Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydropower Suitability Analysis on a Large Scale Level: Inclusion of a Calibration Phase to Support Determination of Model Parameters

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents an approach to the modelling of watercourses or their sections according to and in order to determine their suitability for hydropower water use on a large scale. The method is based on a multi-criteria analysis approach which in addition to existing guidelines defines and describes in detail the main stages for model establishment and hydropower suitability analysis. Since hydropower planning stands in direct conflict with other ecological water-related objectives, evaluation of suitability is based on two main criteria, which are supported with the belonging criteria. The first main criterion is based on evaluation of watercourses by their attractiveness for hydropower water use; the second one on evaluation of watercourses according to their ecological state or value. To support proper determination of unknown model parameters (e.g. weights of selected criteria) the paper also presents an upgrade of general multi-criteria analysis process with a calibration stage, which can efficiently upgrade in cases when calibration data is available. The proposed method was tested and discussed on a real case study with three dislocated Slovenian Alpine watercourses, where weights of preselected criteria and some thresholds of performance functions were selected as model variables and calibrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad A, El-Shafie A, Razali SFM, Mohamad ZS (2014) Reservoir optimization in water resources: a review. Water Resour Manag 28(11):3391–3405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpine Convention (2011) Common guidelines for the use of small hydropower in the Alpine region. Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention. Innsbruck: Permanent Secretariat of the Alpine Convention

  • Barlow E, Tanyimboh TT (2014) Multiobjective memetic algorithm applied to the optimisation of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 28(8):2229–2242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai X, Lasdon L, Michelsen AM (2004) Group decision making in water resources planning using multiple objective analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130(1):4–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Yu J, Shahbaz K, Xevi E (2009) A GIS-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Multi-Criteria Weights. 18th World IMACS / MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13–17 July 2009: 3137–3143

  • Clean Energy Decision Support Centre (2003) Retscreen® Engineering & cases textbook – small hydro project analysis. minister of natural resources Canada 2001–2004

  • Dunning DJ, Ross QE, Merkhofer MW (2000) Multiattribute utility analysis for addressing section 316(b) of the clean water Act. Environ Sci and Policy 3:7–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2000) Directive 2000/60/ EC of the European parliament and the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. OJEC L 327:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Council directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. Official Journal of the European Union L 236 33 23.9.2003. Brussels. European Commission 1992/95/2003

  • European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. OJ L 140:16–62

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2008) Energy and environment report 2008. Available from: http://www.eea.europa.eu//publications/eea_report_2008_6 [Accessed 10 August 2014]

  • Gallego-Ayala J, Juízo D (2014) Integrating Stakeholders’ preferences into water resources management planning in the incomati river basin. Water Resour Manag 28(2):527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisler T, Wellacher J (2012) Potenzialstudie Wasserkraft Steiermark (Hydropower potential study in Steiermark). 12. Symposium Energieinnovation, 15.-17.2.2012, Graz/Austria

  • Gonzalez-Pachon J, Romero C (2001) Aggregation of partial ordinal rankings: an interval goal programming approach. Comput Oper Res 28:827–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajkowicz S, Collins K (2007) A review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and management. Water Resour Manag 21(9):1553–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard AF (1991) A critical look at multiple criteria decision making techniques with reference to forestry applications. Can J For Res 21:1649–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illies J (1978) Limnofauna Europaea, 2nd edn. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine K (2004) Classifying ecological status under the European water framework directive: the need for monitoring to account for natural variability. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 14:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebensministerium (2012) Österreichischer Wasserkatalog Wasser schützen – Wasser nutzen Kriterien zur Beurteilung einer nachhaltigen Wasserkraftnutzung. Available from: http://www.bmlfuw.gv.at/wasser/wasser-oesterreich/plan_gewaesser_ngp/wasserwirtsch_planung/wasserkatalog.html [Accessed 10 August]

  • Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science. New Ser 263(5147):641–646

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribas JR, (2014) An assessment of conflicting intentions in the use of multipurpose water reservoirs. water resources management [Accepted 25 Jun 2014]

  • Rosgen DL (1994) A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22:169–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šantl S, Kozelj D, Cimperman A, Bajcar T (2010) WP7.2 – Kokra River Pilot Case Study Monograph. The Alpine Space Programme & The European Regional Development Fund. Available from: http://share-alpinerivers.eu/tools-and-resources/pilot-case-studies/SHARE_WP4%204_Kokra_MCA%20tree-alternatives_170810_.pdf/view [Accessed 10 August 2014]

  • Šantl S, Kozelj D, Bajcar T, Kozelj K, Steinman F (2012a) Report on pilot case study area Drava river sub-basin with tributaries of Oplotnica and Lobnica streams –Deliverable 6. Available from: http://www.seehydropower.eu/download_deliverables/ [Accessed 10 August 2014]

  • Šantl S, Alterach J, Kozelj D (2012) Development of an informatics tool for efficient hydropower potential determination. Acta hydrotech 25(42):17–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinegger R, Trautwein C, Melcher A, Schmutz S (2012) Multiple human pressures and their spatial patterns in European running waters. Water and Environ J 26(2):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smolar-Žvanut N, Maddock I, Vrhovšek D (2008) Evaluation and application of environmental flows for running waters in Slovenia. Water Resour Dev 24(4):609–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele K, Carmel Y, Cross J, Wilcox C (2009) Uses and misuses of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision making. Risk Anal 29:26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supriyasilp T, Pongput K, Boonyasirikul T (2009) Hydropower development priority using MCDM method. Energy Policy 37:1866–1875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Confederation (2011) Recommendations for developing cantonal conservation and exploitation strategies for small hydropower plants Available from: http://www.environment-switzerland.ch/ud-1037-e [Accessed 10 August 2014]

  • Tavzes B, Urbanič G (2009) New indices for assessment of hydromorphological alteration of rivers and their evaluation with benthic invertebrate communities: Alpine case study. Rev of hydrobiol 2:133–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsakiris G, Spiliotis M (2011) Planning against long TermWater scarcity: a fuzzy multicriteria approach. Water Resour Manag 25(4):1103–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuhtan JA, Noack M, Wieprecht S (2012) Estimating stranding risk due to hydropeaking for juvenile European grayling considering river morphology. KSCE J Civ Eng 16(2):197–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walder C, Litschauer C (2010) Ökomasterplan - Stufe II - Schutz für Österreichs Flussjuwele (Eco Master Plan – Phase II – Protection of Austrian River Juweliers). WWF Österreich Available from: http://www.oekomasterplan.at/ [Accessed 10 August 2014]

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work presented herein is also based on the data, informatics tool development support and cooperation provided by various competent authorities within two projects co-financed by EU programmes, SHARE (www.share-alpinerivers.eu/) and SEE Hydropower (www.seehydropower.eu/). We are grateful to all participating partners and stakeholders.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sašo Šantl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šantl, S., Steinman, F. Hydropower Suitability Analysis on a Large Scale Level: Inclusion of a Calibration Phase to Support Determination of Model Parameters. Water Resour Manage 29, 109–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0830-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0830-9

Keywords

Navigation