Skip to main content
Log in

Sports, Poverty and the Role of the Voluntary Sector. Exploring and Explaining Nonprofit Sports Clubs’ Efforts to Facilitate Participation of Socially Disadvantaged People

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite several decades of Sport for All policies, opportunities for sports participation are still unequally divided, with certain socially disadvantaged groups having less access to sports. To reduce this gap, structural efforts are needed. A question that arises is what role nonprofit sports clubs can fulfill in this matter. In this study, first, it is explored how nonprofit sports clubs perceive their role and responsibility towards socially disadvantaged groups and how they act on it. Second, it is investigated which factors predict the presence or absence of efforts from nonprofit sports clubs for lowering barriers. For this second question, we focus on people living in poverty. Data are based on a survey among 580 nonprofit sports clubs throughout Flanders (Belgium). The findings indicate that the human resources capacity of the club is not the main barrier. It is argued that local sports authorities and sports federations have an important part to play in supporting and encouraging sports clubs in terms of social inclusionary policies, for example by instilling awareness.

Résumé

Malgré plusieurs décennies de politiques favorisant le « sport pour tous » , les occasions sont toujours inégalement réparties et l’accès au sport de certains groupes désavantagés est restreint. Des efforts structuraux sont requis pour remédier à cela. Une question se pose : quel rôle les clubs sportifs sans but lucratif peuvent-ils jouer dans ce sens? Dans la présente étude, nous explorons d’abord la façon dont les clubs sportifs sans but lucratif perçoivent leur rôle et leurs responsabilités envers les groupes désavantagés et les gestes qu’ils posent pour ces derniers. En second lieu, nous étudions les facteurs de prédiction de la présence ou de l’absence d’initiatives de ces clubs pour éliminer les obstacles. Pour ce faire, nous axons nos recherches sur les gens vivant sous le seuil de la pauvreté. Les données sont basées sur un sondage de 580 clubs sportifs sans but lucratif de Flandre (Belgique). Les résultats démontrent que la capacité des ressources humaines desdits clubs ne constitue pas le principal obstacle. L’article avance que les autorités et fédérations sportives locales ont un rôle essentiel à jouer pour soutenir et encourager les clubs sportifs dans le domaine des politiques d’inclusion sociale, notamment par la sensibilisation.

Zusammenfassung

Trotz des jahrzehntelangen Regelwerks „Sport for All“sind die Möglichkeiten zur Sportbeteiligung noch immer ungleich verteilt und gewisse sozial benachteiligte Gruppen haben einen eingeschränkteren Zugang zum Sport. Es sind strukturelle Bemühungen erforderlich, um diese Lücke zu schließen. Eine Frage ist, welche Rolle gemeinnützige Sportvereine in diesem Zusammenhang spielen können. In der vorliegenden Studie wird erstens erforscht, wie gemeinnützige Sportvereine ihre Rolle und Verantwortung für sozial benachteiligte Gruppen wahrnehmen und ausführen. Zweitens werden die Faktoren untersucht, die die Bemühungen bzw. fehlenden Bemühungen seitens gemeinnütziger Sportvereine zur Senkung der Barrieren voraussagen. Bei diesem zweiten Punkt konzentriert man sich auf Menschen, die in Armut leben. Die Daten beruhen auf einer Befragung von 580 gemeinnützigen Sportvereinen in Flandern (Belgien). Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die personelle Kapazität des Vereins nicht die größte Barriere darstellt. Es wird behauptet, dass die lokalen Sportbehörden und Sportverbände die wichtige Funktion übernehmen müssen, Sportvereine mit Hinblick auf Richtlinien zur sozialen Einbindung zu unterstützen und zu fördern, zum Beispiel indem sie ein entsprechendes Bewusstsein schaffen.

Resumen

A pesar de varias décadas de políticas de Deporte para Todos, las oportunidades para participar en deportes siguen estando divididas de manera desigual, y determinados grupos socialmente desfavorecidos obtienen un menor acceso a los deportes. Para reducir esta brecha, se necesitan esfuerzos estructurales. Una pregunta que surge es qué papel pueden desempeñar los clubes deportivos sin ánimo de lucro. En el presente estudio, en primer lugar, se explora cómo los clubes deportivos sin ánimo de lucro perciben su papel y su responsabilidad hacia los grupos socialmente desfavorecidos y cómo actúan sobre esto. En segundo lugar, se investiga qué factores predicen la presencia o ausencia de esfuerzos de los clubes deportivos sin ánimo de lucro para disminuir las barreras. Para esta segunda pregunta, nos centramos en personas que viven en la pobreza. Los datos se basan en una encuesta entre 580 clubes deportivos sin ánimo de lucro en todo Flandes (Bélgica). Los hallazgos indican que la capacidad en recursos humanos del club no es la principal barrera. Se argumenta que las autoridades deportivas locales y las federaciones de deportes tienen un importante papel que desempeñar apoyando y alentando a los clubes deportivos en términos de políticas de inclusión social, por ejemplo, mediante la sensibilización.

摘要

尽管已经实施所有体育政策数十年,但是体育参与的机会仍分配不公,某些弱势群体接触体育的机会更少。为缩小这一差距,需要结构性努力。由此出现的一个问题是,非盈利体育俱乐部应在这一事务中扮演的角色。本研究首先探讨了非盈利体育俱乐部如何看待有关弱势群体的角色和责任,以及如何履行。其次,研究调查了哪些因素预测非盈利体育俱乐部是否为降低门槛作出了努力。对于第二个问题,我们专注于贫困人口。数据基于对整个弗兰德斯(比利时)的580家非盈利体育俱乐部进行的调查。调查结果表明,俱乐部的人力资源能力不是主要的障碍。有人认为,当地体育当局和体育联盟在支持和鼓励体育俱乐部的社会包容性政策方面扮演重要角色,例如灌输意识。.

ملخص

على الرغم من عدة عقود من الرياضة لجميع السياسات ، فرص المشاركة الرياضية لا تزال منقسمة بشكل غير متساوي، مع بعض الجماعات المحرومة إجتماعيا” فرص أقل للوصول إلى الرياضة. لتقليل هذه الفجوة، هناك حاجة إلى جهود هيكلية. السؤال الذي يطرح نفسه هو ما دور الأندية الرياضية الغير ربحية الذي يمكن تحقيقه في هذا الموضوع. في هذه الدراسة، أولا”، تم إكتشاف كيف الأندية الرياضية الغير ربحية تنظر إلى دورها ومسؤوليتها تجاه الفئات المحرومة إجتماعيا” وكيف يتصرفون في ذلك. ثانيا”، تم التحقيق في أي العوامل التي نتوقع وجود أو عدم وجود جهود من الأندية الرياضية الغير ربحية لخفض الحواجز. لهذا السؤال الثاني، نحن نركز على الأشخاص الذين يعيشون في فقر. تستند البيانات على إستطلاع رأي بين 580 من النوادي الرياضية الغير ربحية في جميع أنحاء فلاندرز (بلجيكا). تشير النتائج إلى أن قدرات الموارد البشرية في النادي ليست هي العائق الرئيسي. تجادل أن السلطات الرياضية المحلية والإتحادات الرياضية لها دور هام في دعم وتشجيع الأندية الرياضية من حيث إحتواء السياسات الإجتماعية، على سبيل المثال عن طريق غرس الوعي.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, A. (2011). Between modernization and mutual aid: The changing perceptions of voluntary sports clubs in England. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 3(1), 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akingbola, K. (2013). A model of strategic nonprofit human resource management. Voluntas, 24, 214–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (1991). Capitalisme contre capitalism [Capitalism versus capitalism]. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M. (1992). The Rhine model of capitalism: An investigation. European Business Journal, 4(3), 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, M. (2001). Sports clubs in Scotland. Research report 75. Edinburgh: Sport Scotland.

  • Allison, M., & Hibbler, D. (2004). Organizational barriers to inclusion: perspectives from the recreational professional. Leisure Sciences, 26(3), 261–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balduck, A. L., Lucidarme, S., Marlier, M., & Willem, A. (2015). Organizational capacity and organizational ambition in nonprofit and voluntary sports clubs. Voluntas, 26(5), 2023–2043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergsgard, N. A., Houlihan, B., Mangset, P., Nødland, S. I., & Rommetvedt, H. (2007). Sport policy. A comparative analysis of stability and change. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R. A., & Pralahad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloyce, D., & Smith, A. (2010). Sport policy and development: An introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (2007a). A wider social role for sport. Who’s keeping the score?. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coalter, F. (2007b). Sports clubs, social capital and social regeneration. ‘Ill defined interventions with hard to follow outcomes’? Sport in Society, 10(4), 537–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COE. (1975). The European sport for all charter. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • COE, CDS. (1980). The European sport for all charter. Text and background (2nd ed.). Strasbourg: Council of Europe/Committee for the Development of Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. (2004). Sport, physical activity and social exclusion. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22(8), 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crum, B. (1991). Over versporting van de samenleving. Reflecties over de bewegingsculturele ontwikkelingen met het oog op sportbeleid [On sportification of society. Reflections upon the physical-cultural developments in view of sports policy]. Rijswijk: Ministerie van Welzijn, Volksgezondheid & Cultuur.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A., & Chelladurai, P. (1999). Managing cultural diversity in sport organisations. A theoretical perspective. Journal of Sport Management, 13, 280–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A., Misener, K., & Cuskelly, G. (2014). Toward a multidimensional framework of capacity in community sport clubs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2), 124–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Washington, M. (2009). Institutional pressures, government funding and provincial sport organizations. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 6(2), 128–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elling, A., & Claringbould, I. (2005). Mechanisms of inclusion and exclusion in the Dutch sports landscape. Who can and wants to belong? Sociology of Sport Journal, 22, 498–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enjolras, B. (2002). The commercialization of voluntary sport organizations in Norway. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31(3), 352–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014). Poverty and social exclusion. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=751.

  • Fahlén, J., & Karp, S. (2010). Access denied: The new ‘Sports for all’—programme in Sweden and the reinforcement of the ‘Sports performance’—logic. Sport & EU Review, 2, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feiler, S., Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2015). How to raise voluntary giving for nonprofit sports clubs: An analysis of factors influencing Donations. Voluntas, 26, 1219–1239. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9489-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemish Government. (2012). Besluit van de Vlaamse Regering tot uitvaardiging van de thema’s en richtsnoeren betreffende ethisch verantwoord sporten voor de olympiade 2013-2016. Brussel: Vlaamse Regering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, M. (2005). From ‘Sport for All’ to not about ‘Sport’ at all? Interrogating sport policy interventions in the United Kingdom. European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(3), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, M., & Collins, S. (2008). Policy, politics and path dependency: Sport development in Australia and Finland. Sport Management Review, 11, 225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grix, J. (2010). From hobbyhorse to mainstream: Using sport to understand British politics. British Politics, 5(1), 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M., Andrukow, A., Barr, C., Brock, K., de Wit, M., Embuldeniya, D., et al. (2003). The capacity to serve: A qualitative study of the challenges facing Canada’s nonprofit and voluntary organizations. Toronto: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, C. M., & Coleman, D. J. (2006). Recruitment and retention of culturally diverse people by sport and active recreation sports clubs. Managing Leisure, 11, 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S., Mori, K., & Collins, M. (2009). Great expectations: voluntary sports clubs and their role in delivering national policy for English sport. Voluntas, 20(4), 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Tews, I. (2006). Social stratification in sport and sport policy in the European Union. European Journal for Sport & Society, 3(2), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, B. (2005). Public sector sport policy. Developing a framework for analysis. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 40(2), 163–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoye, R., Nicholson, M., & Houlihan, B. (2010). Sport and policy. Issues and analysis. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibsen, B., & Seippel, Ø. (2010). Voluntary organised sport in Denmark and Norway. Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 13(4), 593–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucassen, J., & van der Roest, J. (2011). Samenwerking, hybridisering en fusies bij sportverenigingen [Cooperation, hybridisation and fusions at sports clubs]. In J. Boessenkool, J. Lucassen, M. Waardenburg, & F. Kemper (Eds.), Sportverenigingen tussen tradities en ambities [Sports clubs in between traditions and ambitions]. Nieuwegein: Arko Sports Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meganck, J., Scheerder, J., Thibaut, E., & Seghers, J. (2015). Youth sports clubs potential as health promoting setting. Profiles, motives and barriers. Health Education Journal, 74(5), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, H. (2013). Sport volunteering, active citizenship and social capital enhancement: What role in the ‘Big Society’? International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 5(3), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, S. (2008). Goals of sports clubs. European Journal for Sport & Society, 5(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G., & James, M. (2008). One size does not fit all. Implications of sports club diversity for their effectiveness as a policy tool and for government support. Managing Leisure, 13(2), 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, G., Padmore, J., Taylor, P., & Barrett, D. (2012). The relationship between types of sports club and English government policy to grow participation. International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 4(2), 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, M., & Hoye, R. (Eds.). (2008). Sport and Social Capital. Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll, T., Banting, L. K., Borkoles, E., Eime, R., & Polman, R. (2014). A systematic literature review of sport and physical activity participation in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) migrant populations. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health, 16, 515–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, H. T. R. (2008). Social capital and social responsibility in Denmark. More than gaining trust. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, F. (2012). Increasing sports participation in Scotland. Are voluntary sports clubs the answer? International Journal of Sport Policy & Politics, 4(2), 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulofs, B. (2012). ‘We are a very, very homogenous group’. Promoting and managing social diversity in sports? In: B. Segaert, M. Theeboom, C. Timmerman, B. Vanreusel (Eds.), Sports governance, development and corporate responsibility (pp. 62–73). New York: Routledge.

  • Scheerder, J., Seghers, J., Meganck, J., Vandermeerschen, H., & Vos, S. (2015). Sportclubs in beeld. Resultaten van het Vlaamse Sportclub Panel 2.0 (VSP2.0) [Mapping sports clubs. Basic report of the Flemish Sports Club Panel 2.0 (VSP2.0)]. Leuven: KU Leuven.

  • Scheerder, J., Thibaut, E., Pauwels, G., Vandermeerschen, H., Winand, M., & Vos, S. (2012). Sport in clubverband (Deel 2). Uitdagingen voor de clubgeorganiseerde sport [Sports in a club-organised context (Part 2). Challenges for club-organised sports]. (Beleid en Management in Sport 9). Leuven: KU Leuven.

  • Scott, W. R. (1987). Organizations. Rational, natural and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seghers, J., Scheerder, J., Boen, F., Thibaut, E., & Meganck, J. (2012). Medisch en ethisch verantwoord sporten. Het promoten van fysiek, psychisch en sociaal welbevinden van jongeren in Vlaamse jeugdsportclubs [Medically and ethically responsible sports practice. The promotion of physical, psychological and social well-being of youth in Flemish youth sports clubs]. (Beleid & Management in Sport 12). Leuven: KU Leuven.

  • Seippel, Ø. (2004). The world according to voluntary sport organizations. Voluntarism, economy and facilities. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 39(2), 223–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skille, E. A. (2008). Understanding sport clubs as sport policy implementers. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 43(2), 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skille, E. A. (2009). State sport policy and voluntary sports clubs: The case of the Norwegian Sport City Program as social policy. European Sport Management Quarterly, 9(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skille, E. A. (2011). The conventions of sports clubs. Enabling and constraining the implementation of social goods through sport. Sport, Education & Society, 16(2), 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack, T., & Hinings, B. (1994). Institutional pressures and isomorphic change: An empirical test. Organization Studies, 15, 803–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • StataCorp. (2011). Stata statistical software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenling, C. (2013). The introduction of drive-in sport in community sport organizations as an example of organizational (non-)change. Journal of Sport Management, 27, 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2009). The order of logics in Swedish sport—feeding the hungry beast of result orientation and commercialization. European Journal for Sport and Society, 6(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenling, C., & Fahlén, J. (2014). Same same, but different? Exploring the organizational identities of Swedish voluntary sports: possible implications of sports clubs’ self-identification for their role as implementers of policy objectives. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 3, 23–43. doi:10.1177/1012690214557103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T. (2001). Gender and cultural diversity in sport organizations. World Leisure Journal, 43(3), 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel, A., & Meier, H. (2004). Überleben durch Abwehr – zur Lernfähigkeid des Sportvereins [Survival through resistance—About the learning capability of sports organizations]. Sport und Gesellschaft, 1(2), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. (1979). Poverty in the United Kingdom. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN, UNESCO. (1978). International charter of physical education and sport. New York, NY: United Nations Educational, Scientific & Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bottenburg, M. (2011). The Netherlands. In: M. Nicholson, R. Hoye & B. Houlihan (Eds.), Participation in sport. International policy perspectives (pp. 25–41). London: Routledge.

  • Van Bottenburg, M., Rijnen, B., & Van Sterkenburg, J. (2005). Sports participation in the European Union. Trends and differences. Nieuwegein: Arko Sports Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandermeerschen, H., Vos, S., & Scheerder, J. (2016). Towards level playing fields? A time trend analysis of young people’s participation in club-organised sports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(4), 468–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyckom, C., & Scheerder, J. (2010). Sport for All? Insight into stratification and compensation mechanisms of sporting activity in the EU-27. Sport, Education & Society, 15(4), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, S., Breesch, D., Kesenne, S., Lagae, W., Hoecke, J. V., Vanreusel, B., et al. (2012). The value of human resources in non-public sports providers: The importance of volunteers in nonprofit sports clubs versus professionals in for-profit fitness and health clubs. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 11(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, S., Breesch, D., Késenne, S., Van Hoecke, J., Vanreusel, B., & Scheerder, J. (2011). Governmental subsidies and coercive isomorphism. Evidence from sports clubs and their resource dependencies. European Journal for Sport and Society, 8(4), 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waardenburg, M. (2016). Which wider social roles? An analysis of social roles ascribed to voluntary sports clubs. European Journal for Sport and Society, 31(1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, P., & Breuer, C. (2013). Understanding the importance of organizational resources to explain organizational problems: Evidence from nonprofit sports clubs in Germany. Voluntas, 24(2), 461–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeroen Scheerder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vandermeerschen, H., Meganck, J., Seghers, J. et al. Sports, Poverty and the Role of the Voluntary Sector. Exploring and Explaining Nonprofit Sports Clubs’ Efforts to Facilitate Participation of Socially Disadvantaged People. Voluntas 28, 307–334 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9799-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9799-8

Keywords

Navigation