Skip to main content
Log in

On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews

  • CRITICAL REVIEW
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Working hours, child labour and property rights have been suggested as topics to assess in social life cycle assessment (SLCA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the scientific justification of the current use of these topics. The long-term aim is to contribute to the future development of SLCA.

Methods

A literature review was conducted for each of the three topics. One thousand scientific articles were analysed for each topic, and relevant articles were selected. The articles were analysed based on whether the topics facilitated or obstructed beneficial social values, and whether they facilitated or obstructed adverse social values.

Results and discussion

The results show that the three topics both facilitate and obstruct beneficial social values. They also show that the topics both facilitate and obstruct adverse social values. Considering the complex and ambiguous nature of these topics reported in the scientific literature, the current use of these topics in the SLCA literature is found not to be completely scientifically justified.

Conclusions

Based on this study, the current use of working hours, child labour and property rights in SLCA studies should be questioned. We suggest that the fields of social science and economics may be fruitfully considered when seeking scientific justification for topics to assess in SLCA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adger WN, Luttrell C (2000) Property rights and the utilisation of wetlands. Ecol Econ 35(1):75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama T, Furukawa Y (2009) Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation. Econ Lett 103(3):138–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altavilla C, Garofalo A, Vinci CP (2005) Evaluating the effects of working hours on employment and wages. J Policy Model 27(6):647–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambadekar NN, Wahab SN, Zodpey SP, Khandait DW (1999) Effect of child labour on growth of children. Public Health 113(6):303–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basu K, Zarghamee H (2009) Is product boycott a good idea for controlling child labor? A theoretical investigation. J Dev Econ 88(2):217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H (2009) Don't fence me in…. In: Boons F, Howard-Grenville J (eds) The social embeddedness of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than it saves in traffic? Discussing an alternative approach to S-LCA methodology. J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît C, Mazijn B, Andrews ES, Barthel L-P, Beck T, Ciroth A, Cucuzzella C, Gensch C-O, Hébert J, Lesage P, Manhart A, Mazeau P, Methot A-L, Moberg A, Norris G, Parent J, Prakash S, Reveret J-P, Spillemaeckers S, Ugaya CML, Valdivia S, Weidema BP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S, Vickery-Niederman G, Franze J, Azuero L, Ciroth A, Mazijn B, Aulision D (2013) The Methodological Sheets for Sub-Categories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemiastry (SETAC)

  • Boholm M, Arvidsson R (2014) Controversy over antibacterial silver: implications for environmental and sustainability assessments. J Clean Prod 68:135–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boholm M, Arvidsson R, Boholm Å, Corvellec H, Molander S (2014) Dis-Ag-reement: the construction and negotiation of risk in the Swedish controversy over antibacterial silver. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.879492

    Google Scholar 

  • Boons F, Baumann H, Hall J (2012) Conceptualizing sustainable development and global supply chains. Ecol Econ 83:134–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borg J, Selmer JK (2012) From Ghana to Magnum Ice Cream: tracking down the organisation of sustainable cocoa product chains Gothenburg. Chalmers Univeristy of Technology

  • Bose N, Murshid AP, Wurm MA (2012) The growth effects of property rights: the role of finance. World Dev 40(9):1784–1797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose-O’Reilly S, Lettmeier B, Matteucci Gothe R, Beinhoff C, Siebert U, Drasch G (2008) Mercury as a serious health hazard for children in gold mining areas. Environ Res 107(1):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay A-M, Bulle C, Bayart J-B, Deschênes L, Margni M (2011) Regional characterization of freshwater use in LCA: modeling direct impacts on human health. Environ Sci Tech 45(20):8948–8957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 13(1):60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter L, Fisman R, Foley CF, Saggi K (2011) Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? J Int Econ 83(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Puttitanun T (2005) Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. J Dev Econ 78(2):474–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu AC, Peng S-K (2011) International intellectual property rights: effects on growth, welfare and income inequality. J Macroecon 33(2):276–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu AC, Cozzi G, Galli S (2014) Stage-dependent intellectual property rights. J Dev Econ 106:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolableded notebook—consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Clift R, Sim S, Sinclair P (2013) Sustainable consumption and production: quality, luxury and supply chain equity. In: Jawahir IS, Sikdar SK, Huang Y (eds) Treatise on sustainability science and engineering. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 291–309

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Costa G (2011) Editorial for special issue of applied ergonomics on working hours. Appl Ergon 42(2):193–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa G, Sartori S (2005) Flexible work hours, ageing and well-being. Int Congr Ser 1280:23–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl AL (2012) Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecol Indic 17:14–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessy S, Pallage S (2005) A theory of the worst forms of child labour. Econ J 115(500):68–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinopoulos E, Segerstrom P (2010) Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. J Dev Econ 92(1):13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fergusson L (2013) The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy. J Dev Econ 103:167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez L (2006) Natural resources, agriculture and property rights. Ecol Econ 57(3):359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frønes I (2007) Theorizing indicators. Soc Indic Res 83(1):5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furukawa Y (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: is stronger always better? J Econ Dyn Control 31(11):3644–3670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galiani S, Schargrodsky E (2010) Property rights for the poor: effects of land titling. J Public Econ 94(9–10):700–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (1996) Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach. Environ Model Assess 1:101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangopadhyay K, Mondal D (2012) Does stronger protection of intellectual property stimulate innovation? Econ Lett 116(1):80–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharaibeh M, Hoeman S (2003) Health hazards and risks for abuse among child labor in Jordan. J Pediatr Nurs 18(2):140–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass AJ, Saggi K (2002) Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. J Int Econ 56(2):387–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorton W (2010) The philosophy of social science, http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-sci/. Encyclopedia of Philisophy. Accessed 07 13 2014

