Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting peasant entrepreneurs’ intention in the Chinese context

  • Published:
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the extant literature, research attention has been largely given to explore the issue of Chinese peasant entrepreneurship based on strategic entrepreneurial perspective. The current study examines the intention of Chinese peasant entrepreneurs based on entrepreneurial behavior perspective and hypothesizes that self-efficacy positively moderates the relationship between the need for power and entrepreneurial intention and the relationship between institutional environment and entrepreneurial intention. An analysis of a sample of 298 Chinese peasants proved most of the hypotheses. Results show that the need for power has a positive influence on the entrepreneurial intentions of the selected low-social-status population. Results also reveal the positive effect of the institutional environment perceived by individuals on entrepreneurial intention. The finding indicates that the government can enhance the entrepreneurial intention of rural individuals by updating entrepreneurial policies, by training and education in entrepreneurial activities that target the rural masses, and by promoting a successful entrepreneurial model. Moreover, positive moderation of self-efficacy on the relationship between the need for power and entrepreneurial intention is proven, which indicates that the effects of these two factors on entrepreneurial intention mutually reinforce each other. The finding also indicates that moderation of self-efficacy on the relationship between the institutional environment and entrepreneurial intention is negative that shows that self-efficacy and institutional environment can substitute for each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahuja, G. (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes and innovation, A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions, Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. l–63). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., MacCrimmon, K. R., & Zietsma, C. (2000). Does money matter? Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 551–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeftink, F., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., & Bertrand, J. W. M. (2012). Being successful in a creative profession, The role of innovative cognitive style, self-regulation, and self-efficacy. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biao, X. (2007). How far are the left‐behind left behind? A preliminary study in rural China. Population, Space and Place, 13(3), 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing entrepreneurial ideas, The case for intentions. Academy of Management Review, 13, 442–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum-Kulka, S., Danet, B., & Gerson, R. (1985). The language of requesting in Israeli society. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Language and social situation (pp. 113–141). New York: New York, Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18, 63–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1972). Pronouns of power and solidarity. In G. Pier (Ed.), Language and social context (pp. 252–282). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness, some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, G. D., & Ahlstrom, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry, Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles, Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 994–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., Shaver, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, G. (2006). Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 610–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. W., & Zhang, L. (1999). The hukou system and rural–urban migration in China, Processes and changes. The China Quarterly, 160, 818–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, A., & Schultz-Nielsen, M. (2004). Immigrant self-employment and economic performance. In T. Tranaes & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), Migrants, work, and the welfare state (pp. 213–241). Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crockett, H. J. (1966). Psychological origins of mobility. In N. J. Smelser & S. M. Lipset (Eds.), Social structure and mobility in economic development (pp. 270–309). Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. T. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Pillis, E. G., & Reardon, K. K. (2007). The influence of personality traits and persuasive messages on entrepreneurial intention, A cross-cultural comparison. Career Development International, 12, 382–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMartino, R., & Barbato, R. (2003). Differences between women and men MBA entrepreneurs, exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (2013). What is a peasant? What are peasantries? A briefing paper on issues of definition. Prepared for the first session of the Intergovernmental Working Group on a United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas, Geneva, 15–19 July 2013.

  • Entrialgo, M., Fernandez, E., & Vazquez, C. (2000). Characteristics of managers as determinants of entrepreneurial orientation, some Spanish evidence. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1, 187–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Y., Chen, N., & Kirby, D. A. (1996). Chinese peasant entrepreneurs, An examination of township and village enterprises (TVEs) in rural China. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(4), 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, J. R. (1946). The English school of phonetics. Transactions of the Philological Society, 45(1), 92–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzsimmons, J. R., & Douglas, E. J. (2011). Interaction between feasibility and desirability in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 431–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor: University of Michegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, L. R., & Good, K. C. (1972). An objective measure of the motive to attain social power. Psychological Reports, 30, 247–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, M., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2008). The impact of desirability and feasibility on entrepreneurial intentions, A structural equation model. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., Wasti, S. A., & Sikdar, A. (2009). The role of gender stereotypes in perceptions of entrepreneurs and intentions to become an entrepreneur. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33, 397–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschowitz, R., & Nell, V. (1983). The relationship between need for power and the life style of South African journalists. The Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschowitz, R., & Nell, V. (1985). The need for power and fear of assertiveness in English-Speaking South African female graduates. The Journal of Psychology, Interdisciplinary and Applied, 119, 603–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship, A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, K. K. (1987). Face and favor, The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 944–974.

  • Joern, B., & Philipp, S. (2006). The effect of motivation on self-employment duration in Germany, necessity versus opportunity entrepreneurs. MPRA Paper.

  • Knight, J. (1995). Price scissors and intersectoral resource transfers, who paid for industrialization in China? Oxford Economic Papers, 117–135.

  • Kostova, T. (1997). Country institutional profiles, Concept and measurement. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 180–189.

  • Kristiansen, S., & Indarti, N. (2004). Entrepreneurial intention among Indonesian and Norwegian students. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12, 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. (1993). The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F. (2000). The cognitive infrastructure of opportunity emergence. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 24, 5–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18, 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., & Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions, Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, N. F., Reilly, M. D., & Carsrud, A. L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15, 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. H., & Wong, P. K. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions, A career anchor perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., Wong, P. K., Foo, M. D., & Leung, A. (2011). Entrepreneurial intentions, The influence of organizational and individual factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 124–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Atuahene-Gima, K. (2001). Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance, evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 791–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance, Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D. S. K., Morse, E. A., Mitchell, R. K., & Seawright, K. K. (2010). Institutional environment and entrepreneurial cognitions, A comparative business systems perspective. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34, 491–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F. (2008). Skill and value perceptions, How do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4, 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33, 593–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liñán, F., & Santos, F. J. (2007). Does social capital affect entrepreneurial intentions? International Advances in Economic Research, 13, 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., & Tao, Z. (2010). Determinants of entrepreneurial activities in China. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship, Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54, 100–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C., Alexander, C., & Marks, E. (1982). The need for power, stress, immune function, and illness among male prisoners. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 91, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meccheri, N., & Pelloni, G. (2006). Rural entrepreneurs and institutional assistance, an empirical study from mountainous Italy. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18(5), 371–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. W. (1973). A note on the definition of peasantries. Journal of Peasant Studies, 1(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nee, V. (1992). Organizational dynamics of market transition, Hybrid firms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77, 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamela, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship in the region, breeding ground for nascent entrepreneurs? Working paper, faculty of economics and business administration. Technical University Freiberg.

  • Prodan, I., & Drnovsek, M. (2010). Conceptualizing academic- entrepreneurial intentions, An empirical test. Technovation, 30, 332–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L. (1985). Asian power and politics, The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. (1956). Peasant society and culture, an anthropological approach to civilization. University of Chicago Press.

  • Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira, J. (2007). The influence of social ties and self-efficacy in forming entrepreneurial intentions and motivating nascent behavior. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 12, 275–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), The encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, S. (1979). The peasant concept in anthropology. Journal of Peasant Studies, 7(1), 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 566–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (1996). Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer-Oatey, H. (1997). Unequal relationships in high and low power distance societies, A comparative study of Ibtor-student role relations in Britain and China. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., & Sun, H. F. (2005). Effects of power concepts and employee performance on managers’ empowering. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 27, 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (2005). Explaining the nature of power, A three-process theory. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, R. L., & Harvey, M. G. (1998). The rural entrepreneurial venture, creating the virtual megafirm. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2004). Are young and small firms hothouses for nascent entrepreneurs? Evidence from German micro data. Applied Economics Quarterly, 50, 379–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35, 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial career intentions, Implications for entrepreneurship education. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 13, 387–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, E. R. (1955). Types of Latin American peasantry, A preliminary discussion. American Anthropologist, 57(3), 452–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Filatotchev, I. (2008). Returnee entrepreneurs, science park location choice and performance, An analysis of high‐technology SMEs in China. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (1965). Ancient China in Transition, An Analysis of Social Mobility, 722–222 BC. Stanford University Press.

  • Yu, J., Zhou, J. X., Wang, Y., & Xi, Y. (2013). Rural entrepreneurship in an emerging economy, reading institutional perspectives from entrepreneur stories. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(2), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Hills, G. E., & Siebert, S. E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1265–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support by Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (71072023).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Song Lin.

Appendix

Appendix

Questionnaire

Entrepreneurial intention

Indicate your level of agreement with the following statements from 1 (total disagreement) to 5 (total agreement)

  1. 1)

    I am ready to do anything to be an entrepreneur

  2. 2)

    My professional goal is to become an entrepreneur

  3. 3)

    I will make every effort to start and run my own firm

  4. 4)

    I am determined to create a firm in the future

  5. 5)

    I have very seriously thought of starting a firm

  6. 6)

    I have the firm intention to start a firm some day

The results of confirmatory factor analysis are: CMIN/DF = 12.335 (P = 0.000), GFI = 0.892, IFI = 0.977, CFI = 0.944, NFI = 0.939, RMSEA = 0.195.

