Abstract
Purpose
Working hours, child labour and property rights have been suggested as topics to assess in social life cycle assessment (SLCA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the scientific justification of the current use of these topics. The long-term aim is to contribute to the future development of SLCA.
Methods
A literature review was conducted for each of the three topics. One thousand scientific articles were analysed for each topic, and relevant articles were selected. The articles were analysed based on whether the topics facilitated or obstructed beneficial social values, and whether they facilitated or obstructed adverse social values.
Results and discussion
The results show that the three topics both facilitate and obstruct beneficial social values. They also show that the topics both facilitate and obstruct adverse social values. Considering the complex and ambiguous nature of these topics reported in the scientific literature, the current use of these topics in the SLCA literature is found not to be completely scientifically justified.
Conclusions
Based on this study, the current use of working hours, child labour and property rights in SLCA studies should be questioned. We suggest that the fields of social science and economics may be fruitfully considered when seeking scientific justification for topics to assess in SLCA.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adger WN, Luttrell C (2000) Property rights and the utilisation of wetlands. Ecol Econ 35(1):75–89
Akiyama T, Furukawa Y (2009) Intellectual property rights and appropriability of innovation. Econ Lett 103(3):138–141
Altavilla C, Garofalo A, Vinci CP (2005) Evaluating the effects of working hours on employment and wages. J Policy Model 27(6):647–664
Ambadekar NN, Wahab SN, Zodpey SP, Khandait DW (1999) Effect of child labour on growth of children. Public Health 113(6):303–306
Basu K, Zarghamee H (2009) Is product boycott a good idea for controlling child labor? A theoretical investigation. J Dev Econ 88(2):217–220
Baumann H (2009) Don't fence me in…. In: Boons F, Howard-Grenville J (eds) The social embeddedness of industrial ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
Baumann H, Arvidsson R, Tong H, Wang Y (2013) Does the production of an airbag injure more people than it saves in traffic? Discussing an alternative approach to S-LCA methodology. J Ind Ecol 17(4):517–527
Benoît C, Mazijn B, Andrews ES, Barthel L-P, Beck T, Ciroth A, Cucuzzella C, Gensch C-O, Hébert J, Lesage P, Manhart A, Mazeau P, Methot A-L, Moberg A, Norris G, Parent J, Prakash S, Reveret J-P, Spillemaeckers S, Ugaya CML, Valdivia S, Weidema BP (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. United Nations Environment Programme and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Nairobi
Benoit-Norris C, Vickery-Niederman G, Valdivia S, Franze J, Traverso M, Ciroth A, Mazijn B (2011) Introducing the UNEP/SETAC methodological sheets for subcategories of social LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(7):682–690
Benoît Norris C, Traverso M, Valdivia S, Vickery-Niederman G, Franze J, Azuero L, Ciroth A, Mazijn B, Aulision D (2013) The Methodological Sheets for Sub-Categories in Social Life Cycle Assessment (S-LCA). United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemiastry (SETAC)
Boholm M, Arvidsson R (2014) Controversy over antibacterial silver: implications for environmental and sustainability assessments. J Clean Prod 68:135–143
Boholm M, Arvidsson R, Boholm Å, Corvellec H, Molander S (2014) Dis-Ag-reement: the construction and negotiation of risk in the Swedish controversy over antibacterial silver. J Risk Res. doi:10.1080/13669877.2013.879492
Boons F, Baumann H, Hall J (2012) Conceptualizing sustainable development and global supply chains. Ecol Econ 83:134–143
Borg J, Selmer JK (2012) From Ghana to Magnum Ice Cream: tracking down the organisation of sustainable cocoa product chains Gothenburg. Chalmers Univeristy of Technology
Bose N, Murshid AP, Wurm MA (2012) The growth effects of property rights: the role of finance. World Dev 40(9):1784–1797
Bose-O’Reilly S, Lettmeier B, Matteucci Gothe R, Beinhoff C, Siebert U, Drasch G (2008) Mercury as a serious health hazard for children in gold mining areas. Environ Res 107(1):89–97
Boulay A-M, Bulle C, Bayart J-B, Deschênes L, Margni M (2011) Regional characterization of freshwater use in LCA: modeling direct impacts on human health. Environ Sci Tech 45(20):8948–8957
Bouzid A, Padilla M (2014) Analysis of social performance of the industrial tomatoes food chain in Algeria. New Medit 13(1):60–65
Branstetter L, Fisman R, Foley CF, Saggi K (2011) Does intellectual property rights reform spur industrial development? J Int Econ 83(1):27–36
Chen Y, Puttitanun T (2005) Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. J Dev Econ 78(2):474–493
Chu AC, Peng S-K (2011) International intellectual property rights: effects on growth, welfare and income inequality. J Macroecon 33(2):276–287
Chu AC, Cozzi G, Galli S (2014) Stage-dependent intellectual property rights. J Dev Econ 106:239–249
Ciroth A, Franze J (2011) LCA of an ecolableded notebook—consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle. GreenDeltaTC GmbH, Berlin
Clift R, Sim S, Sinclair P (2013) Sustainable consumption and production: quality, luxury and supply chain equity. In: Jawahir IS, Sikdar SK, Huang Y (eds) Treatise on sustainability science and engineering. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 291–309
Costa G (2011) Editorial for special issue of applied ergonomics on working hours. Appl Ergon 42(2):193–195
Costa G, Sartori S (2005) Flexible work hours, ageing and well-being. Int Congr Ser 1280:23–28
Dahl AL (2012) Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecol Indic 17:14–19
Dessy S, Pallage S (2005) A theory of the worst forms of child labour. Econ J 115(500):68–87
Dinopoulos E, Segerstrom P (2010) Intellectual property rights, multinational firms and economic growth. J Dev Econ 92(1):13–27
Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97
Ekener-Petersen E, Finnveden G (2013) Potential hotspots identified by social LCA—part 1: a case study of a laptop computer. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(1):127–143
Fergusson L (2013) The political economy of rural property rights and the persistence of the dual economy. J Dev Econ 103:167–181
Fernandez L (2006) Natural resources, agriculture and property rights. Ecol Econ 57(3):359–373
Franze J, Ciroth A (2011) A comparison of cut roses from Ecuador and the Netherlands. Int J Life Cycle Assess 16(4):366–379
Frønes I (2007) Theorizing indicators. Soc Indic Res 83(1):5–23
Furukawa Y (2007) The protection of intellectual property rights and endogenous growth: is stronger always better? J Econ Dyn Control 31(11):3644–3670
Galiani S, Schargrodsky E (2010) Property rights for the poor: effects of land titling. J Public Econ 94(9–10):700–729
Gallopín GC (1996) Environmental and sustainability indicators and the concept of situational indicators. A systems approach. Environ Model Assess 1:101–117
Gangopadhyay K, Mondal D (2012) Does stronger protection of intellectual property stimulate innovation? Econ Lett 116(1):80–82
Gharaibeh M, Hoeman S (2003) Health hazards and risks for abuse among child labor in Jordan. J Pediatr Nurs 18(2):140–147
Glass AJ, Saggi K (2002) Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment. J Int Econ 56(2):387–410
Gorton W (2010) The philosophy of social science, http://www.iep.utm.edu/soc-sci/. Encyclopedia of Philisophy. Accessed 07 13 2014
Grossman HI (2005) Inventors and pirates: creative activity and intellectual property rights. Eur J Polit Econ 21(2):269–285
Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998) Environmental assessment of products, volume 2. Chapman and Hall, London
Hilson G (2008) ‘A load too heavy’: critical reflections on the child labor problem in Africa’s small-scale mining sector. Child Youth Serv Rev 30(11):1233–1245
Hosseinijou S, Mansour S, Shirazi M (2014) Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19(3):620–645
Hudson J, Minea A (2013) Innovation, intellectual property rights, and economic development: a unified empirical investigation. World Dev 46:66–78
Hunkeler D (2006) Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(6):371–382
International Labour Organization (2008) Measurement of decent work. International Labour Office, Geneva
International Labour Organization and Inter-Parliamentary Union (2002) Eliminating the worst forms of child labour: a practical guide to ILO Convention No. 182 Handbook for parliamentarians No. 3. International Labour Office, Geneva
Jørgensen A, Le Bocq A, Nazarkina L, Hauschild M (2008) Methodologies for social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):96–103
Jørgensen A, Lai LCH, Hauschild MZ (2010) Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:5–16
Knabe A, Rätzel S (2010) Income, happiness, and the disutility of labour. Econ Lett 107:77–79
Lai ELC, Qiu LD (2003) The North’s intellectual property rights standard for the South? J Int Econ 59(1):183–209
Lehmann A, Russi D, Bala A, Finkbeiner M, Fullana-i-Palmer P (2011) Integration of social aspects in decision support, based on life cycle thinking. Sustainability 3(4):562–577
MacEachen E, Polzer J, Clarke J (2008) “You are free to set your own hours”: governing worker productivity and health through flexibility and resilience. Soc Sci Med 66(5):1019–1033
Manik Y, Leahy J, Halog A (2013) Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(7):1386–1392
Marimon R, Zilibotti F (2000) Employment and distributional effects of restricting working time. Eur Econ Rev 44:1291–1326
Martínez-Blanco J, Lehmann A, Muñoz P, Antón A, Traverso M, Rieradevall J, Finkbeiner M (2014) Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. J Clean Prod 69:34–48
Mathew AJ, Mukherjee A (2014) Intellectual property rights, southern innovation and foreign direct investment. Int Rev Econ Financ 31:128–137
McAfee RP, Miller AD (2012) The tradeoff of the commons. J Public Econ 96(3–4):349–353
Meadows D (1998) Indicators and information systems for sustainable development —A Report to the Balaton Group. Hartland Four Corners, The Sustainablility Institute
Mehta MN, Prabhu SV, Mistry HN (1985) Child labor in Bombay. Child Abuse Negl 9(1):107–111
Menon N, van der Meulen Rodgers Y, Nguyen H (2014) Women’s land rights and children’s human capital in Vietnam. World Dev 54:18–31
Milà i Canals L, Chenoweth J, Chapagain A, Orr S, Antón A, Clift R (2009) Assessing freshwater use impacts in LCA: part I—inventory modelling and characterisation factors for the main impact pathways. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(1):28–42
Miller TG, Spoolman SE (2013) Environmental science. Brooks/Cloe, Belmont
Musaazi MK, Mechtenberg AR, Nakibuule J, Sensenig R, Miyingo E, Makanda JV, Hakimian A, Eckelman MJ (2014) Quantification of social equity in life cycle assessment for increased sustainable production of sanitary products in Uganda. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.026
Nabe-Nielsen K, Kecklund G, Ingre M, Skotte J, Diderichsen F, Garde AH (2010) The importance of individual preferences when evaluating the associations between working hours and indicators of health and well-being. Appl Ergon 41(6):779–786
Newcombe RG (2007) Working hours and ill-health - a more serious relationship than it appears? Int J Cardiol 114:284–285
Niemeijer D, de Groot RS (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1):14–25
Nieuwenhuys O (1996) The paradox of child labour and anthropology. Annu Rev Anthropol 25:237–251
Noll H-H (2002) Towards a European system of social indicators: theoretical framework and system architecture. Soc Indic Res 58(1–3):47–87
Norris G (2006) Social impacts in product life cycles - towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:97–104
O’Brien M, Doig A, Clift R (1996) Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA). Int J Life Cycle Assess 1(4):231–237
Öncü E, Kurt AÖ, Esenay FI, Özer F (2013) Abuse of working children and influencing factors, Turkey. Child Abuse Negl 37(5):283–291
Parent J, Cucuzzella C, Revéret J-P (2010) Impact assessment in SLCA: sorting the sLCIA methods according to their outcomes. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(2):164–171
Perrin RK (1999) Intellectual property rights and developing country agriculture. Agric Econ 21(3):221–229
Rai V, Schultz K, Funkhouser E (2014) International low carbon technology transfer: do intellectual property regimes matter? Glob Environ Chang 24:60–74
Rametsteiner E, Pülzl H, Alkan-Olsson J, Frederiksen P (2011) Sustainability indicator development—science or political negotiation? Ecol Indic 11(1):61–70
Ranjan P (1999) An economic analysis of child labor. Econ Lett 64(1):99–105
Raposo PS, van Ours JC (2010) How working time reduction affects jobs and wages. Econ Lett 106(1):61–63
Rojas M, Vegas Z, Briceno L, Rodriguez L, Rojas M, Vegas Z, Briceno L, Rodriguez L (2010) Child labor and health: exploratory study from a public market in Valencia, Venezuela. Toxicol Lett 196(Suppl (0)):S69
Rosenberg J, Weiss A (2012) Property rights and institutions in biblical society: the purchase of the Cave of the Patriarchs. Eur J Polit Econ 28(3):279–285
Saint-Paul G (2004) Are intellectual property rights unfair? Labour Econ 11(1):129–144
Sánchez R (2013) Do reductions of standard hours affect employment transitions? Evidence from Chile. Labour Econ 20:24–37
Snir R, Harpaz I (2012) Beyond workaholism: towards a general model of heavy work investment. Hum Resour Manag Rev 22(3):232–243
S-t L (2011) Strengthening intellectual property rights: experience from the 1986 Taiwanese patent reforms. Int J Ind Organ 29(5):524–536
Unruh JD (2002) Poverty and property rights in the developing world: not as simple as we would like. Land Use Policy 19(4):275–276
Valdivia S, Ugaya CL, Hildenbrand J, Traverso M, Mazijn B, Sonnemann G (2013) A UNEP/SETAC approach towards a life cycle sustainability assessment—our contribution to Rio+20. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(9):1673–1685
Voigt S, Gutmann J (2013) Turning cheap talk into economic growth: on the relationship between property rights and judicial independence. J Comp Econ 41(1):66–73
von der Dunk FG, Back-Impallomeni E, Hobe S, Ramirez de Arellano RM (2004) Surreal estate: addressing the issue of ‘Immovable Property Rights on the Moon’. Space Policy 20(3):149–156
Weidema B (2006) The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11:89–96
Weldegiorgis FS, Franks DM (2014) Social dimensions of energy supply alternatives in steelmaking: comparison of biomass and coal production scenarios in Australia. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.056
Wolff F-C, Maliki (2008) Evidence on the impact of child labor on child health in Indonesia, 1993–2000. Econ Hum Biol 6(1):143–169
Wunder C, Heineck G (2013) Working time preferences, hours mismatch and well-being of couples: are there spillovers? Labour Econ 24:244–252
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Marzia Traverso
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arvidsson, R., Baumann, H. & Hildenbrand, J. On the scientific justification of the use of working hours, child labour and property rights in social life cycle assessment: three topical reviews. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20, 161–173 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0821-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0821-3