Skip to main content
Log in

In-Situ SEM J-Testing and Crack-Tip Micromechanics of Zircaloy-4 by Three-Point Bending

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-point bend fixture has been designed, fabricated, and utilized to demonstrate the feasibility of performing in-situ J-testing at ambient and elevated temperatures inside a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Using the three-point bend test technique, in-situ SEM J-testing has been performed to measure the crack mouth opening displacement and crack extension as a function of the applied load in order to generate J-R curves for Zircaloy-4 at 25°C and 316°C. Once the J-R curve is determined, an equivalent KJ-resistance (KJ-R) curve is computed on the basis of a relationship between the J-integral (J) and the stress intensity factor (K). The J-R and KJ-R curves of Zircaloy-4 exhibit a rising R-curve behavior, while the elastic K-R curve underestimates the fracture resistance of Zircaloy-4 once substantial crack extension has occurred. For the specimen dimensions considered, the J-R curves generated by in-situ SEM J-tests are not sensitive to the specimen geometry and measure the actual fracture resistance of the material. Furthermore, the onset of crack extension is dictated by the emission of one or more slipbands from the crack tip, and a change in the crack-tip displacement field, followed by void formation along the slipband, and linkage of the voids with the main crack.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Holt RA (1970) The beta to alpha phase transformation in Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 35:322–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Woo OT, Tangri K (1979) Transformation characteristics of rapidly heated and overheated Zircaloy-4 oxygen alloys. J Nucl Mater 79:82–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woo OT, Tseng D, Tangri K, MacEwen SR (1979) Flow stress and dynamic strain-aging of β-transformed Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 87:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kreyns PH, Bourgeois WF, White CJ, Carpenter PL, Kammenzind BF, Franklin DG (1996) Embrittlement of reactor core materials in zirconium in the nuclear industry. In: ASTM STP 1295, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 758–782

  5. Arias D, Palacios T, Turrillo C (1987) Composition of precipitates present in Zircaloy-2 and 4. J Nucl Mater 148:227–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lemaignan C, Motta AT (1994) Zirconium alloys in nuclear applications, nuclear materials, B. R. T. Frost, ed., Vol. 10B, Chapter 7, Materials science and technology, Cahn RW, Haasen P, Kramer EJ (eds), VCH, New York, pp. 1–51

  7. Bertolino G, Meyer G, Ipiña JP (2003) In situ crack growth observation and fracture toughness measurement of hydrogen charged Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 322:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yawny AA, Ipiña JP (2003) In situ fracture toughness measurement using scanning electron microscopy. J Test Eval 31(5):413–423

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cockeram BV, Chan KS (2009) In situ studies and modeling the fracture of Zircaloy-4. J Nucl Mater 393:387–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bertolino G, Meyer G, Ipiña JP (2002) Mechanical properties degradation at room temperatures in ZRY-4 by hydrogen brittleness. Mater Res 5(2):125–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Raynaud PA, Koss DA, Motta AT, Chan KS (2007) Fracture toughness of hydrided Zircaloy-4 sheet under through-thickness crack growth conditions. Paper ID JAI101183. J ASTM Int 5(1):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagy A, Campbell JB, Davidson DL (1984) A high temperature cyclic loading stage for the SEM. Rev Sci Instrum 55:778–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Castrodeza EM, Bastian FL, Yawny A, Ipiña JP (2002) Fracture micromechanisms of fibre-metal laminates: In-situ SEM observations. J Compos Mater 36:387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chan KS, Kim Y-W (1994) Relationships of slip morphology, microcracking, and fracture resistance in a lamellar TiAl-alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 25A:1217–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chan KS, Shih DS (1997) Fatigue and fracture behavior of a fine-grained lamellar TiAl alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 28A:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan KS, Shih DS (1998) Fundamental aspects of fatigue fracture in a TiAl sheet alloy. Metall Mater Trans A 29A:73–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cockeram BV, Chan KS (2008) In-situ fracture studies and modeling of the toughening mechanism present in wrought LCAC, TZM, and ODS molybdenum flat products. Metall Mater Trans A 39A:2045–2067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM E 1820-99 Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness, American Society for Testing and Materials, Section 3, Vol. 03.01, pp. 981–1013

  20. Anderson TL (1995) Fracture mechanics, Secondth edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (Chapter 3, pp. 117-178; Chapter 7; pp. 385–421)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Murakami Y (1987) Stress intensity factors handbook: vol. 1. Pergamon Press, NY, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YJ (2002) Experimental J estimation equations for single-edge-cracked bars in four-point bend: homogeneous and bi-material specimens. Eng Fract Mech 69:793–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim Y-J, Schwalbe K-H (2001) On experimental J estimation equations based on CMOD for SE(B) specimens. J Test Eval 29:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zerbst U, Heinimann M, Donne CD, Steglich D (2009) Fracture and damage mechanics modeling of thin-walled structure – an overview. Eng Fract Mech 76:5–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weitzman RH, Finnie I (1972) Measuring fracture toughness – a simplified test method for plane-strain fracture toughness using controlled crack propagation. J Mater 7:294–299

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hutchinson JW (1968) Singular behavior at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material. J Mech Phys Solid 16:18–31

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rice JR, Rosengren GF (1968) Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material. J Mech Phys Solid 16:1–12

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Rice JR, Drugan WJ, Sham TL (1980) Elastic-plastic analysis of growing cracks. In: ASTM STP 700, American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 189–221

  29. Chan KS (1990) Crack tip behaviors of stationary and growing cracks in Al-Fe-X alloy: Part II – Crack opening profile. Metall Trans A 21A:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nakamura T, Parks DM (1988) Conditions for J-dominance in three-dimensional thin cracked plates. In: Rosakis AJ, Ravi-Chandar K, Rajapukse Y (eds) Analytical, numerical and experimental aspects of the three dimensional fracture process, vol. 91. ASME, AMD, New York, NY, pp 227–238

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the contributions by Mr. Forrest Campbell in the design of the three-point bend test fixture, Mr. Jose Martinez in performing the in-situ J-testing, and Ms. Loretta Mesa in assisting with the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. S. Chan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chan, K.S. In-Situ SEM J-Testing and Crack-Tip Micromechanics of Zircaloy-4 by Three-Point Bending. Exp Mech 52, 1251–1265 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9587-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9587-8

Keywords

Navigation