Abstract
With reference to a questionnaire aimed at assessing the performance of Italian nursing homes on the basis of the health conditions of their patients, we investigate two relevant issues: dimensionality of the latent structure and discriminating power of the items composing the questionnaire. The approach is based on a multidimensional item response theory model, which assumes a two-parameter logistic parameterization for the response probabilities. This model represents the health status of a patient by latent variables having a discrete distribution and, therefore, it may be seen as a constrained version of the latent class model. On the basis of the adopted model, we implement a hierarchical clustering algorithm aimed at assessing the actual number of dimensions measured by the questionnaire. These dimensions correspond to disjoint groups of items. Once the number of dimensions is selected, we also study the discriminating power of every item, so that it is possible to select the subset of these items which is able to provide an amount of information close to that of the full set. We illustrate the proposed approach on the basis of the data collected on 1,051 elderly people hosted in a sample of Italian nursing homes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In B.N. Petrov & F. Csáki (Eds.), Proceedings of the second international symposium of information theory (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akadémiai Kiado.
Anderson, G.F., & Hussey, P.S. (2000). Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. Health Affairs, 19, 191–203.
Bartolucci, F. (2007). A class of multidimensional IRT models for testing unidimensionality and clustering items. Psychometrika, 72, 141–157.
Bozdogan, H. (1987). Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.
Bozdogan, H. (1993). Choosing the number of component clusters in the mixture-model using a new informational complexity criterion of the inverse-Fisher information matrix. In O. Opitz, B. Lausen, & R. Klar (Eds.), Information and classification: concepts, methods and applications (pp. 40–54). Berlin: Springer.
Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., & Rubin, D.B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.
Dias, J. (2006). Model selection for the binary latent class model: a Monte Carlo simulation. In V. Batagelj, H.-H. Bock, A. Ferligoj, & A. Žiberna (Eds.), Data science and classification (pp. 91–99). New York: Springer.
Forero, C.G., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2009). Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods. Psychological Methods, 14, 275–299.
Goodman, L.A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215–231.
Goodman, L.A. (1978). Analyzing qualitative/categorical data: log-linear models and latent-structure analysis. London: Addison-Wesley.
Harrington, C., Collier, E., O’Meara, J., Kitchener, M., Simon, L.P., & Schnelle, J.F. (2003). Federal and state nursing facility websites: just what the consumer needs? American Journal of Medical Quality, 18, 21–37.
Hawes, C., Morris, J.N., Phillips, C.D., Fries, B.E., Murphy, K., & Mor, V. (1997). Development of the nursing home resident assessment instrument in the USA. Age and Ageing, 26, 19–25.
Hirdes, J.P., Zimmerman, D., Hallman, K.G., & Soucie, P.S. (1998). Use of the MDS quality indicators to assess quality of care in institutional settings. Canadian Journal for Quality in Health Care, 14, 5–11.
Kohler, H.-P., Billari, F.C., & Ortega, J.A. (2002). The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s. Population and Development Review, 28, 641–680.
Lattanzio, F., Mussi, C., Scafato, E., Ruggiero, C., Dell’Aquila, G., Pedone, C., et al. (2010). Health care for older people in Italy: the U.L.I.S.S.E. project (Un Link Informatico sui Servizi Sanitari Esistenti per l’Anziano—a computerized network on health care services for older people). Journal of Nutrition Health & Aging, 14, 238–242.
Lazarsfeld, P.F., & Henry, N.W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Martin-Löf, P. (1973). Statistiska modeller. Stockholm: Institütet för Försäkrings-matemetik och Matematisk Statistisk vid Stockholms Universitet.
Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Cai, L. (2006). A cautionary note on using G2(dif) to assess relative model fit in categorical data analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 55–64.
McLachlan, G.J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
Mor, V., Berg, K., Angelelli, J., Gifford, D., Morris, J., & Moore, T. (2003). The quality of quality measurement in U.S. nursing homes. Gerontologist, 43, 37–46.
Morris, J., Hawes, C., Murphy, K., Nonemaker, S., Phillips, C., Fries, B., et al. (1991). Resident assessment instrument: training manual and resource guide. Natick: Eliot Press.
Nylund, K.L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B.O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535–569.
Phillips, C.D., Hawes, C., Lieberman, T., & Koren, M.J. (2007). Where should Momma go? Current nursing home performance measurement strategies and a less ambitious approach. BMC Health Services Research, 7.
Rasch, G. (1961). On general laws and the meaning of measurement in psychology. In J. Neyman (Ed.), Proceedings of the fourth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Vol. 4, pp. 321–333). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.
Smyth, P. (2000). Model selection for probabilistic clustering using cross-validated likelihood. Statistics and Computing, 10, 63–72.
Zimmerman, D.R. (2003). Improving nursing home quality of care through outcomes data: the MDS quality indicators. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 250–257.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the financial support from “Regione Umbria” and from “Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia”. We also thank the editor and the referees for helpful comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bartolucci, F., Montanari, G.E. & Pandolfi, S. Dimensionality of the Latent Structure and Item Selection Via Latent Class Multidimensional IRT Models. Psychometrika 77, 782–802 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9278-0
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-012-9278-0