Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To be operationally sustainable, any system of environmental management needs to be based on a truly holistic assessment of all of the relevant factors influencing it. This is of course a daunting task, demanding as it does detailed and reliable data, not only from both the physical and social sciences, but also incorporating some representation of that part of knowledge which could be described as non-scientific. This could be said to include the uncertainties of market forces and political will, as well as traditional knowledge systems, and artistic representation. Recognising the limitations of our own knowledge system is important if we are to make progress in the achievement of sustainability. The development of less deterministic models is a step forward in that direction.

This paper provides some discussion on the challenges associated with the integration of data from different disciplines, and the application of that data at different scales. Alternative approaches to the assessment of water resources for policy making are highlighted, and the validity of using such assessments at different scales is discussed. Using the Water Poverty Index as illustration, examples are provided of how an integrated assessment framework can be used to provide consistency and transparency in decision-making, and how this can, in practice, be applied at a variety of scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acreman M, King J (2002) Defining the Ecosystem Component of a Water Poverty Index. In: Sullivan CA, Meigh, JR and Fediw T (eds) Developing and testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase 1 Final Report. Report to DFID, CEH Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad QK (2003) Towards poverty alleviation: the water sector perspectives. Int J Water Resour Dev 19(2):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcamo J, Döll P, Kaspar F, Siebert S (1997) Global change and global scenarios of water use and availability: An application of WaterGAP1.0. CESR, University of Kassel

  • Alcamo J, Doll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rosch T, Siebert S (2003) Global estimates of water withdrawals and availability under current and future ``business-as-usual'' conditions. Hydrol Sci J–Journal Des Sciences Hydrologiques 48(3):339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnell NW, King R (1998) Implications of climate change for global water resources. Report to Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions by Department of Geography, University of Southampton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JL, Grosch ME (1994) Measuring the Effects of Geographic Targeting on Poverty Reduction Living Standards Measurement Study Working Paper 99, World Bank

  • Batchelor C, Lovell C, Murata M (1996) Simple microirrigation techniques for improving irrigation efficiency on vegetable gardens. Agricultural Water Management 32(1):37–48(12)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury RH (1996). Are indicators yesterday's news? Institute of Environmental Studies, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BM, Jeffrey S, Kozanayi W, Luckert M, Mutamba M, Zindi C (2002) Household Livelihoods in Semi-Arid Regions: Options and Constraints. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney D (ed.) (1998) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution Can We Make? Department for International Development, London

  • Clarke MJ (1997) Restoration Ecology and Sustainable Development. Edited by Urbanska, Webb, and Edwards. Cambridge University Press

  • Crenshaw EM, Christenson M, Oakey DR (2000) Demographic transition in ecological focus. Am Sociol Rev 65(3):371–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullis J (2002) Targeting the Water-poor through Water Poverty Mapping. A Case Study using Census Data and the Water Poverty Index for the Estcourt Municipal District, South Africa. MSc. Dissertation Oxford University, Environmental Change Institute

  • Cullis J, O'Regan DP (2004) Targeting the water-poor through water poverty mapping. Water Policy 6:397–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF) (2002) Proposed First Edition of the National Water Resource Strategy DWAF, Pretoria

  • Dube O (2003) The Water Poverty Index in arid regions: The Study of the Nata River basin (the Makgadikgadi salt pans catchment area) in Bulilima district : Zimbabwe-Botswana. M.Sc Dissertation, University of Leicester

  • Ekins P, Simon S (1999) The sustainability gap: a practical indicator of sustainability in the framework of the national accounts. Int J Sustainable Dev 2:24–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Escamilla M, Kurtycz A, van der Heim R (2003) Water participation for poverty alleviation – the case of Meseta Purepecha, Mexico. Water Sci Technol 47(6):145–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark M (1989) The massive water scarcity now threatening Africa – why isn't it being addressed. Ambio 18:112–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Feitelson E, Chenoweth J (2002) Water poverty: towards a meaningful indicator. Water Policy 4:263–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill R (1996) An integrated social fabric matrix/system dynamics approach to policy analysis. Syst Dyn Rev 12(3):167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick P (2000) The World's Water 2000–2001: The Biennial Report on Freshwater Resources, Island Press, Oakland, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner R (2004) Systems framework for regional-scale integrated modelling and assessment. Math Comput Simulat 64(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM, Montgomery DR (eds.) (1999) Hydrological Applications of GIS. Wiley, London

  • Hammond A, Adriaanse A, Rodenburg E, Bryant D, Woodward R (1995) Environmental Indicators: A Systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development World Resources Institute, Baltimore

  • Harris G (2002) Integrated assessment and modelling: an essential way of doing science. Environ Model Softw 17(3):201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman and Hoffman Ltd (2002) Water Poverty Index Media Usage Report. World Water Council, Marseilles

  • Hoon P, Singh N, Wanmali SS (1997) Sustainable livelihoods: Concepts, Principles and Approaches to Indicator Development. UNDP, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huby M (2001) The sustainable use of resources on a global scale. Social Policy Adm 35(5):521–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IISD (International Institute for Sustainable Development) (1999). Beyond delusion: a science and policy dialogue on designing effective indicators for sustainable development

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2001). Climate Change 2001: the Scientific Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson N, Giacomello AM, Sullivan CA, O'Regan D (2004) Managing watersheds for a better future. Research report to DFID, CEH, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt G (2002) Can integrated water resources management sustain the provision of ecosystem goods and services? Phys Chem Earth 27(11–22):887–895

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammerbauer J, Cordoba B, Escolan R, Flores S, Ramirez V, Zeledon J (2001) Identification of development indicators in tropical mountainous regions and some implications for natural resource policy designs: an integrated community case study. Ecol Econ 36(1):45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1973) Modern Economic Growth: findings and Reflections. Am Econ Rev 63:247–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF (1997) Modelling and monitoring land-cover change processes in tropical regions. Prog Phys Geogr 21(3):375–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence P, Meigh JR, Sullivan CA (2002) The Water Poverty Index: an international comparison. In: Sullivan CA, Meigh JR, Fediw T (eds) Developing and testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase 1 Final Report. Report to DFID, CEH, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallawaarachchi T, Walker PA, Young MD, Smyth RE, Lynch HS, Dudgeon G (1996) GIS-based integrated modelling systems for natural resource management. Agricult Syst 50(2):169–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meigh JR, McKenzie AA, Sene KJ (1999) A grid-based approach to water scarcity estimates for eastern and southern Africa. Water Resour Manage 13:85–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz J (2003). Water balances, floods and sediment transport in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas – Data analyses, modeling and comparison of selected mesoscale catchments. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Bern: Department of Geography, University of Bern

  • Meybeck M (2003) Earth Systems and Global Water Systems: Linkages and feedbacks. Philosophical transactions. Royal Academy, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley DC, Pitman WV, Middleton BJ (1994) Surface Water Resources of South Africa 1990. Reports 298/1/94 to 298/6/94, Water Research Commission, Pretoria, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F, Mollinga P (2003) Water poverty indicators. Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy 5:529–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Décamps H (1997) The ecology of interfaces – riparian zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28:621–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman RJ, Bunn SE, Nilsson C, Petts GE, Pinay G, Thompson LC (2002) Legitimizing fluvial systems as users of water: an overview. Environ Manage 30:455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nur Y, Fazi S, Wirjoatmodjo N, Han Q (2001) Towards wise coastal management practice in a tropical megacity. Jakarta Ocean Coastal Manage 44(5–6):335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2002) Towards Sustainability in the Water Sector: The importance of human actors and processes of social learning. Aquat Sci 64:394–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for Life: Managing Water for People and Nature. Island Press, Washington DC, 253 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees W (1996) Revisiting carrying capacity: area based indicators of sustainability. Popul Environ: A J Interdiscip Stud 34(10):1667–1679

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds CS (1998) The state of freshwater ecology. Freshwater Biol 39:741–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biol 13:220–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter BD, Baumgartner JV, Wigington R, Braun DP (1997) How much water does a river need. Freshwater Biol 37:231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruben R, Moll H, Kuyvenhoven A (1998) Integrating agricultural research and policy analysis: Analytical framework and policy applications for bio-economic modelling. Agric Syst 58(3):331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salameh E (2000) Redefining the Water Poverty Index. Water Int 25:469–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleth RM, Samad M, Molden D, Hussain I (2003) Water, poverty and gender: an overview of issues and policies. Water Policy 5:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Samal PK, Palni LMS, Agrawal DK (2003) Ecology, ecological poverty and sustainable development in Central Himalayan region of India. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol 10(2):157–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite D (2003) The links between poverty and the environment in urban areas of Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 590:73–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze RE, Dlamini DJM (2002) Mesoscale Indicators of Water Poverty in the Thukela Catchment, South Africa, under baseline land cover conditions Appendix 9.14 to

  • Schulze RE (1999) Transcending scales of space and time in impact studies of climate and climate change on agrohydrological responses. Paper given at the GCTE Focus 3 Conference on Food and Forestry – Global Change and Global Challenges. Reading, Sept. 1999

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: a Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Seckler D, Amarasinghe U, Molden D, De Silva R, Barker R (1998). World water demand and supply, 1990 to 2025: Scenarios and issues. Colombo, Sri Lanka: IIMI. vi, 40p

  • Sen AK (1985) Commodities and Capabilities. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen AK (1999) Development as Freedom. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta RR, Bennett DA (2003) Agent-based modelling environment for spatial decision support. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 17(2):157–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Soussan J (2004) Water and Poverty. Fighting Poverty through Water Management. ADB. Manila

  • Srinivasan TN (1994) Human Development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel?, American Economic Review, May

  • Stern DI, Common M, Barbier E (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24:1151–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeten PP (1994) Human development: means and ends. Am Econ Rev 84:232–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten PP (1996) Human Development – the Debate about the Index. Int J Soc Sci

  • Sullivan CA, Meigh JR (2003) The Water Poverty Index: its role in the context of poverty alleviation. Water Policy, 5:5. Oct 2003

  • Sullivan CA (2001) The potential for calculating a meaningful Water Poverty Index. Water Int 26:471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CA (2002) Calculating a Water Poverty Index. World Dev 30:1195–1210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CA, Meigh JR and Fediw T (2002) Developing and testing the Water Poverty Index: Phase 1 Final Report. Report to DFID, CEH, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan CA, Meigh JR, Giacomello AM, Fediw T, Lawrence P, Samad M, Mlote S, Hutton C, Allan JA, Schulze RE, Dlamini DJM, Cosgrove W, Delli Priscoli J, Gleick P, Smout I, Cobbing J, Calow R, Hunt C, Hussain A, Acreman MC, King J, Malomo S, Tate EL, O'Regan D, Milner S, Steyl I (2003) The Water Poverty Index: development and application at the community scale. Natural Resources Forum, in press

  • Sullivan CA, Mutamba M, Kozanayi W (2001) Water Use and Livelihood Security: A Study of Rural Households in Southern Zimbabwe. CEH report to DFID

  • Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK van den Bergh JCJM, Soderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierland EC (2000) Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ 35(1):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (1999) Human Development Report 1999. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (United Nations Development Programme) (2001) Human Development Report 2003, Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2003) World Water Development Report. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tongeren F, Van Meijl H, Surry Y (2001) Global models applied to agricultural and trade policies: a review and assessment. Agric Econ 26(2):149–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanvoris P, Millard W D, Thomas J, Urban D (1993) Terra – Vision – The Integration of Scientific Analysis Into The Decision-Making Process. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 7(2):143–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JS, Acreman MC, Sullivan CA (2003) The sharing of water between society and ecosystems: from advocacy to catchment based co-management. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Dec 2003 pp 513–528

  • World Bank (2001) World Bank: 2001, World development indicators 2001, CD-ROM, World Bank, Washington DC

  • World Commission on Dams (WCD) (2000) Dams and Development: A New Framework for Decision-Making. Report of the World Commission on Dams

  • World Economic Forum, Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy, and Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University (2001) Environmental Sustainability Index (http://www.ciesin.columbia.edu/indicators/ESI), January 2001

  • World Resources Institute (2000) World Resources Institute: 2000, World Resources 2000–2001–People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life, World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • WSSD (2002) World Summit on Sustainable Development, Plan of Implementation. Johannesburg; Sept. 2002

  • Yoffe SB, Ward BS (1999) Water resources and indicators of conflict: A proposed spatial analysis. Water Int 24(4):377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, United Kingdom

    Caroline A. Sullivan & Jeremy Meigh

Authors
  1. Caroline A. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Meigh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline A. Sullivan.

Additional information

It is with regret that we announce that Dr. Jeremy Meigh died in February 2006.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, C.A., Meigh, J. Integration of the biophysical and social sciences using an indicator approach: Addressing water problems at different scales. Water Resour Manage 21, 111–128 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9044-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9044-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation