Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of ettringite-related swelling mechanisms for treated chromite ore processing residue

  • Short Research and Discussion Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accelerated one-dimensional unconfined swell tests were conducted for ferrous sulfate chromite ore processing residue (COPR) field-treated samples. The field-treated samples were subjected to wet and dry cycles over 100 days to accelerate the lithification of the samples. Parallel laboratory experiments were performed to investigate the effects of mineralogy on COPR swell under controlled conditions. The field and laboratory samples were treated with ferrous sulfate at a ferrous-to-Cr6+ molar stoichiometric ratios of eight (8×) and five (5×). X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)-energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analyses were used to investigate the mineralogical changes upon treatment. The swell results indicated that significant COPR swelling was observed in all of the tested samples. The swelling was more pronounced in the 5× treated COPR sample than in the 8× treated COPR sample. Moreover, the laboratory-treated samples showed greater swelling behavior as compared with the field-treated samples, which was most probably due to the high dry density of the COPR, indicating that dry density was a more dominant factor than lithification. XRPD and SEM-EDX results confirmed that significant ettringite formation occurred in all treated samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burke T, Fagliano J, Goldoft M, Hazen RE, Iglewicz R, McKee T (1991) Chromite ore processing residue in Hudson County, New Jersey. Environ Health Perspect 92:131–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysochoou M, Dermatas D (2006) Evaluation of ettringite and hydrocalumite formation for heavy metal immobilization: literature review and experimental study. J Hazard Mater 136:20–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chrysochoou M, Dermatas D, Grubb DG, Moon DH, Christodoulatos C (2010) Importance of mineralogy in the geoenvironmental characterization and treatment of chromite ore processing residue. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 36:510–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrie G (2001) Commercial extraction technology and process waste disposal in the manufacture of chromium chemicals from ore. Environ Geochem Health 23:187–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dermatas D (1995) Ettringite-induced swelling in soils: state-of-the art. Appl Mech Rev 48:659–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dermatas D, Bonaparte R, Chrysochoou M, Moon DH (2006a) Chromite ore processing residue (COPR): contaminated soil or hazardous waste?. J ASTM Int 3(7):doi: 10.1520/JAI13313

  • Dermatas D, Chrysochoou M, Moon DH, Grubb DG, Wazne M, Christodoulatos C (2006b) Ettringite-induced heave in chromite ore processing residue (COPR) upon ferrous sulfate treatment. Environ Sci Technol 40:5786–5792

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dermatas D, Chrysochoou M, Moon DH, Kaouris M, Morris J, French C (2008) Current knowledge on heaving mechanism of chromite ore processing residue. In: Proceedings of GeoCongress 2008, New Orleans, Louisiana, March 9–12

  • Elzinga EJ, Cirmo A (2010) Application of sequential extractions and X-ray absorption spectroscopy to determine the speciation of chromium in Northern New Jersey marsh soils developed in chromite ore processing residue (COPR). J Hazard Mater 183:145–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer JG, Graham MC, Thomas RP, Licona-Manzur C, Paterson E, Campbell CD (1999) Assessment and modeling of the environmental chemistry and potential for remediative treatment of chromium-contaminated land. Environ Geochem Health 21:331–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer JG, Thomas RP, Graham MC, Geelhoed JS, Lumsdon DG, Paterson E (2002) Chromium speciation and fractionation in ground and surface waters in the vicinity of chromite ore processing residue disposal sites. J Environ Monit 4:235–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham MC, Farmer JG, Anderson P, Paterson E, Hillier S, Lumsdon DG, Bewley R (2006) Calcium polysulfide remediation of hexavalent chromium contamination from chromite ore processing residue. Sci Total Environ 364:32–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ICDD (2002) Powder diffraction file.PDF-2 database release, International Centre for Diffraction Data, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, USA.

  • Jagupilla SC, Moon DH, Wazne M, Christodoulatos C, Kim MG (2009) Effects of particle size and acid addition on the remediation of chromite ore processing residue using ferrous sulfate. J Hazard Mater 168:121–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James DR (1996) The challenge of remediating chromium-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Technol 30:248A–251A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MDI (2005) Jade version 7.1. Material’s Data Inc, Livermore

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon DH, Chrysochoou M, Dermatas D, Christodoulatos C, Kaouris M, Morris J (2005) Investigation of ettringite formation in chrome ore processing residue. In: Proceedings of the 8th International In Situ and On-Site Bioremediation Symposium, Baltimore, Maryland, June 6–9

  • Moon DH, Dermatas D, Chrysochoou M, Shen G (2006) An investigation of the heaving mechanism related to chromite ore processing residue. J ASTM Int 3(6):doi: 10.1520/JAI13309

  • Moon DH, Wazne M, Dermatas D, Christodoulatos C, Sanchez AM, Grubb DG, Chrysochoou M, Kim MG (2007) Long-term treatment issues with chromite ore processing residue (COPR): Cr6+ reduction and heave. J Hazard Mater 143:629–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Puppala AJ, Intharasombat N, Vempati RK (2005) Experimental studies on ettringite-induced heaving in soils. J Geotech Geoenviron 131:325–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor HFW, Famy C, Scrivener KL (2001) Review delayed ettringite formation. Cem Concr Res 31:683–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2007) Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils and oils. Method 3051A, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Wazne M, Jagupilla SC, Moon DH, Jagupilla SC, Christodoulatos C, Kim MG (2007a) Assessment of calcium polysulfide for the remediation of hexavalent chromium in chromite ore processing residue (COPR). J Hazard Mater 143:620–628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wazne M, Moon DH, Billapati SS, Jagupilla S, Christodoulatos C, Dermatas D, Chryschoou M (2007b) Remediation of chromite ore processing residue (COPR) using ferrous sulfate and calcium polysulfide. Geosci J 11:105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weng CH, Huang CP, Allen HE, Cheng AHD, Sanders PF (1994) Chromium leaching behavior in soil derived from chromite ore processing waste. Sci Total Environ 154:71–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Deok Hyun Moon or Kyung Hoon Cheong.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Bingcai Pan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moon, D.H., Wazne, M., Dermatas, D. et al. Evaluation of ettringite-related swelling mechanisms for treated chromite ore processing residue. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22, 738–744 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3554-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3554-8

Keywords

Navigation