Abstract
A quasi-experimental design (N = 517) was used to investigate the effect on audience response to a supported charity if corporate support is featured in an advertisement. The results indicate that corporate support of a charity appears not to influence audience attitudes and donation intentions for the charity. A small portion of the audience may be motivated to donate when learning of a large corporate donation to the charity. The level of individuals’ favorability for the charity was the strongest predictor of their attitudes and intentions. Gender was also a predictor of more positive charity attitudes, with females reporting more positive attitudes than males for three of four charities. Managerial implications and areas for future research are discussed.
Résumé
Un concept quasi-expérimental (N = 517) a été utilisé pour étudier l’effet d’une publicité mentionnant le soutien d’une entreprise à une œuvre de bienfaisance sur la réaction de l’audience. Les résultats indiquent que le soutien d’une entreprise ne semble pas influencer l’attitude de l’audience ni les intentions de dons à l’œuvre de bienfaisance. Une petite partie de l’audience peut être incitée à donner lorsqu’elle apprend qu’une entreprise a fait un don important à l’œuvre de bienfaisance. Le niveau d’approbation des individus vis-à-vis de l’œuvre de bienfaisance constitue l’élément de prévision le plus déterminant de leur attitude et de leurs intentions. Le genre est également un élément de prévision d’attitude vis-à-vis des œuvres de bienfaisance, les femmes témoignant d’une attitude plus positive que les hommes pour trois œuvres de charité sur quatre. Nous examinons les conséquences de ces résultats en termes de gestion et discutons des champs de recherches à venir.
Zusammenfassung
Es wurde ein quasi-experimentelles Design (N = 517) verwandt, um zu untersuchen, wie eine Zielgruppe reagiert, wenn in einer Werbung der von ihr unterstützten Wohltätigkeitsorganisation die Unterstützung durch Unternehmen erwähnt wird. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Unterstützung einer Wohltätigkeitsorganisation durch Unternehmen scheinbar keinen Einfluss auf die Einstellung und Spendenabsicht der Zielgruppe hat. Ein kleiner Teil der Zielgruppe wird unter Umständen aufgrund einer ansehnlichen Unternehmensspende selbst zum Spenden motiviert. Das Ausmaß der positiven Gesinnung gegenüber der Wohltätigkeitsorganisation war der stärkste Einflusswert für die Einstellungen und Absichten der Personen. Das Geschlecht war ebenfalls eine Einflussgröße für positivere Einstellungen gegenüber der Wohltätigkeitsorganisation; Frauen waren drei von vier Wohltätigkeitsorganisationen positiver gesinnt als Männer. Es werden die Implikationen für das Management und die Bereiche für zukünftige Forschungen diskutiert.
Resumen
Se utilizó un diseño cuasi experimental (N = 517) para investigar el efecto sobre la respuesta de la audiencia a una organización benéfica si se presenta apoyo corporativo en un anuncio. Los resultados indican que el apoyo corporativo a una organización benéfica parece no influir en las actitudes de la audiencia y en sus intenciones de donar a dicha organización. Una pequeña parte de la audiencia puede sentirse motivada a donar cuando se entera de un gran donativo corporativo a la organización benéfica. El nivel de preferencia de los individuos ante la organización benéfica fue el pronosticador más fuerte de sus actitudes e intenciones. El género fue también un pronosticador de actitudes más positivas con respecto a la organización benéfica, mostrando actitudes más positivas las mujeres que los hombres para tres de cuatro organizaciones benéficas. Se examinan las implicaciones y áreas de gestión para futuras investigaciones.
摘要
一种准实验设计(N = 517)被用于调查公众在企业支持被植入广告时对慈善事业的看法。结果显示,企业支持慈善事业好像并未影响公众对慈善事业的态度及其捐赠意向。一小部分公众可能在得知大型的企业慈善捐赠后也有意捐赠。个人对慈善事业的支持率是他们态度与意向的最强有力的预兆。性别也是慈善态度的一种预兆。在四分之三的慈善捐赠中,女性和男性相比,态度更为积极。另外,今后研究的管理问题和领域也得到讨论。
ملخص
تم استخدام تصميم شبه تجريبي (N = 517) لدراسة التأثير على إستجابة الجمهور لجمعية خيرية تم تدعيمها إذا كان دعم الشركات جانب بارز في الإعلان. تشير النتائج إلى إنه يبدو أن دعم الشركات لمنظمة خيرية لا يؤثر على المواقف ونوايا تبرع الجمهورللأعمال الخيرية. جزء صغير من الجمهور قد يتم تشجيعهم على التبرع عندما يعلمون عن تبرع كبير لشركات لمؤسسة خيرية. كان مستوى الأفضلية للأفراد للأعمال الخيرية أقوى مؤشرا˝ لمواقفهم ونواياهم. كان الجنس أيضا مؤشرا˝ لأكثر مواقف خيرية إيجابية، مع إبلاغ الإناث عن مواقف أكثر إيجابية عن الذكور في ثلاثة من أربعة من الجمعيات الخيرية. تم مناقشة الآثار والمجالات الإدارية للبحث في المستقبل.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AMR. (2013). Toyota has strongest reputation in Australia. Retrieved May 5, 2013 from http://stwgroup.com.au/toyota-has-strongest-reputation-in-australia-new-research.
Anonymous. (2010a). Australia’s population. Retrieved October 16, 2012 from Australia Bureau of Statistics: http://www.abs.gov.au/.
Anonymous. (2010b). Target by lifestyle. Retrieved November 5, 2012 from First Direct Solutions: http://auspost.com.au/firstdirectsolutions/target-by-lifestyle.html.
Arumi, A. M., Wooden, R., Johnson, J., Farkas, S., Duffett, A., & Ott, A. (2005). The charitable impulse. New York: Public Agenda.
Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.
Basil, D., & Weber, D. (2006). Values motivation and concern for appearances: The effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 61–72.
Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving. Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(5), 924–973.
Bennett, R. (2003). Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1), 12–29.
Bennett, R., & Gabriel, H. (2000). Image building for charitable organization. Social Marketing Quarterly, 6(3), 77–81.
Bickman, L. (1972). Social influence and diffusion of responsibility in an emergency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8(5), 438–445.
Bigand, E., McAdams, S., & Foret, S. (2000). Divided attention in music. International Journal of Psychology, 35(6), 270–278.
Bingham, T., & Walters, G. (forthcoming). Financial sustainability within UK charities: Community sport trusts and corporate social responsibility partnerships. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9275-z.
Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. The Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179.
Blackston, M. (1992). Observations: Building brand equity by managing the brand’s relationships. Journal of Advertising Research, 32(3), 79–83.
Botetzagias, I & Koutiva, E. (forthcoming). Financial giving of foundations and businesses to environmental NGOs: The role of grantee’s legitimacy. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9338-1.
Bower, A., & Grau, S. L. (2009). Explicit donations and inferred endorsements. Journal of Advertising, 38(3), 113–126.
Bromley, D. B. (2000). Psychological aspects of corporate identity, image and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(3), 240–252.
Brown, T. J., Dacin, P. A., Pratt, M. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 99–106.
Burak, L. J., Rosenthal, M., & Richardson, K. (2013). Examining attitudes, beliefs, and intentions regarding the use of exercise as punishment in physical education and sport: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. doi:10.1111/jasp.12100.
Cavill. (2011). Australia’s most trusted charity. Retrieved July 17, 2012 from http://www.cavill.com.au/cms/images/10013/trust.pdf.
Chen, X., Szolnoki, A., & Perc, M. (2012). Risk-driven migration and the collective-risk social dilemma. Physical Review E, 86(3), 1–8.
Clarke, J., Kane, D., Wilding, K., & Bass, P. (2012). UK civil society almanac 2012. London: NCVO.
Dacin, P. A., & Brown, T. J. (2002). Corporate identity and corporate associations: A framework for future research. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(2/3), 254–263.
Dean, D. H. (2003). Consumer perception of corporate donations effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of advertising, 32(4), 91–102.
Deutskens, E., De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., & Oosterveld, P. (2004). Response rate and response quality of internet-based surveys: An experimental study. Marketing Letters, 15(1), 21–36.
Dey, E. (1997). Working with low survey response rates: The efficacy of weighing adjustments. Research in Higher Education, 38, 215–227.
Dobbs, J., Jochum, V, & Smith, M. (2012). UK giving 2012. Retrieved March 15, 2013 from http://www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/sites/default/files/uk_giving_2012_full_report_1211.pdf.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 24(3), 224–241.
Genovese, A. (2012). How companies can bring crowds to their causes. Retrieved March 19, 2013 from http://cecp.co/press-room/cecp-insights/item/26-how-companies-can-bring-crowds-to-their-causes.html.
Groves, R. M. (2006). Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(5), 646–675.
Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167–189.
Guido, G. (1998). The dichotic theory of salience: A framework for assessing attention and memory. European Advances in Consumer Research, 3(3), 114–119.
Guido, G. (2001). The salience of marketing stimuli: An incongruity-salience hypothesis on consumer awareness. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Guthrie, D. (2003). Survey on corporate-community relations. New York: Social Sciences Research Council.
Gwinner, K. (1997). A model of image creation and image transfer in event sponsorship. International Marketing Review, 14(3), 145–158.
Hamilton, M. B. (2009). Online survey response rates and times. Super Survey, Retrieved May 9, 2013 from http://www.supersurvey.com/papers/supersurvey_white_paper_response_rates.pdf.
Harbaugh, W. T. (1998). The prestige motive for making charitable transfers. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 277–282.
Hite, R. E., & Fraser, C. (1988). Meta-analyses of attitudes toward advertising by professionals. The Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 95–103.
IAFS. (2011). Mission intangible. Retrieved October 13, 2012 from http://www.iafinance.org/_blog/MISSION_INTANGIBLE/tag/Automobiles_sector/.
Künemund, H., & Rein, M. (1999). There is more to receiving than needing: Theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19(01), 93–121.
Kypri, K., Stephenson, S., & Langley, J. (2004). Assessment of nonresponse bias in an internet survey of alcohol use. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 28(4), 630–634.
Larsen, D., & Watson, J. J. (2001). A guide map to the terrain of gift value. Psychology and Marketing, 18(8), 889–906.
Latane, B., & Nida, S. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89(2), 308.
Madden, K., & Scaife, W. (2008). Keeping giving going: Charitable bequests and Australians. Brisbane: The Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies, QUT.
Meijer, M.-M. (2009). The effects of charity reputation on charitable giving. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(1), 33–42.
Nagel, F., Maurer, M., & Reinnemann, C. (2012). Is there a visual dominance in political communication? How verbal, visual, and vocal communication shape viewers’ impressions of political candidates. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 833–850.
Peloza, J., & Hassay, D. N. (2007). A typology of charity support behaviors: Toward a holistic view of helping. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 17(1–2), 135–151.
Readers Digest. (2007). Australia’s most trusted charities 2007. Retrieved September 7, 2012 from http://www.readersdigest.com.au/australias-most-trusted-charities-2007.
Ross, J. K., Stutts, M. A., & Patterson, L. (2011). Tactical considerations for the effective use of cause-related marketing. Journal of Applied Business Research, 7(2), 58–65.
Roster, C. A. (2006). Moments of truth in gift exchanges: A critical incident analysis of communication indicators used to detect gift failure. Psychology and Marketing, 23(11), 885–903.
Saiia, D., Carroll, A., & Buchholtz, A. (2003). Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home. Business & Society, 42(2), 169.
Salamon, L. (2010). Rethinking corporate social engagement: Lessons from Latin America. Sterline: Kumarian Press.
Samu, S., & Wymer, W. (2009). The effect of fit and dominance in cause marketing communications. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 432–440.
Sargeant, A., & Crissman, K. (2006). Corporate giving in Australia: An analysis of motives and barriers. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 41(4), 477–492.
Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409–432.
Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 158–166.
Sokolowski, S. (2013). Effects of government support of nonprofit institutions on aggregate private philanthropy: Evidence from 40 countries. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 24(2), 359–381.
Torres-Moraga, E., Vásquez-Parraga, A. Z., & Barra, C. (2010). Antecedents of donor trust in an emerging charity sector: The role of reputation, familiarity, opportunism and communication. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 29E, 159–177. Retrieved February 19, 2013 from http://captura.uchile.cl/jspui/bitstream/2250/11516/1/Torres_Moraga_Eduardo.pdf.
Walther, E. (2002). Guilty by mere association: Evaluative conditioning and the spreading attitude effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 919.
Wymer, W. (2007). Implications of sexual dimorphism on volunteer recruitment and retention. In A. Sargeant & W. Wymer (Eds.), The Routledge companion to nonprofit marketing (pp. 373–386). New York: Routledge.
Wymer, W., & Samu, S. (2003). Dimensions of business nonprofit collaborative relationships. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 3–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Treatment Ads
Appendix: Treatment Ads
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wymer, W., McDonald, K. & Scaife, W. Effects of Corporate Support of a Charity on Public Perceptions of the Charity. Voluntas 25, 1388–1416 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9397-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-013-9397-y