Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ethylene based on woody biomass—what are environmental key issues of a possible future Swedish production on industrial scale

  • LCA OF CHEMICALS
  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 06 August 2013

Abstract

Purpose

In order to reduce its environmental impact, the chemical industry no longer produces base chemicals such as ethylene, solely from fossil, but also from biomass-based feedstocks. However, a biomass option suitable for one region might not be as suitable for another region due to, e.g., long transport and the related environmental. Therefore, local biomass alternatives and the environmental impact related to the production of chemicals from these alternatives need to be investigated. This study assesses the environmental impact of producing ethylene from Swedish wood ethanol.

Methods

The study was conducted following the methodology of life cycle assessment. The life cycle was assessed using a cradle-to-gate perspective for the production of 50,000 tonnes ethylene/year for the impact categories global warming, acidification (ACP), photochemical ozone creation, and eutrophication (EP).

Results and discussion

The production of enzymes used during the life cycle had a significant effect on all investigated impacts. However, reduced consumption of enzyme product, which could possibly be realized considering the rapid development of enzymes, lowered the overall environmental impact of the ethylene. Another approach could be to use alternative hydrolyzing agents. However, little information on their environmental impact is available. An additional key contributor, with regard to ACP, EP, and POCP, was the ethanol production. Therefore, further improvements with regard to the process’ design may have beneficial effects on its environmental impact.

Conclusions

The study assessed the environmental impact of wood ethylene and pointed to several directions for improvements, such as improved enzyme production and reduced consumption of enzyme products. Moreover, the analysis showed that further investigations into other process options and increase of ethylene production from biomass are worth continued research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Wood needed to produce 50,000 tonnes ethylene is ∼4.5 × 105 tonnes (dry matter content 50 %) (unallocated).

  2. One filter paper unit for cellulase enzymes according to Ferreira et al. (2009) is “the amount of enzyme that releases 1 micromole glucose per minute during hydrolysis reaction” and can be used to describe the activity of the enzyme. The enzyme product assessed in this study, however, does not only contain the enzyme but also some formulation materials. For this reason 1 g of enzyme product does not necessarily equal 1 g of enzyme rather it may vary for different products and product generations. The stated FPU dosage was, therefore, only used to calculate the enzyme product consumption for the current scenarios, since only data for current FPU/g enzyme product were available. For the future consumption scenarios, however, simplified estimates of possible future enzyme product consumptions were made, without the intention to project.

  3. This high purity is not necessary for the production of ethylene. However, the model was set up to simulate production of biofuels, which require this high concentration.

References

  • Aden A, Ruth M, Ibsen K, Jechura J, Neeves K, Sheehan J, Wallace B (2002) Montague L, Slayton A, Lukas J (Harris Group, Seattle, Washington). Lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol process design and economics utilizing co-current dilute acid hydrolysis and enzymatic hydrolysis for corn stover. NREL/TP-510-32438, National Renewable Energy Lab

  • Andersson B-I (1996) Miljö- och energidatabas för träindustrin - etapp I (Environmental and energy data for the forestry industry—stage I) Rapport P 9601006. Trätek - Institutet för Träteknisk Forskning, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Bals B, Wedding C, Balan V, Sendich E, Dale B (2011) Evaluating the impact of ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) pretreatment conditions on the cost of ethanol production. Biores Technol 102(2):1277–1283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrocas HV, Lacerda A (2007) Process for the production of ethylene from ethyl alcohol. Brazil Patent

  • Barta Z, Kovacs K, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010a) Process design and economics of on-site cellulase production on various carbon sources in a softwood-based ethanol plant. Enzyme Res. doi:10.4061/2010/734182

  • Barta Z, Reczey K, Zacchi G (2010b) Techno-economic evaluation of stillage treatment with anaerobic digestion in a softwood-to-ethanol process. Biotechnol Biofuels 3(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg S, Lindholm EL (2005) Energy use and environmental impacts of forest operations in Sweden. J Clean Prod 13(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börjesson P, Tufvesson L, Lantz M (2010) Life cycle assessment of biofuels in Sweden Report no 70

  • Braskem (accessed September 11, 2011) Green ethylene. http://www.braskem.com.br/plasticoverde/eng/linha_tempo.html

  • E-On (accessed March 7, 2011) Priser (prices). http://www.eon.se/templates/Eon2TextPageaspx?id=47699&epslanguage=SV&redirect=1#

  • Ferreira SMP, Duarte AP, Queiroz JA, Domingues FC (2009) Influence of buffer systems on Trichoderma reesei Rut C-30 morphology and cellulase production. Electron J Biotechnol 12(3):8–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbe M, Zacchi G (2007) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:41–65

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galbe M, Sassner P, Wingren A, Zacchi G (2007) Process engineering economics of bioethanol production. In: Springer-Verlag (ed)

  • Gao Y, Skutsch M, Drigo R, Pacheco P, Masera O (2011) Assessing deforestation from biofuels: methodological challenges. Appl Geogr 31(2):508–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-García S, Berg S, Feijoo G, Moreira MT (2009) Environmental impacts of forest production and supply of pulpwood: Spanish and Swedish case studies. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(4):340–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-García S, Mola-Yudego B, Murphy RJ (2012) Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess. doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0536-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschlich N (2004) Nachhaltigkeitsbewertung eines biologisch abbaubaren Kunststoffes unter gleichzeitiger Erarbeitung von Maßnahmenkatalogen. Fachhochschule Lippe und Höxter, Höxter

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang R, Su R, Qi W, He Z (2011) Bioconversion of lignocellulose into bioethanol: process intensification and mechanism research. Bioenergy Res 4(4):225–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2008) Energy policies of IEA countries Sweden 2008 Review

  • International Energy Agency (IEA) (2011) World key energy statistics

  • ISO (2006) International Organization for Standardization: ISO 14040:2006 Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeihanipour A (2011) Waste textiles bioprocessing to ethanol and biogas. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochar N, Merims R, Padia A (1981) Ethylene from ethanol. CEP (June):66–71

  • Lapola DM, Schaldach R, Alcamo J, Bondeau A, Koch J, Koelking C, Priess JA (2010) Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(8):3388–3393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtikangas P (1999) Lagringshandbok för trädbränslen slu. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm EL (2006) Energy use in Swedish forestry and its environmental impact. SLU (Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet), Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Liptow C, Tillman AM (2009) Comparative life cycle assessment of polyethylene based on sugarcane and crude oil; internal report. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Liptow C, Tillman A-M (2012) A comparative LCA study of polyethylene based on sugarcane and crude oil. JIE 16(3):420–435

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu QP, Hou XD, Li N, Zong MH (2012) Ionic liquids from renewable biomaterials: synthesis, characterization and application in the pretreatment of biomass. Green Chem 14(2):304–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean HL, Spatari S (2009) The contribution of enzymes and process chemicals to the life cycle of ethanol. Environ Res Lett 4:014001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naturvårdsverket Swedish EPA (2010) Sågverk Fakta om branschen och dess miljöpåverkan branschfakta utgåva 1, April 2010 (Sawmill—facts from the industry and its environmental impact) branschfakta utgåva 1, April 2010. Naturvårdsverket, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumann K (2011) Abschlussworkshop Monitoring zur Wirkung nationaler und internationaler gesetzlicher Rahmenbedingungen auf die Marktentwicklung im Biokraftstoffsektor Deutsches Biomasse Forschungs Zentrum

  • Nordfjell T, Nilsson P, Henningsson M, Wästerlund I (2008) Unutilized biomass resources in Swedish young dense forests. Paper presented at the World Bioenergy

  • Novozymes (2012) http://bioenergy.novozymes.com/en/cellulosic-ethanol/CellicCTec3/product-description/Pages/default.aspx, accessed February 23, 2012

  • Network for Transport and the Environment (NTM) (2011) http://www.ntmcalc.se/index.html

  • PRé Consultants SimaPro 7.2. Amersfoort, The Netherlands, accessed April 6, 2011

  • Sassner P, Galbe M, Zacchi G (2008) Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenergy 32(5):422–430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SEKAB (2012) World Leading in the production of ethanol from cellulose. http://www.sekab.com/cellulose-ethanol/demo-plant, accessed March 26, 2012

  • Skogsstyrelsen (2010) Swedish Statistical yearbook of forestry 2010. Skogsstyrelsen

  • Slade R, Bauen A, Shah N (2009) The greenhouse gas emissions performance of cellulosic ethanol supply chains in Europe. Biotechnol Biofuels 2(15):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Sweden (2011) Electricity prices for different customers. http://www.scb.se/Pages/TableAndChart____85467aspx, accessed March 7, 2011

  • Svensk Fjärrvärme (Swedish district heating) (2011) Fjärrvärmepriser (prices for district heating). http://www.svenskfjarrvarme.se/Statistik--Pris/Fjarrvarmepriser/, accessed March 7, 2011

  • Swedish Forest Industries Federation (2010) The Swedish forest industries: facts and figures 2009. Swedish Forest Industries Federation, Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillman A-M (2000) Significance of decision-making for LCA methodology. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20(1):113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uihlein A, Schebek L (2009) Environmental impacts of a lignocellulose feedstock biorefinery system: An assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 33(5):793–802

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verardi A, De Bari I, Ricca E, Calabro V (2011) Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: current status of processes and technologies and future perspectives. Bioethanol, pp 95–122

  • Wesolowski D (2005) The sustainability of ethanol fuel in the United States

  • Zhao X, Cheng K, Liu D (2009) Organosolv pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82(5):815–827

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christin Liptow.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Guido W. Sonnemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liptow, C., Tillman, AM., Janssen, M. et al. Ethylene based on woody biomass—what are environmental key issues of a possible future Swedish production on industrial scale. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18, 1071–1081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0564-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0564-6

Keywords

Navigation