Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Use of System Dynamics Simulation in Water Resources Management

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we discuss the use of system dynamics as a methodology with which to address dynamically complex problems in water resources management. Problems in regional planning and river basin management, urban water management, flooding and irrigation exhibit important short-term and long-term effects, and are often contentious issues with high potential for conflict. We argue that system dynamics combined with stakeholder involvement provides an appropriate methodology to address these issues effectively. We trace the theoretical and practical evolution of system dynamics in these areas over the past 50 years. From this review of the literature and selected case studies we identify and discuss a number of best practices and common pitfalls in applications of system dynamics simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott MD, Stanley RS (1999) Modeling groundwater recharge and flow in an upland fractured bedrock aquifer. Syst Dyn Rev 15(2):163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RA (1974) Redesigning the future: a systems approach to societal problems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff RL (1993) From mechanistic to social systemic thinking. Systems thinking in action conference, transcript of the plenary address. November 1993. http://acasa.upenn.edu/socsysthnkg.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2006

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2000) Dynamic modeling of flood management policies. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference of the system dynamics society: sustainability in the third millennium. Bergen, Norway, 6–10 Aug 2000

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2001) Modeling dynamic processes in space and time: a spatial system dynamics approach. In: Phelps D, Sehlke G (eds) World water congress 2001 bridging the gap: meeting the world’s water and environmental resources challenges, Orlando, May 2001. doi:10.1061/40569(2001)88

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2004) Spatial system dynamics: new approach for simulation of water resources systems. J Comput Civ Eng 18(4):331–340, October. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2004)18:4(331)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Simonovic SP (2006) An intelligent decision support system for management of floods. Water Resour Manage 20(3):391–410. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-0326-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque S (2001) A system model for source water assessment in the Las Vegas valley. Master’s thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

  • Andersen DF, Richardson GP (1997) Scripts for group model building. Syst Dyn Rev 13(2):107–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen DF, Rohrbaugh J (1992) Some conceptual and technical problems in integrating models of judgment with simulation models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22(1):21–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen DF, Richardson GP, Vennix JAM (1997) Group model building: adding more science to the craft. Syst Dyn Rev 13(2):187–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JM, Anderson AA, Feree GD (1972) Dynamic models in water resources planning. Technical Report 72-3, Center for Advanced Planning, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Alexandria, Virginia, USA

  • Ansoff HI, Slevin DP (1968) An appreciation of industrial dynamics. Manage Sci 14(7):383–397, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagheri A (2006) Sustainable development: implementation in urban water systems. PhD thesis, Lund Universitet, Sweden. ISBN: 978916286789

  • Bagheri A, Hjorth P (2007) A framework for process indicators to monitor for sustainable development: practice to an urban water system. Environ Dev Sustain 9(2):143–161, May. doi:10.1007/s10668-005-9009-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y (1989) Multiple tests for validation of system dynamics type of simulation models. Eur J Oper Res 42:59–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y (1996) Formel aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):183–210, Fall

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y, Carpenter S (1990) Philosophical roots of model validation. Syst Dyn Rev 6(2):148–166, Summer

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron JS, Poff NL, Angermeier PL, Dahm CN, Gleick PH, Jackson RB, Johnston CA, Richter BD, Steinman AD (2002) Meeting ecological and societal needs for fresh water. Ecol Appl 12(5):1247–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK (1976) Systems approach to water management. McGraw Hill, London. ISBN: 0070054800

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden MJ, Glennie JM (1986) Integrated water resource management on the central plains: the need for irrigation. N Z Agric Sci 20(1):18–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (eds) (2008) River futures—an integrative scientific approach to river repair. The science and practice of ecological restoration series. Island, Washington, DC. ISBN: 9781597261135

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara AS, Viegas MG, Amaro A (1986) Interfacing system dynamics and multiobjective programming for regional water resources planning. Ann Reg Sci 20(3):104–113, November

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright L, Connor J (2003) Collaborative water supply planning: a shared vision approach for the Rappanhannock Basin. In: Proceedings of the 2003 UCOWR meeting, Universities Council on Water Resources, Washington, DC, 30 July–1 August 2003

  • Chapra SJ (1997) Surface water quality modeling. McGraw-Hill, Singapore. ISBN: 0 07 115242 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaves HML, Alipaz S (2007) An integrated indicator based on basin hydrology, environment, life, and policy: the watershed sustainability index. Water Resour Manag 21(5):883–895. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9107-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloud SW (2001) Testing the potential of system dynamics models for improving public participation in resource management. Master’s thesis, Department of Water Resources Management, College of Sciences, University of Nevada. Las Vegas, USA

  • Cockerill KC, Passell H, Tidwell VC (2006) Cooperative modelling: building bridges between science and the public. J Am Water Resour Assoc 42(2):457–471. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb03850.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerill KC, Tidwell VC, Passell H, Malczynski L (2007) Commentary: collaborative modelling lessons for environmental modelling management. Environ Pract 9(1):28–41. doi:10.1017/S1466046607070032

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockerill KC, Tidwell VC, Passell HD (2004) Assessing public perceptions of computer-based models. Environ Manage 34(5):609–619. doi:10.1007/s00267-003-0259-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Neale T (2006) Participatory integrated assessment of water management and climate change in the Okanagan Basin, British Columbia. Final report, Environment Canada and University of British Columbia

  • Connor J, Cartwright L, Stephenson K (2004) Collaborative water supply planning: a shared vision approach for the Rappahannock Basin in Virginia. In: Sehlke G, Hayes DF, Stevens DK (eds) Proceedings of the 2004 world water and environmental resources congress. Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, pp 1–9, 27 June–1 July 2004. Environmental and Water Resources Institute of The American Society of Civil Engineers. doi:10.1061/40737(2004)323

  • Costanza R, Ruth M (1998) Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environ Manage 22(2):183–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford NH, Linsley RK (1966) Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford Watershed Model IV. Technical Report 39, Civil Engineering Deptartment, Stanford University, California

  • Croke BFW, Ticehurst JL, Letcher RA, Norton JP, Newham LTH, Jakeman AJ (2007) Integrated assessment of water resources: Australian experiences. Water Resour Manage 21(1):351–373, January. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9057-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha LV (1989) Water resources situation and management in the EEC. Hydrogeologie 2:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaton ML, Winebrake JJ (2000) Dynamic modeling of environmental systems. Modeling dynamic systems. Springer, New York. ISBN: 0-387-98880-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Exter K (2004) Integrating environmental science and management: the role of system dynamics modelling. PhD thesis, CRC Sustainable Tourism School of Environmental Science and Management, Southern Cross University, Queensland, Australia

  • Den Exter K, Specht A (2003) Assisting stakeholder decision making using system dynamics group model-building. In: Extending extension: beyond traditional boundaries, methods and ways of thinking!. Proceedings of the 2003 APEN national forum, Hobart, 26–28 November 2003

  • DeVries JJ, Hromadka TV (1993) Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 21.1–21.39 (chapter Computer models for surface water)

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Ibarra MA (2004) A system dynamics model of El-Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1. PhD thesis, Environmental Science and Engineering, The University of Texas, El Paso

  • Dolado JJ (1992) Qualitative simulation and system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 8(1):55–81, Winter

    Google Scholar 

  • Donigian AS (1981) Modeling components of hydrologic cycle. Water Resources Publications, Littleton, pp 343–382 (chapter Water quality modeling in relation to watershed hydrology)

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JK, Ford DN (1998) Mental models concepts for system dynamics research. Syst Dyn Rev 14(1):3–29, Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein RL (1989) Simplification and understanding of models. Syst Dyn Rev 5(1):51–68, Winter

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden C, Sims D, Jones S (1979) Policy analysis and organizational politics. Eur J Oper Res 3:207–215

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Kadi AI (1989) Watershed models and their applicability to conjunctive use management. Water Resour Bull 15(1):125–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmahdi A, Malano H, Etchells T (2007) Using system dynamics to model water-reallocation. Environmentalist 27(1):3–12. doi:10.1007/s10669-007-9010-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskinasi M, Fokkema E (2006) Lessons learned from unsuccessful modelling interventions. Syst Res Behav Sci 23:483–492. doi:10.1002/sres.774

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2007) The EU Water Framework Directive - integrated river basin management for Europe. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html (last updated 22 March 2007)

