Field Applicability of the SCS-CN-Based Mishra–Singh General Model and its Variants
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The general soil conservation service curve number (SCS-CN)-based Mishra and Singh (Mishra and Singh, 1999, J. Hydrologic. Eng. ASCE, 4(3), 257–264) model and its eight variants were investigated for their field applicability using a large set of rainfall-runoff events, derived from a number of U.S. watersheds varying in size from 0.3 to 30351.5 ha, grouped into five classes based on the rainfall magnitude. The analysis based on the goodness of fit criteria of root mean square error (RMSE) and error in computed and observed mean runoff revealed that the performance of the existing version of the SCS-CN method was significantly poorer than that of all the model variants on all the five data sets with rainfall ≤ 38.1 mm. The existing version showed a consistently improved performance on the data with increasing rainfall amount, but greater than 38.1 mm. The one-parameter modified SCS-CN method (a = 0.5 and λ = a median value) performed significantly better than the existing one on all the data sets, but far better on rainfall data less than 2 inches. Finally, the former with λ = 0 was recommended for routine field applications to any data set.
- Benjamin, J. R. and Cornell, C. A., 1970, Probability Statistics and Decisions for Civil Engineers, McGraw Hill, New York.
- Bhunya, P. K., Mishra, S. K., and Ronny Berndtsson, 2003, ‘Discussion on estimation of confidence interval for curve numbers,’ J. Hydrologic Eng. ASCE, 8(4), 232–233.
- Bonta, J. V., 1997, ‘Determination of watershed curve number using derived distributions,’ J. Irrigation Drainage Eng. ASCE, 123(1), 28–36.
- Bosznay, M., 1989, ‘Generalisation of SCS curve number method,’ J. Irrigation Drainage Eng. A.S.C.E., 115(1), 139–144.
- Hawkins, R. H., 1993, ‘Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data,’ J. Irrigation Drainage Eng. ASCE, 119(2), 334–345.
- Hawkins, R. H., Woodward, D. E., and Jiang, R., 2001, ‘Investigation of the Runoff Curve Number Abstraction Ratio,’ Paper presented at USDA-NRCS Hydraulic Engineering Workshop, Tucson, Arizona.
- Hjelmfelt, A. T., Jr., 1991, ‘Investigation of curve number procedure,’ J. Hydraulic Eng. 117(6), 725–737.
- McCuen, R. H., 1982, A Guide to Hydrologic Analysis Using SCS Methods,Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
- McCuen, R. H., 2002, ‘Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers,’ J. Hydrologic Eng. 7(1), 43–48.
- Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P., 1999a, ‘Another look at the SCS–CN method,’ J. Hydrologic. Eng. ASCE 4(3), 257–264.
- Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P., 1999b, ‘Behaviour of SCS-CN method in C-Ia *-λ spectrum,’ Proceedings “Hydrologic Modeling”, International Conference on Water, Environment, Ecology, Socio-economics, and Health Engineering, Seol National University, Korea, 18–21 October, pp. 112–117.
- Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P., 2003a, Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) Methodology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1132–1136.
- Mishra, S. K. and Singh, V. P., 2003b, ‘SCS-CN method’ Part-II, Analytical treatment,’ Acta Geophysica Polonica 51(1), 107–123.
- Mishra, S.K., Singh, V. P., Sansalone, J. J., and Aravamuthan, V., 2003, ‘A modified SCS-CN method: Characterization and testing,’ J. Water Resources Manage. 17(1), 37–68.
- Mockus, V., 1949, ‘Estimation of Total (peak rates of) Surface Runoff for Individual Storms,’ Exhibit A of Appendix B, Interim Survey Report Grand (Neosho) River Watershed, USDA, December 1.
- Ponce, V. M. and Hawkins, R. H., 1996, ‘Runoff curve number: Has it reached maturity?,’ J. Hydrolog. Eng. ASCE 1(1), 11–19.
- SCD, 1972, Handbook of Hydrology, Soil Conservation Department, Ministry of Agriculture, New Delhi.
- Schramm, G, Fenton, R. W., Moore, J. L., Hughart, D., and Moore, G. R., 1974, ‘Decision making under uncertainty: Economic evaluation of streamflow forecasts,’ Final Report to the Office of Water Resources Research,U.S. Department of Interior, The University of Michigan, School of Natural Resources, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104.
- Soil Conservation Service, 1956, 1964, 1971, 1985, 1993, Hydrology, National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4, Chapter 10, Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, D.C.
- Yevjevich,V., 1972, Probability and Statistics in Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Fort Collins, Colorado, U.S.A.
- Field Applicability of the SCS-CN-Based Mishra–Singh General Model and its Variants
Water Resources Management
Volume 19, Issue 1 , pp 37-62
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- agriculture research service
- ars water database
- curve number
- initial abstraction coefficient
- soil conservation service
- SCS-CN method
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Water Res. Dev. Training Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India
- 2. National Institute of Hydrology, Roorkee, 247 667, U.P., India
- 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803-6405, U.S.A.