Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aerobic capacities, anaerobic power, and anthropometric characteristics of elite female canoe polo players based on playing position

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sport Sciences for Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the aerobic capacities, anaerobic power, and anthropometric characteristics of elite female canoe polo players. A secondary purpose was to investigate positional differences between goalkeepers (GKs), flat 3 defenders (FDFs), and chase defenders (CHDFs).

Methods

Twenty-one elite female canoe polo players (age 26.8 ± 2.1 years; height 166.9 ± 5.2 cm; body mass 61.4 ± 7.1 kg; and percent body fat 21.0 ± 3.8%) volunteered. Anthropometric variables, peak oxygen uptake (\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)), ventilatory threshold (VT), anaerobic peak power output (PPO), and mean power output (MPO) were determined.

Results

\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{ 2 {\text{peak}}}} \) was 40.88 ± 4.0 ml kg−1 min−1 or 2.50 ± 0.29 l min−1, VT was 79.1 ± 8.6 \( \% \dot{V}O_{2peak} \), PPO was 348.7 ± 32.1 W, 5.66 ± 0.64 W kg−1, and MPO was 266.5 ± 29.4 W, 4.37 ± 0.56 W kg−1. CHDFs and FDFs had significantly (p < 0.05) greater relative \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \) (19.5 and 15.0%, respectively) compared to GKs. GKs were significantly (p < 0.05) taller than CHDFs (6.3%) and FDFs (4.8%).

Conclusions

Elite female canoe polo players have well-developed oxidative and non-oxidative energy systems, as well as low percent body fat. Positional differences demonstrated that CHDFs and FDFs had significantly higher aerobic power compared to GKs; however, GKs were significantly taller. These results may assist the coach or sport scientist to construct and implement tailored training programs and may be beneficial for talent identification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \) :

Peak oxygen uptake

\( v\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \) :

Velocity at \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

\( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{ 2} /{\text{HR}} \) :

Oxygen pulse (O2 pulse)

\( {\text{HR@}}\dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \) :

Heart rate at \( \dot{V}{\text{O}}_{{2{\text{peak}}}} \)

VT:

Ventilatory threshold

PPO:

Peak power output

MPO:

Mean power output

BP:

Bench press

PBP:

Prone bench pull

BMI:

Body mass index

RPI:

Reciprocal ponderal index

GKs:

Goal keepers

FDFs:

Flat 3 defenders

CHDFs:

Chase defenders

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

SD:

Standard deviation

References

  1. Forbes SC, Kennedy MD, Bell GJ (2013) Time-motion analysis, heart rate, and physiological characteristics of international canoe polo athletes. J Strength Cond Res 27:2816–2822. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280d2a2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheykhlouvand M, Khalili H, Agha-Alinejad H, Gharaat M (2016) Hormonal and physiological adaptations to high-intensity interval training in professional male canoe polo athletes. J Strength Cond Res 30:859–866. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Alves CR et al (2011) Anthropometric, physiological, performance, and nutritional profile of the Brazil National canoe polo Team. J Sports Sci 30:305–311. doi:10.1080/02640414.2011.638086

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheykhlouvand M et al (2015) Anthropometric, physiological, and performance characteristics of elite canoe polo players. Psychol Neurosci 8:257–266. doi:10.1037/pne0000013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferragut C et al (2011) Anthropometry and throwing velocity in elite water polo by specific playing positions. J Hum Kinet 27:31–44. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laursen PB, Shing CM, Peake JM, Coombes JS, Jenkins DG (2005) Influence of high-intensity interval training on adaptations in well-trained cyclists. J Strength Cond Res 19:527–533. doi:10.1519/15964.1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beaver WL, Wasserman K, Whipp BJ (1986) A new method for detecting anaerobic threshold by gas exchange. J Appl Physiol 60:2020–2027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Forbes SC, Kennedy MD, Boule NB, Bell G (2014) Determination of the optimal load setting for arm crank anaerobic testing in men and women. Int J Sports Med 35:835–839. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1368789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zupan MF et al (2009) Wingate anaerobic test peak power and anaerobic capacity classifications for men and woman intercollegiate athletes. J Strength Cond Res 23:2598–2604. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1b21b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ, Pérez CE, Pallarés JG (2014) Velocity- and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 35:209–216. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1351252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sánchez-Medina L, Pérez CE, González-Badillo JJ (2010) Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 31:123–129. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1242815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nevill A, Holder R, Watts A (2009) The changing shape of “successful” professional footballers. J Sports Sci 27:419–426. doi:10.1080/02640410802668676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsekouras YE et al (2005) The anthropometrical and physiological characteristics of elite water polo players. Eur J Appl Physiol 95:35–41. doi:10.1007/s00421-005-1388-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bishop D (2000) Physiological predictors of flat-water kayak performance in women. Eur J Appl Physiol 82:91–97. doi:10.1007/s004210050656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zamparo P, Capelli C, Guerrini G (1999) Energetics of kayaking at submaximal and maximal speeds. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 80:542–548. doi:10.1007/s004210050632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pendergast DR, Bushnell D, Wilson DW, Cerretelli P (1989) Energetics of kayaking. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 59:342–350. doi:10.1007/BF02389808

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buglione A, Lazzer S, Colli R, Introini E, Di Prampero PE (2011) Energetics of best performances in elite kayakers and canoeists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:877–884. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181fdfdb7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garrett WE, Kirkendall DT (2000) Exercise and sport science. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  19. McKean MR, Burkett BJ (2014) The influence of upper-body strength on flat-water sprint kayak performance in elite athletes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 9:707–714. doi:10.1123/ijspp.2013-0301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. McCluskey L et al (2010) Throwing velocity and jump height in female water polo players: performance predictors. J Sci Med Sport 13:236–240. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2009.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez JG et al (2015) Position-specific anthropometry and throwing velocity of elite female water polo players. J Strength Cond Res 29:472–477. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hill RJ, Davies PS (2002) Energy intake and energy expenditure in elite lightweight female rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1823–1829. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000035370.25209.96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bampouras TM, Marrin K (2009) Comparison of two anaerobic water polo-specific tests with the Wingate test. J Strength Cond Res 23:336–340. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181876ad0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Sheykhlouvand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All methods performed in the study were in accordance with ethical standards of the national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Funding

No external financial support was received for this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sheykhlouvand, M., Forbes, S.C. Aerobic capacities, anaerobic power, and anthropometric characteristics of elite female canoe polo players based on playing position. Sport Sci Health 14, 19–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-017-0395-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-017-0395-0

Keywords

Navigation