Skip to main content
Log in

Water Security Assessment: Integrating Governance and Freshwater Indicators

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new approach is developed for assessing water security status: the Water Security Status Indicators (WSSI) assessment method. The WSSI has four innovative aspects which address important gaps in the literature. First, it was developed in cooperation with end-users, whose participation enabled the design of a user-friendly assessment method. Second, this method is designed to be implemented at the local scale (small scale watershed or sub-watershed). Third, the WSSI is multivariate: it integrates variables pertaining to water quality and water quantity as they relate to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Fourth, the method provides concrete outputs for incorporation into water decision-making processes. In this paper, we document the WSSI assessment method and its application in a community in British Columbia (Canada), including the incorporation of community input into the development and application of the WSSI, and the integration of WSSI results into community water governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This research was part of the 4-year project (2008–2012), Developing a Canadian Water Security Framework as a Tool for Improved Governance for Watersheds, funded through Canadian Water Network. The Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation provided additional support. The University of British Columbia Ethics Review Certificate Number is H08-01157.

References

  • Bakker K (2012) Water security: research challenges and opportunities. Science 337(6097):914–915. doi:10.1126/science.1226337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond DOF, Ironside G, Buckland B, Smith R (2005) Current status, trends, and perceptions regarding environmental indicators and state of the environment reporting in Canada. Background paper to an environmental indicators and state of the environment reporting strategy, 2004–2009 (trans: K. I. S. Division). Environment Canada, Gatineau

  • Braden JB, Brown DG, Dozier J, Gober P, Hughes SM, Maidment DR, Schneider SL, Schultz PW, Shortle JS, Swallow St K, Werner CM (2009) Social science in a water observing system. Water Resour Res 45. doi:10.1029/2009WR008216

  • Brennin R (2007) Linking information to the policy process for sustainable development. Lessons learned from relevant international examples. Environment Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Ministry of Environment (BCMoE) (2011) Sensitive stream assessment. British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Victoria http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/habitat/fish_protection_act/sensitive_streams/sensitive.html

  • Brown A, Medd W, Anderson B (2012) Incorporating social science in water assessment practices. Developing novel approaches to tracking domestic water demand under uncertainty—a reflection on the “up scaling” of social science approaches in the United Kingdom. Water Res Man (forthcoming)

  • Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) (2001) Canadian water quality index 1.0 technical report and user’s manual. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Gatineau

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcanti de Albuquerque R, Allen DM, Kirste D (2012) A methodology for spatially representing the likelihood of occurrence of natural contaminants in groundwater. Environ Earth Sci. doi:10.1007/s12665-012-1874-x

  • Chaves HML, Alipaz S (2007) An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: the watershed sustainability index. Water Resour Manag 21(5):883–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook C, Bakker K (2012) Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 22(1):94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delanty G (2002) Knowledge as communication: a review of literature on method and theory in social science. Int J Soc Res Methods 5(1):83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt J, Denhardt R (2007) The new public service: serving not steering. ME Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2011) Indicators of sustainable development. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRosemund S, Duro D, Dubé M (2008) Comparative analysis of regional water quality in Canada using the water quality index. Environ Monit Assess 156(1–4):223–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn G (ed) (2012) Water security guidance document. UBC Program on Water Governance, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn G, Bakker K (2009) Canadian approaches to assessing water security: an inventory of indicators. Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn G, Bakker K (2011) Fresh water-related indicators in Canada: an inventory and analysis. Can Water Res J 36(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert U, Welch H (2004) Meaningful environmental indices: a social approach. J Environ Econ Manag 27:270–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2010a) Committee on the status of endangered wildlife in Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Canada (2010b) Water availability index. Methodology and validation draft report. Environment Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (2007) Shift in thinking to address the 21st century hunger gap. Water Resour Manag 21(1):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M, Lundqvist J (1998) Towards water security: political determination and human adaptation crucial. Nat Resour Forum 22(1):37–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M, Rockström J (2004) Balancing water for humans and nature: the new approach in ecohydrology. Earthscan, London, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M, Lundqvist J, Widstrand C (1989) Macro-scale waterscarcity requires micro-scale approaches–aspects of vulnerability in semi-arid development. Nat Resour Forum 13(4):258–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhendler I, Heikkila T (2010) Does integrated water resources management support institutional change? the case of water policy reform in Israel. Ecol Soc 15:4–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2006) The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvis T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio R Swed Acad Sci 31(5):437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (1990) Vulnerability of water systems. In: Waggoner PE (ed) Climate change and US water resources. Wiley, New York, pp 223–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (1996) Basic water requirements for human activities: meeting basic needs. Water Int 21:83–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH, Chalecki EL, Wong A (2002) Measuring water well-being: water indicators and indices. In: Gleick PH, Pacific Institute for Studies in Development Environment and Security (eds) The world’s water: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Island Press, Washington, pp 87–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Glozier NE, Crosley RW, Mottle LW, Donald DB (2004) Water quality characteristics and trends for Banff and Jasper national parks: 1973–2002. Environment Canada, Saskatoon

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden Associates Ltd. (2005) Comprehensive groundwater modeling assignment, Final Report. Township of Langley, British Columbia

  • Halstead EC (1986) Ground water supply–Fraser Lowland, British Columbia. National Hydrology Research Centre Saskatoon

  • Hamouda MA, Nour El-Din MM et al (2009) Vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in the Eastern Nile Basin. Water Resour Manag 23(13):2697–2725. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9404-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heap C, Kemp-Benedict E, Raskin P (1998) Conventional worlds: technical description of bending the curve scenarios. Polestar series report. Stockholm Environmental Institute, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill C, Furlong K, Bakker K, Cohen A (2008) Harmonization versus subsidiarity: emerging trends in water governance in Canada. Can Water Resour Assoc J 33(4):315–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. IPCC Secreteriat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (2004) Science and citizenship: a new synergy. Sci Public Policy 31(2):90–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, Wood, Leidal, Associates (2009) Betrand Creek ISMP final report. Report prepared for Township of Langley, British Columbia. Report Number 647.019

  • Khan AA, Tobin A, Paterson R, Khan H, Warren R (2005) Application of CCME procedure for deriving site-specific water quality guidelines from the CCME water quality index. Water Qual Res J Can 40(4):448–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen M (2008) Mainstreaming sustainable development in the OECD through indicators and peer reviews. Sustain Dev 16:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos MC, Bell AR, Engle NL, Formiga-Johnsson RM, Nelson DR (2010) Technical knowledge and water resources management: a comparative study of River Basin Councils. Water Resour Res 46

  • Lumb A, Halliwell D, Sharma T (2006) Application of CCME water quality index to monitor water quality: a case of the Mackenzie River Basin, Canada. Environ Monit Assess 113:411–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy S, James P, Bayliss C, (eds) (2010) Sustainable Cities, United Nations Global Compact, Cities Programme, vol. 1. New York and Melbourne, 134pp

  • Meigh J, McKenzie A, Austin B, Bradford R, Reynard N (1998) Assessment of global water resources–phase II. In: Estimates of present and future water availability in Eastern and Southern Africa. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford

  • Molden D, de Fraiture C, Rijsberman F (2007) Water scarcity: the food factor. Issues Sci Tech 23(4):39–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2005) Measuring sustainability: a multi-criterion framework. Environ Dev Sustain 7:117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemeijer D, de Groot R (2008) A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic 8(1):14–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman E, Bakker K, Cook C, Dunn G, Allen D (2010) Water security: a primer. Canada water network: developing a Canadian water security framework as a tool for improved water governance for watersheds. Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman E, Bakker K, Dunn G (2011) Recent developments in Canadian water policy: an emerging water security paradigm. Can Water Resour J 36(1):53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowlan L, Bakker K (2010) Practising shared water governance in Canada: a primer. Program on Water Governance, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the Auditor General (OAG) (2010) An audit of the management of groundwater resources in British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002) Aggregated environmental indices: review of aggregation methodologies in use. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintér L, Hardi P, Bartelmus P (2005) Indicators of sustainable development: proposals for a way forward. UN Division for Sustainable Development, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer R, de Loë R, Armitage D (2012) A systematic review of water vulnerability assessment tools. Water Res Man (forthcoming)

  • Policy Research Institute (PRI) (2007) Canadian Water Sustainability Index (CWSI): project report. Policy Research Initiative, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin P (1997) Water futures: assessment of long-range patterns and problems background document to the comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world report. Stockholm Environmental Institute, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier P, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (2005) Swimming up-stream: collaboration approaches to watershed management. In: Kamieniecki S, Kraft ME (eds) American and comparative environmental policy. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson MWS (2012) Assessing risk to groundwater quality using an integrated risk framework. MSc thesis, Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC

  • Statistics Canada (2009) A framework for developing environmental statistics. Statistics Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan C (2002) Calculating a water poverty index. World Dev 30(7):1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan C, Meigh J (2007) Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resour Manag 21(5):111–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Township of Langley (ToL) (2009) Township of Langley watershed management plan, final report. Township of Langley

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA) (2007) Indicators of sustainable development: guidelines and methodologies. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations World Water Assessment Program (UN WWAP) (2006) Water a shared responsibility. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations World Water Assessment Program (UN WWAP) (2009) Water in a changing world. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (2002) Index of watershed indicators: an overview. Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Keur P, Brugnach M et al (2010) Identifying uncertainty guidelines for supporting policy making in water management illustrated for Upper Guadiana and Rhine Basins. Water Resour Manag 24(14):3901–3938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Zaag P, Gupta J (2008) Scale issues in the governance of water storage projects. Water Resour Res 44. doi:10.1029/2007WR006364

  • Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy C, Liermann CR, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:551–561. doi:10.1038/nature09440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, McGlynn BL, Harman CJ, Gupta HV, Kumar P, Suresh P, Rao C, Basu NB, Wilson JS (2010) The future of hydrology: an evolving science for a changing world. Water Resour Res 46

  • Water Systems Analysis Group (WSAG) (2005) Relative water stress index. University of New Hampshire, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheater E, Evans E (2009) Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy 26:S251–S264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is the product of the second phase of a 4-year (2008–2012) research project “Developing a Canadian Water Security Framework as a Tool for Improved Governance for Watersheds” that created a Water Security Assessment Framework (WSAF) and includes decision-support tools for water managers. This research project, led by Dr. Karen Bakker and Dr. Diana Allen, was funded by grants from the Canadian Water Network (CWN) and the Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation. We would particularly like to thank our case study partners in the Township of Langley (Asher Rivzi, Mark Sloat, and Kevin Larsen) and the Water Availability Index development team (Michel Villeneuve, Francis Savignac, and Gillian Walker), and Gwyn Graham from Environment Canada. We would like to acknowledge the contributions of our team researchers, in particular Christina Cook, Judy Isaac-Renton, Natalie Prystajecky, Kay Teschke, Renuka Grover, Mike Simpson, Ed McBean and Cassandra Banting. In addition, thanks to Eric Leinberger for creating Fig. 1. We would also like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for financially supporting the dissemination of this research and the BC Ministry of Environment for funding our workshop on water security in September 2009.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma S. Norman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, E.S., Dunn, G., Bakker, K. et al. Water Security Assessment: Integrating Governance and Freshwater Indicators. Water Resour Manage 27, 535–551 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0200-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-012-0200-4

Keywords

Navigation