Strengths or bias in social LCA?
Social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) emerged in the last years as a methodological approach aimed at evaluating social and socioeconomic aspects of products and their potential positive and negative impacts along their life cycle. According to the Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products (Benoît and Mazijn 2009), developed within the UNEPS/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, social impacts are those that may affect stakeholders along the life cycle of a product and may be linked to company behaviour, socioeconomic processes and impacts on social capital. This definition includes two strengths of S-LCA that together distinguish it from other social assessment methods: (1) the focus on the product and (2) the broad definition of social impacts, which encompasses both the company behaviour and the socioeconomic perspective.
From a company perspective, one of the main added values of S-LCA is the possibility to spend the results of the evaluation on the market. This could be achieve ...
- Assefa G, Frostell B (2007) Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies. Technol Soc 29:63–78 CrossRef
- Benoît C, Mazijn B (eds) (2009) Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products. Social and socio-economic LCA Guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development. UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative, Paris, France
- Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2006) A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):88–97 CrossRef
- Dreyer LC, Hauschild MZ, Schierbeck J (2010) Characterisation of social impacts in LCA: part 1: development of indicators for labour rights. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(3):247–259 CrossRef
- Fiat Group Automobiles (2009) http://www.fiatgroup.com/it-it/mediacentre/group/Documents/MEDIAKIT_2009_ITA/FGA.pdf Accessed March 18th 2011
- Hauschild MZ, Dreyer LC, Jørgensen A (2008) Assessing social impacts in a life cycle perspective—lessons learned. CIRP Annals—Manuf Technol 57:21–24 CrossRef
- Jørgensen A, Hauschild MZ, Jørgensen MS, Wangel A (2009) Relevance and feasibility of social life cycle assessment from a company perspective. Int J Life Cycle Assess 14(3):204–214 CrossRef
- Jørgensen A, Finkbeiner M, Jørgensen MS, Hauschild MZ (2010) Defining the baseline in social life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15(4):376–384 CrossRef
- Kloepffer W (2008) Life cycle sustainability assessment of products. Int J Life Cycle Assess 13(2):89–95 CrossRef
- Labuschagne C, Brent AC (2006) Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(1):3–15 CrossRef
- McMillan DW, Chavis DM (1986) Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol 14:6 CrossRef
- Reuters (2008) German unions urge Nokia boycott over plant closure. January 17, 2008
- Vanclay F (2003) Conceptual and methodological advances in social impact assessment. In: Becker HA, Vanclay F (eds) The international handbook of social impact assessment—conceptual and methodological advances. Edward Elgar, Boston
- Wikipedia (2011a) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nike,_Inc Accessed March 18th, 2011
- Wikipedia (2011b) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Coca-Cola Accessed March 18th, 2011
- Strengths or bias in social LCA?
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume 16, Issue 7 , pp 596-598
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. LCA & Ecodesign Laboratory, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129, Bologna, Italy
- 2. Research & Study Unit, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Lungotevere Thaon di Revel 76, 00196, Rome, Italy