Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pricing and Water Resource Allocation Scheme for the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The eastern route of the South-to-North Water Diversion (SNWD-ER) project is a massive-scale interbasin system to transfer water from the Yangtze River to North China. With the infrastructure construction close to completion, the project is now faced with many complicated operations management problem at different levels. The problems are unique in that, on the one hand, the project is expected to be financially self-sustainable by charging water usages, and on the other hand, the water price is regulated for its nature as a social product. One such problem is to achieve a rational water allocation among different users by appropriate pricing schemes. In this paper, we study how to use a two-tier pricing scheme to balance the water allocation by using a Stackelberg game model. From the study, we find that (1) the Stackelberg game always has equilibrium solutions to balance the benefit of every party in the system, which implies that the two-tier pricing scheme can effectively coordinate the water allocation; (2) the two-tier pricing scheme can also result in multiple desirable by-products such as encouraging the implementation of water saving mechanism and giving the local water users certain priority; and (3) the government can adjust the pricing parameters to control and balance the profit of every party. As such we conclude that the two-tier pricing scheme is an effective way that integrates both the government control and market powers to ensure the public interest and the economic benefit, which is suitable for SNWD-ER project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abed-Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2012a) Water resources allocation using a cooperative game with fuzzy payoffs and fuzzy coalitions. Water Resour Manag 26(13):3961–3976. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0115-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abed-Elmdoust A, Kerachian R (2012b) Incorporating economic and political considerations in inter-basin water allocations: a case study. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0219-6

  • Byrnes J, Crase L, Dollery B (2006) Regulation versus pricing in urban water policy: the case of the Australian national water initiative. Aust J Agric Resour Econ 50(3):437–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calizaya A, Meixner O, Bengtsson L, Berndtsson R (2009) Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) for Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) in the Lake Poopo Basin, Bolivia. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2267–2289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Yang ZF (2009) Residential water demand model under block rate pricing: a case study of Beijing, China. Comm Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 14(5):2462–2468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar A, Mody J (2004) Irrigation water management policies: allocation and pricing principles and implementation experience. Nat Resour Forum 28(2):112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dole D, Niemi E (2004) Future water allocation and in-stream values in the Willamette river basin: a basin-wide analysis. Ecol Appl 14(2):355–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dono G, Giraldo L, Severini S (2010) Pricing of irrigation water under alternative charging methods: possible shortcomings of a volumetric approach. Agr Water Manag 97(11):1795–1805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eleftheriadou E, Mylopoulos Y (2008) Game theoretical approach to conflict resolution in transboundary water resources management. J Water Resour Plann Manag 134(5):466–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman SL (1975) Peak-load pricing of urban water supply. Water Resour Res 11(2):355–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-valinas MA (2005) Efficiency and equity in natural resources pricing: a proposal for urban water distribution service. Environ Resour Econ 32(2):183–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Limon JA, Riesgo L (2004) Irrigation water pricing: differential impacts on irrigated farms. Agric Econ 31(1):47–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haro D, Paredes J, Solera A, Andreu J (2012) A model for solving the optimal water allocation problem in river basins with network flow programming when introducing non-linearities. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4059–4071. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0129-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt JA, Hanemann WM (1995) A discrete/continuous choice approach to residential water demand under block rate pricing. Land Econ 71(2):173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung MF, Chie BT (2012) Residential water use: efficiency, affordability, and price elasticity. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0185-z

  • Jacobs JM, Vogel RM (1998) Optimal allocation of water withdrawals in a river basin. J Water Resour Plann Manag 124(6):357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucukmehmetoglu M (2009) A game theoretic approach to assess the impacts of major investments on transboundary water resources: the case of the Euphrates and Tigris. Water Resour Manag 23(15):3069–3099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucukmehmetoglu M, Guldmann J (2010) Multiobjective allocation of transboundary water resources: case of the Euphrates and Tigris. J Water Resour Plann Manag 136(1):95–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu HW, Huang GH, He L (2012) Simulation-based inexact rough-interval programming for agricultural irrigation management: a case study in the Yongxin county, China. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4163–4182. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0138-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahjouri N, Ardestani M (2009) A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues. Environ Monit Assess 167(1–4):527–544

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney DC, Teasley RL (2007) Cooperative game theory for transboundary river basins: the Syr Darya basin. Proceedings of the ASCE EWRI World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007, Tampa, Florida, US

  • Moncur JET (1987) Urban water pricing and drought management. Water Resour Res 23(3):393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoo MR, Kerachian R, Poorsepahy-Samian H (2012) An interval parameter model for cooperative inter-basin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues. Water Resour Manag 26(11):3329–3343. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0074-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaudo JD, Neverre N, Montginoul M (2012) Simulating the impact of pricing policies on residential water demand: a Southern France case study. Water Resour Manag 26(7):2057–2068. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-9998-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadegh M, Mahjouri N, Kerachian R (2009) Optimal inter-basin water allocation using crisp and fuzzy Shapley games. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2291–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer CR (1977) Water allocation and pricing for control of irrigation-related salinity in a river basin. Water Resour Res 13(2):225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sechi GM, Zucca R, Zuddas P (2012) Water costs allocation in complex systems using a cooperative game theory approach. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0171-5

  • Shao WW, Yang DW, Hu HP, Sanbongi K (2009) Water resources allocation considering the water use flexible limit to water shortage-a case study in the yellow river basin of china. Water Resour Manag 23(5):869–880. doi:10.1007/s11269-008-9304-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibly H (2006) Efficient urban water pricing. Aust Econ Rev 39(2):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Hidalgo H, Martín-Domínguez IR, Alarcón-Herrera MT, Granados-Olivas A (2009) Mathematical modeling for the integrated management of water resources in hydrological basins. Water Resour Manag 23(4):721–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsur Y, Dinar A (1997) The relative efficiency and implementation costs of alternative methods for pricing irrigation water. World Bank Econ Rev 11(2):243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viaggi D, Raggi M, Bartolini F, Gallerani V (2010) Designing contracts for irrigation water under asymmetric information: are simple pricing mechanisms enough? Agr Water Manag 97(9):1326–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GQ, Ouyang Q, Zhang YD, Wei JH, Ren ZY (2009) World’s water diversion project. Science Press, Beijing

  • Xia C, Pahl-Wostl C (2012) The development of water allocation management in the yellow river basin. Water Resour Manag 26(12):3395–3414. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0078-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang LX (2003) Foreign projects of water diversion. China Water and Power Press, Beijing

  • Yang W, Yang ZF (2009) An interactive fuzzy satisfying approach for sustainable water management in the yellow river Delta, China. Water Resour Manag 24(7):1273–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C, Wang GL, Peng Y, Tang GL, Liang GH (2012a) A negotiation-based multi-objective, multi-party decision-making model for inter-basin water transfer scheme optimization. Water Resour Manag 26(14):4029–4038. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0127-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang LH, Jia SF, Leung CK, Guo LP (2012b) An analysis on the transaction costs of water markets under DPA and UPA auctions. Water Resour Manag. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0197-8

  • Zhao RH, Chen SY (2008) Fuzzy pricing for urban water resources: model construction and application. J Environ Manag 88(3):458–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JS, Wang ZJ, Wang DX (2009) Evaluation of economic and hydrologic impacts of unified water flow regulation in the yellow river basin. Water Resour Manag 23(7):1387–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XQ, Ierland EC (2012) Economic modelling for water quantity and quality management: a welfare program approach. Water Resour Manag 26(9):2491–2511. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0029-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported in part by: (i) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 50379009, 70471083, 90924027 and 41101509; (ii) the National Social Science Foundation of China under Grant 10AJY005; (iii) the Fund for 2009 Graduate Students research and innovation projects of Jiangsu Province under Grant CX09B_057R.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Business School, Nanjing Normal University, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, China

    Zhisong Chen

  2. State Key Lab. of Hydrology Water Resource and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China

    Zhisong Chen & Huimin Wang

  3. Management Science Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China

    Huimin Wang

  4. Department of Industrial Engineering and Logistics Management, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Xiangtong Qi

Authors
  1. Zhisong Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huimin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiangtong Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhisong Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Wang, H. & Qi, X. Pricing and Water Resource Allocation Scheme for the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. Water Resour Manage 27, 1457–1472 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0248-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0248-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation