Abstract
Purpose
In order to reduce its environmental impact, the chemical industry no longer produces base chemicals such as ethylene, solely from fossil, but also from biomass-based feedstocks. However, a biomass option suitable for one region might not be as suitable for another region due to, e.g., long transport and the related environmental. Therefore, local biomass alternatives and the environmental impact related to the production of chemicals from these alternatives need to be investigated. This study assesses the environmental impact of producing ethylene from Swedish wood ethanol.
Methods
The study was conducted following the methodology of life cycle assessment. The life cycle was assessed using a cradle-to-gate perspective for the production of 50,000 tonnes ethylene/year for the impact categories global warming, acidification (ACP), photochemical ozone creation, and eutrophication (EP).
Results and discussion
The production of enzymes used during the life cycle had a significant effect on all investigated impacts. However, reduced consumption of enzyme product, which could possibly be realized considering the rapid development of enzymes, lowered the overall environmental impact of the ethylene. Another approach could be to use alternative hydrolyzing agents. However, little information on their environmental impact is available. An additional key contributor, with regard to ACP, EP, and POCP, was the ethanol production. Therefore, further improvements with regard to the process’ design may have beneficial effects on its environmental impact.
Conclusions
The study assessed the environmental impact of wood ethylene and pointed to several directions for improvements, such as improved enzyme production and reduced consumption of enzyme products. Moreover, the analysis showed that further investigations into other process options and increase of ethylene production from biomass are worth continued research.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Wood needed to produce 50,000 tonnes ethylene is ∼4.5 × 105 tonnes (dry matter content 50 %) (unallocated).
One filter paper unit for cellulase enzymes according to Ferreira et al. (2009) is “the amount of enzyme that releases 1 micromole glucose per minute during hydrolysis reaction” and can be used to describe the activity of the enzyme. The enzyme product assessed in this study, however, does not only contain the enzyme but also some formulation materials. For this reason 1 g of enzyme product does not necessarily equal 1 g of enzyme rather it may vary for different products and product generations. The stated FPU dosage was, therefore, only used to calculate the enzyme product consumption for the current scenarios, since only data for current FPU/g enzyme product were available. For the future consumption scenarios, however, simplified estimates of possible future enzyme product consumptions were made, without the intention to project.
This high purity is not necessary for the production of ethylene. However, the model was set up to simulate production of biofuels, which require this high concentration.
References
Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace B (2002) Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J (Harris Group, Seattle, Washington). Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438, National Renewable Energy Lab
Andersson B-I (1996) Miljö- och energidatabas för träindustrin - etapp I (Environmental and energy data for the forestry industry—stage I) Rapport P 9601006. Trätek - Institutet för Träteknisk Forskning, Stockholm
Bals B, Wedding C, Balan V, Sendich E, Dale B (2011) Evaluating the impact of ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreatment conditions on the cost of ethanol production. Biores Technol 102(2):1277–1283
Barrocas HV, Lacerda A (2007) Process for the production of ethylene from ethyl alcohol. Brazil Patent
Barta Z, Kovacs K, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010a) Process design and economics of on-site cellulase production on various carbon sources in a softwood-based ethanol plant. Enzyme Res. doi:10.4061/2010/734182
Barta Z, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010b) Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):1–11
Berg S, Lindholm EL (2005) Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden. J Clean Prod 13(1):33–42
Börjesson P, Tufvesson L, Lantz M (2010) Life cycle assessment of biofuels in Sweden Report no 70
Braskem (accessed September 11, 2011) Green ethylene. http://www.braskem.com.br/plasticoverde/eng/linha_tempo.html
E-On (accessed March 7, 2011) Priser (prices). http://www.eon.se/templates/Eon2TextPageaspx?id=47699&epslanguage=SV&redirect=1#
Ferreira SMP, Duarte AP, Queiroz JA, Domingues FC (2009) Influence of buffer systems on Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 morphology and cellulase production. Electron J Biotechnol 12(3):8–9
Galbe M, Zacchi G (2007) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:41–65
Galbe M, Sassner P, Wingren A, Zacchi G (2007) Process engineering economics of bioethanol production. In: Springer-Verlag (ed)
Gao Y, Skutsch M, Drigo R, Pacheco P, Masera O (2011) Assessing deforestation from biofuels: methodological challenges. Appl Geogr 31(2):508–518
González-García S, Berg S, Feijoo G, Moreira MT (2009) Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):340–353
González-García S, Mola-Yudego B, Murphy RJ (2012) Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0536-2
Gottschlich N (2004) Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung eines biologisch abbaubaren Kunststoffes unter gleichzeitiger Erarbeitung von Maßnahmenkatalogen. Fachhochschule Lippe und Höxter, Höxter
Huang R, Su R, Qi W, He Z (2011) Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: process intensification and mechanism research. Bioenergy Res 4(4):225–245
International Energy Agency (2008) Energy policies of IEA countries Sweden 2008 Review
International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011) World key energy statistics
ISO (2006) International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland
Jeihanipour A (2011) Waste textiles bioprocessing to ethanol and biogas. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg
Kochar N, Merims R, Padia A (1981) Ethylene from ethanol. CEP (June):66–71
Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J, Bondeau A, Koch J, Koelking C, Priess JA (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(8):3388–3393
Lehtikangas P (1999) Lagringshandbok för trädbränslen slu. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala
Lindholm EL (2006) Energy use in Swedish forestry and its environmental impact. SLU (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet), Uppsala
Liptow C, Tillman AM (2009) Comparative life cycle assessment of polyethylene based on sugarcane and crude oil; internal report. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg
Liptow C, Tillman A-M (2012) A comparative LCA study of polyethylene based on sugarcane and crude oil. JIE 16(3):420–435
Liu QP, Hou XD, Li N, Zong MH (2012) Ionic liquids from renewable biomaterials: synthesis, characterization and application in the pretreatment of biomass. Green Chem 14(2):304–307
MacLean HL, Spatari S (2009) The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol. Environ Res Lett 4:014001
Naturvårdsverket Swedish EPA (2010) Sågverk Fakta om branschen och dess miljöpåverkan branschfakta utgåva 1, April 2010 (Sawmill—facts from the industry and its environmental impact) branschfakta utgåva 1, April 2010. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm
Naumann K (2011) Abschlussworkshop Monitoring zur Wirkung nationaler und internationaler gesetzlicher Rahmenbedingungen auf die Marktentwicklung im Biokraftstoffsektor Deutsches Biomasse Forschungs Zentrum
Nordfjell T, Nilsson P, Henningsson M, Wästerlund I (2008) Unutilized biomass resources in Swedish young dense forests. Paper presented at the World Bioenergy
Novozymes (2012) http://bioenergy.novozymes.com/en/cellulosic-ethanol/CellicCTec3/product-description/Pages/default.aspx, accessed February 23, 2012
Network for Transport and the Environment (NTM) (2011) http://www.ntmcalc.se/index.html
PRé Consultants SimaPro 7.2. Amersfoort, The Netherlands, accessed April 6, 2011
Sassner P, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2008) Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy 32(5):422–430
SEKAB (2012) World Leading in the production of ethanol from cellulose. http://www.sekab.com/cellulose-ethanol/demo-plant, accessed March 26, 2012
Skogsstyrelsen (2010) Swedish Statistical yearbook of forestry 2010. Skogsstyrelsen
Slade R, Bauen A, Shah N (2009) The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe. Biotechnol Biofuels 2(15):1–19
Statistics Sweden (2011) Electricity prices for different customers. http://www.scb.se/Pages/TableAndChart____85467aspx, accessed March 7, 2011
Svensk Fjärrvärme (Swedish district heating) (2011) Fjärrvärmepriser (prices for district heating). http://www.svenskfjarrvarme.se/Statistik--Pris/Fjarrvarmepriser/, accessed March 7, 2011
Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2010) The Swedish forest industries: facts and figures 2009. Swedish Forest Industries Federation, Stockholm, Sweden
Tillman A-M (2000) Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(1):113–123
Uihlein A, Schebek L (2009) Environmental impacts of a lignocellulose feedstock biorefinery system: An assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 33(5):793–802
Verardi A, De Bari I, Ricca E, Calabro V (2011) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: current status of processes and technologies and future perspectives. Bioethanol, pp 95–122
Wesolowski D (2005) The sustainability of ethanol fuel in the United States
Zhao X, Cheng K, Liu D (2009) Organosolv pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82(5):815–827
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Guido W. Sonnemann
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liptow, C., Tillman, AM., Janssen, M. et al. Ethylene based on woody biomass—what are environmental key issues of a possible future Swedish production on industrial scale. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1071–1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0564-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0564-6