Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influencing public policy: an embedded criminologist reflects on California prison reform

The Academy of Experimental Criminology 2007 Joan McCord Prize Lecture

  • Published:
Journal of Experimental Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Criminologists bemoan their lack of influence on U.S. crime policy, believing that the justice system would be improved if their research findings were more central in decision making. I had an opportunity to test that notion as I participated in California’s historic attempt to reform its prisons over the past 4 years. I became an embedded criminologist, where I was able to observe and contribute to the inner workings of state government. This article reports on my accomplishments with respect to fostering research activities and shifting the department’s focus towards prisoner reintegration. It discusses some of the lessons I learned, including the personal toll that such work entails, the importance of the timing of policy initiatives, and the power of rigorous methodology and clear communication. I conclude by recommending that other policy-oriented criminologists seek out similar experiences, as I believe our academic skills are uniquely suited and ultimately necessary to create a justice system that does less harm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, E. (1975). The monkey wrench gang: Harper Collins.

  • Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. (2008). Adult population projections 2008–2013. Sacrament, CA. Available at http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/Reports_Research/Offender_Information_Services_Branch/Population_Reports.asp, accessed May 23, 2008.

  • California Expert Panel on Adult Offender Recidivism Reduction Programming (2007). A roadmap for effective offender programming in California: Report to the California state legislature. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Independent Review Panel. (2004). Reforming California’s youth and adult correctional system. California Performance Review. Available at http://cpr.ca.gov/, accessed on May 15, 2008.

  • California Inspector General. (2008). California rehabilitation oversight board: Biannual report. Sacramento, CA.

  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). (2005). Strategic Plan. Available at http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/About_CDCR/index.html, accessed May 15, 2008.

  • California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR). (2008). Strategic Plan: 2007–2012. Available at www.cdcr.ca.gov, accessed May 15, 2008.

  • Clear, T., & Frost, N. A. (2007). Informing public policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(4), 633–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. (2005). The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference. Criminology, 43(1), 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (2007). Against marginality: arguments for a public criminology. Theoretical Criminology, 11(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domanick, J. (2004). Cruel justice: Three strikes and the politics of crime in America’s golden state. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, D. (1995). Preparing convicts for law-abiding lives: The pioneering penology of Richard A. McGee. NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (2005). State of the state address. Sacramento, CA: State of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Governmental Studies. (2008). California correctional peace officers association. Berkeley, California. Available at http://igs.berkeley.edu/library/htCaliforniaPrisonUnion.htm., accessed May 15, 2008.

  • Jenness, V. (2008). Pluto, prisons, and plaintiffs: notes on systematic back-translation from an embedded researcher. Social Problems, 55(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohls, J. (2005). Structural reorganization research workgroup: Final report. Sacramento, CA: Youth and Adult Corrections Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. G. (2004). The California Governor recall election. Los Angeles, California: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little Hoover Commission. (2007). Solving California’s corrections crisis: Time is running out. Sacramento: CA, available at http://www.lhc.ca.gov/lhcdir/crime.html.

  • Logan, C. (1993). Criminal justice performance measures for prisons. In J. DiIulio (Ed.), Performance measures for the criminal justice system. Washington, D.C: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, J. (1990). Crime in moral and social contexts. Criminology, 28(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCord, W., & McCord, J. (1959). Origins of crime. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2008). Parole, desistance from crime, and community integration. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1987). The influence of criminal justice research. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1991). Policy relevance and the future of criminology. Criminology, 29(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2006). Understanding California corrections. Berkeley, California: California Policy Research Center. Available at http://ucicorrections.seweb.uci.edu/pubs., accessed Sept. 20, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2007a). Employ behavioral contracting for “Earned discharge” parole. Criminology and Public Policy, 6(4), 807–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J., Committee Chair. (2007b). Meeting the challenges of rehabilitation in California’s prison and parole system, Governor Schwarzenegger’s rehabilitation strike team final report, Sacramento, CA. Available at http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/News/Gov_Rehab__Strike_Team_Release_Rpt.html, accessed May 15, 2008.

  • Petersilia, J. (2008). California’s correctional paradox of excess and deprivation. In M. H. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research. Vol. 37: pp. 207–218 Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: An annual review of research pp. 281–335. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Foundation. (2008). One in 100: Behind Bars in America. Available at http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_detail.aspx?id = 74, accessed May 23, 2003.

  • Prison Law Office. (2008). Major cases reviewed. Available at http://www.prisonlaw.com/cases.php, accessed May 15, 2008.

  • Ricciardulli, A. (2003). A job for a tough guy: Schwarzenegger’s persona may open the way for compassionate reforms. Los Angeles Times.

  • Riveland, C. (1999). Prison administration. In M. Tonry, & J. Petersilia (Eds.), Crime and justice: Prisons. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheff, D. (2004). The good jailer. New York Times, March 14.

  • Warren, J. (2005). Ailing prison system finds friend in criminologist. Los Angeles Times, May 16.

  • Weisburd, D. (2000). Randomized experiments in criminal justice policy: prospects and problems. Crime & Delinquency, 46(2), 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. (2003). Three strikes and you’re out in California. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Petersilia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petersilia, J. Influencing public policy: an embedded criminologist reflects on California prison reform. J Exp Criminol 4, 335–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-008-9060-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-008-9060-6

Keywords

Navigation