Skip to main content
Log in

Sample-based estimation of “contagion metric” using line intersect sampling method (LIS)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Landscape and Ecological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantification of landscape pattern is of primary interest in landscape ecological studies. For quantification purposes, a large number of landscape metrics have been developed, with definitions based on measurable patch attributes. Calculation of these metrics is commonly conducted on wall-to-wall maps, whereas a new interest is to use sample data. It is argued that a sample survey takes less time and results are more reliable. The overall objective in this paper was to present the potential of the line interest sampling method for estimating a special contagion metric. The specific objective was to assess statistical properties in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) and bias of the contagion metric estimator. This study was conducted on 50.1 km2 already manually delineated land cover maps from the National Inventory of Landscape in Sweden. Monte-Carlo sampling simulation was employed to assess the statistical properties of the estimator. The simulation was conducted for different combinations of two sampling designs, four sample sizes, five lines transect configurations, three lines transect lengths, and two classification systems. The systematic sampling design resulted in lower RMSE and bias compared to a simple random one. Both RMSE and bias of the contagion estimator tended to decrease with increasing sample size and line transect length. We recommend using a combination of systematic sampling design, straight line configuration and long line transect. We conclude that there is no need to use mapped data and thus polygon delineation errors can considerably be reduced or eliminated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Affleck DLR, Gregoire TG, Valentine HT (2005) Design unbiased estimation in line intersect sampling using segmented transects. Environ Ecol Stat 12:139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T (2004) Object-based contextual image classification built on image segmentation. In: IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, pp 113–119

  • Cain DH, Riitters K, Orvis K (1997) A multi-scale analysis of landscape statistics. Landsc Ecol 12:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corona P, Chirici G, Travaglini D (2004) Forest ecotone survey by line intersect sampling. Can J For Res 34:1776–1783. doi:10.1139/X04-045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eiden G, Jadues P, Theis R (2005) Linear landscape features in the European Union. Developing indicators related to linear landscape features based on LUCAS transect data

  • Frohn RC (1998) Remote sensing for landscape ecology: new metric indicators for monitoring, modeling, and assessment of ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG, Valentine HT (2008) Sampling strategies for natural resources and the environment Boca Raton, Fla. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson JE (1998) Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: what is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassett EM, Stehman SV, Wickham JD (2011) Estimating landscape pattern metrics from a sample of land cover. Landsc Ecol 27(1):1–17. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9657-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazard J, Pickford S (1986) Simulation studies on Line intersect sampling of forest residue, part II. For Sci 32:447–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunsaker CT, O’Neill RV, Jackson BL, Timmins SP, Levine DA, Norton DJ (1994) Sampling to characterize landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 9:207–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenness JS (2004) Calculating landscape surface area from digital elevation models. Wildl Soc Bull 32:829–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinn C (2000) Estimating metrics of forest spatial pattern from large area forest inventory cluster samples. For Sci 46:548–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinn C, Kändler G, Schnell S (2011) Estimating forest edge length from forest inventory sample data. Can J For Res 41:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Reynolds J (1993) A new contagion index to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landsc Ecol 8:155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunetta RS, Congalton RG, Fenstermaker LK, Jensen JR, Mcgwire KC, Tinney LR (1991) Remote-sensing and geographic information-system data integration—error sources and research issues. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 57:677–687

    Google Scholar 

  • Matérn B (1964) A method of estimating the total length of roads by means of line survey. Studia forestalia Suecica 18:68–70

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Marks EJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape pattern. General technical report 351. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station

  • NIJOS (2001) Norwegian 3Q monitoring program. Norwegian institute of land inventory

  • O’Neill RV, Krumme JR, Gardner HR, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelist DL, Milne BT, Turner M, Zygmunt B, Christensen SW, Dale VH, Graham LR (1988) Indices of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol 1:153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezani H (2010) Deriving landscape metrics from sample data (PhD thesis). In: Faculty of Forest Sciences Department of Forest Resource Management 72. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Umeå

  • Ramezani H, Holm S (2011) Sample based estimation of landscape metrics: accuracy of line intersect sampling for estimating edge density and Shannon’s diversity. Environ Ecol Stat 18:109–130. doi:10.1007/s10651-009-0123-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezani H, Holm S (2012) A distance dependent contagion functions for vector-based data. Environ Ecol Stat 19:161–181. doi:10.1007/s10651-011-0180-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramezani H, Holm S (2013) Estimating a distance dependent contagion function using point sample data. Environ Ecol Stat 21:61–82. doi:10.1007/s10651-013-0244-5

  • Ramezani H, Holm S, Allard A, Ståhl G (2010) Monitoring landscape metrics by point sampling: accuracy in estimating Shannon’s diversity and edge density. Environ Monit Assess 164:403–421. doi:10.1007/s10661-009-0902-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramezani H, Holm S, Allard A, Ståhl G (2013) A review of sampling based approaches for estimating landscape metrics. Nor J Geogr 67(2):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C, Corona P, Marchetti M (2003) Beware of contagion! Landsc Urban Plan 62:173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL (1995) A factor-analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol 10:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Wickham JD (1996) A note on contagion indices for landscape analysis. Landsc Ecol 11:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl G (1998) Transect relascope sampling—a method for the quantification of coarse woody debris. For Sci 44:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståhl G, Allard A, Esseen P-A, Glimskär A, Ringvall A, Svensson J, Sture Sundquist S, Christensen P, Gallegos Torell Å, Högström M, Lagerqvist K, Marklund L, Nilsson B, Inghe O (2011) National Inventory of Landscapes in Sweden (NILS)—scope, design, and experiences from establishing a multi-scale biodiversity monitoring system. Environ Monit Assess 173:579–595. doi:10.1007/s10661-010-1406-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade TG, Wickham JD, Nash MS, Neale AC, Riitters KH, Jones KB (2003) A comparison of vector and raster GIS methods for calculating landscape metrics used in environmental assessments. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 69:1399–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD, Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Jones KB, Wade TG (1996) Landscape ‘contagion’ in raster and vector environments. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 10:891–899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA, Moss MR (2005) Issues and perspectives in landscape ecology. In: Cambridge studies in landscape ecology, vol 390. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • With KA, Gardner RH, Turner MG (1997) Landscape connectivity and population distributions in heterogeneous environments. Oikos 78:151–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wulder MA, White JC, Hay GJ, Castilla G (2008) Towards automated segmentation of forest inventory polygons on high spatial resolution satellite imagery. For Chronicle 84:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the three anonymous referees for their valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habib Ramezani.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5 and 6.

Table 5 Estimated range and mean of RMSE for the contagion estimator over 48.1-km2 NILS plots for some sampling combinations and for a system with seven classes
Table 6 Estimated range and mean of RMSE for the contagion estimator over 50.1-km2 NILS plots for some sampling combinations and for a system with 20 classes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramezani, H., Holm, S. Sample-based estimation of “contagion metric” using line intersect sampling method (LIS). Landscape Ecol Eng 11, 239–248 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0260-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-014-0260-0

Keywords

Navigation