Skip to main content
Log in

Does the Median Voter or Special Interests Determine State Highway Expenditures? Recent Evidence

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using cross-sectional data from 50 states of the United States and the District of Columbia for two different time periods, this paper examines the degree to which special interests or the median voter determine state highway expenditures. In addition to finding that previous estimates of the determinants of state highway expenditures are robust, we find that that special interests that were important in 1984 were no longer significant nearly 20 years later. Like the previous literature, we conclude that the reduced form median voter model performs well in explaining state highway expenditures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, S., & Greene, K. V. (2000). Is the median voter a clear-cut winner? Comparing the median voter theory and competing theories in explaining local government spending. Public Choice, 105(3–4), 207–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. (2010). A call for replication studies. Public Finance Review, 38(6), 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaulier, S. A., Hall, J. C., & Lynch, A. K. (2011). The impact of political factors on military base closures. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 14(4), 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R.D. (2006). The story of Katrina: New Orleans and the political economy of catastrophe. Public Choice, 127(1–2), 127, 5–30.

  • Congleton, R. D., & Bennett, R. W. (1995). On the political economy of state highway expenditures: some evidence of the relative performance of alternative public choice models. Public Choice, 84(1–2), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments. (1987). The Book of the States. Washington: The Council of State Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of State Governments. (2013). The Book of the States 2013. Washington: The Council of State Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamkhar, S. (2003). The role of federal budget and trust fund institutions in measuring the effect of federal highway grants on state and local government highway expenditure. Public Budgeting & Finance, 23(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, T. A., & Sobel, R. S. (2003). The political economy of FEMA disaster payments. Economic Inquiry, 41(3), 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2003). Use or abuse of highway tax revenues? An economic analysis of highway spending. Applied Economics Letters, 10(13), 813–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C., & Schiefelbein, J. (2011). The political economy of medical marijuana laws. Atlantic Economic Journal, 39(2), 197–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. C., Nesbit, T. M., & Thorson, R. (2012). The determinants of congressional franking: evidence from the 110th congress. Journal of Applied Economics & Policy, 31(1), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J., Ross, A., & Yencha, C. (2015). The political economy of the essential air service program. Public Choice, 165(1–2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J., Rossi, A. F. D., & Viscusi, W. K. (2004). Voter preferences and state regulation of smoking. Economic Inquiry, 42(3), 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, J. P., & Dominguez, M. (2012). The importance of modeling spatial spillovers in public choice analysis. Public Choice, 150(3–4), 525–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (2016). Right to work states: dyou work in a right to work state? At: http://www.nrtw.org/rtws.htm.

  • Oakland, W. H. (1972). Congestion, public goods and welfare. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). Logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales and Marketing Management. (1985). Survey of buying power. New York: Sales and Marketing Mangement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. F., II. (2006). Katrinanomics: the politics and economics of disaster relief. Public Choice, 127(1–2), 31–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R. S., & Hall, J. C. (2016). Has the war between the rent seekers escalated? Cato Journal, 36(1), 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, R. S., Coyne, C. J., & Leeson, P. T. (2007). The political economy of FEMA: did reorganization matter? Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 25(2–3), 151–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, D., & Poitras, M. (2002). The political economy of automobile safety inspections. Public Choice, 113(3–4), 367–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1984). Employment and wages annual averages. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2014). Employment and wages annual averages, 2014. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1980). 1980 Census of population, general social and economics characteristics. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (1987). Statistical abstract of the United States, 1987. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2010). State area measurements and internal point coordinates. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2014). Current population survey. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2012). 2012 Census of agriculture. Washington: National Agriculture Statistics Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation. (1985). Highway statistics 1985. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Transportation. (2013). 2013 State Statistical Abstracts Highway Statistics Series. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walden, M. L., & Eryuruk, G. (2012). Determinants of local highway spending in North Carolina. Growth and Change, 43(3), 462–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua Hall.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Data sources

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hall, J., Pokharel, S.B. Does the Median Voter or Special Interests Determine State Highway Expenditures? Recent Evidence. Atl Econ J 45, 59–69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-016-9523-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-016-9523-5

Keywords

JEL

Navigation