Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Outdoor Water Use as an Adaptation Problem: Insights from North American Cities

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent efforts to influence the efficiency and timing of urban indoor water use through education, technology, conservation, reuse, economic incentives, and regulatory mechanisms have enabled many North American cities to accommodate population growth and buffer impacts of drought. It is unlikely that this approach will be equally successful into the future because the source of conservation will shift from indoor to outdoor use. Outdoor water is climate sensitive, difficult to measure, hard to predict, linked to other components of complex and dynamic urban resource systems, imbued with behavioral and cultural dimensions, and implicated in societal conflicts about climate risk, modern lifestyles, social justice, and future growth. Outdoor water conservation is not a traditional management problem focused on the water sector, assuming a stationary climate, and set aside from public debate. Instead, outdoor water is an adaptation problem, involving complex and uncertain system dynamics, the need for cross-sector coordination, strategies for dealing with climatic uncertainty, and mechanisms for engaging stakeholders with differing goals. This paper makes the case for treating outdoor water as an adaptation problem and offers a six-point strategy for how cities can better prepare their water systems for the uncertainties of climate and societal change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott JK, Klaiber HA, Smith VK (2015) Economic Behavior, Market Signals and Urban Ecology. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 20959. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w20959

  • Arbués FM, García-Valiñas MA, Martínez-Espiñeira R (2003) Estimation of residential water demand: a state-of-the-art review. J Socio-Econ 32(1):81–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balling Jr RC, Gober P (2007) Climate variability and residential water use in Phoenix. Arizona J Appl Meteor Climatol 46(7):1130–1137

  • Bates S (2012) Bridging the governance gap: emerging strategies to integrate water and land use planning. Nat Resour J 52(1):61–97

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC Research & Consulting (2007) Water conservation awareness, attitudes, and behaviors. Arizona municipal water users association. Phoenix, AZ

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner RD (2010) Adaptive governance as a reform strategy. Policy Sci 43:301–341. doi:10.1007/s11077-010-9117-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho AE (2009) Adapting governance to climate change: managing uncertainty through a learning infrastructure. Emory L J 59(1):1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow WTL, Brazel AJ (2012) Assessing xeriscaping as a sustainable heat island mitigation approach for a desert city. Build Environ 47:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christain-Smith J, Herberger M, Allen L (2012) Urban water demand in California to 2100: incorporating climate change. Pacific Institute Available at http://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/04/2100-urban-water-efficiency.pdf

  • Coomes P, Rockaway T, Rivard J, Kornstein B (2010) North American residential water usage trends since 1992. Denver, CO., Water Research Foundation Available at: http://www.waterrf.org/PublicReportLibrary/4031.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutts AM, Beringer J, Tapper NJ (2007) Impact of increasing urban density on local climate: spatial and temporal variations in the surface energy balance in Melbourne, Australia. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46:477–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeOreo WB, Mayer PW, Martien L, Hayden M, Funk A, Kramer-Duffield M, Davis R, Henderson J, Raucher B, Gleick P, Heberger M (2011) California Single-family Water Use Efficiency Study. Aquacraft Water Engineering and Management, Boulder, CO. Available at: http//www.aquacraft.com/sites/default/files/pub/CalSF Water Study Report Body 120811.pdf

