Skip to main content
Log in

Spatial interpolation methods and geostatistics for mapping groundwater contamination in a coastal area

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mapping groundwater contaminants and identifying the sources are the initial steps in pollution control and mitigation. Due to the availability of different mapping methods and the large number of emerging pollutants, these methods need to be used together in decision making. The present study aims to map the contaminated areas in Richards Bay, South Africa and compare the results of ordinary kriging (OK) and inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation techniques. Statistical methods were also used for identifying contamination sources. Na–Cl groundwater type was dominant followed by Ca–Mg–Cl. Data analysis indicate that silicate weathering, ion exchange and fresh water–seawater mixing are the major geochemical processes controlling the presence of major ions in groundwater. Factor analysis also helped to confirm the results. Overlay analysis by OK and IDW gave different results. Areas where groundwater was unsuitable as a drinking source were 419 and 116 km2 for OK and IDW, respectively. Such diverse results make decision making difficult, if only one method was to be used. Three highly contaminated zones within the study area were more accurately identified by OK. If large areas are identified as being contaminated such as by IDW in this study, the mitigation measures will be expensive. If these areas were underestimated, then even though management measures are taken, it will not be effective for a longer time. Use of multiple techniques like this study will help to avoid taking harsh decisions. Overall, the groundwater quality in this area was poor, and it is essential to identify alternate drinking water source or treat the groundwater before ingestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aller L, Bennet T, Lehr JH and Petty RJ (1985) DRASTIC: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeological settings. R.S. Kerr, Envir. Res. Lab., EPA/600/2-85/018, Ada, Oklahoma

  • Anane M, Abidi B, Lachaal F, Limam A, Jellali S (2013) GIS-based DRASTIC, pesticide DRASTIC and the susceptibility index (SI): comparative study for evaluation of low pollution potential in the Nabeul-Hammamet shallow aquifer, Tunisia. Hydrogeology J 21(3):715–731

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (American Public Health Association) (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelo CAJ, Postma D (1993) Geochemistry, groundwater and pollution, 2nd edn. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 321

    Google Scholar 

  • Arslan H (2013) Application of multivariate statistical techniques in the assessment of groundwater quality in seawater intrusion area in Bafra Plain, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 185(3):2439–2452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj V, Singh DS (2011) Surface and groundwater quality characterization of Deoria District, Ganga Plain. India Environ Earth Sci 63(2):383–395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouzourra H, Bouhlila R, Elango L, Slama F, Ouslati N (2015) Characterization of mechanisms and processes of groundwater salinization in irrigated coastal area using statistics, GIS and hydrogeochemical investigations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(4):2643–2660

  • Brindha K, Elango L (2012a) Impact of tanning industries on groundwater quality near a metropolitan city in India. Water Resour Manag 26(6):1747–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindha K, Elango L (2012b) Groundwater quality zonation in a shallow weathered rock aquifer using GIS. Geo-spatial Information Science 15(2):95–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindha K, Elango L (2015) Cross comparison of five popular groundwater pollution vulnerability index approaches. J Hydrol 524:597–613

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brindha K, Neena Vaman KV, Srinivasan K, Sathis Babu M, Elango L (2014) Identification of surface water–groundwater interaction by hydrogeochemical indicators and assessing the suitability for drinking and irrigational purposes in Chennai, southern India. Appl Water Sci 4(2):159–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brindha K, Pavelic P, Sotoukee T, Douangsavanh S, Elango L (2016) Geochemical characteristics and groundwater quality in the Vientiane Plain, Laos. Exposure and Health. doi:10.1007/s12403-016-0224-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan S, Triantafilis J (2009) Mapping water table depth using geophysical and environmental variables. Ground Water 47:80–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen L, Feng Q (2013) Geostatistical analysis of temporal and spatial variations in groundwater levels and quality in the Minqin oasis, Northwest China. Environ Earth Sci 70:1367–1378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chester R, Jickells TD (2012) Marine geochemistry. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chiras DD (2001) Environmental science: creating a sustainable future, 6th edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc, p 731

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung SY, Venkatramanan S, Park N, Rajesh R, Ramkumar T, Kim BW (2015) An assessment of selected hydrochemical parameter trend of the Nakdong River water in South Korea, using time series analyses and PCA. Environ Monit Assess 187:4192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doneen LD (1964) Water quality for agriculture. Department of Irrigation, University of California, Davis

    Google Scholar 

  • DWAF (Department of water affairs and forestry) (1996) South African water quality guidelines (second edition). Volume 1: domestic use., Pretoria. Pp. 214

  • DWAF (2000) Strategic environmental assessment for water use Mhlathuze catchment—KZN. Report No SEA-01/2000

  • Eaton EM (1950) Significance of carbonates in irrigation waters. Soil Sci 69:123–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2012) ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Falivene O, Cabrera L, Sáez A (2007) Optimum and robust 3D facies interpolation strategies in a heterogeneous coal zone (tertiary as Pontes Basin, NW Spain). Int J Coal Geol 71:185–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Falivene O, Cabrera L, Tolosana-Delgado R, Sáez A (2010) Interpolation algorithm ranking using cross-validation and the role of smoothing effect. A coal zone example. Comput Geosci 36:512–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeze RA, Cherry JA (1979) Groundwater. Prentice Hall Inc, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Germishuyse, T. (1999) A geohydrological study of the Richards bay area. Master of Science thesis. Department f Hydrology, University of Zululand

  • Gong G, Mattevada S, O’Bryant SE (2014) Comparison of the accuracy of kriging and IDW interpolations in estimating groundwater arsenic concentrations in Texas. Environ Res 130:59–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gorai AK, Hasni SA, Iqbal J (2014) Prediction of ground water quality index to assess suitability for drinking purposes using fuzzy rule-based approach. Appl Water Sci DOI. doi:10.1007/s13201-014-0241-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundogdu KS, Guney I (2007) Spatial analyses of groundwater levels using universal kriging. Journal of Earth Systems Science 116(1):49–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helena B, Pardo R, Vega M, Barrado E, Fernandez JM, Fernandez L (2000) Temporal evolution of groundwater composition in an alluvial aquifer (Pisuerga river, Spain) by principal component analysis. Water Res 34:807–816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RK (1965) An index number system for rating water quality. J Water Pollut Control Fed 37(3):300–306

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM SPSS (International Business Machines Corporation Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) (2013) IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 22.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

  • Jankowski J, Acworth RI and Shekarforoush S (1998) Reverse ion exchange in a deeply weathered porphyritic dacite fractured aquifer system, Yass, New South Wales, Australia. In Arehart GB, & Hulston JR (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium, water–rock interaction (pp 243–246). Rotterdam: Balkema

  • Jones BF, Vengosh A, Rosenthal E, Yechieli Y (1999) Geochemical investigations. Chapter 3. In: Bear J, Sorek S, Ouazar D, Herrera I (eds) Seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers—concepts, methods and practises. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts CH (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelbe B, Germishuyse T, Snyman N, Fourie I (2001) Geohydrological studies of the primary coastal aquifer in Zululand. WRC report no.720/1/01. Water Research Commission, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly WP (1957) Adsorbed sodium cation exchange capacity and percentage sodium sorption in alkali soils. Science 84:473–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J-H, Kim R-H, Lee J, Cheong T-J, Yum B-W, Chang H-W (2005) Multivariate statistical analysis to identify the major factors governing groundwater quality in the coastal area of Kimje, South Korea. Hydrol Process 19:1261–1276. doi:10.1002/hyp.5565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar PJS, Elango L, James EJ (2014) Assessment of hydrochemistry and groundwater quality in the coastal area of South Chennai, India. Arab J Geosci 7(7):2641–2653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Li X, Meng X, Li M, Zhang Y (2016) Appraising groundwater quality and health risks from contamination in a semiarid region of northwest China. Exposure and Health 8(3):361–379. doi:10.1007/s12403-016-0205-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2010) Groundwater quality assessment based on improved water quality index in Pengyang County, Ningxia, Northwest China. E-Journal of Chemistry 7(S1):S209–S216. doi:10.1155/2010/451304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2011) Application of set pair analysis method based on entropy weight in groundwater quality assessment-a case study in Dongsheng City, Northwest China. E-Journal of Chemistry 8(2):851–858. doi:10.1155/2011/879683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Qian H, Wu J (2014) Origin and assessment of groundwater pollution and associated health risk: a case study in an industrial park, northwest China. Environ Geochem Health 36(4):693–712. doi:10.1007/s10653-013-9590-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Wu J, Qian H (2012) Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China. Environ Monit Assess 184(8):4841–4854. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2306-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd JW, Heathcote JA (1985) Natural inorganic hydrochemistry in relation to groundwater. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal D, Jha MK (2015) Identifying sources of groundwater contamination in a hard-rock aquifer system using multivariate statistical analyses and GIS-based geostatistical modeling techniques. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 4:80–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiwal D, Singh PK (2015) Understanding factors influencing groundwater levels in hard-rock aquifer systems by using multivariate statistical techniques. Environ Earth Sci 74:5639–5652

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaei R, Sakizadeh M (2016) Comparison of interpolation methods for the estimation of groundwater contamination in Andimeshk-Shush Plain, Southwest of Iran. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:2758–2769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondal NC, Singh VP (2011) Hydrochemical analysis of salinization for a tannery belt in Southern India. J Hydrol 405:235–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mouser PJ, Rizzo DM, Röling WF, Van Breukelen BM (2005) A multivariate statistical approach to spatial representation of groundwater contamination using hydrochemistry and microbial community profiles. Environ Sci Technol 39(19):7551–7559

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller TG, Pierce FJ, Schabenberger O, Warncke DD (2001) Map quality for site-specific fertility management. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65(5):1547–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park S, Yun S, Chae G, Yoo I, Shin K, Heo C, Lee S (2005) Regional hydrochemical study on salinization of coastal aquifers, western coastal area of South Korea. J Hydrol 313:182–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian H, Li P, Howard KWF, Yang C, Zhang X (2012) Assessment of groundwater vulnerability in the Yinchuan Plain, Northwest China using OREADIC. Environ Monit Assess 184(6):3613–3628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh R, Brindha K, Murugan R, Elango L (2012) Influence of hydrogeochemical processes on temporal changes in groundwater quality in a part of Nalgonda district, Andhra Pradesh India. Environ Earth Sci 65:1203–1213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA handbook 60

  • Richter BC and Kreitler CW (1993) Geochemical techniques for identifying sources of ground-water salinization. Boca Raton, Florida: C.R.C. Press, Inc.

  • Sawyer CN, McCarty PL (1978) Chemistry of environmental engineering. In: Series in water resources and environmental engineering, 3rd edn. McGraw–Hill, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze RE (1982) Agrohydrology and climatology of Natal. Published by Water Research Commission, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. Proceedings of the 1968 ACM National Conference. pp. 517–524

  • Shrestha S, Kazama F (2007) Assessment of surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques: a case study of the Fuji river basin, Japan. Environ Model Softw 22:464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds ALE (1990) Investigations into possible saline intrusion at lake Mzingazi, Richards Bay, Department of Water Affairs, Geohydrology Report no. 3711

  • Spokas K, Graff C, Morcet M, Aran C (2003) Implications of the spatial variability of landfill emission rates on geospatial analyses. Waste Manag 23:599–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK, Ramanathan AL (2008) Geochemical assessment of groundwater quality in vicinity of Bhalswa landfill, Delhi, India, using graphical and multivariate statistical methods. Environ Geol 53(7):1509–1528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stallard RF, Edmond JM (1983) Geochemistry of the Amazon: 2. The influence of geology and weathering environment on the dissolved load. J Geophy Res 88:9671–9688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stigter TY, Ribeiro L, Dill AMMC (2006) Evaluation of an intrinsic and a specific vulnerability assessment method in comparison with groundwater salinisation and nitrate contamination levels in two agricultural regions in the south of Portugal. Hydrogeol J 14:79–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcs I and Darab C (1964) The influence of irrigation water of high sodium carbonate content of soils, Proceedings of 8th ISSS, Trans vol II 802–812

  • Turekian KK (1968) Oceans. Prentice-Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, N.J

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatramanan S, Chung SY, Kim TH, Kim B-W, Selvam S (2016) Geostatistical techniques to evaluate groundwater contamination and its sources in Miryang City, Korea. Environ Earth Sci 75:994. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5813-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatramanan S, Chung SY, Rajesh R, Lee SY, Ramkumar T, Prasanna MV (2015) Comprehensive studies of hydrogeochemical processes and quality status of groundwater with tools of cluster, grouping analysis, and fuzzy set method using GIS platform: a case study of Dalcheon in Ulsan City, Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(15):11209–11223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vetrimurugan E, Elango L, Rajmohan N (2013) Sources of contaminants and groundwater quality in thecoastal part of a river delta. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10:473–486

  • WHO (World Health Organisation) (1993) Guidelines for drinking water quality, vol 1, 2nd edn, Recommendations, WHO, Geneva, p 130

  • Wilcox LV (1955) Classification and use of irrigation waters. USDA, Washington, DC Circular 969

  • Wu J, Li P, Qian H, Duan Z, Zhang X (2014) Using correlation and multivariate statistical analysis to identify hydrogeochemical processes affecting the major ion chemistry of waters: case study in Laoheba phosphorite mine in Sichuan, China. Arab J Geosci 7(10):3973–3982

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Chen T-B, Lei M, Yang J, Guo Q-J, Song B, Zhou X-Y (2011) Spatial distribution of soil heavy metal pollution estimated by different interpolation methods: accuracy and uncertainty analysis. Chemosphere 82:468–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors from the University of Zululand thank their University’s Department of Research and Innovation for financial assistance (Grant S721/15), the Department of Agriculture for assitance in chemical analysis and  the Department of Hydrology for their extended support in successful completion of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vetrimurugan Elumalai.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elumalai, V., Brindha, K., Sithole, B. et al. Spatial interpolation methods and geostatistics for mapping groundwater contamination in a coastal area. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24, 11601–11617 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8681-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8681-6

Keywords

Navigation