Skip to main content
Log in

The Influence of Objective Function and Acceptability Threshold on Uncertainty Assessment of an Urban Drainage Hydraulic Model with Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation Methodology

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban drainage model is an important computer-aided tool in stormwater management and drainage planning and designing. A popular urban drainage hydraulic model, stormwater management model (SWMM), was applied in a pump lifting combined sewer system for a high-intensity urban catchment located in Shanghai, China. Uncertainty of SWMM water quantity parameters was assessed with generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) methodology. The sensitivity of parameters was discussed and compared based on the results of uncertainty analysis. To discuss the influence of the acceptability threshold on model parameter sensitivity and the margin of uncertainty band, the GLUE approach was applied several times varying acceptability threshold. The results indicated that a higher acceptability threshold value is contributed to achieve a stricter verification with a high confidence level, and the uncertainty analysis significant level can be featured by the value of acceptability threshold. The selection of acceptability threshold value can be regarded as a tradeoff process. Both reducing the low efficient simulation and reducing computation cost should be considered for the selection of acceptability threshold. Moreover, the GLUE approach was applied several times varying different objective functions with corresponding acceptability thresholds. The results indicated that some parameters may be sensitive to a specific objective function, and other parameters may be sensitive to another objective function. Some parameters cannot easily identified when a single objective function was used within the GLUE approach, and a multiple-objective function combined different objective functions requirements, may be a alternative approach to reduce the model prediction uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arabi M, Govindaraju RS, Hantush MM (2007) A probabilistic approach for analysis of uncertainty in the evaluation of watershed management practice. J Hydrol 333:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balascio CC, Palmeri DJ, Gao H (1998) Use of a genetic algorithm and multi-objective programming for calibration of a hydrologic model. T ASABE 41:615–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barco J, Wong KM, Stenstrom MK (2008) Automatic calibration of the U. S. EPA SWMM model for a large urban catchment. J Hydraul Eng 134:466–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Binley A (1992) The future of distributed models–model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrol Process 6:279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler D, Davies J (2010) Urban drainage. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi HT, Beven K (2007) Multi-period and multi-criteria model conditioning to reduce prediction uncertainty in an application of TOPMODEL within the GLUE framework. J Hydrol 332:316–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles NA, Sivapalan M, Larsen JE, Linnet PE, Fahrner CK (1997) Modelling runoff generation on small agricultural catchments: can real world runoff responses be captured? Hydrol Process 11:111–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott AH, Trowsdale SA (2007) A review of models for low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22:394–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Notaro V (2012) Bayesian inference analysis of the uncertainty linked to the evaluation of potential flood damage in urban areas. Water Sci Technol 66:1669–1677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2008) Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the effect of acceptability threshold in the GLUE methodology. Water Res 42:2061–2072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freni G, Mannina G, Viviani G (2010) The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling. Water Sci Technol 61:2381–2390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia Y, Culver TB (2008) Uncertainty analysis for watershed modeling using generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation with multiple calibration measures. J Water Res Plan Manag 134:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang T, Lee S (2014) Modification of the SCE-UA to include constraints by embedding an adaptive penalty function and application: application approach. Water Resour Manag 28:2145–2159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liong SY, Chan WT, Lum LH (1991) Knowledge-based system for SWMM runoff component calibration. J Water Res Plan Manag 117:507–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manz BJ, Rodríguez JP, Maksimović Č, McIntyre N (2013) Impact of rainfall temporal resolution on urban water quality modelling performance and uncertainties. Water Sci Technol 68:68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Notaro V, Fontanazza CM, Freni G, Puleo V (2013) Impact of rainfall data resolution in time and space on the urban flooding evaluation. Water Sci Technol 68:1984–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V (2001) Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J Hydrol 242:275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2010) Storm water management model user’s manual, version 5.0. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

  • Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1995) Model calibration. In: Singh VP (ed) Computer models for watershed hydrology. Water Resources Publications, Highland Ranch, pp 23–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Sourisseau S, Basseres A, Perie F, Caquet T (2008) Calibration, validation and sensitivity analysis of an ecosystem model applied to artificial streams. Water Res 42:1167–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun N, Hong B, Hall M (2014) Assessment of the SWMM model uncertainties within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework for a high‐resolution urban sewershed. Hydrol Process 28:3018–3034

    Google Scholar 

  • Talebizadeh M, Morid S, Ayyoubzadeh SA, Ghasemzadeh M (2010) Uncertainty analysis in sediment load modeling using ANN and SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 24:1747–1761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndahl S, Beven KJ, Jensen JB, Schaarup-Jensen K (2008) Event based uncertainty assessment in urban drainage modelling, applying the GLUE methodology. J Hydrol 357:421–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolson BA, Shoemaker CA (2007) Cannonsville Reservoir watershed SWAT2000 model development, calibration and validation. J Hydrol 337:68–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez RF, Beven K, Feyen J (2009) GLUE based assessment on the overall predictions of a MIKE SHE application. Water Resour Manag 23:1325–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willems P (2008) Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modeling. Water Res 42:3539–3551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang YS, Wang L (2010) A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU water framework directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resour Manag 24:1819–1843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zoppou C (2001) Review of urban storm water models. Environ Model Softw 16:195–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

These studies were financially supported by National water pollution control and management technology major projects (2011ZX07303-002). The authors would like to extend their appreciation to research team members for providing zealous support. We also appreciate Shanghai Municipal Sewerage Co. Ltd. for SCADA data and great help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Li, T. The Influence of Objective Function and Acceptability Threshold on Uncertainty Assessment of an Urban Drainage Hydraulic Model with Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation Methodology. Water Resour Manage 29, 2059–2072 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0928-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0928-8

Keyword

Navigation