Environmental Science and Pollution Research

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 28–32

Tissue-based environmental quality benchmarks and standards

  • James P. Meador
  • Michael St. J. Warne
  • Peter M. Chapman
  • King Ming Chan
  • Shen Yu
  • Kenneth M. Y. Leung
Environmental Quality Benchmarks for Protecting Aquatic Ecosystems

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1714-x

Cite this article as:
Meador, J.P., Warne, M.S.J., Chapman, P.M. et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2014) 21: 28. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1714-x

Abstract

Although the use of tissue concentrations (residues) of chemical contaminants as the dose metric to characterize chemical toxicity to aquatic organisms has been gaining acceptance over the past 20 years, tissue concentrations are less commonly used in water quality management and have yet to be formally adopted as benchmarks or environmental quality standards (EQS). This synthesis paper addresses advantages and disadvantages for the development and application of tissue-based EQS as an alternative and supplement to exposure-based EQS determined with water and sediment concentration data. Tissue-based EQS can be readily developed in parallel with conventional toxicity tests, and achieved by quantification of chemical concentrations in tissue alongside traditional concentration-response toxicity testing. Tissue-residue toxicity metrics can be used as benchmarks for screening and monitoring water and sediment quality, to derive equivalent water or sediment EQS, and for ecological risk assessments and weight of evidence approaches for assessing ecosystem impairment. Tissue-based toxicity metrics and associated EQS provide several advantages; however, there are some limitations to consider and key knowledge gaps to fill.

Keywords

Tissue benchmarksWeight of evidenceEnvironmental risk assessmentTissue-residue approachEnvironmental quality standards

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • James P. Meador
    • 1
  • Michael St. J. Warne
    • 2
  • Peter M. Chapman
    • 3
  • King Ming Chan
    • 4
  • Shen Yu
    • 5
  • Kenneth M. Y. Leung
    • 6
  1. 1.NOAA Fisheries, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Fish Health ProgramSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Water Quality and Investigations, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Science, Science Delivery, Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the ArtsBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.Golder AssociatesBurnabyCanada
  4. 4.Chinese University of Hong Kong, Faculty of ScienceSchool of Life SciencesSha TinChina
  5. 5.Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Urban Environment, Key Laboratory of Urban Environment and HealthXiamenChina
  6. 6.The Swire Institute of Marine Science and School of Biological SciencesThe University of Hong KongPokfulamChina