Skip to main content
Log in

Using System Dynamics Method to Determine the Effect of Water Demand Priorities on Downstream Flow

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the past decades, the command and control approaches were used to access a safe water supply policy. However, traditional methods of water management rarely consider complex interactions and outcomes of water allocations which can show their effects in feedback loops. These methods also might deteriorate the situation in long terms as they have not taken into account the outcome of such plans on the future of a watershed as a whole system. Dynamic simulation methods provide flexible tools to accomplish a holistic analysis. This ability of system dynamics method is used in this research to show the feedback of water allocation. Bookan dam is one of the constructed dams in Urmia Lake basin upstream of which four dams are being constructed. Three well known archetypes are shown in this paper that help to recognize the effect of a reservoir water supply on downstream flow. The result of dam construction and water supply priorities on Bookan dam inflow is investigated too. The difference of inflow reduction to Bookan reservoir for the best and worst policies is about 18.4 MCM which is a significant amount. Also the best preference of water demand allocation for four dams was defined as agricultural demand, domestic demand, industrial demand and environmental demand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abed Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2012) Water Resources allocation using a cooperative game with fuzzy payoffs and fuzzy coalitions. Water Resour Manag 26:3961–3976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2006) An intelligent decision support system for management of floods. Water Resour Manag 20(3):391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2004) Spatial system dynamics: new approach for simulation of water resources systems. J Comput Civ Eng 18(4):331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2000) Dynamic modeling of flood management policies. 18th International Conference of The System Dynamics Society, Sustainability in the Third Millennium, Bergen, Norway

  • Albuquerque S (2001) A system model for source water assessment in the Las Vegas Valley. M. S. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

  • Alfieri L, Perona P, Burlando P (2006) Optimal water allocation for an Alpine hydropower system under changing Scenarios. Water Resour Manag 20:761–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron JS, Poff NL, Angermeier PL, Dahm CN, Gleick PH, Jackson RB, Johnston CA, Richter BD, Steinman AD (2002) Meeting ecological and societal needs for fresh water. Ecol Appl 12(5):1247–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Alaya A, Souissi A, Tarhouni J, Ncib K (2003) Optimization of Nebhana reservoir water allocation by stochastic dynamic programming. Water Resour Manag 17:259–272. doi:10.1007/s12665-013-2801-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camara AS, Viegas MG, Amaro A (1986) Interfacing system dynamics and multi objective programming for regional water resources planning. Ann Reg Sci 20(3):104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright L, Connor J (2003) Collaborative water supply planning, a shared vision approach for the Rappanhannock Basin. In Proceedings of the 2003 UCOWR Meeting, Washington DC USA, Universities Council on Water Resources

  • Cohen S, Neale T (2006) Participatory integrated assessment of water management and climate change in the Okanagan Basin. British Columbia Final report, Environment Canada and University of British Columbia, Vancouver

  • Connor J, Cartwright L, Stephenson K (2004) Collaborative water supply planning: a shared vision approach for the Rappahannock Basin in Virginia. World Water and Environmental Resources Congress, Salt Lake City

  • Exter K den (2004) Integrating environmental science and management: the role of system dynamics modeling. PhD Dissertation, CRC Sustainable Tourism School of Environmental Science and Management, Southern Cross University, Queensland, Australia

  • Exter K den, Specht A (2003) Assisting stakeholder decision making using system dynamics group model-building. In: Proceedings of APEN National Forum, p. 43. http://www.regional.org.au/au/apen/2003/non_refereed/108denexterk.htm

  • Diaz-Ibarra MA (2004) A System Dynamics Model of El-Paso County Water Improvement. PhD Dissertation, Environmental Science and Engineering, University of Texas, El Paso, USA

  • Fernandez JM, Selma MAE (2004) The dynamics of water scarcity on irrigated Landscapes: Mazarron and Aguilas in south-eastern Spain. Syst Dyn Rev 20(2):117–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamouz M, Ponnambalam K, Javan MA (2008) Fuzzy stochastic dynamic Nash game analysis of policies for managing water allocation in a reservoir system. Water Resour Manag 22:51–66. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9143-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gastelum Perez JR (2006) Analysis of water resources alternatives to improve water allocation on the Conchos Basin during drought situation. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, USA

  • Gleick PH (2000) The changing water paradigm- a look at twenty first century water resources development. Water Int 25(2):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo HC, Liu L, Huang GH, Fuller GA, Zou R, Yin YY (2001) A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: a study for the Lake Erhai Basin. J Environ Manag 61(1):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassanzadeh E, Zarghami M, Hassanzadeh Y (2012) Determining the main factors in declining the Urmia Lake level by using system dynamics modeling. Water Resour Manag 26:129–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins A, Archer A, Hajkowicz S (2008) A stochastic non-linear programming model for a multi-period water resource allocation with multiple objectives. Water Resour Manag 22:1445–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homayounfar M, Ganji A, Martinez CJ (2011) A novel solution for stochastic dynamic game of water allocation from a reservoir using collocation method. Water Resour Manag 25:3427–3444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11(4):1027–1045, http://esa.sdsc.edu/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson J, Sehlke G (2005) System dynamics modeling of trans boundary systems: the Bear River basin model. Ground Water 43(5):722–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi A, Ardakanian R (2010) Development of a dynamic long-term water allocation model for agriculture and industry water demands. Water Resour Manag 24:1717–1746. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9521-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal Neto AC, Legey LFL, Gonzalez-Araya MC, Jablonski S (2006) A system dynamics model for the environmental management of the Sepetiba Bay watershed, Brazil. Environ Manag 38(5):879–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH (2008) Interval-parameter two-stage stochastic nonlinear programming for water resources management under uncertainty. Water Resour Manag 22:681–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li YP, Huang GH, Chen X (2009) Multistage scenario-based interval-stochastic programming for planning water resources allocation. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 23:781–792. doi:10.1007/s00477-008-0258-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louati MH, Benabdallah S, Lebdi F, Milutin D (2011) Application of a genetic algorithm for the optimization of a complex reservoir system in Tunisia. Water Resour Manag 25:2387–2404. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9814-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirchi A, Madani K, Watkins D, Ahmad S (2012) Synthesis of system dynamics tools for holistic conceptualization of water resources problems. Water Resour Manag 26:2421–2442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo MR, Karimi A, Kerachian R (2013) Optimal long-term operation of reservoir-river systems under hydrologic uncertainties: application of interval programming. Water Resour Manag 27:3865–3883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo MR, Kerachian R, Karimi A, Azadnia AA, Jafarzadegan K (2014) Optimal water and waste load allocation in reservoir–river systems: a case study. Environ Earth Sci 71:4127–4142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passell HD, Tidwell VC, Conrad SH, Thomas RP, Roach J (2003) Cooperative water resources modeling in the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Technical Report

  • Peterson TR, Kenimer A, Grant WE (2004) Mediated modeling, a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Chapter: using mediated modeling to facilitate collaborative learning among resident of the San Antonio Watershed. Island Press, Texas, pp 136–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahbord Danesh Pouya Institue (2009) Tehran, Iran

  • Saysel AK (2004) System dynamics model for integrated environmental assessment of large scale surface irrigation. Technical Report 2. The System Dynamics Group, Department of Information Science, University of Bergen, Norway

  • Simonovic SP (2009) Managing water resources: methods and tools for a systems approach. UNESCO, Paris and Earthscan, James & James, London

  • Simonovic SP, Rajasekaram V (2004) Integrated analyses of Canada’s water Resources: a system dynamics approach. Can Water Resour J 29(4):223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP (2002a) Global water dynamics: issues for the 21st century. Water Sci Technol 45(8):53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP (2002b) World water dynamics: global modeling of water resources. J Environ Manag 66:249–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Fahmy H (1999) A new modeling approach for water resources policy analysis. Water Resour Res 35:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stave KA (2003) A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas Nevada. J Environ Manag 67(4):303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tennant DL (1976) In stream flow regimens for fish, wildlife, recreation and related environmental resources. Fisheries 1:6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell VC, Passell HD, Conrad SH, Thomas RP (2004) System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: application to the Middle Rio Grande. Aquat Sci 66:35–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modeling- a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventana Systems (2010) User’s guide version 5, Ventana Systems, Inc. http://www.vensim.com

  • Winz I, Brierley G (2007) The use of system dynamics simulation in integrated water resources management. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 50th Anniversary Celebration, Boston

  • Xu HG (2001) Exploring effective policies for underground water management in artificial oasis: a system dynamics analysis of a case study of Yaoba Oasis. J Environ Sci (China) 13(4):476–480

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safar Marofi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghashghaie, M., Marofi, S. & Marofi, H. Using System Dynamics Method to Determine the Effect of Water Demand Priorities on Downstream Flow. Water Resour Manage 28, 5055–5072 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0791-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0791-z

Keywords

Navigation