Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elastic Properties and Representative Volume Element of Polycrystalline Silicon for MEMS

  • Published:
Experimental Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A nanoscale mechanical deformation measurement method was employed to obtain the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of polycrystalline silicon for Microelectromechanical Systems (MEMS) from different facilities, and to assess the scale at which these effective properties are valid in MEMS design. The method, based on in situ Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) imaging and Digital Image Correlation (DIC) analysis, employed 2–2.5 μm thick freestanding specimens with surface measurement areas varying between 1×2 and 5×15 μm2. The effective mechanical properties were quite invariant with respect to the fabrication facility: the Poisson’s ratio of polycrystalline silicon from the Multi-user MEMS Processes (MUMPs) and from Sandia’s Ultra planar four layer Multilevel MEMS Technology (SUMMiT-IV) was 0.22±0.02, while the elastic moduli for MUMPs and SUMMiT-IV polysilicon were 164±7 and 155±6 GPa, respectively. The AFM/DIC method was used to determine the size of the material domain whose mechanical behavior could be described by the isotropic constants. For SUMMiT polysilicon with columnar grains and 650 nm average grain size, it was found that a 10×10-μm2 specimen area, on average containing 15×15 columnar grains, was a representative volume element. However, the axial displacement fields in 4×4 or 2×2 μm2 areas could be highly inhomogeneous and the effective behavior of these specimen domains could deviate significantly from that described by isotropy. As a consequence, the isotropic material constants are applicable to MEMS components comprised of 15×15 or more grains, corresponding to specimen areas equal to 10×10 μm2 for SUMMiT and 5×5 μm2 for MUMPs, and do not provide an accurate description of the mechanics of smaller MEMS components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chasiotis I, Knauss WG (2003) Experimentation at the micron- and submicron scale. In: Gerberich W, Yang W (eds) Comprehensive structural integrity vol. 8. Interfacial and nanoscale failure. Elsevier Science, pp 41–87.

  2. Sharpe WN Jr, Yuan B, Edwards RL (1997) A new technique for measuring the mechanical properties of thin films. J Microelectromechanical Syst 6(3):193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jayaraman S, Edwards RL, Hemker KJ (1999) Relating mechanical testing and microstructural features of polysilicon thin films. J Mater Res 14(3):688–697.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vlassak JJ, Nix WD (1992) A new bulge test technique for the determination of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of thin films. J Mater Res 7(12):3242–3249.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cho S, Cárdenas-García JF, Chasiotis I (2005) Measurement of nano-displacements and elastic properties of MEMS via the microscopic hole method. Sens Actuators A Phys 120:163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mullen RL, Ballarini R, Yin Y, Heuer AH (1997) Monte Carlo simulation of effective elastic constants of polycrystalline thin films. Acta Mater 45(6):2247–2255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drugan WJ, Willis JR (1996) A micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites. J Mech Phys Solids 44(4):497–524.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu C (2005) On the minimum size of representative volume element: an experimental investigation. Exp Mech 45(3):238–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koester DA, Mahadevan R, Hardy B, Markus KW (2001) MUMPs design handbook. Revision 6.0.

  10. Sniegowski JJ (1996) Multi-level polysilicon surface-micromachining technology: applications and issues. International mechanical engineering congress and exposition. Proceedings of the ASME aerospace division AD 52, pp 751–759.

  11. Schriner H, Davies B, Sniegowski J, Rodgers MS, Allen J, Shepard C (1998) Sandia agile MEMS prototyping, layout tools, education and services program. 2nd international conference on engineering design and automation, Maui, Hawaii.

  12. Hetherington DL, Sniegowski JJ (1998) Improved polysilicon surface – micromachined micromirror devices using chemical–mechanical polishing. Proc SPIE 3440:148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dyck CW, Smith J, Miller S, Russick E, Adkins C (1996) Supercritical carbon dioxide solvent extraction from surface – micromachined micromechanical structures. Proc SPIE 2879:225–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen BD, de Boer MP, Masters ND, Bitsie F, LaVan DA (2001) Interferometry of actuated microcantilevers to determine material properties and test structure nonidealities in MEMS. J Microelectromechanical Syst 10(3):336–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chasiotis I, Knauss WG (2002) A new microtensile tester for the study of MEMS materials with the aid of atomic force microscopy. Exp Mech 42(1):51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho SW, Chasiotis I, Friedman TA, Sullivan J (2005) Direct measurements of Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and failure properties of ta-C MEMS. J Micromechanics Microengineering 25(4):728–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutton MA, Wolters WJ, Peters WH, Ranson WF, McNeil SR (1983) Determination of displacements using an improved digital image correlation method. Image Vis Comput 1(3):133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knauss WG, Chasiotis I, Huang Y (2003) Mechanical measurements at the micron and nanometer scales. Mech Mater 35(3–6):217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chasiotis I (2004) Mechanics of thin films and microdevices. IEEE Trans Dev Mat Rel 4(2):176–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nye JF (1985) Physical properties of crystals. Clarendon, Oxford, p 145.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brantley WA (1973) Calculated elastic constants for stress problems associated with semiconductor devices. J Appl Phys 44(1):534–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Voigt W (1928) Lehrbuch der kristallphysik, 2nd edn. B.G. Teubner, Leipsig, pp 962–963.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Reuss A (1929) Berechnung der fliessgrenze von mischkristallen auf grund der plastizitätts-bediengung für einkristalle. Z Angew Math Mech 9(1):49–58.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren ZY, Zheng QS (2002) A quantitative study of minimum sizes of representative volume elements of cubic polycrystals – numerical experiments. J Mech Phys Solids 50:881–893.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Elvin AA (1996) Number of grains required to homogenenize elastic properties of polycrystalline ice. Mech Mater 22:51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chasiotis I, Cho SW, Jonnalagadda K (2006) Fracture toughness and subcritical crack growth in polycrystalline silicon. J Appl Mech 73(5):714–722.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Chasiotis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cho, S.W., Chasiotis, I. Elastic Properties and Representative Volume Element of Polycrystalline Silicon for MEMS. Exp Mech 47, 37–49 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-0405-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-006-0405-7

Keywords

Navigation