  • Domene E, Saurí D (2006) Ubanisation and water consumption: influencing factors in the metropolitan region of Barcelona. Urban Stud 43(9):1605–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke JM, Ehemann RW, Mackenzie J (2002) The distributional effects of water quantity management strategies: a spatial analysis. Rev Reg Stud 32(1):19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Dziegielewski B, Keifer JC (2010) Appropriate design and evaluation of water use and conservation metrics and benchmarks. J Am Water Works Assoc 102(6):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of socio-ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost D (2013) The water demand revolution. Plann 79(7):12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerth LS (2009) Foresight and anticipatory governance. Foresight 11(4):14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage E, Cooper DJ (2015) The influence of land cover, vertical structure and socioeconomic factors on outdoor water use in a western US city. Water Resour Manag 29:3877–3890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Brazel AJ, Quay R, Myint S, Grossman-Clarke S, Miller A, Rossi S (2010) Using watered landscapes to manipulate urban heat island effects: how much water will it take to cool phoenix? J Am Plan Assoc 76(1):109–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Middel A, Brazel A, Myint S, Chang H, Duh J, House-Peters L (2012) Tradeoffs between water conservation and temperature amelioration in phoenix and Portland: implications for urban sustainability. Urban Geogr 33(7):1030–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Larson KL, Quay R, Polsky C, Chang H, Shandas V (2013) Why land planners and water managers don’t talk to one another and why they Should! Soc Nat Resour 26(3):356–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton RQ, Ward MB, To H, Kompas T (2011) Determinants of residential water consumption: Evidence and analysis from a 10 country household survey. Water Resour Res 47:W0853. doi:10.1029/2010WR009685

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamin E, Gurran N (2009) Urban form and climate change: balancing adaptation and mitigation in the US and Australia. Habitat Int 33(3):238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlan SL, Brazel AJ, Prashad L, Stefanov WL, Larsen L (2006) Neighborhood microclimates and vulnerability to heat stress. Soc Sci Med 63(11):2847–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JA, Hanemann MJ (1995) A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing. Land Econ 71(2):173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill T, Polsky C (2007) Development and drought in suburbia: a mixed methods rapid assessment of vulnerability to drought in rainy Massachusetts. Environ Hazards 7(4):291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogue TS, Pincetl S (2015) Are you watering your lawn? Science 348(6241): 1319–1320. Available at. doi:10.1126/science.aaa6909

  • Huitema D, Meijerink S (2010) Realizing water transitions: the role of policy entrepreneurs in water policy change. Ecol Soc 15(2):26

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White RR (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson KT (1985) Crabgrass frontier: the suburbanization of the United States. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenerette GD, Harlan SL, Brazel A, Jones N, Larsen L, Stefanov WL (2007) Regional relationships between surface temperature, vegetation, and human settlement in a rapidly urbanizing ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 22(3):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer JC, Clayton JM, Dziegieleski B, Henderson J (2013) Analysis of changes in water use under regional climate change scenarios. Denver, CO., Water Research Foundation Available at: http://www.waterrf.org/Pages/Projects.aspx?PID=4263

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach D, Ingram H, Rayner S (2005) Maintaining the status quo: how institutional norms and practices create conservative water organizations. Tex Law Rev 83(7):2027–2053

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson KL, Ibes DC, Wentz ED (2013) Identifying the water conservation potential of neighborhoods in Phoenix, AZ: an integrated socio-spatial approach. In: Lawrence P (ed) Geospatial Approaches to Urban Water Resources. Geotechnologies and the Environment Series: Planning and Socioeconomic Applications. Springer, New York, pp. 11–36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Popper SW, Bankes SC (2003) Shaping the next one hundred years: new methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, Pell AN, Deadman P, Kratz T, Lubchenco J, Ostrom E, Ouyang Z, Provencher W, Redman CL, Schneider SH, Taylor W (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer PW, DeOreo WG, Opitz EM, Kiefer JC, Davis WY, Dziegielewski B, Nelson J (1999) Residential end uses of water. American Water Works Association, Denver CO Available at: http://www.waterrf.org/PublicReportLibrary/RFR90781_1999_241A.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, AQ (2011) Beyond billing: applications of meter technology for water resources and development planning. Presentation to the Metering, Billing, MDM America Meeting in Dallas, TX, April 18-21, 2011. Available at: https://www.google.com/#q=Adam+Q+Miller+Beyond+Billing

  • Nagourney A, Healy J (2015) Drought frames economic divide of California. New York Times, April 26:2015 Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/27/us/drought-widens-economic-divide-for-californians.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Neel R, Sadalla E, Berlin A, Ledlow S, Neufeld S (2014) The social symbolism of water-conserving landscaping. J Environ Psychol 40:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead SM, Hanemann MW, Stavins RN (2007) Water demand under alternative price structures. J Environ Econ Manag 54:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead SM, Stavins RN (2009) Comparing price and non‐price approaches to urban water conservation. Water Resour Res 45(4). Available at: doi: 10.1029/2008WR007227

