The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 429–436

A protocol for horizontal averaging of unit process data—including estimates for uncertainty

  • Patrik John Gustav Henriksson
  • Jeroen Bartholomeus Guinée
  • Reinout Heijungs
  • Arjan de Koning
  • Darren Michael Green
UNCERTAINTIES IN LCA

DOI: 10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4

Cite this article as:
Henriksson, P.J.G., Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R. et al. Int J Life Cycle Assess (2014) 19: 429. doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0647-4

Abstract

Purpose

Quantitative uncertainties are a direct consequence of averaging, a common procedure when building life cycle inventories (LCIs). This averaging can be amongst locations, times, products, scales or production technologies. To date, however, quantified uncertainties at the unit process level have largely been generated using a Numerical Unit Spread Assessment Pedigree (NUSAP) approach and often disregard inherent uncertainties (inaccurate measurements) and spread (variability around means).

Methods

A decision tree for primary and secondary data at the unit process level was initially created. Around this decision tree, a protocol was developed with the recognition that dispersions can be either results of inherent uncertainty, spread amongst data points or products of unrepresentative data. In order to estimate the characteristics of uncertainties for secondary data, a method for weighting means amongst studies is proposed. As for unrepresentativeness, the origin and adaptation of NUSAP to the field of life cycle assessment are discussed, and recommendations are given.

Results and discussion

By using the proposed protocol, cross-referencing of outdated data is avoided, and user influence on results is reduced. In the meantime, more accurate estimates can be made for horizontally averaged data with accompanying spread and inherent uncertainties, as these deviations often contribute substantially towards the overall dispersion.

Conclusions

In this article, we highlight the importance of including inherent uncertainties and spread alongside the NUSAP pedigree. As uncertainty data often are missing in LCI literature, we here describe a method for evaluating these by taking several reported values into account. While this protocol presents a practical way towards estimating overall dispersion, better reporting in literature is promoted in order to determine real uncertainty parameters.

Keywords

LCA LCI NUSAP Uncertainty Variability 

Supplementary material

11367_2013_647_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (411 kb)
ESM 1(XLSX 410 kb)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrik John Gustav Henriksson
    • 1
  • Jeroen Bartholomeus Guinée
    • 1
  • Reinout Heijungs
    • 1
  • Arjan de Koning
    • 1
  • Darren Michael Green
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Department of Industrial EcologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of AquacultureUniversity of StirlingStirlingUK

Personalised recommendations