Abstract
The paper presents an approach to the modelling of watercourses or their sections according to and in order to determine their suitability for hydropower water use on a large scale. The method is based on a multi-criteria analysis approach which in addition to existing guidelines defines and describes in detail the main stages for model establishment and hydropower suitability analysis. Since hydropower planning stands in direct conflict with other ecological water-related objectives, evaluation of suitability is based on two main criteria, which are supported with the belonging criteria. The first main criterion is based on evaluation of watercourses by their attractiveness for hydropower water use; the second one on evaluation of watercourses according to their ecological state or value. To support proper determination of unknown model parameters (e.g. weights of selected criteria) the paper also presents an upgrade of general multi-criteria analysis process with a calibration stage, which can efficiently upgrade in cases when calibration data is available. The proposed method was tested and discussed on a real case study with three dislocated Slovenian Alpine watercourses, where weights of preselected criteria and some thresholds of performance functions were selected as model variables and calibrated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahmad A, El-Shafie A, Razali SFM, Mohamad ZS (2014) Reservoir optimization in water resources: a review. Water Resour Manag 28(11):3391–3405
Alpine Convention (2011) Common guidelines for the use of small hydropower in the Alpine region. Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention. Innsbruck: Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention
Barlow E, Tanyimboh TT (2014) Multiobjective memetic algorithm applied to the optimisation of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 28(8):2229–2242
Cai X, Lasdon L, Michelsen AM (2004) Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(1):4–14
Chen Y, Yu J, Shahbaz K, Xevi E (2009) A GIS-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Weights. 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13–17 July 2009: 3137–3143
Clean Energy Decision Support Centre (2003) Retscreen® Engineering & cases textbook – small hydro project analysis. minister of natural resources Canada 2001–2004
Dunning DJ, Ross QE, Merkhofer MW (2000) Multiattribute utility analysis for addressing section 316(b) of the clean water Act. Environ Sci and Policy 3:7–14
European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/ EC of the European parliament and the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. OJEC L 327:1–73
European Commission (2003) Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Union L 236 33 23.9.2003. Brussels. European Commission 1992/95/2003
European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. OJ L 140:16–62
European Environment Agency (2008) Energy and environment report 2008. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/eea_report_2008_6 [Accessed 10 August 2014]
Gallego-Ayala J, Juízo D (2014) Integrating Stakeholders’ preferences into water resources management planning in the incomati river basin. Water Resour Manag 28(2):527–540
Geisler T, Wellacher J (2012) Potenzialstudie Wasserkraft Steiermark (Hydropower potential study in Steiermark). 12. Symposium Energieinnovation, 15.-17.2.2012, Graz/Austria
Gonzalez-Pachon J, Romero C (2001) Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Comput Oper Res 28:827–834
Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21(9):1553–1566
Howard AF (1991) A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications. Can J For Res 21:1649–1659
Illies J (1978) Limnofauna Europaea, 2nd edn. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart
Irvine K (2004) Classifying ecological status under the European water framework directive: the need for monitoring to account for natural variability. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 14:107–112
Lebensministerium (2012) Österreichischer Wasserkatalog Wasser schützen – Wasser nutzen Kriterien zur Beurteilung einer nachhaltigen Wasserkraftnutzung. Available from: http://www.bmlfuw.gv.at/wasser/wasser-oesterreich/plan_gewaesser_ngp/wasserwirtsch_planung/wasserkatalog.html [Accessed 10 August]
Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science. New Ser 263(5147):641–646
Ribas JR, (2014) An assessment of conflicting intentions in the use of multipurpose water reservoirs. water resources management [Accepted 25 Jun 2014]
Rosgen DL (1994) A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169–199
Šantl S, Kozelj D, Cimperman A, Bajcar T (2010) WP7.2 – Kokra River Pilot Case Study Monograph. The Alpine Space Programme & The European Regional Development Fund. Available from: http://share-alpinerivers.eu/tools-and-resources/pilot-case-studies/SHARE_WP4%204_Kokra_MCA%20tree-alternatives_170810_.pdf/view [Accessed 10 August 2014]
Šantl S, Kozelj D, Bajcar T, Kozelj K, Steinman F (2012a) Report on pilot case study area Drava river sub-basin with tributaries of Oplotnica and Lobnica streams –Deliverable 6. Available from: http://www.seehydropower.eu/download_deliverables/ [Accessed 10 August 2014]
Šantl S, Alterach J, Kozelj D (2012) Development of an informatics tool for efficient hydropower potential determination. Acta hydrotech 25(42):17–28
Schinegger R, Trautwein C, Melcher A, Schmutz S (2012) Multiple human pressures and their spatial patterns in European running waters. Water and Environ J 26(2):261–273
Smolar-Žvanut N, Maddock I, Vrhovšek D (2008) Evaluation and application of environmental flows for running waters in Slovenia. Water Resour Dev 24(4):609–619
Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J, Wilcox C (2009) Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Risk Anal 29:26–33
Supriyasilp T, Pongput K, Boonyasirikul T (2009) Hydropower development priority using MCDM method. Energy Policy 37:1866–1875
Swiss Confederation (2011) Recommendations for developing cantonal conservation and exploitation strategies for small hydropower plants Available from: http://www.environment-switzerland.ch/ud-1037-e [Accessed 10 August 2014]
Tavzes B, Urbanič G (2009) New indices for assessment of hydromorphological alteration of rivers and their evaluation with benthic invertebrate communities: Alpine case study. Rev of hydrobiol 2:133–161
Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2011) Planning against long TermWater scarcity: a fuzzy multicriteria approach. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1103–1129
Tuhtan JA, Noack M, Wieprecht S (2012) Estimating stranding risk due to hydropeaking for juvenile European grayling considering river morphology. KSCE J Civ Eng 16(2):197–206
Walder C, Litschauer C (2010) Ökomasterplan - Stufe II - Schutz für Österreichs Flussjuwele (Eco Master Plan – Phase II – Protection of Austrian River Juweliers). WWF Österreich Available from: http://www.oekomasterplan.at/ [Accessed 10 August 2014]
Acknowledgments
The work presented herein is also based on the data, informatics tool development support and cooperation provided by various competent authorities within two projects co-financed by EU programmes, SHARE (www.share-alpinerivers.eu/) and SEE Hydropower (www.seehydropower.eu/). We are grateful to all participating partners and stakeholders.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Šantl, S., Steinman, F. Hydropower Suitability Analysis on a Large Scale Level: Inclusion of a Calibration Phase to Support Determination of Model Parameters. Water Resour Manage 29, 109–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0830-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0830-9