Skip to main content
Log in

User Influence on Two Complementary Residual Stress Determination Methods: Contour Method and Incremental X-Ray Diffraction

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The combination of various residual stress measurement methods is a common practice to complete knowledge that a single measurement method cannot provide. In this study, incremental X-Ray diffraction is combined with the contour method to measure a bent notched specimen to study the methods robustness. A finite element analysis model is built and validated with strain measurement of the bending process thus providing prior knowledge of the residual stress field. Three-dimensional neutron diffraction residual stress measurements are also performed to obtain a reference measurement with a non-destructive method and to validate the simulated stress field. In-depth stress gradient measured by X-ray diffraction is corrected with four different methods that all show good correlation with neutron diffraction measurements. Correction methods, assumptions and uncertainties are discussed and differences are observed on the robustness of the methods. Contour method measurements are performed and results are also in agreement with neutron measurements. The results provided by the contour method are complementary to those of the X-Ray diffraction since, despite a lower accuracy on the edges where X-ray diffraction is performed, the contour method offers the complete cartography of longitudinal stress in a symmetry plane of the bent specimen. Uncertainty of the contour method due to the post-processing procedure is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McCLUNG RC (2007) A literature survey on the stability and significance of residual stresses during fatigue. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 30(3):173–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Withers PJ (2007) Residual stress and its role in failure. Rep Prog Phys 70(12):2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schajer GS, Ruud CO (2013) Overview of residual stresses and their measurement. Practical residual stress measurement methods, Schajer GS, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 1–27

  4. Perenda J, Trajkovski J, Žerovnik A, Prebil I (2015) Residual stresses after deep rolling of a torsion bar made from high strength steel. J Mater Process Technol 218:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Epp J, Surm H, Hirsch T, Hoffmann F (2011) Residual stress relaxation during heating of bearing rings produced in two different manufacturing chains. J Mater Process Technol 211(4):637–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pagliaro P, Prime MB, Robinson JS, Clausen B, Swenson H, Steinzig M, Zuccarello B (2010) Measuring inaccessible residual stresses using multiple methods and superposition. Exp Mech 51(7):1123–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Toparli MB, Fitzpatrick ME, Gungor S (2015) Determination of multiple near-surface residual stress components in laser peened aluminum alloy via the contour method. Metall Mater Trans A 46(9):4268–4275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xie P, Zhao H, Wu B, Gong S (2015) Evaluation of residual stresses relaxation by post weld heat treatment using contour method and x-ray diffraction method. Exp Mech 55(7):1329–1337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Elmesalamy A, Francis JA, Li L (2014) A comparison of residual stresses in multi pass narrow gap laser welds and gas-tungsten arc welds in AISI 316 L stainless steel. Int J Press Vessels Pip 113:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scholz J (2002) Experimental analysis and modelling of the mechanical behaviour of an unstable austenitic stainless steel, Paris 6

  11. Voce E (1955) A practical strain-hardening function. Metallurgica 51:219–226

    Google Scholar 

  12. Armstrong PJ, Frederick CO, Central Electricity Generating Board (1966) A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect

  13. Hauk V (1997) Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods A2 - . structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., iii

  14. Prévey P (1986) X-ray diffraction residual stress techniques. ASM, 380–392

  15. Moore MG, Evans WP (1958) Mathematical correction for stress in removed layers in x-ray diffraction residual stress analysis, SAE International, Warrendale, PA, SAE Technical Paper 580035

  16. Pedersen TF, Hansson ILH (1989) Finite element calculations for correction of residual stress profiles of coated and uncoated materials measured by X-ray diffraction. NDT Int 22(6):347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lambda Research (1996) Finite element correction for stress relaxation in complex geometries

  18. Savaria V, Bridier F, Bocher P (2012) Computational quantification and correction of the errors induced by layer removal for subsurface residual stress measurements. Int J Mech Sci 64(1):184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray CE, Cevdet Noyan I (2013) Applied and residual stress determination using x-ray diffraction. Practical residual stress measurement methods, Schajer GS, Ed. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 139–161

  20. Savaria V, Monajati H, Bridier F, Bocher P (2015) Measurement and correction of residual stress gradients in aeronautical gears after various induction surface hardening treatments. J Mater Process Technol 220:113–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Prime MB (2000) Cross-sectional mapping of residual stresses by measuring the surface contour after a cut. J Eng Mater Technol 123(2):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. De Wald AT, Prime MB (2013) The contour method. practical residual stress measurement methods. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kjer WJHM (2010) Evaluation of surface registration algorithms for PET motion correction

  24. MATLAB and Statistics Toolbox Release (2012b) The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States. Csaps function, Cubic smoothing spline

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial support of DGA/MRIS (Mission for Scientific Research and Innovation) is gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank the Laboratoire Léon Brillouin of the CEA Saclay for the beamtime at line G 5-2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Levieil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levieil, B., Bridier, F., Doudard, C. et al. User Influence on Two Complementary Residual Stress Determination Methods: Contour Method and Incremental X-Ray Diffraction. Exp Mech 56, 1641–1652 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0189-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0189-3

Keywords

Navigation