Abstract
Honeybees collect propolis from practically any abundant plant source in the neighborhood of the hive, be it populus, eucalyptus, pine, sugarcane, cashew nut or orange trees. We have described that the origin plants of Turkish propolis are Populus sp., Eucalyptus sp. and Castanea sativa. In our previous study, propolis samples from Middle Anatolia displayed the typical pattern of “poplar” propolis: they contained pinobanksin, caffeic and ferulic acids and their esters. The propolis samples examined in this study were shown not to contain polar phenolics. The main components of Eucalyptus propolis were aromatic acids, mainly cinnamic acid and its esters, that are usually found in Eucalyptus species resins. The second distinct sample originated from West Anatolia. Although it contained low amounts of phenolic substances and aromatic acids, its main components were sugars and glycosides. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between propolis samples in antibacterial activity, however the yeasts were shown to be more sensitive to eucalyptus-propolis. Gram negative bacteria were susceptible to none of the samples tested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdel-Sattar E, Kohiel MA, Shihata IA et al (2000) Phenolic compounds from Eucalyptus maculate. Pharmazie 55:623–624
Amoros M, Sauvager F, Girre L et al (1992) In vitro antiviral activity of propolis. Apidologie 23:231–240
Bankova V (2005) Recent trends and important developments in propolis research. eCAM 2:29–32
Bankova V, Marcucci MC (2000) Standardization of propolis: present status and perspectives. Bee World 81:182–188
Bankova V, Christov R, Stoev G et al (1992) Determination of phenolics from propolis by capillary gas chromatography. J Chromatogr 607:150–153
Bankova V, Boudoureva-Krasteva G, Sforcin JM et al (1999) Phytochemical evidence for the plant origin of Brazilian propolis from Sao Paulo State. Z Naturforsch C 54:401–405
Bankova V, De Castro SL, Marcucci MC (2000) Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 31:3–15
Bankova V, Popova M, Bogdanov S et al (2002) Chemical composition of European propolis : expected and unexpected results. Z. Naturforsch. 57c:530–533
Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Adnyana IK et al (2001) Hepatoprotective and anti Helicobacter pylori activities of constituents of Brazilian propolis. Phytomedicine 8:16–23
Bonvehi JS, Coll FV (2000) Study on propolis quality from China and Uruguay. Z Naturforsch 55c:778–784
Bonvehi S, Ventura Coll F, Escola Jorda E (1994) The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetics. J Am Oil Chem Soc 71:529–532
Chen Z, Landman P, Colmer TD et al (1998) Simultaneous analysis of amino and organic acids in extracts of plant leaves as tert-Butyldimethylsily derivatives by capillary gas chromatograpy. Anal Biochem 259:203–211
Dimov V, Ivanovska N, Bankova V et al (1992) Immunomodulatory action of propolis: IV. Prophylactic activity against gram negative infections and adjuvant effect of the water soluble derivative. Vaccine 10:817–823
Garcia-Viguera C (1992) Composition of propolis from two different Spanish regions. Z Naturforsch 47c:634–637
Garcia-Viguera C, Ferreres F, Tomas-Barberan FA (1993) Study of Canadian propolis by GC-MS and HPLC. Z Naturforsch 48c:731–735
Greenaway W, Whatley FR (1990) Analysis of phenolics of bud exudates of Populus angustifolia by GC-MS. Phytochemistry 29:2551–2554
Greenaway W, Scaysbrook T, Whatley FR (1988) Composition of propolis in Oxfordshire, U.K.and its relation the poplar bud exudates. Z Naturforsch 43c:301–305
Greenaway W, English S, Whatley FR (1990) Phenolic composition of bud exudates of Populus deltoids. Z Naturforsch 45c:587–593
Greenaway W, May J, Scaysbrook T et al (1991) Identification by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry of 150 compounds in propolis. Z. Naturforsch C 46:111–121
Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV (1999) Influence of organic matter, cations and surfactanys on the antimicrobial activity of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil in vitro. J Appl Microbiol 86:446–452
Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Warnock DW (1984) In-vitro resistance to imidazole antifungals in Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother 13:547–558
Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Yu et al (1999) Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin. J Ethnopharmacol 64:235–240
Kumazawa S, Yoneda M, Shıbata I et al (2003) Direct evidence for the plant origin of Brazilian propolis by the observation of honeybee behavior and phytochemical analysis. Chem Pharm Bull 51:740–742
Kustimur S, Kalkanci A, Mansuroglu H et al (2001) Determination of fluconazole susceptibility of Candida species: comparison of two microdlution methods. Turkish J Infect 15:349–351
Koenig B (1985) Plant sources of propolis. Bee World 66:136–139
Lampire O, Mila I, Raminosa M, Michon V et al (1998). Polyphenols isolated from the bark of Castanea sativa Mill. Chemical structures and auto-association. Phytochemistry 49:623–631
Lopes FC, Bankova V, Sforcin JM (2003) Effect of three vegetal sources of propolis on macrophages activation. Phytomedicine 10:343
Marcucci MC (1995) Propolis:chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 26:83–99
Martos I, Cossentini M, Ferreres F, Tomas-Barberan FA (1997) Flavanoid composition of Tunisian honeys and propolis. J Agric Food Chem 45:2824–2829
Metzner J, Schneidewind E, Frienfich E (1977) Effects of propolis and pinocembrin on yeasts. Pharmazie 32:730
NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) (1999) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 9th International Supplement; M100–S9; Wayne, Pa
Popova M, Silici S, Kaftanoglu O et al (2005) Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine 12:221–228
Popravko SA, Sokolov MV (1980) Plant sources of propolis. Pchelovodstvoz 2:28–29
Pereira-Lorenzo S, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Diaz-Hernandez MB et al (2006) Chemical composition of chestnut cultivars from Spain. Scientia Horticulture 107(3):306–314
Salatino A, Teixeira EW, Negri G et al (2005) Origin and chemical variation of Brazilian propolis. eCAM 2:33–38
Sorkun K, Süer B, Salih B (2001) Determination of chemical composition of Turkish propolis. Z Naturforsch 56c:666–668
Velikova M, Bankova V, Sorkun K et al (2000) Propolis from Mediterranean region: chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. Z Naturforsch 55c:1–4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9898-9.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Silici, S., Ünlü, M. & Vardar-Ünlü, G. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical evidence for the plant origin of Turkish propolis from different regions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23, 1797–1803 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9430-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9430-7