Need for power

Indicate your level of agreement with the following statements from 1 (total disagreement) to 5 (total agreement)

  1. 1)

    I would probably enjoy being elected to an influential political position.

  2. 2)

    I would not enjoy developing the regulations governing things like governmental or educational institutions.

  3. 3)

    I would not enjoy supervising other people.

  4. 4)

    I would enjoy functioning in a high-level, decision-making capacity.

  5. 5)

    I would enjoy influencing the career decisions of my associates.

  6. 6)

    I would not enjoy directing decision-making processes.

  7. 7)

    I would not enjoy functioning in a managerial or executive capacity for a corporation.

  8. 8)

    It is unlikely that I will ever seek a leadership position.

  9. 9)

    I would enjoy making the arrangements for an organization’s activities.

  10. 10)

    I would enjoy deciding how institutional procedures or regulations should be interpreted.

  11. 11)

    I would enjoy influencing the social relationships of my associates.

  12. 12)

    I would dislike managing or being in charge of the financial resources of an institution.

  13. 13)

    I would enjoy deciding upon educational or social standards.

  14. 14)

    I would dislike having to make the decisions concerning who should be promoted.

  15. 15)

    1 would dislike having to set the work-schedules or the work-standards for other people.

  16. 16)

    I would enjoy assessing the qualifications of trainees in my field.

  17. 17)

    I would be interested in being involved in personnel decisions concerning who should be hired for certain jobs.

  18. 18)

    If I were in a professional field, I would not wish to serve on a committee in charge of admitting new members to the field.

  19. 19)

    I would dislike delegating work to subordinates.

  20. 20)

    1 would enjoy being in a position to decide points in a merit system.

  21. 21)

    I would not be interested in deciding who is best qualified for a particular assignment or mission.

  22. 22)

    I would enjoy being employed by a prestigious institution.

  23. 23)

    I would enjoy being appointed director of a department in government or industry.

  24. 24)

    I would not care to be regarded as an influential person in the community.

  25. 25)

    I would find influencing the lives of others to be a very rewarding experience.

The results of confirmatory factor analysis are: CMIN/DF = 6.464 (P = 0.000), GFI = 0.708, IFI = 0.647, CFI = 0.644, NFI = 0.590, RMSEA = 0.111.

Institutional environment

Indicate your level of agreement with the following statements from 1 (total disagreement) to 5 (total agreement)

  1. 1)

    Government organizations in this country assist individuals with starting their own business.

  2. 2)

    The government sets aside government contracts for new and small businesses.

  3. 3)

    Local and national governments have special support available for individuals who want to start a new business.

  4. 4)

    The government sponsors organizations that help new businesses develop.

  5. 5)

    Even after failing in an earlier business, the government assists entrepreneurs in starting again.

  6. 6)

    Individuals know how to legally protect a new business.

  7. 7)

    Those who start new businesses know how to deal with much risk.

  8. 8)

    Those who start new businesses know how to manage risk.

  9. 9)

    Most people know where to find information about markets for their products.

  10. 10)

    Turning new ideas into businesses is an admired career path in this country.

  11. 11)

    In this country, innovative and creative thinking is viewed as the route to success.

  12. 12)

    Entrepreneurs are admired in this country.

  13. 13)

    People in this country tend to greatly admire those who start their own business.

The results of confirmatory factor analysis are: CMIN/DF = 2.984 (P = 0.000), GFI = 0.917, IFI = 0.957, CFI = 0.957, NFI = 0.590, RMSEA = 0.082.

Self-efficacy

Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy was measured by asking respondents to rate themselves against their peers on the following measures. 1 means much worse and 5 means much better.

  1. 1)

    Being able to solve problems

  2. 2)

    Managing money

  3. 3)

    Being creative

  4. 4)

    Getting people to agree with you

  5. 5)

    Being a leader

  6. 6)

    Making decisions

The results of confirmatory factor analysis are: CMIN/DF = 2.793 (P = 0.000), GFI = 0.970, IFI = 0.982, CFI = 0.982, NFI = 0.972, RMSEA = 0.078.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, S., Si, S. Factors affecting peasant entrepreneurs’ intention in the Chinese context. Int Entrep Manag J 10, 803–825 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0325-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-014-0325-4

Keywords

Navigation