Skip to main content
Log in

Entry mode choices in the international new ventures context. A study from different theoretical perspectives

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Few studies have investigated the factors that enhance entry mode choice in the context of international new ventures (INVs). In this paper, we hypothesize that the characteristics of INVs’ products or services can explain their preference for equity entry modes. We also hypothesize that the inter-firm networks in which INVs are embedded play a deciding role in their choice of non-equity entry modes. When INVs are in inter-firm networks in which activities are developed to manage them, non-equity entry modes are preferred. We have adopted an effectuation approach to study the influence of different inter-firm network management activities on entry mode choice. In short, we have studied the effect of developing inter-firm network knowledge exchange, coordination, adaptation, conflict resolution and resource sharing management activities. In this paper we attempt to contribute to international entrepreneurship studies by reconciling the most widely accepted approaches to entry mode choice (Transactional Cost Economics, Organizational Capabilities-based and Network perspective) and international new ventures. Our findings show that the technological complexity of INVs’ products/services explain their preference for equity entry modes. Additionally, the development of network management activities among the networked firms determines the INVs’ preference for non-equity entry modes. Our results draw a decision model that differs from the ones derived from previous perspectives, which highlight the role of different characteristics of international new ventures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Laham, A., Amburgey, T., & Bates, K. (2008). The dynamics of research alliances: examining the effect of alliance experience and partner characteristics on the speed of alliance entry in the biotech industry. British Journal of Management, 19, 343–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almobaireek, W. N., Alshumaimeri, A. A., & Manolova, T. S. (2016). Building entrepreneurial inter-firm networks in an emerging economy: the role of cognitive legitimacy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(1), 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Modes of foreign entry: a transaction cost analysis and propositions. Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansoff, H. I. (1988). Corporate strategy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N., & Mayer, K. J. (2007). Contract design as a firm capability: an integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1060–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelund, A., Madsen, T. K., & Moen, O. (2007). A review of the foundation, international marketing strategies, and performance of international new ventures. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1423–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baronchelli, G., & Cassia, F. (2014). Exploring the antecedents of born-global companies’ international development. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(1), 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M. S., Aspelund, A., & Sørheim, R. (2008). The hybrid structures of international new ventures. a social capital approach and research agenda. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 9(1), 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist, K., Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, P., Nummela, N., & Saarenketo, S. (2008). The role of trust and contracts in the internationalization of technology-intensive born globals. Journal of Engineering Technology and Management, 25, 123–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics, 10, 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgel, O., & Murray, G. C. (2000). The international market entry choices of start-up companies in high-technology industries. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 33–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures. social measurement: Current Issues, 65–115.

  • Chen, T.-J. (2006). Liability of foreignness and entry mode choice: Taiwanese firms in Europe. Journal of Business Research, 59, 288–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claycomb, C., & Frankwick, G. L. (2010). Buyers’ perspectives of buyer–seller relationship development. Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 252–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosset, J., & Roy, J. (1991). The determinants of country risk ratings. Journal of International Business Studies, 22(1), 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E., & Jones, M. V. (2004). Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N. E., & Munro, H. J. (1997). Network relationship and the internationalisation process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(4), 361–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, D., & Jones, M. V. (2000). Small high-technology firms and international high-technology markets. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, D., & Spence, M. (2005). The internationalisation of ‘high performing’ UK high-tech SMEs: a study of planned and unplanned strategies. International Business Review, 14(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, M. T., & Homse, E. (1986). Controlling the marketing-purchasing interface: resource development and organisational implications. Industrial Marketing and Purchasing, 1(2), 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. (1999). Collaborative research programmes: building trust from difference. Technovation, 19(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckhardt, J. T., & Shane, S. A. (2003). Opportunities and entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 29(3), 333–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, M. K., & Rao, C. P. (1993). Service firms’ international entry-mode choice: a modified transaction cost analysis approach. Journal of Marketing, 57(July), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernhaber, S. A., & McDougall, P. P. (2005). New venture growth in international markets: The role of strategic adaptation and networking capabilities. In D. A. Shepherd & J. A. Katz (Eds.), International entrepreneurship (pp. 137–164). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson, M., Kirpalani, V. H. M., Dimistratos, P., Solberg, A. C., & Zucchella, A. (2008). Born-global: propositions to help advance the theory. International Business Review, 17(4), 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galkina, T., & Chetty, S. (2015). Effectuation and networking of internationalizing SMEs. Management International Review, 55(5), 647–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Anderson, E. (1988). The multinational corporation’s degree of control over foreign subsidiaries: an empirical test of a transaction cost explanation. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 4(2), 305–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Pechuan, I., Exposito-Langa, M., & Tomas-Miquel, J. V. (2013). International entrepreneurship in SMEs: a study of influencing factors in the textile industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 9(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, D. C., & Wiggenhorn, J. (2007). Born globals, the choice of globalization strategy, and the market’s perception of performance. Journal of World Business, 42(3), 322–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (2004). The relationship marketing process: communication, interaction, dialogue, value. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 19(2), 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G., Fruensgaard, J. L., Risom, K., Sonne, A.-M., Hansen, K., & Trondsen, T. (2002). Market orientation at industry and value chain levels: concepts, determinants and consequences. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 1(2), 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gummesson, E., & Mele, C. (2010). Marketing as value co-creation through network interaction and resource integration. Journal of Business Market Management, 4(4), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, B., & Zucchella, A. (2014). Born global or born to run? the long-term growth of born global firms. Management International Review, 54, 497–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. London: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallén, L., Johanson, J., & Seyed-Mohamed, N. (1991). Interfirm adaptation in business relationships. Journal of Marketing, 55(2), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R. (1988). Strategic alliance and partner asymmetries. Management International Review, 28(4), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfert, G., Ritter, T., & Walter, A. (2002). Redefining market orientation from a relationship perspective. theoretical considerations and empirical results. European Journal of Marketing, 36(9/10), 1119–1139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hite, J. M., & Hesterly, W. S. (2001). The evolution of firm networks: from emergence to early growth of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 275–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, H., & Sandberg, S. (2008). Internationalization of small and medium sized enterprises in the Baltic Sea Region. Journal of International Management, 14(1), 65–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantunen, A., Nummela, N., & Saarenketo, S. (2008). Strategic orientations of born globals—do they really matter? Journal of World Business, 43(2), 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., Mackenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Academy of International Business, 40, 1411–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V., & Coviello, N. E. (2005). Internationalisation: conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 284–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. V., Coviello, M., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). Entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 632–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: structural equation modeling with the simplis command language. Hilldale: Lawrence Er lbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. Boston: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, G., & Cavusgil, T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35, 124–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., & Subramaniam, V. (1997). A contingency framework for the mode of entry decision. Journal of World Business, 32(1), 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurell, H., Achtenhagen, L., & Andersson, S. (2015). The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1–28.

  • Löfgren, A., Tolstoy, D., Sharma, D. D., & Johanson, J. (2008). Network coordination as a key to external resources: a study of an internationalizing Biotech SME. In L. P. Dana, I. M. Welpe, M. Han, & V. Ratten (Eds.), Handbook of research on European business and entrepreneurship (pp. 618–635). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 565–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, R. C., & Browne, M. W. (1993). The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: some practical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 533–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (1997). Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madhok, A. (1998). The nature of multinational firm boundaries: transaction costs, firm capabilities, and foreign market entry modes. International Business Review, 7, 259–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. (1997). The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process? International Business Review, 7, 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, P. P., & Robinson, R. B. (1990). New venture strategies: an empirical identification of eight archetypes of competitive strategies for entry. Strategic Management Journal, 11(6), 447–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, D., & Horan, C. (2000). Business marketing: perspectives from the markets-as-networks approach. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(4), 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melén, S., & Rovira, E. (2009). The internationalisation modes of born globals: a longitudinal study. European Management Journal, 27, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanov, H., & Fernhaber, S. A. (2009). The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new venture networks. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels. a theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, J., & Spekman, R. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W., & Rieple, A. (2014). Special issue on “the role of networks in entrepreneurial performance: new answers to old questions?”. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummela, N., Saarenketo, S., Jokela, P., & Loane, S. (2014). Strategic decision-making of a born global: a comparative study from three small open economies. Management International Review, 54, 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R., Rothwell, R., & Cooper, S. (1988). The management of innovation in high-technology small firms. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(1), 45–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. (2005). Defining international entrepreneurship and modelling the speed of internationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1042–2587.

  • Pett, T. L., & Dibrell, C. C. (2001). A process model of global strategic alliance formation. Business Process Management Journal, 7(4), 349–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B., Mintzberg, H., & James, R. M. (1988). The strategy process: concepts, contexts, and cases (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.

  • Rank, O. N. (2008). Formal structures and informal networks: structural analysis in organizations. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(2), 145–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed, H. S. (2005). Foreign entry mode and performance: the moderating effects of environment. Journal of Small Business Management, 43(1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripollés, M., Blesa, A., & Monferrer, D. (2012). Factors enhancing the choice of higher resource commitment entry modes in international new ventures. International Business Review, 21(4), 648–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003). Network competence: its impact on innovation success and its antecedents. Journal of Business Research, 56(9), 745–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F., & Johnston, W. J. (2002). Measuring network competence: some international evidence. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2/3), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, T., Wilkinson, I. F., & Johnston, W. J. (2004). Managing in complex business networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(3), 175–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. C., & McDougall, P. (2001). Entry barriers and new venture performance: a comparison of universal and contingency approaches. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 659–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C. (1987). Marketing’s interaction with other functional units: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. & Dew, N. (2003). Effectual networks: A pre-commitment approach to bridging the gap between opportunism and trust. InAOM meeting in Seattle. University of Maryland and University of Virginia.

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., & Dew, N. (2005). New market creation through transformation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 15(5), 533–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S., Kumar, K., York, J. G., & Bhagavatula, S. (2014). An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 38(1), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sasi, V., & Arenius, P. (2008). International new ventures and social networks: advantage or liability? European Management Journal, 26(6), 400–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser, F. K., & McNaughton, R. B. (2009). Individual-level antecedents to market-oriented actions. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 438–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solis‐Rodriguez, V., & Gonzalez‐Diaz, M. (2012). How to design franchise contracts: the role of contractual hazards and experience. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(4), 652–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B. (1987). Assessment of fit in overidentified models with latent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 118–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. Sociological Methodology, 8(1), 84–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E., Khavul, S., Perez-Nordtvedt, L., Prakhya, S., Dabrowski, R. V., & Zheng, C. (2011). Strategic commitment and timing of internationalization from emerging markets: evidence from China, India, Mexico, and South Africa. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(2), 252–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacharakis, A. (1997). Entrepreneurial entry into foreign markets: a transaction cost perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. Programa Estatal de Fomento de la Investigación Científica y Técnica de Excelencia. 2013–2016. Reference ECO-2013-44027-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreu Blesa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ripollés, M., Blesa, A. Entry mode choices in the international new ventures context. A study from different theoretical perspectives. Int Entrep Manag J 13, 465–485 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0410-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-016-0410-y

Keywords

Navigation