  • Everard M, Powell A (2002) Rivers as living systems. Aquat Conserv 12:329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasset C, Rostapshov O (2001) Riverweb water quality simulator - creating an educational model. Poster at the American Geophysical Union Spring Meeting

  • Fernandez JM, Selma MAE (2004) The dynamics of water scarcity on irrigated landscapes: Mazarron and Aguilas in south-eastern Spain. Syst Dyn Rev 20(2):117–137. doi:10.1002/sdr.290

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming G (1975) Computer simulation techniques in hydrology. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford A (1996) Testing the snake river explorer. Syst Dyn Rev 12(4):305–329, Winter

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford A (1999) Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics modeling of environmental systems. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1958) Industrial dynamics—a major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Bus Rev 36(4):37–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. Productivity, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1969) Urban dynamics. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1987) Lessons from system dynamics modelling. Syst Dyn Rev 3(2):136–149, Summer

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastelum Perez JR (2006) Analysis of water resources alternatives to improve water allocation on the Conchos Basin during drought situations. PhD thesis, University of Arizona, USA. ISBN: 9780542528262

  • Gates WE, Males RM, Walker JF (1970) Application of industrial dynamics concepts to decision making in environmental management. Water Resour Res 6(6):1549–1558

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (2000) The changing water paradigm—a look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Int 25(2):127–138, March

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS (1977) Management of water resources: a systems approach. Colorado State University, Ft. Collins

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS (1997) Systemic analysis of urban water supply and growth management. J Urban Plann Dev 123(2):23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS, Bryson MC (1975) Interactive simulation for water system dynamics. J Urban Plann Dev 101(UP1):77–92, May

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo HC, Liu L, Huang GH, Fuller GA, Zou R, Yin YY (2001) A system dynamics approach for regional environmental planning and management: a study for the Lake Erhai Basin. J Environ Manag 61(1):93–111, January. doi:10.1006/jema.2000.0400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton HR (1969) Systems simulation for regional analysis: an application to river-basin planning. MIT, Cambridge. ISBN: 0262080303

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand RT (2003) System structure, natural history, dynamic modeling and adaptive management of the Mekong watershed’s Tonle Sap-Great Lake, Cambodia. PhD thesis, Graduate School of the University of Maryland

  • Helweg OJ (1985) Water resources planning and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs E (2003) Nature by design: people, natural process and ecological restoration. MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines WW, Knight JE (1971) Complex systems analysis of water quality dynamics—the feedback systems structure. Technical Report ERC-0570, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Environmental Resources Centre, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, USA

  • Hjorth P, Bagheri A (2006) Navigating towards sustainable development: a system dynamics approach. Futures 38:74–92. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2005.04.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson AM (1992) Hexagons for systems thinking. Eur J Oper Res 59:220–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer JB (1996) Why we iterate: scientific modeling in theory and practice. Syst Dyn Rev 12(1):1–19, Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe CW, Schurmeter DR, Douglas SW (1986) Innovative approaches to water allocation: the potential of water markets. Water Resour 22(4):439–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Huerta JM (2004) A system dynamics approach to conflict resolution in water resources: the model of the Lerma-Chapala watershed. In: Proceedings of the international conference of the system dynamics society, Oxford, 25–29 July 2004

  • Islam MS, Oki T, Kanae S, Hanasaki N, Agata Y, Yoshimura K (2007) A grid-based assessment of global water scarcity including virtual water trading. Water Resour Manag 21(1):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Carpenter SR, Dahm CN, McKnight DM, Naiman RJ, Postel SL, Running SW (2001) Water in a changing world. Ecol Appl 11(4):1027–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane DC (2000) Should system dynamics be described as a ‘hard’ or ‘deterministic’ systems approach? Syst Res Behav Sci 17:3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Neto A de C, Legey LFL, Gonzalez-Araya MC, Jablonski S (2006) A system dynamics model for the environmental management of the Sepetiba Bay watershed, Brazil. Environ Manage 38(5):879–888, November. doi:10.1007/s00267-005-0211-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Li I, Simonovich SP (2002) System dynamics model for predicting floods from snowmelt in North American prairie watersheds. Hydrol Process J 16:2645–2666

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, van Beek E, with contributions from, Stedinger JR, Dijkman JPM, Villars MT (1981/2005) Water resources systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models and applications. Princeton Hall, Englewood Cliffs. ISBN: 9231039989

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Reyes LF, Andersen DL (2003) Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models. Syst Dyn Rev 19(4):271–296. doi:10.1002/sdr.280

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo B, Huang GH, Zou Y, Yin YY (2007) Toward quantifying the effectiveness of water trading under uncertainty. J Environ Manag 82(2):181–190, April

    Google Scholar 

  • Males RM, Gates WE (1971) Decision processes in water quality management. Final report submitted to Office of Water Resources Research, Department of the Interior, Engineering Science, Inc., Research and Development Laboratory, Systems/Behavioral Studies Division, Oakland, April

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. University Books, New York. ISBN 0-87663-165-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Robinson JM (2002) The electronic oracle: computer models and social decisions. Syst Dyn Rev 18(2):271–308. doi:10.1002/sdr.239

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft JDW (1988) System dynamics and microworlds for policymakers. Eur J Oper Res 35:301–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft JDW (1992) Executive knowledge, models and learning. Eur J Oper Res 59:9–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N, Shrader-Frechette K, Belitz K (1994) Verification, validation and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth Sciences. Science 263:641–646, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer R, Keyes AM, Fisher S (1993) Empowering stakeholders through simulation in water resources planning. In: Hon K (ed) Proceedings of the 20th anniversary conference of the american society of civil engineers, Seattle, 1–5 May 1993, pp 451–454

  • Passell HD (2004) Hydrogeoecological patterns and trends in the upper and middle Rio Grande, 1975–2002. PhD thesis, University of New Mexico

  • Passell HD, Tidwell VC, Conrad SH, Thomas RP, Roach J (2003) Cooperative water resources modeling in the Middle Rio Grande Basin. Technical report, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque

  • Peterson TR, Kenimer A, Grant WE (2004) Mediated modelling, a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building, chapter using mediated modelling to facilitate collaborative learning among resident of the San Antonio watershed. Texas, USA. Island, Washington, DC, pp 136–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Randers J (ed) (1980) Elements of the system dynamics methods. Productivity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP (ed) (1996) Modelling for management—simulation in support of systems thinking, vol I and II. The International Library of Management. Dartmouth, Hants. ISBN 1 85521697 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP, Pugh III AL (1981) Introduction to system dynamics modelling. Productivity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach J (2007) Integrated surface water groundwater modeling in the Upper Rio Grande in support of scenario analysis. PhD thesis, The University of Arizona. ISBN: 9780549080121

  • Roberts N, Andersen D, Deal R, Garet M, Shaffer W (1983) Introduction to computer simulation: a system dynamics modeling approach. Productivity, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers KH (2006) The real river management challenge: integrating scientists, stakeholders and service agencies. River Res Appl 22(2):269–280. doi:10.1002/rra.910

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers KH (2008) Limnology and the post-normal imperative: an african perspective. Verhandlungen IVL 30(2):171–185 (proceedings of the 30th congress of the international association of theoretical and applied limnology, Montreal, 12–18 August 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P (1993) Integrated urban water resources management. Nat Resour Forum 17(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers PP, Fiering MB (1986) Use of systems analysis in water management. Water Resour Res 22(9):146S–158S

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouwette EAJA, Vennix JAM (2006) System dynamics and organizational interventions. Syst Res Behav Sci 23:451–466. doi:10.1002/sres.772

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed K (1992) Slicing a complex problem for systems dynamics modeling. Syst Dyn Rev 8(3):251–262, Fall

    Google Scholar 

  • Saysel AK (2004) System dynamics model for integrated environmental assessment of large-scale surface irrigation. Technical Report 2, The System Dynamics Group, Department of Information Science, University of Bergen, Norway

  • Saysel AK, Barlas Y, Yenigün O (2002) Environmental sustainability in an agricultural development project: a system dynamics approach. J Environ Manag 64(3):247–260, March. doi:10.1006/jema.2001.0488

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehlke G, Jacobson J (2005) System dynamics modeling of transboundary systems: the Bear River basin model. Ground Water 43(5):722–730, September–October. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.00065.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1992) The fifth discipline, 7th edn. Random House, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp JA, Price DHR (1984) System dynamics and operational research: an appraisal. Eur J Oper Res 16:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP (2002a) Global water dynamics: issues for the 21st century. Water Sci Technol 45(8):53–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP (2002b) World water dynamics: global modeling of water resources. J Environ Manag 66:249–267. doi:10.1006/jema.2002.0585

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Fahmy H (1999) A new modeling approach for water resources policy analysis. Water Resour Res 35(1):295–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic SP, Rajasekaram V (2004) Integrated analyses of Canada’s water resources: a system dynamics approach. Can Water Resour J 29(4):223–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (ed) (1995) Computer models of watershed hydrology. Water Resources, Highlands Ranch

    Google Scholar 

  • Stave KA (2002) Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. Syst Dyn Rev 18(2):139–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Stave KA (2003) A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada. J Environ Manag 67:303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modelling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (1994) Learning in and about complex systems. Syst Dyn Rev 10(2–3):291–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterman JD (2002) All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 18(4):501–531. doi:10.1002/sdr.261

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell VC, Passell HD, Conrad SH, Thomas RP (2004) System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: application to the Middle Rio Grande. Aquat Sci 66:357–372. doi:10.1007/s00027-004-0722-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell VC, van den Brink C (2008) Cooperative modeling: linking science, communication, and ground water planning. Ground Water 46(2):174–182. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2007.00394.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Troendle CA (1985) Hydrological Forecasting. Wiley, New York pp 347–403 (chapter Variable source area models)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Belt M (2004) Mediated modelling—a system dynamics approach to environmental consensus building. Island, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Belt MJ (2000) Mediated modeling: a collaborative approach for the development of shared understanding and evaluation of environmental policy scenarios, with case studies in the Fox River Basin, Wisconsin and the Ria Formosa, Portugal. PhD thesis, University of Maryland College Park. ISBN: 0493184716

  • Vennix JAM (1995) Building consensus in strategic decision making: system dynamics as a group support system. Group Decis Negot 4(4):335–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JAM (1996) Group-model building: facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JAM, Andersen DF, Richardson GP, Rohrbaugh J (1992) Model-building for group decision support: issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation. Eur J Oper Res 59:28–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennix JAM, Gubbels JM, Post D, Poppen HJ (1988) Model building for group decision support: issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation. In: Homer JB, Ford A (eds) Proceedings of the 1988 conference of the system dynamics society, La Jollam, July 1988

  • Vezjak M, Savsek T, Stuhler EA (1998) System dynamics of euthrophication processes in lakes. Eur J Oper Res 109:442–451

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriens D, Achterbergh J (2006) The social dimension of system dynamics-based modelling. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(4):553–563. doi:10.1002/sres.782

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace SD, Sancar FH, Fahriye H (1988) An integrative approach to water resources management: an application in Middleton, Wisconsin. In: Forrester NB, Ford A, Homer J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference of the system dynamics society, La Jolla, July 1988, pp 448–459

  • Winch GW (1993) Consensus building in the planning process: benefits from a hard modeling approach. Syst Dyn Rev 9(3):287–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme E (2004) Using generic system archetypes to support thinking and modelling. Syst Dyn Rev 20(4):341–356. doi:10.1002/sdr.302

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme EF (1990) System enquiry: a system dynamics approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • World Water Assessment Program (2006) Water: a shared responsibility. World water development report no. 2. United Nations, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Wurbs RA (1994) Computer models for water resources planning and management. Technical Report IWR Report 94-NDS-7, US Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources. ISBN: B00010OTE2

  • Xu HG (2001) Exploring effective policies for underground water management in artificial oasis: a system dynamics analysis of a case study of Yaoba Oasis. J Environ Sci—China 13(4):476–480, October

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZX, Takeuchi K, Ishidaira H, Qhang XW (2002) Sustainability analysis for Yellow River water resources using the system dynamics approach. Water Resour Manage 16(3):239–261. doi:10.1023/A:1020206826669

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Ines Winz & Gary Brierley

  2. Landcare Research Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand

    Sam Trowsdale

Authors
  1. Ines Winz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gary Brierley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sam Trowsdale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ines Winz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winz, I., Brierley, G. & Trowsdale, S. The Use of System Dynamics Simulation in Water Resources Management. Water Resour Manage 23, 1301–1323 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9328-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9328-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation