Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life Course, Gender, and Participation in Voluntary Organizations in Italy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article investigates the gender differences in participation in voluntary organizations across the life course in Italy. It shows that three forms of engagement in voluntary organizations—donating money, attending meetings, and doing unpaid work—may depend on some stages of the life course—leaving the parental home, forming a union, and becoming a parent—as it is plausible that they may change personal resources and pose constraints or provide opportunities for involvement. Using the household survey “ISTAT Multipurpose Survey—Aspects of daily life”, the article finds that while leaving the parental home is positively associated with both men’s and women’s involvement, forming a union, and being a parent is detrimental for women’s involvement and not for men’s. This pattern indicates that gender roles may constrain more women’s than men’s probability of participation in voluntary organizations.

Résumé

Cet article étudie les différences entre les sexes dans la participation aux organisations bénévoles au cours d’une vie en Italie. Il montre que les trois formes d’engagement dans les organismes bénévoles – dons d’argent, participation aux réunions et travail non rémunéré – peuvent dépendre de certaines étapes au cours de la vie – quitter le domicile parental, former un syndicat et devenir parent – car il est plausible qu’elles modifient les ressources personnelles et posent des contraintes ou offrent des occasions de participation. À l’aide de l’enquête sur les ménages « Enquête universelle : aspects de la vie quotidienne » , l’article conclut que si quitter le domicile parental est corrélé de manière positive à la fois à la participation des hommes et à celle des femmes, former un syndicat et être parent est préjudiciable à la participation des femmes et non à celle des hommes. Ce modèle indique que le rôle des sexes peut limiter davantage la probabilité des femmes que des hommes de participer aux organisations bénévoles.

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag untersucht die Unterschiede zwischen den Geschlechtern in Italien hinsichtlich ihrer Mitwirkung in ehrenamtlichen Organisationen im Laufe ihres Lebens. Es zeigt sich, dass drei Formen des Engagements bei ehrenamtlichen Organisationen - Geldspenden, die Teilnahme an Versammlungen und die Verrichtung unbezahlter Arbeit - von bestimmten Lebensabschnitten abhängig sein können, z. B. der Auszug aus dem Elternhaus, das Eingehen einer Partnerschaft und eine Elternschaft, da sich dadurch verständlicherweise persönliche Ressourcen ändern können und diese Ereignisse die Möglichkeit sich zu engagieren entweder einschränken oder erhöhen. Unter Bezugnahme auf die Haushaltserhebung „ISTAT Mehrzweckbefragung - Aspekte des täglichen Lebens“ kommt man zu folgendem Ergebnis: Während sich der Auszug aus dem Elternhaus positv auf das Engagement von sowohl Männern als auch Frauen auswirkt, haben das Eingehen einer Partnerschaft und die Elternschaft einen nachteiligen Effekt für das Engagement von Frauen, nicht jedoch für das Engagement von Männern. Dieses Verhaltensmuster ist ein Zeichen dafür, dass die Geschlechterrollen die Wahrscheinlichkeit für ein Engagement in ehrenamtlichen Organisationen für Frauen mehr einschränkt als für Männer.

Resumen

El presente artículo investiga las diferencias de género en la participación en organizaciones voluntarias en el transcurso de la vida en Italia. Muestra que tres formas de compromiso en organizaciones voluntarias - la donación de dinero, la asistencia a reuniones y la realización de trabajo no remunerado - pueden depender de algunas etapas del curso de la vida - dejar el hogar parental, formar una unión y convertirse en padres - ya que es plausible que puedan cambiar los recursos personales y plantear restricciones o proporcionar oportunidades para implicarse. Utilizando la encuesta sobre hogares “Encuesta Multipropósitos ISTAT - Aspectos de la vida diaria”, el presente artículo encuentra que aunque dejar el hogar parental se asocia de manera positiva con la implicación tanto de hombres como de mujeres, formar una unión y ser padres va en detrimento de la implicación de las mujeres y no en la de los hombres. Este patrón indica que los roles de género pueden restringir la probabilidad de participación de las mujeres en mayor medida que en los hombres, en organizaciones voluntarias.

摘要

本论文考察了意大利的不同性别的人们一生中在参与自愿性组织方面存在的差异, 结果显示,自愿性组织的三种参与类型(捐款、参加会议和从事免费的工作)和生命的某些阶段有关(离开父母独立、结婚以及为人父母),这一点不无道理,他们由于在这几个阶段中,他们可能会在个人资源、遭受的限制或参与机会等方面发生变化。本文利用“ISTAT 多功能调查 - 日常生活的各个方面”这一家庭调查,发现离开父母和男女的参与呈正相关,而结婚和为人父母会影响女性的参与而不会影响男性的参与,这一发现说明, 性别在参与自愿性组织方面,对女性可能要大于其对男性的影响。

ملخص

تبحث هذه المقالة الإختلافات بين الجنسين في المشاركة في المنظمات التطوعية عبر مسار الحياة في إيطاليا. فإنه يدل على أن ثلاثة أشكال من الإنخراط في المنظمات التطوعية - التبرع بالمال، حضور الإجتماعات والعمل بدون أجر - قد يعتمد على بعض مراحل دورة الحياة - مغادرة منزل الوالدين، الزواج وإنجاب الأولاد- كما هو من المعقول أنه قد تتغير الموارد الشخصية، تشكل القيود أو توفير فرص للمشاركة. بإستخدام إستطلاع الرأي الأسري “إستطلاع رأي متعدد الأغراض (ISTAT)- جوانب الحياة اليومية”، وجدت هذه المقالة أنه في حين ترك منزل الوالدين له علاقة إيجابية مع تشكيل كل من الرجل ومشاركة المرأة، الزواج و إنجاب الأطفال هو ضار لمشاركة المرأة وليس للرجال.هذا النمط يشير إلى أن أدوار الجنسين قد يحد المزيد من النساء من إحتمال المشاركة عن إحتمال مشاركة الرجال في المنظمات التطوعية.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Respondents are selected between 18 and 80 years old.

  2. The category of the “Not employed” category includes unemployed, homemakers, and unable respondents. In previous analyses the variable included an additional category for homemakers. Since the homemakers category in the men’s sample was very small and that the estimates are were not different from those presented here, we preferred to use a more parsimonious solution.

  3. Unfortunately, the survey does not include information on neither household nor personal income, thus this variable is used as a proxy of income.

  4. The NUTS1 classification is followed. North-west includes: Piemonte, Valle d’Aosta, Liguria, and Lombardia; North-east includes: Trentino-Alto Adige, Veneto, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, and Emilia Romagna; Center includes: Toscana, Umbria, Marche, and Lazio; South includes: Abruzzo, Molise, Campania, Puglia, Basilicata, and Calabria; Islands includes: Sicilia and Sardegna.

  5. Doing so, we do not encounter the “identification problem,” stemming from the dependence between age, cohorts, and periods (see Glenn, 2005). Moreover, previous analyses showed that including age and its square would lead to multicollinearity.

  6. The birth cohorts are “≤1930,” “1931–1940,” “1941–1950,” “1951–1950,” “1951–1960,” “1961–1970,” “1971–1980,” “>1980.”

  7. Marginal effects are the difference in probability between each category and the reference (Long 1997), and are computed at the mean of the covariates. The confidence intervals are obtained using simulation (Gelman and Hill 2006).

  8. The difference between the first the statuses, being single living with parents and being living on their own, is a marginal effect. See footnote no. 7 on the estimation method.

References

  • Aassve, A., Davia, M. A., Iacovou, M., & Mazzucco, S. (2007). Does leaving home make you poor? Evidence from 13 European countries. European Journal of Population, 23(3–4), 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliaga, C. (2006). How is the time of women and men distributed in Europe? Statistics in Focus, 4, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anxo, D., Mencarini, L., Pailè, A., Solaz, A., Tanturri, M. L., & Flood, L. (2011). Gender differences in time use over the life course in France, Italy, Sweden, and the US. Feminist Economics, 17(3), 159–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbagli, M., Castiglioni, M., & Dalla Zuanna, G. (2003). Fare famiglia in Italia. Un secolo di cambiamenti. Bologna: Il Mulino.

  • Becker, G. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79(1), 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billari, F. C. (2004). Becoming an adult in Europe: A macro(/micro)-demographic perspective. Demographic Research, S3, 15–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H.-P., & Drobnic, S. (Eds.). (2011). Careers of couples in contemporary society: From male breadwinner to dual-earner families. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchmann, M. C., & Kriesi, I. (2011). Transition to adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 481–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budig, M., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66(2), 204–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 1208–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work-family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(5), 1344–1361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. E., Grabb, E., & Baer, D. E. (1992). Voluntary association membership in fifteen countries: A comparative analysis. American Sociological Review, 57(2), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P., & Van Den Broek, A. (1998). Civil society in comparative perspective: Involvement in voluntary associations in North America and Western Europe. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(1), 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, D., Pasqua, S., & Pronzato, C. (2008). Motherhood and market work decisions in institutional context: a European perspective. Oxford Economic Papers, 61(Suppl. 1), i147–i171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M. (2012). La divisione del lavoro domestico e delle attività di cura nelle coppie italiane: un’analisi empirica. Stato e Mercato, 94(1), 161–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotti Sani, G. M. (2014). Men’s employment hours and time on domestic chores in European countries. Journal of Family Issues, 35(8), 1023–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIGE. (2010). Gender Equality Index. Vilnius: European Institute for Gender Equality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, L., & Greene, S. (2012). The politics of parenthood: causes and consequences of the politicization of the American families. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1996). The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6(1), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. A., Finlay, A., Gallay, L., & Kim, T. (2012). Political incorporation and the protracted transition to adulthood: the need for new institutional inventions. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. A., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(10), 159–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. K., & Gerstel, N. (2001). Connections and constraints: the effects of children on caregiving. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(1), 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Mainar, I., Molina, J. A., & Montuenga, V. M. (2011). Gender differences in childcare: time allocation in five European countries. Feminist Economics, 17(1), 119–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. H., & Furstenberg, F. J. (2002). The transition to adulthood: a time use perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gesthuizen, M., & Scheepers, P. (2012). Educational differences in volunteering in crossnational perspective: individual and contextual explanations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(1), 58–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, S. J., Ferguson, D. M., Horwood, L. J., & Boden, J. M. (2014). The effects of parenthood on workforce participation and income for men and women. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35(1), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, N. D. (2005). Cohort analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S. (1999). The effects of transitions in marital status on men’s performance of housework. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(3), 700–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, S., & McKenzie, T. (2014). Gender differences in formal and informal volunteering in Germany. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 887–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M. (2003). Why should we be bowling alone? Results from a Belgian survey on civic participation. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2013). Il benessere equo e sostenibile in Italia. Roma: ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT. (2014). Attività gratuite a beneficio degli altri. Available at: http://www.istat.it/it/archivio/129115. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.

  • Janoski, T., & Wilson, J. (1995). Pathways to Voluntarism: Family socialization and status transmission models. Social Forces, 74(1), 271–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. K., & Stoker, L. (2004). Social trust and civic engagement across time and generations. Acta Politica, 39(4), 342–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kan, M. Y., Sullivan, O., & Gershuny, J. (2011). Gender convergence in domestic work: Discerning the effects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data. Sociology, 45(2), 234–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, D., & Thomson, R. (1977). Voluntary association membership trends and the family life cycle. Social Forces, 56(1), 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, A. (2011). Working fathers in Europe: Earning and caring. European Sociological Review, 27(2), 230–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Valle, D. (2006). La partecipazione alle associazioni in Italia. Tendenze generali e differenze regionali. Stato e Mercato, 77(3), 277–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancee, B., & Radl, J. (2014). Volunteering over the life course. Social Forces, 93(2), 833–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Presti, A. (2013). The interactive effects of job resources and motivations to volunteer among a sample of Italian volunteers. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(4), 969–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, S. J. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M. (1984). The order of events in the transition to adulthood. Sociology of Education, 57(2), 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucco, S., Mencarini, L., & Rettaroli, R. (2006). Similarities and differences between two cohorts of young adults in Italy: Results of a CATI Survey on transition to adulthood. Demographic Research, 15(5), 105–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mencarini, L., & Tanturri, M. L. (2004). Time use, family role-set and childbearing among Italian working women. Genus, 60(1), 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, H. (2014). Influences of resources and subjective dispositions on formal and informal volunteering. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(4), 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musick, M., & Wilson, J. (2008). Volunteers: A social profile. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naldini, M., & Saraceno, C. (2011). Conciliare famiglia e lavoro. Vecchi e nuovi patti tra sessi e generazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesbit, R. (2012). The influence of major life cycle events on volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(6), 1153–1174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomagouchi, K. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2003). Costs and rewards of children: The effects of becoming a parent on adults’ lives. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(2), 356–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Labour force statistics. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterle, S., Kirkpatrick Johnson, M., & Mortimer, J. T. (2004). Volunteerism during the transition to adulthood: A life course perspective. Social Forces, 82(3), 1123–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omoto, A. M., Snyder, M., & Martino, S. C. (2000). Volunteerism and the life course: Investigating age-related agendas for action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(3), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paik, A., & Navarre-Jackson, L. (2011). Social networks, recruitment, and volunteering: Are social capital effects conditional on recruitment? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 476–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perks, T., & Haan, M. (2011). Youth religious involvement and adult community participation: Do levels of youth religious involvement matter? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(1), 107–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. (1991). Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, G., & Schnepf, S. V. (2008). Gender differences in charitable giving in Great Britain. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(2), 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton Princeton: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rasbash, J., & Browne, M. W. (2008). Non-hierarchical multilevel models. In J. De Leeuw & E. Meijer (Eds.), Handbook of multilevel analysis (pp. 301–334). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano, M. C., Mencarini, L., & Tanturri, M. L. (2012). Uso del tempo e ruoli di genere. Tra lavoro e famiglia nel ciclo di vita. Roma: ISTAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotolo, T. (2000). A time to join, a time to quit: the influence of life cycle transitions on voluntary association membership. Social Forces, 78(3), 1133–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotolo, T., & Wilson, J. (2004). What happened to the ‘long civic generation’? Explaining cohort differences in volunteerism. Social Forces, 82(3), 1091–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotolo, T., Wilson, J., & Hughes, M. E. (2010). Homeownership and volunteering: an alternative approach to studying social inequality and civic engagement. Sociological Forum, 25(3), 570–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., & Verba, S. (1999). What happened at work today? A multistage model of gender, employment and political participation. Journal of Politics, 61(1), 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofer, E., & Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. (2001). The structural contexts of civic engagement: voluntary association membership in comparative perspective. American Sociological Review, 66(6), 806–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Settersten, R. A., & Mayer, K. U. (1997). The measurement of age, age structuring, and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: a literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solera, C. (2009). Women in and out of paid work. Changes across generations in Italy and Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, L., & Jennings, M. K. (1995). Life-cycle transitions and political participation: the case of marriage. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundeen, R. A. (1990). Family life course status and volunteer behavior: implications for the single parent. Sociological Perspectives, 33(4), 483–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundström, A. (2013). Women’s local political representation within 30 European countries: A comparative dataset on regional figures. QoG Working Paper Series, Vol. 18, pp. 1–41. University of Gothenburg, The Quality of Government Institute.

  • Taniguchi, H. (2006). Men’s and women’s volunteering: gender differences in the effects of employment and family characteristics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(1), 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, H. (2012). The determinants of formal and informal volunteering: Evidence from the American time use survey. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 930–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi, H., & Thomas, L. (2011). The influences of religious attitudes on volunteering. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(2), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Lippe, T., de Ruijter, J., de Ruijter, E., & Raub, W. (2011). Persistent inequalities in time use between men and women: A detailed look at the influence of economic circumstances, policies, and culture. European Sociological Review, 27(2), 164–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ingen, E. J. (2008). Social participation revisited: Disentangling and explaining period, life-cycle and cohort effects. Acta Sociologica, 51(2), 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ingen, E. J., & Van der Meer, T. W. G. (2011). Welfare state expenditure and inequalities in voluntary association participation. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 302–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voorpostel, M., & Coffè, H. (2012). Transition in partnership and parental status, gender, and political and civic participation. European Sociological Review, 28(1), 28–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2000). Volunteering. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 215–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2012). Volunteerism research: A review essay. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(2), 176–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 694–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1995). Learning to care: Elementary kindness in an age of indifference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., & Land, K. C. (2008). Age-period-cohort analysis of repeated cross-section surveys fixed or random effects? Sociological Methods & Research, 36(3), 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Quaranta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Quaranta, M. Life Course, Gender, and Participation in Voluntary Organizations in Italy. Voluntas 27, 874–899 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9615-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9615-x

Keywords

Navigation