Skip to main content
Log in

Nanomechanical Property and Nanowear Measurements for Sub-10-nm Thick Films in Magnetic Storage

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the magnetic storage industry, thin film carbon overcoats play a critical role in reducing magnetic and physical spacing between the recording slider and the rotating disk so that the information stored per unit area is maximized. Thin film carbon overcoats have been improved such that they exhibit higher hardness with lower thickness of few nanometers and still being able to perform reliably. In this paper, nanoindentation and nanoscratch techniques to measure nanomechanical properties, namely hardness, elastic modulus and shear strength of thin solid films were presented along with a recently developed high resolution force transducer. Nanowear behavior characterization techniques were also examined and were applied to commercially available magnetic disks to characterize their wear behavior. It was shown that the properties and wear behavior of sub-10-nm thick film carbon overcoats were reliably measured. These techniques could be applied to different thin solid films on substrates, and they are not restricted to magnetic storage systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wood RW, Miles J, Olson T (2002) Recording technologies for terabit per square inch systems. IEEE Trans Magn 38(4):1711–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oliver WC, Pharr GM (1992) Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 7(6):1564–1580.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Herbert EG, Pharr GM, Oliver WC, Lucas BN, Hay JL (2001) On the measurement of stress–strain curves by spherical indentation. Thin Solid Films 398–399, 331–335.

  4. Kulkarni AV, Bhushan B (1996) Nano/picoindentation measurements on single-crystal aluminum using modified atomic force microscopy. Mater Lett 29(4–6):221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lim YY, Chaudhri MM (2001) Do residual nano indentations in metals and ceramics relax with time? J Phys D Appl Phys 34(13):L70–L78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yu N, Bonin WA, Polycarpou AA (2005) High-resolution capacitive load-displacement transducer and its application in nanoindentation and adhesion force measurements. Review of Scientific Instruments 76(4):045109-1-045109-8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kohzaki M, Matsumuro A, Hayashi T, Muramatsu M, Yamaguchi K (1997) Preparation of carbon nitride thin films by ion beam assisted deposition and their mechanical properties. Thin Solid Films 308–309, 239–244.

  8. Scharf TW, Deng H, Barnard JA (1997) Nanowear/nanomechanical testing and the role of stress in sputtered CNx overcoats. J Appl Physi 81(8):5393–5935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lemoine P, Zhao JF, Quinn JP, McLaughlin JA, Maguire P (2000) Hardness measurements at shallow depths on ultra-thin amorphous carbon films deposited onto silicon and Al2O3-TiC substrate. Thin Solid Films 379:166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yu N, Polycarpou AA (2004) Use of the focused ion beam technique to produce a sharp spherical diamond indenter for sub-10 nm nanoindentation measurements. J Vac Sci Technol B 22(2):668–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tayebi N, Conry TF, Polycarpou AA (2003) Determination of hardness from nanoscratch experiments: Corrections for interfacial shear stress and elastic recovery. J Mater Res 18(9):2150–2162.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tayebi N, Polycarpou AA, Conry TF (2004) Effects of the substrate on the determination of hardness of thin films by the nanoscratch and nanoindentation techniques. J Mater Res 19(6):1791–1802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tayebi N, Conry TF, Polycarpou AA (2004) Reconciliation of nanoscratch hardness with nanoindentation hardness including the effects of interface shear stress. J Mater Res 19(11):3316–3323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goddard J, Wilman H (1962) A theory of friction and wear during the abrasion of metals. Wear 5:114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Komvopoulos K, Saka N, Suh NP (1985) Mechanism of friction in boundary lubrication. ASME Journal of Tribology 107:452–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kral DR, Komvopoulos K, Bogy DB (1996) Hardness of thin film media: Scratch experiments and finite element simulations. ASME Journal of Tribology 118:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee KM, Polycarpou AA (2006) Shear strength determination using the nanoscratch technique and its application to thin solid films. J Mater Res 21(9).

  18. Archard JF (1953) Contact and rubbing of flat surface. J Appl Physi 24:981–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao X, Bhushan B (1998) Material removal mechanisms of single-crystal silicon on nanoscale and at ultralow loads. Wear 223:66–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lu W, Komvopoulos K (2001) Nanotribological and nanomechanical properties of ultrathin amorphous carbon films synthesized by radio frequency sputtering. ASME Journal of Tribology 123:641–650.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sneddon IN (1965) The relation between load and the penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci 3:44–57.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Bückle H (1973) The science of hardness testing and its research applications. In: Westbrook JH, Conrad H (eds) American Society of Metals, Metals Park. OH.

  23. Xu Z, Rowcliffe D (2004) Finite element analysis of substrate effect on indentation behavior of thin films. Thin Solid Films 447–448, 399–405.

  24. Saha R, Xue Z, Huang Y, Nix WD (2001) Indentation of a soft metal film on a hard substrate: Strain gradient hardening effect. J Mech Phys Solids 49(9):1997–2014.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Boussinesq J (1885) Application des potentials a l’etude de l’equilibre du movement des solides elastiqeus. Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tabor D (1951) Hardness of metals. Claredon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hertz H (1896) On the contact of rigid elastic solids. J. Reine und Angewandte Mathmatik, 92, 156 (1882), English Translation by Jones and Schott, London Macmillan.

  28. Mindlin RD (1949) Compliance of elastic bodies in contact. J Appl Mech 16:259–268.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamilton GM, Goodman LE (1966) The stress field created by a circular sliding contact. J Appl Mech 33:371–376.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hamilton GM (1983) Explicit equations for the stresses beneath a sliding spherical contact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Mechanical Engineering Science 197:53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sackfield A, Hills DA (1983) Some useful results in the tangentially loaded Hertz contact problem. J Strain Anal 18(2):107–110.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bryant MD, Keer LM (1982) Rough contact between elastically and geometrically similar curved bodies. J Appl Mech 49:345–352.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Kuhn L, Corcoran S, Wyrobek T (1998) Measuring the hardness of ultra-thin coatings. Data Storage Magazine, July, 55–57.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Polycarpou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, K.M., Yeo, CD. & Polycarpou, A.A. Nanomechanical Property and Nanowear Measurements for Sub-10-nm Thick Films in Magnetic Storage. Exp Mech 47, 107–121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-9393-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-9393-x

Keywords

Navigation