Skip to main content
Log in

Antibacterial activity and phytochemical evidence for the plant origin of Turkish propolis from different regions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 11 November 2008

Abstract

Honeybees collect propolis from practically any abundant plant source in the neighborhood of the hive, be it populus, eucalyptus, pine, sugarcane, cashew nut or orange trees. We have described that the origin plants of Turkish propolis are Populus sp., Eucalyptus sp. and Castanea sativa. In our previous study, propolis samples from Middle Anatolia displayed the typical pattern of “poplar” propolis: they contained pinobanksin, caffeic and ferulic acids and their esters. The propolis samples examined in this study were shown not to contain polar phenolics. The main components of Eucalyptus propolis were aromatic acids, mainly cinnamic acid and its esters, that are usually found in Eucalyptus species resins. The second distinct sample originated from West Anatolia. Although it contained low amounts of phenolic substances and aromatic acids, its main components were sugars and glycosides. The study revealed that there was no significant difference between propolis samples in antibacterial activity, however the yeasts were shown to be more sensitive to eucalyptus-propolis. Gram negative bacteria were susceptible to none of the samples tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Sattar E, Kohiel MA, Shihata IA et al (2000) Phenolic compounds from Eucalyptus maculate. Pharmazie 55:623–624

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amoros M, Sauvager F, Girre L et al (1992) In vitro antiviral activity of propolis. Apidologie 23:231–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankova V (2005) Recent trends and important developments in propolis research. eCAM 2:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankova V, Marcucci MC (2000) Standardization of propolis: present status and perspectives. Bee World 81:182–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankova V, Christov R, Stoev G et al (1992) Determination of phenolics from propolis by capillary gas chromatography. J Chromatogr 607:150–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bankova V, Boudoureva-Krasteva G, Sforcin JM et al (1999) Phytochemical evidence for the plant origin of Brazilian propolis from Sao Paulo State. Z Naturforsch C 54:401–405

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bankova V, De Castro SL, Marcucci MC (2000) Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin. Apidologie 31:3–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bankova V, Popova M, Bogdanov S et al (2002) Chemical composition of European propolis : expected and unexpected results. Z. Naturforsch. 57c:530–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Banskota AH, Tezuka Y, Adnyana IK et al (2001) Hepatoprotective and anti Helicobacter pylori activities of constituents of Brazilian propolis. Phytomedicine 8:16–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonvehi JS, Coll FV (2000) Study on propolis quality from China and Uruguay. Z Naturforsch 55c:778–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonvehi S, Ventura Coll F, Escola Jorda E (1994) The composition, active components and bacteriostatic activity of propolis in dietetics. J Am Oil Chem Soc 71:529–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Landman P, Colmer TD et al (1998) Simultaneous analysis of amino and organic acids in extracts of plant leaves as tert-Butyldimethylsily derivatives by capillary gas chromatograpy. Anal Biochem 259:203–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dimov V, Ivanovska N, Bankova V et al (1992) Immunomodulatory action of propolis: IV. Prophylactic activity against gram negative infections and adjuvant effect of the water soluble derivative. Vaccine 10:817–823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Viguera C (1992) Composition of propolis from two different Spanish regions. Z Naturforsch 47c:634–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Viguera C, Ferreres F, Tomas-Barberan FA (1993) Study of Canadian propolis by GC-MS and HPLC. Z Naturforsch 48c:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway W, Whatley FR (1990) Analysis of phenolics of bud exudates of Populus angustifolia by GC-MS. Phytochemistry 29:2551–2554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway W, Scaysbrook T, Whatley FR (1988) Composition of propolis in Oxfordshire, U.K.and its relation the poplar bud exudates. Z Naturforsch 43c:301–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway W, English S, Whatley FR (1990) Phenolic composition of bud exudates of Populus deltoids. Z Naturforsch 45c:587–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway W, May J, Scaysbrook T et al (1991) Identification by gas chromatography- mass spectrometry of 150 compounds in propolis. Z. Naturforsch C 46:111–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV (1999) Influence of organic matter, cations and surfactanys on the antimicrobial activity of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil in vitro. J Appl Microbiol 86:446–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Warnock DW (1984) In-vitro resistance to imidazole antifungals in Candida albicans. J Antimicrob Chemother 13:547–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Yu et al (1999) Antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral activity of propolis of different geographic origin. J Ethnopharmacol 64:235–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumazawa S, Yoneda M, Shıbata I et al (2003) Direct evidence for the plant origin of Brazilian propolis by the observation of honeybee behavior and phytochemical analysis. Chem Pharm Bull 51:740–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kustimur S, Kalkanci A, Mansuroglu H et al (2001) Determination of fluconazole susceptibility of Candida species: comparison of two microdlution methods. Turkish J Infect 15:349–351

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig B (1985) Plant sources of propolis. Bee World 66:136–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampire O, Mila I, Raminosa M, Michon V et al (1998). Polyphenols isolated from the bark of Castanea sativa Mill. Chemical structures and auto-association. Phytochemistry 49:623–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes FC, Bankova V, Sforcin JM (2003) Effect of three vegetal sources of propolis on macrophages activation. Phytomedicine 10:343

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcucci MC (1995) Propolis:chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 26:83–99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martos I, Cossentini M, Ferreres F, Tomas-Barberan FA (1997) Flavanoid composition of Tunisian honeys and propolis. J Agric Food Chem 45:2824–2829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metzner J, Schneidewind E, Frienfich E (1977) Effects of propolis and pinocembrin on yeasts. Pharmazie 32:730

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) (1999) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 9th International Supplement; M100–S9; Wayne, Pa

  • Popova M, Silici S, Kaftanoglu O et al (2005) Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition. Phytomedicine 12:221–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Popravko SA, Sokolov MV (1980) Plant sources of propolis. Pchelovodstvoz 2:28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira-Lorenzo S, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Diaz-Hernandez MB et al (2006) Chemical composition of chestnut cultivars from Spain. Scientia Horticulture 107(3):306–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salatino A, Teixeira EW, Negri G et al (2005) Origin and chemical variation of Brazilian propolis. eCAM 2:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorkun K, Süer B, Salih B (2001) Determination of chemical composition of Turkish propolis. Z Naturforsch 56c:666–668

    Google Scholar 

  • Velikova M, Bankova V, Sorkun K et al (2000) Propolis from Mediterranean region: chemical composition and antimicrobial activity. Z Naturforsch 55c:1–4

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel Silici.

Additional information

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9898-9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silici, S., Ünlü, M. & Vardar-Ünlü, G. Antibacterial activity and phytochemical evidence for the plant origin of Turkish propolis from different regions. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23, 1797–1803 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9430-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9430-7

Keywords

Navigation