  • Grossman HI (2005) Inventors and pirates: creative activity and intellectual property rights. Eur J Polit Econ 21(2):269–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products, volume 2. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilson G (2008) ‘A load too heavy’: critical reflections on the child labor problem in Africa’s small-scale mining sector. Child Youth Serv Rev 30(11):1233–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosseinijou S, Mansour S, Shirazi M (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson J, Minea A (2013) Innovation, intellectual property rights, and economic development: a unified empirical investigation. World Dev 46:66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization (2008) Measurement of decent work. International Labour Office, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization and Inter-Parliamentary Union (2002) Eliminating the worst forms of child labour: a practical guide to ILO Convention No. 182 Handbook for parliamentarians No. 3. International Labour Office, Geneva

  • Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knabe A, Rätzel S (2010) Income, happiness, and the disutility of labour. Econ Lett 107:77–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai ELC, Qiu LD (2003) The North’s intellectual property rights standard for the South? J Int Econ 59(1):183–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacEachen E, Polzer J, Clarke J (2008) “You are free to set your own hours”: governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Soc Sci Med 66(5):1019–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(7):1386–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marimon R, Zilibotti F (2000) Employment and distributional effects of restricting working time. Eur Econ Rev 44:1291–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathew AJ, Mukherjee A (2014) Intellectual property rights, southern innovation and foreign direct investment. Int Rev Econ Financ 31:128–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee RP, Miller AD (2012) The tradeoff of the commons. J Public Econ 96(3–4):349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows D (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development —A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners, The Sustainablility Institute

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta MN, Prabhu SV, Mistry HN (1985) Child labor in Bombay. Child Abuse Negl 9(1):107–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menon N, van der Meulen Rodgers Y, Nguyen H (2014) Women’s land rights and children’s human capital in Vietnam. World Dev 54:18–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milà i Canals L, Chenoweth J, Chapagain A, Orr S, Antón A, Clift R (2009) Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(1):28–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TG, Spoolman SE (2013) Environmental science. Brooks/Cloe, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J, Sensenig R, Miyingo E, Makanda JV, Hakimian A, Eckelman MJ (2014) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.026

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabe-Nielsen K, Kecklund G, Ingre M, Skotte J, Diderichsen F, Garde AH (2010) The importance of individual preferences when evaluating the associations between working hours and indicators of health and well-being. Appl Ergon 41(6):779–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe RG (2007) Working hours and ill-health - a more serious relationship than it appears? Int J Cardiol 114:284–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1):14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuys O (1996) The paradox of child labour and anthropology. Annu Rev Anthropol 25:237–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll H-H (2002) Towards a European system of social indicators: theoretical framework and system architecture. Soc Indic Res 58(1–3):47–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris G (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles - towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öncü E, Kurt AÖ, Esenay FI, Özer F (2013) Abuse of working children and influencing factors, Turkey. Child Abuse Negl 37(5):283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin RK (1999) Intellectual property rights and developing country agriculture. Agric Econ 21(3):221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rai V, Schultz K, Funkhouser E (2014) International low carbon technology transfer: do intellectual property regimes matter? Glob Environ Chang 24:60–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rametsteiner E, Pülzl H, Alkan-Olsson J, Frederiksen P (2011) Sustainability indicator development—science or political negotiation? Ecol Indic 11(1):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjan P (1999) An economic analysis of child labor. Econ Lett 64(1):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raposo PS, van Ours JC (2010) How working time reduction affects jobs and wages. Econ Lett 106(1):61–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas M, Vegas Z, Briceno L, Rodriguez L, Rojas M, Vegas Z, Briceno L, Rodriguez L (2010) Child labor and health: exploratory study from a public market in Valencia, Venezuela. Toxicol Lett 196(Suppl (0)):S69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg J, Weiss A (2012) Property rights and institutions in biblical society: the purchase of the Cave of the Patriarchs. Eur J Polit Econ 28(3):279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Paul G (2004) Are intellectual property rights unfair? Labour Econ 11(1):129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez R (2013) Do reductions of standard hours affect employment transitions? Evidence from Chile. Labour Econ 20:24–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snir R, Harpaz I (2012) Beyond workaholism: towards a general model of heavy work investment. Hum Resour Manag Rev 22(3):232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S-t L (2011) Strengthening intellectual property rights: experience from the 1986 Taiwanese patent reforms. Int J Ind Organ 29(5):524–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unruh JD (2002) Poverty and property rights in the developing world: not as simple as we would like. Land Use Policy 19(4):275–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdivia S, Ugaya CL, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2013) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1673–1685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt S, Gutmann J (2013) Turning cheap talk into economic growth: on the relationship between property rights and judicial independence. J Comp Econ 41(1):66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von der Dunk FG, Back-Impallomeni E, Hobe S, Ramirez de Arellano RM (2004) Surreal estate: addressing the issue of ‘Immovable Property Rights on the Moon’. Space Policy 20(3):149–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidema B (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:89–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.056

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff F-C, Maliki (2008) Evidence on the impact of child labor on child health in Indonesia, 1993–2000. Econ Hum Biol 6(1):143–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wunder C, Heineck G (2013) Working time preferences, hours mismatch and well-being of couples: are there spillovers? Labour Econ 24:244–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rickard Arvidsson.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Marzia Traverso

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arvidsson, R., Baumann, H. & Hildenbrand, J. On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 161–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0821-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0821-3

Keywords

Navigation