Abstract
The Georgescu-Roegen’s statements about the connexion between the Economy and the Thermodynamics, together with the Eco-integrator approach introduced by Naredo and its relation with the water cost definitions given in the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), are the outline backgrounds of the work presented in this paper. Assuming that the physical laws are called to be the objective and universal tools to assess water costs, Physical Hydronomics (PH) has been developed as the accounting tool for the WFD application, regarding its physico-chemical objectives. PH is defined as the specific application of the Thermoeconomics to physically characterize the degradation and correction of water bodies. The Second Law of Thermodynamics, through the exergy loss calculation, is the basic working tool in this study. The final objective of PH is to use those calculated physical costs of water as a guide to allocate the environmental and resource costs introduced by the WFD. In this paper, the general framework and the basic accounting principles of PH are explained. First, from the quantity and quality measurements in the river (they give the exergy value to water bodies), the exergy profiles of the river at different statuses (those defined by the WFD) are obtained. Then, the environmental cost of water is obtained (in energy units) as the exergy needed to cover the gap between the current state of the river and the objective state defined by the applicable legislation to fulfil the European requirements. To do it, thermodynamic efficiency of water treatment technologies was introduced in the analysis. Then, the physical cost are translated into monetary units. To illustrate the application of the PH’s methodology, the example of the Spanish Muga Basin, sited in the Inland Basins of Catalonia, is summarized at the end of this paper. The results show that similar results to conventional Measurements Plans to fulfil the WFD objectives are obtained. However, PH presents an important advantage: costs could be allocated according to the degradation (exergy costs) provoked by the different water users in the water bodies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrojo P (2004) El reto de la sostenibilidad en la nueva política de aguas en España. Revista del Colegio Oficial de Físicos 15:32–36. Colegio Oficial de Físicos. (In Spanish)
Chen GQ (2006) Scarcity of exergy and ecological evaluation based on embodied exergy. Communications in nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 11:531–552
Chen GQ, Ji X (2007) Chemical exergy based evaluation of water quality. Ecol Model 200:259–268
Cleveland C, Ruth M (1997) When, where, and by how much do biophysical limits constrain the economic process? A survey of Georgescu-Roegen’s contribution to ecological economics. Ecol Econ 22:203–223
Dincer I (2002) Technical environmental and exergetic aspects of hydrogen energy systems. Int J Hydrogen Energy 27:265–285
Direccio General d’obres hidraliques (1998) El pla hidrologic de les conques internes de Catalunya. Departament de Politica territorial i obres publiques-Departament de Medi Ambient. Gneralitat de Catalunya. (In Catalan)
European Water Framework Directive (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy (23 October 2000)
Georgescu-Roegen N (1971) The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gong M, Wall G (2001) On exergy and sustainable development, Part-2: indicators and methods. Exergy-Int J 1(4):217–233
Harris JM (2006) Environmental and natural resources economics: a contemporary approach. Tufts University, USA
Hellström D (1997) An exergy analysis for a wastewater treatment plant—an estimation of the consumption of physical resources. Water Environ Res 69(1):44–51
Hellström D (2003) Exergy analysis of nutrient recovery processes. Water Sci Technol 48(1):27–36
IADEN (1998) Proposta de Pla Integral de la MugaCastello d’Empuries. Institucio Altempordanesa per la defensa i l’Estudi de la Natura. (In Catalan)
Jorgensen SE, Nielsen SN, Mejer H (1995) Energy, environ, exergy and ecological modelling. Ecol Model 77:99–109
Llamas R (2003) From hydro-schizophrenia to the farmers silent revolution. From the silent revolution to clamorous social conflicts. Focus session 7. XI-IWRA World Water Congress. Madrid
Martínez A, Uche J (2010) Exergy of organic matter in a water flow. Energy 35(1):77–84
Martínez A, Uche J, Bayod A, Rubio C (2009) Assessment of the world fresch water resources through energy requirements in desalination technologies. Desalination and Water Treatment (DWT) 10:165–174
Martínez A, Uche J, Rubio C, Carrasquer B (2010a) Exergy cost of water supply and water treatment technologies. Desalination and Water Treatment (DWT) 24:123–131
Martínez A, Uche J, Valero A, Valero Al (2010b) Environmental costs of a river watershed within the European water framework directive: results from Physical Hydronomics. Energy 35(2):1008–1016
Moran MJ, Shapiro SN (2004) Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics, 5th edn. Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology, 896 pp
Naredo JM (2007) Costes y cuentas del agua: propuestas desde el enfoque ecointegrador. Documento Marco. In: Proc. of the “Seminario sobre cuentas y costes del agua en Cataluña”. Barcelona, 18–19 June 2007. (In Spanish)
Naredo JM, Gascó JM (1994) Spanish water accounts. In: OECD, ENV/EPOC/SE/A(94)2. Environmental accounting for decision-making. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Environmental Directorate (ENV), Environment Policy Committee (EPOC), 9 Group on the State of the Environment (SE), Statistic Directorate and the OECD Economics Department, Paris, France, 118 pp
Perry RH, Green D (1984) Chemical engineer’s handbook, 6th edn. McGraw-Hill, NY
Rosen MA, Diner I (2003) Exergy-cost-energy-mass analysis of thermal systems and processes. Energy Convers Manag 44:1633–1651
Szargut JT (2004) Optimization of the design parameters aiming at the minimization of the depletion of non-renewable resources. Energy 29:2161–2169
Szargut J, Valero A, Stanek W, Valero-Delgado A (2005) Towards an international legal reference environment. In: Proc. of ECOS 2005:409–420
Valero D, Valero A, Arauzo I (2008) Evolution of the decrease in mineral exergy throughout the 20th century. The case of copper in the US Energy 33(2):107–115
Wall G (1986) Exergy—a useful concept. Physical Resource Theory Group. Chalmers Bibliot. Trick. University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden. EOLSS Publisher
Wall G (2002) Conditions and tools in the design of energy conversion and management systems of a sustainable society. Energy Convers Manag 43:1235–1248
Working Group 2.6-WATECO (2003) Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Economics and the Environment—the implementation challenge of the Water framework Directive. European Union
Zaleta A, Ranz L, Valero A (1998) Towards a unified measure of renewable resources availability: the exergy method applied to the water of a river. Energy Convers Manag 39(16–18):1911–1917
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martínez, A., Uche, J., Valero, A. et al. Assessment of Environmental Water Cost Through Physical Hydronomics. Water Resour Manage 25, 2931–2949 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9786-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9786-1