Skip to main content
Log in

A Review of Research on Nonprofit Communications from Mission Statements to Annual Reports

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review surveys the state of research on nonprofit communication and collects and summarizes the resulting advice for nonprofit communication practice. The citations of research papers since 2000 were collected from standard bibliographic databases and selected bibliographies. The resulting collection of papers was summarized and synthesized into relevant themes and organized into five broad categories: (1) strategic planning, (2) management, (3) development, (4) outreach, and (5) accountability. From these broad themes, comparisons and contrasts arise between the research and current practice of nonprofit communications.

Résumé

Cette étude examine l’état de la recherche sur la communication des organisations à but non lucratif, et rassemble et résume les avis qui en résultent pour les pratiques de ces organisations en matière de communication. Les références des travaux de recherche depuis 2000 ont été réunies à partir de bases de données bibliographiques courantes et de bibliographies sélectionnées. Ce recueil de travaux a été résumé et synthétisé en thèmes pertinents et structuré en cinq grandes catégories: (1) la planification stratégique, (2) la gestion, (3) le développement, (4) la portée et (5) la responsabilité. De ces grands thèmes, des comparaisons et des distinctions apparaissent entre la recherche et les pratiques actuelles des organisations à but non lucratif en matière de communication.

Zusammenfassung

Diese Rezension untersucht den Stand der Forschung zur Kommunikation im gemeinnützigen Bereich und erstellt eine Zusammenfassung der sich daraus ergebenden Empfehlungen für die Kommunikationspraktiken im gemeinnützigen Bereich. Die Zitierungen von Forschungsarbeiten seit 2000 wurden aus standardmäßigen bibliographischen Datenbanken und ausgewählten Bibliographien zusammengetragen. Die gesammelten Dokumente wurden in entsprechenden Themenbereichen zusammenfassend dargestellt und in fünf umfassende Kategorien unterteilt: (1) strategische Planung, (2) Managment, (3) Entwicklung, (4) Outreach und (5) Rechenschaftslegung. Bei diesen umfassenden Themen ergeben sich Zusammenhänge und Gegensätze zwischen der Forschung und den gegenwärtigen Kommunikationspraktiken im gemeinnützigen Bereich.

Resumen

La presente revisión evalúa el estado de la investigación sobre la comunicación de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro y recopila y resume el asesoramiento resultante para la práctica de la comunicación de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. Las citas de documentos de investigación desde el año 2000 fueron recopiladas de bases de datos bibliográficas estándar y de bibliografías seleccionadas. La recopilación resultante de documentos fue resumida y sintetizada en temas relevantes y organizada en cinco amplias categorías: (1) planificación estratégica, (2) gestión, (3) desarrollo, (4) alcance, y (5) responsabilidad. De estos amplios temas surgen comparaciones y contrastes entre la investigación y la práctica actual de las comunicaciones de las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro.

摘要

本文调查了非盈利组织的沟通研究的状态,搜集并汇总由此为非盈利组织的沟通实践提供的建议。从标准书目数据库和选定参考书目收集了自2000年起的研究论文引用。由此编制的论文集合被汇总和综合为相关主题,分成五个大类:(1) 战略规划,(2) 管理,(3) 发展,(4) 延伸和 (5) 可说明性。通过这些得出非盈利组织的沟通研究和当前实践之间的比较和对比。

ملخص

هذه المراجعة تفحص وضع البحوث في التواصل الغير ربحي وتجمع وتلخص النصائح الناتجة عن ممارسة التواصل الغير ربحي. تم جمع الإستشهادات بالرأي من المقالات البحثية منذ عام 2000 من قواعد بيانات ببليوجرافية قياسية والببليوجرافيات المحددة من مصادر البحوث. قد تم تلخيص و توليف المجموعة الناتجة من المقالات في شكل موضوعات ذات صلة وتنظيمها في خمس فئات رئيسية هي: (1) التخطيط الاستراتيجي،(2) الإدارة،(3) التنمية،(4)التوعية، و(5) المساءلة. من هذه الموضوعات العامة تنشأ المقارنات والتناقضات بين البحث والممارسة الحالية المتمثلة في وسائل الإتصال الغير ربحي

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, J., Vohs, K. D., & Mogilner, C. (2010). Nonprofits are seen as warm and for-profits as competent: Firm stereotypes matter. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 224–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashcraft, K., & Kedrowicz, A. (2002). Self-direction or social support? Nonprofit empowerment and the tacit employment contract of organizational communication studies. Communication Monographs, 69(1), 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, S., & Faulk, L. (2010). Nonprofit competition in the grants marketplace exploring the relationship between nonprofit financial ratios and grant amount. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 21(1), 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, T. N. (2008). Textual mapping of imitation and intertextuality in college and university mission statements: A new institutional perspective. Semiotica, 172(1–4), 361–387. doi:10.1515/SEMI.2008.104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart, C. K., & Tabone, J. C. (2000). Mission statements in canadian not-for-profit hospitals: Does process matter? Health Care Management Review, 25(2), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerema, A. J. (2006). An analysis of private school mission statements. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 180–202. doi:10.12071/S15327930pje81018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolon, D. (2005). Comparing mission statement content in for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals: Does mission really matter? Hospital Topics: Research and Perspectives in Health-care, 83(4), 2–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradner, J. H. (2001). Volunteer management. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M. K., Noble, C. H., Utter, D. J., & Smith, G. E. (2002). How to give and receive: An exploratory study of charitable hybrids. Psychology and Marketing, 19(11), 919–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briggs, E., Peterson, M., & Gregory, G. (2010). Toward a better understanding of volunteering for nonprofit organizations: Explaining volunteers; pro-social attitudes. Journal of Macromarketing, 30(1), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. A., & Iverson, J. O. (2004). Exploring strategy and board structure in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. A., & Yoshioka, C. F. (2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buffett, P. (2013). The charitable-industrial complex, The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/27/opinion/the-charitable-industrial-complex.html?_r=0. Accessed 26 July 2013.

  • Bussell, H., & Forbes, D. (2002). Understanding the volunteer market: The what, where, who and why of volunteering. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7(3), 244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvajal, M., Garcia-Aviles, J., & Gonzalez, J. (2012). Crowdfunding and nonprofit media. Journalism Practice, 6(5/6), 638–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coe, C. K. (2003). A report card on report cards. Public Performance and Management Review, 27(2), 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, C. K., & Brunet, J. R. (2006). Organizational report cards: Significant impact or much ado about nothing? Public Administration Review, 66(1), 90–100. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00558.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connors, T. D. (2001a). The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connors, T. D. (2001b). The self-renewing organization. In J. M. Greenfield (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, W. T. (2007). Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 10, 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornut, F., Giroux, H., & Langley, A. (2012). The strategic plan as a genre. Discourse and Communication, 6(1), 21–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coy, D., Fischer, M., & Gordon, T. (2001). Public accountability: A new paradigm for college and university annual reports. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L., Edwards, C., Fraser, K. L., Gudelsky, S., Holmquist, J., Thornton, K., & Sweetser, K. D. (2010). Adoption of social media for public relations by nonprofit organizations. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 90–92. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Ruhe, J., Lee, M., & Rajadhyaksha, U. (2007). Mission impossible: Do school mission statements work? Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. (2002). Associating the corporation with a charitable event through sponsorship: Measuring the effects on corporate community relations. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmidt, S., Prinzie, A., & Heene, A. (2008). The level and determinants of mission statement use: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(10), 1433. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, G. E. (2013). Nonprofit Virtual Accountability: An Index and Its Application. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5), 1049–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eimhjellen, I. S. (2013). Internet communication: Does it strengthen local voluntary organizations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 890–909. doi:10.1177/0899764013487996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, E., & Eschenfelder, B. (2009). In the public interest: Communication in nonprofit organizations. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Handbook of applied communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschenfelder, B. (2012). Exploring the nature of nonprofit work through emotional labor. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 173–178. doi:10.1177/0893318911424373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrow, H. (2011). Building stronger ties with alumni through facebook to increase volunteerism and charitable giving. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16, 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldner, S. B. (2006). Living our mission: A study of university mission building. Communication Studies, 57, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forehand, A. (2000). Mission and organizational performance in the healthcare industry. Journal of Healthcare Management, 45(4), 267–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox-McIntyre, M. (2001). Internet strategy for nonprofits. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. T. (2001). Strategic positioning and the financing of nonprofit organizations: Is efficiency rewarded in the contributions marketplace? Public Administration Review, 61(3), 266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaffny, T. (2001). Technology applications. In J. M. Greenfield (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Fund raising. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & MacAulay, M. (2009). NPO 2.0? Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada. Global Media Journal—Canadian Edition, 2(1), 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, J. M. (2001a). The nonprofit handbook: Fund raising. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, J. M. (2001b). Fund-raising management. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • GuideStar. (2009). The state of nonprofit transparency (2008): Voluntary disclosure practices. Washington: GuideStar. http://www2.guidestar.org/rxa/news/articles/2009/the-state-of-nonprofit-transparency-2008.aspx.

  • Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2014). Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: Persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology and Marketing, 24(8), 723–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P. (2002). Compassionate love, agape, and altruism: A new framework for understanding and supporting impoverished consumers. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(1), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houle, B. J., Sagarin, B. J., & Kaplan, M. F. (2005). A functional approach to volunteerism: Do volunteer motives predict task preference? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(4), 337–344. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2704_6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, I. W., & Wyer, R. S. (2009). Differences in perspective and the influence of charitable appeals: When imagining oneself as the victim is not beneficial. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 46(3), 421–434. doi:10.1509/jmkr.46.3.421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingenhoff, D., & Koelling, A. M. (2009). The potential of web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 66–73. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2008.09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, E. M., & Venkatesan, M. (2001). Marketing. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, T. M. (1999). The volunteer’s folly and socio-economic man: Some thoughts on altruism, rationality, and community. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(4), 475–492. doi:10.1016/S1053-5357(99)00045-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M. A. (2012). Developing a communicative theory of the nonprofit. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 139–146. doi:10.1177/0893318911423640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, M. A., Isbell, M. G., & Sanders, M. L. (2015). Connecting nonprofit and communication scholarship: A review of key Issues and a meta-theoretical framework for future research. Review of Communication, 15, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, R., Yetman, M. H., & Yetman, R. J. (2006). Expense misreporting in nonprofit organizations. Accounting Review, 81(2), 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll, L., (2008). The World’s Billionaires. Forbes. Accessed 5 March 2008.

  • Laverie, D. A., & McDonald, R. E. (2007). Volunteer dedication: Understanding the role of identity importance on participation frequency. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(3), 274–288. doi:10.1177/0276146707302837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, L. (2005). The civil society sector: A review of critical issues and research agenda for organizational communication scholars. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 238–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao-Troth, M. A. (2001). Attitude differences between paid workers and volunteers. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11(4), 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao-Troth, M. A. (2005). Are they here for the long haul? The effects of functional motives and personality factors on the psychological contracts of volunteers. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(4), 510–530. doi:10.1177/0899764005279513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, G. (2009). High-dollar nonprofit donors would embrace social media. Journal of New Communications Research, 4(1), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, M. B., Lucas, C., Raines, V., & Yankey, J. A. (2001). Lessons in strategic plan implementation. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, D. (2008). Participatory planning and means-end rationality: A translation problem. Planning Theory and Practice, 9(3), 325–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marnoch, G. (2008). A comparison of the annual reports presented by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the English National Health Service. Public Performance and Management Review, 31(4), 570–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, B. J. (2001). Marketing strategies in development. In J. M. Greenfield (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Fund raising. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meacham, J., & Gaff, J. G. (2006). Learning goals in mission statements: Implications for educational leadership. Liberal Education, 92(1), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meneghetti, M. M., & Seel, K. (2001). Ethics and values in the nonprofit organization. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, C., & Fyfe, N. R. (2005). Preserving space for volunteers: Exploring the links between voluntary welfare organisations, volunteering and citizenship1. Urban Studies, 42(3), 417–433. doi:10.1080/00420980500034884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morphew, C. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, J. C., & Sujan, H. (2005). Volunteer behavior: A hierarchical model approach for investigating its trait and functional motive antecedents. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(2), 170–182. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1502_9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. (2007). The use of pathos in charity letters: Some notes toward a theory and analysis. Journal Of Technical Writing and Communication, 37(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, J. (2008). Linking public relations tactics to long-term success: An investigation of how communications contribute to trust, satisfaction, and commitment in a nonprofit organization. Journal of Promotion Management, 14(3), 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osten, M. (2001). Technology and strategy for organizational effectiveness. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palli, P., Vaara, E., & Sorsa, V. (2009). Strategy as text and discursive practice: A genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration. Discourse and Communication, 3(3), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, L. M. (2003). Is accounting information from nonprofit organizations useful to donors? A review of charitable giving and value-relevance. Journal of Accounting Literature, 22, 104–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrut, M., Cmeciu, C., & Miron, L. (2011). NGO annual reports as a device to frame education in Romanian public communication campaigns. Public Relations Review, 37, 432–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, A. M., & Katz, S. B. (2010). Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse (3rd ed.). Pearson: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddick, C. G., & Ponomariov, B. (2013). The effect of individuals’ organization affiliation on their internet donations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(6), 1197–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumsey, G. G., & White, C. (2009). Strategic corporate philanthropic relationships: Nonprofits’ perceptions of benefits and corporate motives. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 301–303. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2009.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, S. (2007). Missioning in nonprofits: Assessing nonprofits’ efforts at crafting and electronically disseminating their formal mission statements, Paper presented to the 2007 International Communication Association Conference.

  • Ryan, R., Kaplan, R., & Grese, R. E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5), 629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, M. L. (2012). Theorizing nonprofit organizations as contradictory enterprises: Understanding the inherent tensions of nonprofit marketization. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 179–185. doi:10.1177/0893318911423761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., & Lee, S. (2004). Donor trust and relationship commitment in the U.K. charity sector: The impact on behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, A., & Shang, J. (2011). Bequest giving: Revisiting donor motivation with dimensional qualitative research. Psychology and Marketing, 28(10), 980–997. doi:10.1002/mar.20424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G. D., & Wang, L. (2014). The social network effect: The determinants of giving through social media. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 850–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, A., & Pforr, F. (2011). The crisis communication preparedness of nonprofit organizations: The case of German interest groups. Public Relations Review, 37(1), 68–70. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2010.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seel, K. (2001). Commercial ventures: Opportunities and risks for nonprofit organizations. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seshadri, S., & Carstenson, L. (2007). The perils of e-mail communications in nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 77–99. doi:10.1002/nml.172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafrir, S. M., & Connie Yuan, Y. (2012). Getting the feel: Email usage in a nonprofit community organization in a low-income community. Communication Quarterly, 60(1), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearman, S. M., & Yoo, J. H. (2007). “Even a penny will help!”: Legitimization of paltry donation and social proof in soliciting donation to a charitable organization. Communication Research Reports, 24(4), 271–282. doi:10.1080/08824090701624148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sisco, H. F. (2012). Nonprofit in crisis: An examination of the applicability of situational crisis communication theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaerbaek, P. (2005). Annual reports as interaction devices: The hidden constructions of mediated communication. Financial Accountability and Management, 21(4), 385–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, M. F. (2009). The effects of nonprofit accountability ratings on donor behavior. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(2), 220–236. doi:10.1177/0899764008316470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. T. (2004). What they really want: Assessing psychological contracts of volunteers. Journal Of Volunteer Administration, 22(1), 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. M. (2007). Nonprofit religious organization web sites: Underutilized avenue of communicating with group members. Journal of Media and Religion, 6(4), 273–290. doi:10.1080/15348420701626789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. R., Cronley, M. L., & Barr, T. F. (2012). Funding implications of social enterprise: The role of mission consistency, entrepreneurial competence, and attitude toward social enterprise on donor behavior. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 31(1), 142–157. doi:10.1509/jppm.11.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M., & Sypher, B. D. (2010). Philanthropy in the workplace: How a financial institution communicates charitable giving values. Southern Communication Journal, 75(4), 370–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smitko, K. (2012). Donor engagement through twitter. Public Relations Review, 38(4), 633–635. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, P. G., Mahoney, T. Q., & Hambrick, M. E. (2014). Twitter as a communication tool for nonprofits: A study of sport-for-development organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16, 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinkelman, D., & Mankaney, K. (2007). When is administrative efficiency associated with charitable donations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector, 36(1), 41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., Sorsa, V., & Pälli, P. (2010). On the force potential of strategy texts: A critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organization, 17(6), 685–702. doi:10.1177/1350508410367326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Til, J., & PettroneSwalve, D. A. (2001). Change leadership or change management. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D. (2007). Nonprofit organizations’ use of the internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the internet sites of the philanthropy 400. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(1), 59–76. doi:10.1002/nml.171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D. (2009). Comparing the two sides of the nonprofit organization–donor relationship: Applying coorientation methodology to relationship management. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 144–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D. (2011). Increasing fundraising efficiency through evaluation: Applying communication theory to the nonprofit organization—donor relationship. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 458–475. doi:10.1177/0899764009354322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D. (2013). Tracing the impact of media relations and television coverage on U.S. charitable relief fundraising: An application of agenda-setting theory across three natural disasters. Journal of Public Relations Research, 25(4), 329–346. doi:10.1080/1062726X.2013.806870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35, 102–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, R. D., & Lo, K. D. (2012). Exploring the impact of culture in the social media sphere: A content analysis of nonprofit organizations’ use of Facebook. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41(3), 297–319. doi:10.1080/17475759.2012.728772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, B. (2012). Framing breast cancer: Building an agenda through online advocacy and fundraising. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: Their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124. doi:10.1509/jmkg.73.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J., Smythe, W., Hadjistavropoulos, T., Malloy, D., & Martin, R. (2005). A study of thematic content in hospital mission statements: A question of values. Health Care Management Review, 30(4), 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, E. M. (2001). Strategic media relations. In T. D. Connors (Ed.), The nonprofit handbook: Management. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Souder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souder, L. A Review of Research on Nonprofit Communications from Mission Statements to Annual Reports. Voluntas 27, 2709–2733 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9699-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9699-y

Keywords

Navigation