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector: the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64(4):394–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Chang 19:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B, Kneiper C (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Pol 13:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson LJ, Coggan A, Proctor W, Smith, TF (2010) A Sustainable Decision Support Framework for Urban Water Management. Water Resour Manag 24:363–376. Available at: doi 10.1007/s11269-009-9450-1

  • Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance: a tool for climate change adaptation. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):496–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran M, Johnston RJ (2011) Quantitative restrictions and residential water demand: A spatial analysis of neighborhood. Working paper No. 2011–19. Clark University, Perkins Marsh Research Institute. Available at: https://www.clarku.edu/departments/marsh/news/WP2011-19.pdf

  • Robbins P (2007) Lawn people: how grasses, weeds, and chemicals make us who we are. Temple University Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell S, Fielding K (2010) Water demand management research: a psychological perspective. Water Resour Res 46:W05302. doi:10.1029/2009WR008408 Available at: http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/35719/66007_1.pdf%3Fsequence%3D1&hl=en&sa=X&scisig=AAGBfm2iae5UIBE8NPagffAOAXtrEZEy1A&nossl=1&oi=scholar

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailor DJ (2006) Mitigation of urban heat islands—recent progress and future prospects. Paper presented at the sixth symposium on the urban environment. American Meteorological Society, Atlanta, GA Available at: https://ams.confex.com/ams/Annual2006/techprogram/paper_105264.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Shandas V, Parandvash HG (2010) Integrating urban form and demographics in water-demand management: an empirical case study of Portland, Oregon. Environ Plann B 37(1):112–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stabler LB, Martin CA, Brazel AJ (2005) Microclimates in a desert city were related to land use and vegetation index. Urban For Urban Green 3:137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein BA, Staudt CA, Dubois MS, Enquist NS, Griffis C, Hansen R, Hellmann LJ, Lawler J, Nelson EJ, Pairis A (2013) Preparing for and managing change: climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:502–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone Jr B, Vargo J, Liu P, Habeeb B, DeLucia A, Marcus T, Hu Y, Russell A (2014) Avoided heat-related mortality through climate adaptation strategies in three US cities. PLoS One 9(6). Available at: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0100852

  • Tapsuwan S, Burton M, Mankad A, Tucker D, Greenbill M (2014) Adapting to less water:household willingness to pay for decentralized water systems in urban Australia. Water Resour Manag 28:1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE (2010) More knowledge, less certainty. Nat Clim Chang 21(Jan 2010):20–21. doi:10.1038/climate.2010.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers A, Bracciano D (2014) Low-volume plumbing fixtures achieve water savings. Opflow 40(7):8–9 Available at: http://www.awwa.org/publications/opflow/abstract/articleid/46049779.aspx

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz EA, Gober P (2007) Determinants of small-area water consumption in the city of phoenix, Arizona USA. Water Resour Manag 21(4):1849–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Dessai S (2010) Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 65(7):180–185. doi:10.1002/wea.543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winz I, Brierley G, Trowsdale S (2009) The use of system dynamics simulation in water resources management. Water Resour Manag 23:1301–1323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington AC, Hoffman M (2008) An empirical survey of residential water demand modeling. J Econ Surv 22(5):842–871. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2008.00551.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5302, USA

    Patricia Gober & Kelli L. Larson

  2. Decision Center for a Desert City, Arizona State University, 126b, 21 E 6th St, Tempe, AZ, 85287-8209, USA

    Patricia Gober, Ray Quay & Kelli L. Larson

  3. School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5502, USA

    Kelli L. Larson

Authors
  1. Patricia Gober
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ray Quay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kelli L. Larson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Gober.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gober, P., Quay, R. & Larson, K.L. Outdoor Water Use as an Adaptation Problem: Insights from North American Cities. Water Resour Manage 30, 899–912 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1205-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1205-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation