Skip to main content
Log in

Water Management and the Procedural Turn: Norms and Transitions in Alberta

Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water management reforms promoting deliberative, decentralized decision making are often accompanied by procedures designed to accommodate a range of stakeholder perspectives. This paper considers the role of political and ethical norms affecting this ‘procedural turn’ in order to understand the management of transitions in complex socio-technical systems. It examines the discourse and practice of water reforms in Alberta, Canada in order to identify how new procedures were designed alongside changes to management institutions. It finds that the existing social and cultural context is an uneasy fit with procedural norms theorized in deliberative models of democracy. Using examples from the Alberta case, it draws out implications for understanding the procedural turn in water management and the role of norms affecting transitions toward sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberta Environment (2003a) Water for life: Alberta’s strategy for sustainability. Pub No. I/955, Alberta Environment, Edmonton

  • Alberta Environment (2003b) Water for life: draft for discussion: Alberta’s strategy for sustainability: highlights. Pub No. I/936, Alberta Environment, Edmonton

  • Alberta Environment (2005) South Saskatchewan River Basin water allocation (revised). Alberta Environment, Regional Services, Southern Region, Edmonton

  • Alberta Irrigation Projects Association [AIPA] (2002) South Saskatchewan river basin: Irrigation in the 21st century. Alberta Irrigation Projects Association, Lethbridge, Summary Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Water Council (2007) Review of implementation progress of water for life, 2005–2006. Alberta Water Council, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Water Council (2008a) Strengthening partnerships: A shared governance framework for water for life collaborative partnerships. Alberta Water Council, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Alberta Water Council (2008b) Water for life: A renewal. Alberta Water Council, Edmonton, ISBN 978-0-7785-7670-9

  • Armstrong C, Evenden M, Nelles H (2009) The river returns: An environmental history of the Bow. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2004) An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker K (2010) Privatizing water: Governance failure and the world’s urban water crisis. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett RH (1986) Aboriginal water rights in Canada: A study of aboriginal title to water and Indian water rights. The Canadian Institute of Resources Law, Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter J, Eyles J (1997) Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Trans Inst Br Geogr 22:505–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boelens R, Getches D, Guerva-Gill A (eds) (2010) Out of the mainstream: Water rights, politics and identity. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley D (2012) Environmental governance as stochastic belief updating: crafting rules to live by. Ecol Soc 17:14

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach M, Ingram H (2012) Ambiguity: the challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environ Sci Pol 15:60–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach M et al (2011) More is not always better: coping with ambiguity in natural resources management. J Environ Manag 92:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler L (2000) The pathology of property norms: living with nature’s boundaries. South Calif Law Rev 73:927–1016

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A (2012) Watersheds as boundary objects: scale at the intersection of competing ideologies. Environ Plan A 44:2207–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek J (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant RJ, Fiorino DJ, O’Leary R (eds) (2004) Environmental governance reconsidered: Challenges, choices and opportunities. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Espeland W (1998) The struggle for water: Politics, rationality, and identity in the American Southwest. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman D (1995) Water resources management: In search of an environmental ethic. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman D (2007) Water policy for sustainable development. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay D, Woods J (2005) The reach of abduction: Insight and trial. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn J (1999) Once upon an Oldman: Special interest politics and the Oldman River Dam. UBC Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984a) Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984b) Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1996) Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer MA (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinmiller BT (2013) Advocacy coalitions and the Alberta Water Act. Can J Polit Sci 46:525–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks C (2009) Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sci 42:341–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E et al (2009) Oil sands development contributes polycyclic aromatic compounds to the Athabasca River and its tributaries. PNAS 106:22346–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E et al (2010) Oil sands development contributes elements toxic at low concentrations to the Athabasca River and its tributaries. PNAS 107:16178–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 14:78–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2004) Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurek J et al. (2013) Legacy of half century of Athabasca oil sands development recorded by lake ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(5):1761–1766

  • Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angelas

    Google Scholar 

  • Kysar D (2010) Regulating from nowhere: Environmental law and the search for objectivity. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laird K et al (2003) Lake sediments record large-scale shifts in moisture regimes across the northern prairies of North America during the past two millennia. PNAS 100:2483–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law J (2004) After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23:161–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchildon G (2009) The Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration: climate crisis and federal-provincial relations during the great depression. Can Hist Rev 90:275–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui K (2009) Native peoples and water rights: Irrigation, dams, and the law in Western Canada. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan B (2001) Alberta’s water strategy: A summary of ideas. Equus Consulting Group, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan B (2002) Water for life: Summary of consultation results. Equus Consulting Group, Edmonton

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J (2007) Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. J Environ Policy Plan 9:299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J (2009) What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci 42:323–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft J (2011) Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Transit 1:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe C (2005) On the political. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: A philosophy for adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P et al (2006) Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 11:18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards sustainability in the water sector—the importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64:394–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C et al (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the management and transition framework. Environ Sci Pol 13:571–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C et al (2011) Maturing the new water management paradigm: progressing from aspiration to practice. Water Resour Manag 25:837–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce W (1891) Letter to A.M. Burgess, January 7. William Pearce Papers, University of Alberta Archives 9/2/7/2/6: 1–14

  • Peppard CZ (2014) Just water: Theology, ethics and the global water crisis. Orbis Books, Maryknoll

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy D (1977) Water rights in Alberta. Alberta Law Rev 15:142–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy D (1986) Water rights law and water shortages in Western Canada. Can Water Res J 11:14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percy D (1996) Seventy-five years of Alberta water law: maturity, demise & rebirth. Alberta Law Rev 35:221–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Phare M (2009) Denying the source: The crisis of first nations water rights. Rocky Mountain Books, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for life: Managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Priscoli JD (2000) Water and civilization: using history to reframe water policy debates and to build a new ecological realism. Water Policy 1:623–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priscoli JD (2004) What is public participation in water resources management and why is it important? Water Int 29:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney R, Bayley S, Schindler D (2012) Oil sands mining and reclamation cause massive loss of peatland and stored carbon. PNAS 109(13):4933–4937

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose G (1997) Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Prog Hum Geogr 21:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2009) Complexity and transition management. J Ind Ecol 13:184–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin Y (2003) Conflict, consensus, and rationality in environmental planning: an institutional discourse approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA et al (eds) (2005) Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel MJ (1996) Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauchyn D, Stroich J, Beriault A (2003) A paleoclimatic context for the drought of 1999–2001 in the northern Great Plains of North America. Geogr J 169:158–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler D, Donahue W (2006) An impending water crisis in Canada’s western prairie provinces. PNAS 103:7210–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JJ (2010) Water ethics and water management. In: Brown PG, Schmidt JJ (eds) Water ethics: Foundational readings for students and professionals. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt JJ (2012) Ethical enigmas in modern water policy: the Albertan example. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geography, University of Western Ontario. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, Paper 606

  • Schorr D (2005) Appropriation as agrarianism: distributive justice in the creation of property rights. Ecol Law Q 32:3–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Senecal C, Madramootoo C (2005) Watershed management: review of Canadian diversity. Water Policy 7:509–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd A, Gill K, Rood S (2010) Climate change and future flows of Rocky Mountain rivers: converging forecasts from empirical trend projection and down-scaled global circulation modeling. Hydrol Sci 24:3864–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A, Stirling A (2010) The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecol Soc 15:11

    Google Scholar 

  • Strang V (2014) The Taniwha and the Crown: defending water rights in Aotearoa/New Zealand. WIREs Water 1:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme G, Nancarrow B (1996) Planning attitudes, lay philosophies and water allocation: a preliminary analysis and research agenda. Water Resour Res 32:1843–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syme G, Nancarrow B, McCreddin J (1999) Defining the components of fairness in the allocation of water to environmental and human uses. J Environ Manag 57:51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tisdell JG (2003) Equity and social justice in water doctrines. Soc Justice Res 16:401–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully J (1995) Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van der Brugge R, van Raak R (2007) Facing the adaptive management challenge: insights from transition management. Ecol Soc 12:33

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß J, Bornemann B (2011) The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecol Soc 16:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Wescoat JL, White GF (2003) Water for life: Water management and environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West C (2007) For body, soul, or wealth: the distinction, evolution, and policy implications of a water ethic. Stanf Environ Law J 26:201–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley JM, Ingram H, Perry RW (Eds) (2008) Water, place & equity. MIT Press, Cambridge

  • Wood S, Tanner G, Richardson B (2010) Whatever happened to Canadian environmental law? Ecol Law Q 37:981–1040

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Trudeau Foundation and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremy J. Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmidt, J.J. Water Management and the Procedural Turn: Norms and Transitions in Alberta. Water Resour Manage 28, 1127–1141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0544-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0544-z

Keywords

Navigation