Skip to main content
Log in

Greedy algorithms for actor redeployment in wireless sensor–actor networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a wireless sensor–actor network, an actor usually has to provide services as soon as the actor receives the event signals from the sensors. Therefore, the performance of a wireless sensor–actor network depends on the actor deployment. In many circumstances, actors may fail or go out to deal with events, and thus, the sensors covered by the missing actors could be not to be reachable in time. This introduces the necessity of actor redeployment. In this paper, we study the problems of redeploying actors to maximize the number of sensors able to be covered by actors and to maximize the decrease of the residual distances of sensors, respectively. Both problems are shown to be NP-complete. Additionally, we prove that the greedy algorithm for each problem has an approximation ratio of 2. Simulations show that the greedy algorithm for each problem performs well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The special channel is used as a management channel between the actors and the sink.

References

  1. Abbasi, A. A., Younis, M., & Akkaya, K. (2009). Movement-assisted connectivity restoration in wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 20, 1366–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbasi, A. A., Younis, M., & Baroudi, U. (2010). Restoring connectivity in wireless sensor–actor networks with minimal topology changes. In IEEE ICC (pp. 1550–3607).

  3. Akkaya, K., & Janapala, S. (2008). Maximizing connected coverage via controlled actor relocation in wireless sensor and actor networks. Computer Networks, 52, 2779–2796.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Akkaya, K., Senel, F., Thimmapuram, A., & Uludag, S. (2010). Distributed recovery from network partitioning in movable sensor/actor networks via controlled mobility. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 59, 258–271.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Akkaya, K., Thimmapuran, A., Senel, F., & Uludag, S. (2008). Distributed recovery of actor failures in wireless sensor and actor networks. In IEEE WCNC (pp. 2355–2360).

  6. Akkaya, K., & Younis, M. (2006). COLA: A coverage and latency aware actor placement for wireless sensor and actor networks. In IEEE VTC (pp. 1–5).

  7. Bai, X., Kumar, S., Xuan, D., Yun, Z., & Lai, T. H. (2006). Deploying wireless sensors to achieve both coverage and connectivity. In ACM MOBIHOC (pp. 131–142).

  8. Basu, P., & Redi, J. (2004). Movement control algorithms for realization of fault-tolerant ad hoc robot networks. IEEE Networks, 18, 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bredin, J. L., Demaine, E. D., Hajiaghayi, M. T., & Rus, D. (2010). Deploying sensor networks with guaranteed fault tolerance. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 18, 216–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feige, U. (1998). A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the ACM, 45, 634–652.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, C. F., Tseng, Y. C., & Wu, H. L. (2007). Distributed protocols for ensuring both coverage and connectivity of a wireless sensor network. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 3, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ismail, I. A., Akyildiz, I. F., & Kasimoglu, I. H. (2004). Wireless sensor and actor networks: Research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks, 2, 351–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ke, W. C., Liu, B. H., & Tsai, M. J. (2011). Efficient algorithm for constructing minimum size wireless sensor networks to fully cover critical square grids. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10, 1154–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Melodia, T., Pompili, D., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2010). Handling mobility in wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 9, 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren, X. P., & Cai, Z. X. (2009). A distributed actor deployment algorithm for maximum connected coverage in WSAN. In ICNC (pp. 283–287).

  16. Tamboli, N., & Younis, M. (2009). Coverage-aware connectivity restoration in mobile sensor networks. In IEEE ICC (pp. 1–5).

  17. Wang, S., Mao, X., Tang, S. J., Li, X., Zhao, J., & Dai, G. (2011). On movement-assisted connectivity restoration in wireless sensor and actor networks. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 22, 687–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, J., Yang, S., & Cardei, M. (2008). On maintaining sensor–actor connectivity in wireless sensor and actor networks. In IEEE INFOCOM (pp. 888–896).

  19. Younis, M., & Waknis, R. (2010). Connectivity restoration in wireless sensor networks using steiner tree approximations. In IEEE GLOBECOM (pp. 1–5).

  20. Zamanifar, A., Kashefi, O., & Sharifi, M. (2009). AOM: An efficient approach to restore actor–actor connectivity in wireless sensor and actor networks. Computer Networks and Communications, 1, 61–72.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang, H., & Hou, J. C. (2004). Maintaining sensing coverage and connectivity in large sensor networks. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 1, 89–124.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant MOST102-2221-E-151-002.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing-Hong Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, BH., Tang, YJ., Yu, CW. et al. Greedy algorithms for actor redeployment in wireless sensor–actor networks. Wireless Netw 21, 431–442 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0796-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0796-9

Keywords

Navigation