Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Impacts of biosolids application on soil quality under alternate year no-till corn–soybean rotation

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biosolids are a source of recycled organic matter and nutrients. To evaluate the impact of biosolids application (1984–2008) on soil quality, composite soils (Genesee silt loam, fine loamy, mixed, nonacid, and mesic typic udifluvent) were randomly sampled at geo-referenced sites from 0 (control), 2, 5, and 25 years of lime-stabilized anaerobically digested biosolid-applied fields. Results showed that microbial biomass C (Cmic), N (Nmic), and P (Pmic) contents were significantly higher at both depths of the 5 and 25 years of biosolid-applied fields compared to the control. Biosolid application significantly enlarged the biologically labile C (Cmic over total organic C, Cmic:Corg) and N (Nmic over total N, Nmic:TN) pools with an associated decrease in metabolic C loss (20–53 %) by specific maintenance respiration (qCO2) relative to the control. The Corg, active (AC) and soluble C (SC), TN and reactive N (RN), and reactive P (RP) contents were significantly higher in the long-term biosolid-applied fields than in the control. However, there was an indication of leaching of SC, RN, and RP between depths. Years of biosolid application significantly increased soil moisture content (θ v at −0.03 MPa) by 20–40 %, macroaggregate stability (MaA) by 2–44 %, and mean weight diameter (MWD) of aggregates by 7–51 %, respectively. Consequently, there was a decrease in soil bulk density (ρ b) and microaggregate stability (MiA) at both depths. Results confirmed that biosolids application at rates recommended is a viable management option to improve soil quality for crop production. However, long-term and repeated biosolid applications above the recommended agronomic N and P rates may be responsible for accumulation and consequent leaching and runoff of SC, RN, and RP to cause groundwater and surface water pollution with environmental consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. H., & Domsch, K. H. (1990). Application of eco-physiological quotients (qCO2 and qD) on microbial biomasses from soils of different cropping histories. Soil Biol Biochem, 22, 251–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angin, I., & Yaganoglu, A. V. (2011). Effects of sewage sludge application on some physical and chemical properties of a soil affected by wind erosion. J Agric Sci Technol, 13, 757–768.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, I., Mahmood, T., & Islam, K. R. (2013). Effect of long-term no-till and conventional tillage practices on soil quality. Soil Tillage Res, 131, 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, M. R., Burton, D. L., & Depoe, S. (1997). Impact of sewage sludge applications on soil biological characteristics. Agric Ecosys Environ, 66, 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, D. L., Dobermann, A., Sander, D. H., & Cassman, K. G. (2002). Biosolid as nitrogen source for irrigated maize and rainfed sorghum. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 66, 531–543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bragato, G., Leita, L., Figliolia, A., & de Nobili, M. (1998). Effects of sewage sludge pre-treatment on microbial biomass and biovailability of heavy metals. Soil Tillage Res, 46, 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, P. C., Powlson, D. S., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1982). Measurement of microbial biomass phosphorus in soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 14, 319–329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, P. C., Landman, A., Pruden, G., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1985). Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil-nitrogen—a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 17, 837–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, P., Easson, D. L., Picton, J. R., & Love, S. C. P. (2001). Agronomic value of alkaline-stabilized sewage biosolid for spring barley. Agron J, 93, 144–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cogger, C. G., Bary, A. I., Myhre, E. A., & Fortuna, A.-M. (2013). Biosolid applications to tall fescue have long-term influence on soil nitrogen, carbon, and phosphorus. J Environ Qual, 42, 516–522.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Nobili, M., Contin, M., Mondini, C., & Brookes, P. C. (2001). Soil microbial biomass is triggered into activity by trace amounts of substrate. Soil Biol Biochem, 33, 1163–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour, J. T., Cogger, C. G., Jacobs, L. W., Evanylo, G. K., & Sullivan, D. M. (2003). Decomposition and plant available N in biosolid: laboratory studies, field studies, and computer simulation. J Environ Qual, 32, 1498–1507.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, M., Song, W., & Kazda, R. (2012). Fertilizer value of lime-stabilized biosolids as a soil amendment. Agron J, 104, 1679–1686.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, J. C., Adl, M. S., & Warman, P. R. (2008). A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ, 123, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, B. D. (1994). Soil organic matter and available water capacity. J Soil Water Conserv, 49, 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute, S. A. S. (2010). The SAS system for Microsoft Windows, R. 9.3. Cary: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, K. R., & Weil, R. R. (2000). Soil quality indicator properties in mid-Atlantic soils as influenced by conservation management. J Soil Water Conserv, 55, 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, K. R., Ahsan, S., Barik, K., & Aksakal, E. L. (2013). Biosolid impact on heavy metal accumulation and lability in soil under alternate-year no-till corn–soybean rotation. Water Air Soil Pollut, 224, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, W. D., & Rosenau, R. C. (1986). Aggregate stability and size distribution. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA book series (Vol. 5, pp. 425–442). Madison: ASA/SSSA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klute, A. (1986). Water retention: Laboratory methods. In A. Klute (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis: Part 1—Physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA book series (Vol. 5, pp. 635–662). Madison: ASA/SSSA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, A., Cheng, Z., Grewal, S. S., Islam, K. R., Kleinhenz, M. D., & Grewal, P. S. (2013). Soil health as a predictor of lettuce productivity and quality: a case study of urban vacant lots. Urban Ecosyst, 16, 637–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, Q., He, Z. L., & Stoffella, P. J. (2012). Land application of biosolid in the USA: a review. Appl Environ Soil Sci, 2012, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Christie, P. (2002). Alleviation of soil acidity and aluminum phytotoxicity in acid soils by using alkaline stabilized biosolid. Pedosphere, 12, 185–188.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, S. P., Chaudri, A. M., & Giller, K. E. (1995). Long-term effects of metals in sewage sludge on soils, microorganisms and plants. J Ind Microbiol, 14, 94–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oades, J. M. (1984). Soil organic matter and structural stability: mechanisms and implications for management. Plant Soil, 76, 319–337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pagliali, M., & Antisari, L. V. (1993). Influence of waste organic matter on soil micro- and macrostructure. Bioresour Technol, 43, 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parat, C., Chaussod, R., Leveque, J., & Andreux, F. (2005). Long-term effects of metal-containing farmyard manure and sewage sludge on soil organic matter in a fluvisol. Soil Biol Biochem, 37, 673–679.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powlson, D. S., Brooks, P. C., & Christensen, B. T. (1987). Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic-matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem, 19, 159–164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saviozzi, A., Biasci, A., Riffaldi, R., & Levi-Minzi, R. (1999). Long-term effects of farmyard manure and sewage sludge on some soil biochemical characteristics. Biol Fertil Soils, 30, 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigua, G. C., Adjei, M. B., & Rechcigl, J. E. (2005). Cumulative and residual effects of repeated sewage sludge applications: forage productivity and soil quality implications in South Florida, USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 12, 80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. P., & Agrawal, M. (2008). Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Manag, 28, 347–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soil and Water Conservation Staff. (1967). Soil survey of Ross County, Ohio. Washington: USDA-SCS, Ohio Dept. Natural Resources and Ohio Agricultural Experiment Station. 20402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundermeier, A. P., Islam, K. R., Raut, Y., Reeder, R., & Dick, W. (2011). Continuous no-till impacts on biophysical carbon sequestration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 75, 1779–1788.

  • Tarrasón, D., Ojeda, G., Oritiz, O., & Alcaniz, J. M. (2010). Effects of different types of sludge on soil microbial properties: a field experiment on degraded Mediterranean soils. Pedosphere, 20, 681–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsadilas, C. D., Mitsios, I. K., & Golia, E. (2005). Influence of biosolid on some soil physical properties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal, 36, 709–716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (2011). Water: Sewage sludge (biosolid). http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/wastewater/treatment/biosolid/index.cfm.

  • Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biol Biochem, 19, 703–707.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, R. R., Islam, K. R., Stine, M. A., Gruver, J. B., & Sampson-Liebig, S. E. (2003). Estimating active carbon for soil quality assessment: a simplified method for laboratory and field use. Am J Altern Agric, 18, 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Eastern Mediterranean Research Institute, Adana, Turkey

    Derya Yucel & Celal Yucel

  2. Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey

    Ekrem L. Aksakal & Kenan Barik

  3. Potato Research Center, Fredericton, NB, Canada

    Maninder Khosa

  4. Department of Agronomy, PAMS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan

    Irfan Aziz

  5. Soil, Water and Bioenergy Resources, The Ohio State University South Centers, Piketon, OH, 45661, USA

    Khandakar Rafiq Islam

Authors
  1. Derya Yucel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Celal Yucel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ekrem L. Aksakal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kenan Barik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maninder Khosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Irfan Aziz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Khandakar Rafiq Islam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khandakar Rafiq Islam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yucel, D., Yucel, C., Aksakal, E.L. et al. Impacts of biosolids application on soil quality under alternate year no-till corn–soybean rotation. Water Air Soil Pollut 226, 168 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2430-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2430-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation