussion

A total of 6616 records were obtained from the four databases. Journal articles are the most frequently used document type representing 74.33 % (4918) of the records, and English is the dominant language with 5914 records (97.53 %). The most common subject category is environmental sciences, and the most productive journal is International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. The USA, focusing on “energy,” “industrial ecology,” and “greenhouse gas emissions,” is the most productive country in the research field of LCA. Technology University of Denmark is the most productive institute all over the world over the past 16 years. According to the ranking of keywords, “greenhouse gas,” “energy”, and “biofuel” are the hotspots of LCA research. The main purpose of LCA is sustainability assessment whereas climate change is one of the most outstanding environmental issues.

Conclusions

By identifying global hotspots in the LCA research, this study provides a useful reference to researchers for the future research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adisa A (1999) Life cycle assessment and its application to process selection, design and optimization. Chem Eng J 73:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler PR, Del Grosso SJ, Parton WJ (2007) Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. Ecol Appl 17(3):675–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azapagic A, Clift R (1999) The application of life cycle assessment to process optimization. Comput Chem Eng 23(10):1509–1526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H (2002) Int J LCA could have received better acknowledgement. Int J Life Cycle Assess 7(1):2–3

  • Bettencourt LMA, Kaur J (2011) Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(49):19540–19545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boner K, Chen C, Boyack K (2003) Visualizing knowledge domains. Annu Rev Inf Sci Technol 37:179–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Courtial JP, Laville F (1991) Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: the case of polymer chemistry. Scientometrics 22(1):155–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HB, Yang Y, Yang Y et al (2014) A bibliometric investigation of life cycle assessment research in the web of science databases. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(10):1674–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu WT, Ho YS (2007) Bibliometric analysis of tsunami research. Scientometrics 73(1):3–17

  • Cobo MJ, Lopez-Herrera AG, Herrera-Viedma E et al (2011) An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: a practical application to the fuzzy sets theory field. J Inf 5:146–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig D, Alison K, Haroun C et al (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. For Ecol Manag 259:660–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Mosier AR, Smith KA et al (2008) N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels. Atmos Chem Phys 8(2):389–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • David A, Haruna G, Heinz S et al (2013) Life cycle environmental impacts of carbonated soft drinks. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Souza CG, Barbastefano RG (2011) Knowledge diffusion and collaboration networks on life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(6):561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbas A (2011) Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass. Appl Energy 88(1):17–28

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Espinosa N, Hosel M, Angmo D et al (2012) Solar cells with one-day energy payback for the factories of the future. Energy Environ Sci 5(1):5117–5132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA (2008) Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J 22(2):338–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand I, Sahajpal R, Zhang XS et al (2013) Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature 493(7433):514–517

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goran F, Michael ZH, Tomas E et al (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas G, Wetterich F, Kopke U (2001) Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agric Ecosystems Environ 83(1–2):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellweg S, Mila L (2014) Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Nature 344(6188):1109–1113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson C, Horvath A, Joshi S et al (1998) Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ Sci Technol 32(7):184A–191A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch JE (2005) An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(46):16569–16572

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hui ZF, Yuh SH, Yu MS et al (2010) A bibliometric analysis of solid waste research during the period 1993–2008. Waste Manag 30:2410–2417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Thissen U, Guinee JB et al (2000) Priority assessment of toxic substances in life cycle assessment. Part I: calculation of toxicity potentials for 181 substances with the nested multi-media fate, exposure and effects model USES-LCA. Chemosphere 41(4):541–573

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1998) AS/NZS ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Homebush

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1999) AS/NZS ISO 14041. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. ISO, Homebush

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2000a) ISO 14042:2000(E) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle impact assessment. ISO Central Secretariat. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2000b) ISO 14043:2000(E) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—life cycle interpretation. ISO Central Secretariat. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi SV, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK et al (2004) Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos Part A Appl S 35(3):371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Dale BE (2005) Life cycle assessment of various cropping systems utilized for producing biofuels: bioethanol and biodiesel. Biomass Bioenergy 29(6):426–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lardon L, Helias A, Sialve B et al (2009) Life-cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae. Environ Sci Technol 43(17):6475–6481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin C, Morgavi DP, Doreau M (2010) Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Anim 4(3):351–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meho LI, Yang K (2007) Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of Science versus Scopus and Google Scholar. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 58(13):2015–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming HW, Te CY, Yuh SH (2010) A bibliometric analysis of the performance of water research. Scientometrics 84:813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463(7282):747–756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson M, Eckerberg K (2007) Environmental policy integration in practice. Shaping institutions for learning, Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Noyons ECM, Moed HF, Luwel M (1999) Combining mapping and citation analysis for evaluative bibliometric purposes: a bibliometric study. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(2):115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oscar O, Francesc C, Guido S (2009) Sustainability in the construction industry: a review of recent developments based on LCA. Constr Build Mater 23:28–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pehnt M (2006) Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies. Renew Energy 31(1):55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebitzer G, Ekvall T, Frischknecht R et al (2004) Life cycle assessment part 1: framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environ Int 30:701–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robert HC (2008) Validation of a hybrid life-cycle inventory analysis method. J Environ Manage 88:496–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert KH, Schmidt BB, Larderel JA et al (2002) Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J Clean Prod 10(3):197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastien H, Vincent R, Manuele M et al (2009) Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars vs. plastic pots. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14:95–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenella S, Francesca F, Alessandra Z (2013a) Life cycle sustainability assessment in the context of sustainability science progress (part 2). Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1686–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenella S, Francesca F, Alessandra Z (2013b) Progress in sustainability science: lessons learnt from current methodologies for sustainability assessment: part 1. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1653–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serrat O (2009) Social network analysis. Asian Development Bank, Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsay MY (2008) A bibliometric analysis of hydrogen energy literature, 1965–2005. Scientometrics 75(3):421–438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van RAFJ (2005) For your citations only? Hot topics in bibliometric analysis. Meas Interdisc Res Perspect 3(1):50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vink ETH, Rabago KR, Glassner DA et al (2003) Applications of life cycle assessment to NatureWorks (TM) polylactide (PLA) production. Polym Degrad Stab 80(3):403–419

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Von BH, Curran MA (2007) A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 15(7):607–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo J, Zhao ZY (2014) Green building research–current status and future agenda: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 30:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank anonymous referees and editors for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions, which substantially improved the content and composition of the present article. This study was financially supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China under Grant 71273185, 71431005, Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China under Grant 2013M540145 and National Major Science and Technology Program of China–Water Body Pollution Control and Remediationunder Grant 2014ZX07504-005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Qian Hou, Guozhu Mao & Lin Zhao

  2. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Huibin Du

  3. School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5000, Australia

    Jian Zuo

Authors
  1. Qian Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guozhu Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lin Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huibin Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jian Zuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guozhu Mao.

Additional information

Walter Klöpffer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, Q., Mao, G., Zhao, L. et al. Mapping the scientific research on life cycle assessment: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 541–555 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0846-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0846-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation