Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The low impact development (LID) approach has been recommended as an alternative to traditional stormwater design. Research on individual LID practices such as bioretention, pervious pavements, and grassed swales has increased in recent years. Bioretention cells have been effective in retaining large volumes of runoff and pollutants on site, and consistently reduced concentrations of certain pollutants such as metals. However, retention of certain pollutants such as nitrate–nitrogen and phosphorus has been problematic. Porous pavements have been extremely effective in infiltrating stormwater runoff. Concerns have been raised about groundwater contamination, but research has shown that this is not a problem in most settings. Green roofs have been found to retain a large percentage of rainfall (63% on average) in a variety of climates. A common thread across bioretention, green roofs and grassed swales was found: the export of phosphorus. The issue appears to be linked to high phosphorus levels in the soil media, or possibly to fertilization of turf or planted areas. Solutions to this problem have been recommended. Contrary to popular belief, research has shown that bioretention and pervious pavements continue to infiltrate even with frost in the ground. Although issues have been identified with retention of certain pollutants, the LID approach has been found to result in increased retention of stormwater and pollutants on site, mimicking pre-development hydrologic function. Future research needs have also been identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atchison, D., Potter, K. W., & Severson, L. (2006). Design Guidelines for Stormwater Bioretention Facilities. University of Wisconsin Water Resources Institute, WIS-WRI-06-01.

  • Baladès, J.-D., Legret, M., & Madiec, H. (1995). Permeable pavements: Pollution management tools. Water Science and Technology, 32(1), 49–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannerman, R. T., Owens, D. W., Dodds, R. B., & Hornewer, N. J. (1993). Sources of pollutants in Wisconsin stormwater. Water Science and Technology, 28(3–5), 241–259.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Banting, D., Doshi, H., Li, J., Missios, P., Au, A., Currie, B. A., & Verrati, M. (2005). Report on the environmental benefits and costs of green roof technology for the city of Toronto. City of Toronto and Ontario Centres of Excellence–Earth and Environmental Technologies.

  • Bean, E. Z., Hunt, W. F., & Bidelspach, D. A. (2007). Field survey of permeable pavement surface infiltration rates. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 133(3), 249–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, L., Grahn, L., & Olsson, J. (2005). Hydrological function of a thin extensive green roof in southern Sweden. Nordic Hydrology, 36(3), 259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boivin, M., Lamy, M., Gosselin, A., & Dansereau, B. (2001). Effect of artificial substrate depth on freezing injury of six herbaceous perennials grown in a green roof system. Horticulture Technology, 11(3), 409–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. B., & Jackson, R. (1997). Urbanization of aquatic systems: Degradation thresholds, stormwater detection and the limits of mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33(5), 1077–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. B., & Leavitt, J. (1999). Field evaluation of permeable pavement systems for improved stormwater management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(3), 314–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brattebo, B. O., & Booth, D. B. (2003). Long-term stormwater quantity and quality performance of permeable pavement systems. Water Research, 37, 4369–4376.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, K. A., Hunt, W. F., & Hathaway, J. M. (2006, November). Evaluation of various types of permeable pavements with respect to water quality improvement and flood control. Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving, San Francisco, CA.

  • Davis, A. P., & McCuen, R. H. (2005). Stormwater management for smart growth. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., & Minami, C. (2001). Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management. Water Environment Research, 73(1), 5–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minami, C., & Winogradoff, D. (2003). Water quality improvement through bioretention: Lead, copper and zinc removal. Water Environment Research, 75(1), 73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Day, G. E., Smith, D. R., & Bowers, J. (1981). Runoff and pollution abatement characteristics of concrete grid pavements. Virginia Water Resources Research Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Project A-090-VA VPI-VWRRC-BULL 135 4C.

  • Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2005). A field evaluation of rain garden flow and pollutant treatment. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 167(1–4), 123–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2006). Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(4), 1335–1340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, M. E., & Clausen, J. C. (2007), Stormwater runoff and export changes with development in a traditional and low impact subdivision. Journal of Environmental Management, (in press). DOI 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.026.

  • Dietz, M. E., & Filchak, K. F. (2006). Rain gardens: A design guide for homeowners in Connecticut. University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension System.

  • Dreelin, E. A., Fowler, L., & Carroll, C. R. (2006). A test of porous pavement effectiveness on clay soils during natural storm events. Water Research, 40, 799–805.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, B. K. (2005). Porous pavements. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, G. (2002). The new and improved open graded friction course mixes. Asphalt, 2002, 16–18, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Clausen, J. C. (2006). Stormwater runoff quality and quantity from asphalt, paver, and crushed stone driveways in Connecticut. Water Research, 40, 826–832.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haselbach, L. M., Valavala, S., & Montes, F. (2006). Permeability predictions for sand-clogged Portland cement pervious concrete pavement systems. Journal of Environmental Management, 81, 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, G. E. (1977). Water yield changes after the urbanization of the Canon’s Brook catchment, Harlow, England. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin, 22, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, M., Clausen, J. C., & Warner, G. S. (2007). Comparison of stormwater lag times for low impact and traditional residential development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43(4), 1036–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., & Sharkey, L. J. (2006). Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 132(6), 600–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, W. F., & Lord, W. G. (2006). Bioretention performance, design, construction, and maintenance. North Carolina State University Cooperative Extension.

  • Hutchinson, D., Abrams, P., Retzlaff, R., & Liptan, T. (2003), Stormwater monitoring two ecoroofs in Portland, Oregon, USA. Paper presented at the First Annual Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference, Awards and Trade Show, Chicago, IL.

  • Jennings, D. B., & Jarnagin, S. T. (2002). Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: A historical perspective in a mid-Atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecology, 17, 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal, S. S., Groffman, P. M., Likens, G. E., Belt, K. T., Stack, W. P., Kelly, V. R., et al. (2005). Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 13517–13520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Seagren, E. A., & Davis, A. P. (2003). Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff. Water Environment Research, 75(4), 355–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Korom, S. F. (1992). Natural denitrification in the saturated zone: A review. Water Resources Research, 28(6), 1657–1668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuichling, E. (1889). The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 20, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwiatkowski, M., Welker, A. L., Traver, R. G., Vanacore, M., & Ladd, T. (2007). Evaluation of an infiltration best management practice (BMP) utilizing pervious concrete. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, (in press).

  • LeBlanc, R. T., Brown, R. D., & FitzGibbon, J. E. (1997). Modeling the effects of land use change on the water temperature in unregulated urban streams. Journal of Environmental Management, 49, 445–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legret, M., & Colandini, V. (1999). Effects of a porous pavement with reservoir structure on runoff water: Water quality and fate of heavy metals. Water Science and Technology, 39(2), 111–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. B. (1968). Hydrology for urban land planning—a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. Geological Survey Circular, 554.

  • Makepeace, D. K., Smith, D. W., & Stanley, S. J. (1995). Urban stormwater quality: Summary of contaminant data. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 25(2), 93–139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Monterusso, M. A., Rowe, D. B., & Rugh, C. L. (2005). Establishment and persistence of Sedum spp. and native taxa for green roof applications. Horticultural Science, 40(2), 391–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monterusso, M. A., Rowe, D. B., Russell, D. K., & Rugh, C. L. (2004). Runoff water quantity and quality from green roof systems. Acta Horticulturae, 639, 369–376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, A., Hunt, W., & Jennings, G. (2004). Greenroof research of stormwater runoff quantity and quality in North Carolina. NC State University, A&T State University, Cooperative Extension, ISSN 1062-9149.

  • Muthanna, T. M., Thorolfsson, S. T., & Viklander, M. (2006, Winter hydrology in a cold climate rain garden. Paper presented at the 2006 American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, paper No. 062309, Portland, OR.

  • Pitt, R. (1999). Small storm hydrology and why it is important for the design of stormwater control practices. In W. James (Ed.), Advances in modeling the management of stormwater impacts, volume 7. Guelph, Ontario: Computational Hydraulics International and Lewis Publishers/CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, R. (2004, September). WinSLAMM and low impact development. Paper presented at the Putting the LID on Stormwater Management, College Park, MD.

  • Pitt, R., Clark, S., & Field, R. (1999). Groundwater contamination potential from stormwater infiltration practices. Urban Water, 1, 217–236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prince George’s County. (1993). Design manual for use of bioretention in stormwater management. Prince George’s County, MD Department of Environmental Resources, Watershed Protection Branch, MD Department of Environmental Protection, Landover, MD.

  • Prince George’s County. (1999). Low-impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach. Prince George’s County, MD Department of Environmental Resources.

  • Roseen, R. M., Ballestero, T. P., Houle, J. J., Avelleneda, P., Wildey, R., & Briggs, J. (2006). Storm water low-impact development, conventional structural, and manufactured treatment strategies for parking lot runoff. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1984, 135–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusciano, G. M., & Obropta, C. C. (2005). Efficiency of bioretention systems to reduce fecal coliform counts in stormwater. Paper presented at the North American Surface Water Quality Conference and Exposition, Orlando, FL, July 18–25.

  • Rushton, B. (2001). Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 127(3), 172–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCS (1986). Urban hydrology for small watersheds. U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Release No. 55 (revised), 210-VI-TR-55.

  • Stenmark, C. (1995). An alternative road construction for stormwater management in cold climates. Water Science and Technology, 32(1), 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toronto and Region Conservation. (2006). Performance evaluation of permeable pavement and a bioretention swale. Seneca College, King City, Ontario. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Interim Report #2.

  • Traver, R. G., Welker, A. L., Horst, M., Vanacore, M., Braga, A., & Kob, L. (2005). Lessons in porous concrete. Stormwater, July/August, 30–45.

  • US EPA (1983). Results of the nationwide urban runoff program. United States Environmental Protection Agency, NTIS PB84-185552.

  • US EPA (2000). Low impact development (LID), a literature review. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-841-B-00-005.

  • US EPA (2002). National water quality inventory, 2000 report. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-841-R-02-001.

  • VanWoert, N. D., Rowe, D. B., Andresen, J. A., Rugh, C. L., Fernandez, R. T., & Xiao, L. (2005). Green roof stormwater retention: Effects of roof surface, slope, and media depth. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 1036–1044.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Waananen, A.O. (1969). Effects of watershed changes on streamflow. In W. L. Moore, & C. W. Morgan (Eds.), Urban effects on water yield (pp. 169–182). Austin and London: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winogradoff, D. (2002). The bioretention manual. Prince George’s County, MD Department of Environmental Resources, Watershed Protection Branch, MD Department of Environmental Protection, Landover, MD.

  • WI DNR. (2003). Rain gardens: A how-to manual for homeowners. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, DNR Publication PUB-WT-776 2003.

  • WI DNR. (2006). Bioretention for infiltration. Conservation Practice Standard (1004). Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, 5215 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT, 84322-5215, USA

    Michael E. Dietz

Authors
  1. Michael E. Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, M.E. Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions. Water Air Soil Pollut 186, 351–363 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation