Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Financial Sustainability Within UK Charities: Community Sport Trusts and Corporate Social Responsibility Partnerships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The change in political leadership in the UK in 2010 has created financial uncertainty and instability for many third sector organisations. In a shifting funding landscape, it is clear that an over-reliance on Government funding is a risky strategy and that there is a need to diversify and seek out alternative sources of revenue. This article considers the impact of political change on the financial sustainability of community sports trusts associated with Premier League and Football League clubs in England. It explores sources of revenue through the analysis of financial statements, revealing that on average community sports trusts receive a significant proportion of income from grant funding whilst sponsorship income is relatively small. The article goes on to discuss the potential for community sports trusts to diversify revenue streams by developing social partnerships that address the corporate social responsibility (CSR) agendas of commercial organisations. It illustrates that although commercial sponsorship can provide benefits including the provision of additional funding that can enable financial stability, key issues include the balance of power, the impact on organisational flexibility, whether there is a need to restructure, and the development of long-term partnerships. Although the findings from this article are focused on a particular type of charity, given the importance of CSR partnership income for the charities sector they may also have broader implications for other charitable organisations.

Résumé

Le changement de direction politique au Royaume-Uni en 2010 a suscité une incertitude et une instabilité financière pour de nombreuses organisations du secteur tertiaire. Dans un contexte marqué par un financement aléatoire, il est clair qu’une dépendance excessive à l’égard du financement gouvernemental est une stratégie risquée et qu’un besoin se fait jour en faveur d’une diversification et d’une recherche de sources alternatives de revenu. Cet article examine l’impact de l’alternance politique sur la durabilité financière des trusts sportifs communautaires associés aux clubs de Première division et de Ligue de Football en Angleterre. Il explore leurs sources de revenus dans le cadre d’une analyse des états financiers, laquelle révèle qu’en moyenne les trust sportifs communautaires reçoivent une part significative de leurs revenus des subventions alors que le financement par parrainage est relativement modeste. L’article se poursuit par une discussion sur le potentiel des trusts sportifs communautaires en faveur d’une diversification des flux de revenus par le biais du développement de partenariats sociaux prenant en compte les objectifs de responsabilité sociale d’entreprise (corporate social responsibility - CSR) des organisations commerciales. Il met en évidence que bien que le parrainage commercial puisse présenter des avantages notamment l’apport d’un financement supplémentaire susceptible de permettre une stabilité financière, les questions clés comportent l’équilibre des pouvoirs, l’impact de la flexibilité organisationnelle, le besoin ou non d’une restructuration et le développement de partenariats à long terme. En dépit du fait que les conclusions de cet article soient consacrées à un type particulier d’organisation caritative, eu égard à l’importance des revenus du partenariat CSR pour le secteur caritatif, elles pourraient également avoir des implications plus vastes pour d’autres organisations caritatives.

Zusammenfassung

Die Änderung in der politischen Führung Großbritanniens im Jahr 2010 brachte vielen Organisationen des dritten Sektors finanzielle Unsicherheit und Instabilität. In einer sich ändernden Finanzierungslandschaft ist eine allzu große Abhängigkeit von staatlicher Finanzierung eindeutig eine riskante Strategie, und es sollten auf jeden Fall verschiedene alternative Einnahmequellen ausgemacht werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag betrachtet die Auswirkungen der politischen Änderungen auf die finanzielle Nachhaltigkeit von Gemeindesportverbänden, die mit Vereinen der englischen Premier League und Football League verbunden sind. Die Einnahmequellen werden anhand von Finanzaufstellungen untersucht, wobei sich herausstellt, dass Zuschussförderungen im Durchschnitt einen Großteil der Einnahmen der Gemeindesportverbände ausmachen, während die Einnahmen aus Sponsorenschaften nur relativ gering sind. Der Beitrag diskutiert sodann das Potential für Gemeindesportverbände, ihre Einnahmequellen zu diversifizieren, indem sie soziale Partnerschaften entwickeln, die sich mit den Programmen gewerblicher Organisationen zur Corporate Social Responsibility, der unternehmerischen Gesellschaftsverantwortung, befassen. Es wird dargelegt, dass trotz möglicher Vorteile einer kommerziellen Sponsorenschaft, einschließlich der Bereitstellung zusätzlicher Gelder zur Förderung der finanziellen Stabilität, unter anderem das Gleichgewicht der Kräfte, die Auswirkungen auf die organisatorische Flexibilität, ggf. der Bedarf für eine Umstrukturierung sowie die Entwicklung langfristiger Partnerschaften wichtige Aspekte darstellen. Zwar beziehen sich die Ergebnisse dieses Beitrags hauptsächlich auf eine bestimmte Art von Wohltätigkeitsorganisation, doch haben sie angesichts der Bedeutung der Einnahmen aus der Corporate Social Responsibility-Partnerschaft für den gemeinnützigen Sektor auch weitreichendere Auswirkungen für andere gemeinnützige Organisationen.

Resumen

El cambio de liderazgo político en el Reino Unido en 2010 ha creado incertidumbre financiera e inestabilidad en muchas organizaciones del sector terciario. Con un panorama de financiación cambiante, resulta claro que un exceso de confianza en la financiación gubernamental es una estrategia arriesgada y que hace falta diversificar y buscar fuentes de ingresos alternativas. Este artículo considera el impacto del cambio político en la sostenibilidad financiera de las fundaciones deportivas comunitarias asociadas a los clubes de la Primera Liga y de la Liga de Fútbol en Inglaterra. Explora fuentes de ingresos mediante el análisis de los estados financieros, revelando que, como promedio, las fundaciones deportivas comunitarias reciben una proporción significativa de ingresos procedentes de subvenciones mientras que los ingresos por patrocinio son relativamente pequeños. El artículo prosigue tratando el potencial de que las fundaciones deportivas comunitarias diversifiquen los flujos de ingresos mediante el desarrollo de asociaciones sociales que aborden las agendas sobre responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC o CSR, del inglés corporate social responsibility) de las organizaciones comerciales. Ilustra que aunque el patrocinio comercial puede proporcionar beneficios, incluso la provisión de financiación adicional que puede permitir estabilidad financiera, las cuestiones claves incluyen el equilibrio de poder, el impacto sobre la flexibilidad organizativa, si existe la necesidad de reestructurar, y el desarrollo de asociaciones de largo plazo. Aunque los hallazgos del presente documento se centran en un tipo específico de organización benéfica, dada la importancia de los ingresos de la asociación RSC para el sector de las organizaciones benéficas, pueden tener también implicaciones más amplias para otras organizaciones benéficas.

摘要

2010 年,英国政坛发生领导人变更,为许多第三部门组织带来了财务的不确定和不稳定性。随着资金来源发生变化,一个问题清楚地显现出来:过度依赖政府资金是一种危险的策略,为此亟需实现资金来源的多元化,寻找替代性的收入来源。本文着眼于英国超级联赛和足球联赛俱乐部的相关社区体育信托基金,探讨了政坛更迭对其财务可持续性的影响。本文以分析财务报表的方式研究了这些基金的收入来源,结果发现平均而言,社区体育信托基金的大部分收入来自政府拨款,赞助性收入所占的比例较小。本文进而讨论了社区体育信托基金通过社会合作,与商业组织的企业社会责任(CSR)项目挂钩,以此实现收入来源多样化的可能性。本文旨在阐明:尽管商业赞助能带来诸多好处——包括获得更多资金,从而取得财务稳定性,但它也会造成一些重大问题,包括权力平衡、对组织灵活性的影响、是否需要改组、如何培养长期合作关系等问题。尽管本文的结论主要是针对特定的慈善组织,但考虑到 CSR 合作项目的收入对此类慈善组织的重要程度,或许这些结论对其他慈善组织具有更广泛的意义。

ملخص

قد خلق هذا التغيير في القيادة السياسية في المملكة المتحدة في عام 2010 عدم اليقين وعدم الإستقرار المالي لكثير من مؤسسات القطاع الثالث. واضح في مشهد تحول التمويل أن الإعتماد المفرط على التمويل الحكومي هو إستراتيجية محفوفة بالمخاطر، وأن هناك حاجة إلى التنويع والبحث عن مصادر بديلة للدخل. هذه المقالة تأخذ في الإعتبار تأثير التغيير السياسي في ودائع الإستدامة المالية لرياضة المجتمع المرتبطة بالدوري الممتاز وأندية دوري كرة القدم في إنجلترا. تستكشف مصادر الدخل من خلال تحليل البيانات المالية، الكشف عن أنه في المتوسط ودائع الأوساط الرياضية تتلقى نسبة كبيرة من الدخل من التمويل في شكل منح رعاية الدخل بينما هي صغيرة نسبيا. المقالة تمضي لمناقشة إحتمال أن رياضة المجتمع تثق في تنويع مصادر الدخل من خلال تطوير الشراكات الإجتماعية التي تتناول جداول مسؤولية الشركات الإجتماعية (CSR) للمنظمات التجارية. توضح أنه على الرغم من أن الرعاية التجارية يمكن أن توفر فوائد بما في ذلك توفير التمويل الإضافي الذي يمكن أن يساعد على الإستقرار المالي، تشمل القضايا الرئيسية توازن القوى، الأثرعلى المرونة التنظيمية، سواء كانت هناك حاجة لإعادة هيكلة، تنمية الشراكات على المدى الطويل. على الرغم أن النتائج من هذا البحث تركز على نوع معين من الأعمال الخيرية، نظرا لأهمية دخل شراكة المسؤولية الاجتماعية للشركات (CSR) لقطاع الأعمال الخيرية قد يكون لديهم أيضا آثار أوسع نطاقا˝ للمنظمات الخيرية الأخرى.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, P., & Kendall, J. (2011). Constituting the third sector: Processes of decontestation and contention under the UK labour governments in England. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 22(3), 450–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, P., & Stratton, A. (2010, October 20). Spending review 2010: The winners and losers. The Guardian.

  • Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Profits for non-profits: Find a corporate partner. Harvard Business Review, 74, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariño, A., de la Torre, J., & Ring, P. S. (2005). Relational quality and inter-personal trust in strategic alliances. European Management Review, 2(1), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arya, B., & Salk, J. E. (2006). Cross-sector alliance learning and effectiveness of voluntary codes of corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(2), 211–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M. J., Miyazaki, A. D., & Taylor, K. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H. (2011, July 26). Charity funding: How to approach business for help. The Guardian.

  • Becker-Olsen, K. L., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of sponsor fit on brand equity: The case of nonprofit service providers. Journal of Service Research, 9(1), 73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. (2008). Marketing of voluntary organizations as contract providers of national and local government welfare services in the UK. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(3), 268–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Crabbe, T., Mellor, G., Blackshaw, T., & Stone, C. (2006). Football and its Communities: Final Report, The Football Foundation and Manchester Metropolitan University.

  • Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organisations: Does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), 947–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C., & Tuckman, H. (1994). Revenue diversification among nonprofits. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 5(3), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charity Commission. (2005). Accounting and reporting by charities: Statement of recommended practice. London: Charity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, C., & Osborne, S. P. (2009). Exploring strategic positioning in the UK charitable sector: Emerging evidence from charitable organizations that provide public services. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, M. (1994). Global corporate philanthropy and relationship marketing. European Management Journal, 12(2), 226–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design, qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, W. F. (2000). Spinning straw into gold: The tenuous strategy, funding, and financial performance linkage. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 164–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demetriou, M., Papasolomou, I., & Vrontis, D. (2010). Cause-related marketing: Building the corporate image while supporting worthwhile causes. Journal of Brand Management, 17, 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, A., & Murray, M. (2007). The strategic sponsorship process in a nonprofit sport organization. Sport Marketing Quarterly, 16(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, L., Hou, J., & Huang, Y. (2008). Mechanisms of power and action for cause-related marketing: Perspectives of enterprise and non-profit organizations. Baltic Journal of Management, 3(1), 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2008). Management research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, K. (2011). ‘Big society’ in the UK: A policy review. Children and Society, 25, 164–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • File, K. M., & Prince, R. A. (1998). Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1529–1539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. L., Wilsker, A., & Young, D. R. (2011). Exploring the revenue mix of nonprofit organizations: Does it relate to publicness? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(4), 662–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofits organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P., & Keating, E. K. (2002). The risks and rewards of nonprofit revenue concentration. Paper presented at the ARNOVA annual conference, Montreal, QC, Canada.

  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Bielefeld, W. (1998). Nonprofit organizations in an age of uncertainty. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing: The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hager, M. A. (2001). Financial vulnerability among arts organizations: A test of the Tuckman–Chang measures. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 376–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harley, M., & Warburton, J. (2008). Risks to business in social involvement: An Australian case example. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 29, 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. (2010). Third sector organizations in a contradictory policy environment. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 25–45). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmig, B., Jegers, M., & Lapsley, I. (2004). Challenges in managing nonprofit organizations: A research overview. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, J., & Gard, L. (2004, November 29). The corporate givers. Business Week, pp. 100–104.

  • Hodge, M. M., & Piccolo, R. R. (2005). Funding source, board involvement techniques, and financial vulnerability in nonprofit organizations: A test of resource dependence. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 16(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, V., Weitzmann, M., Abrahams, J. A., Crutchfield, E. A., & Stevenson, D. R. (1996). Nonprofit almanac 1996–1997. Washington: Independent Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, R., & Cairns, B. (2010). Community anchor organizations: Sustainability and independence. In D. Billis (Ed.), Hybrid organizations and the third sector (pp. 134–152). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., & Keshishian, T. (2009). Uneasy alliances: Lessons learned from partnerships between businesses and NGOs in the context of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(2), 277–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamali, D., Yianni, M., & Abdallah, H. (2011). Strategic partnerships, social capital and innovation: Accounting for social alliance innovation. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(4), 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, J. (2003). The voluntary sector. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, B. R. (1993). Portfolio theory and nonprofit financial stability. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(2), 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., Tomas, G., & Hult, M. (2004). The impact of the alliance on the partners: A look at cause-brand alliances. Psychology and Marketing, 21(7), 509–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. (2005). New labour’s approach to the voluntary sector: Independence and the meaning of partnership. Social Policy and Society, 4(2), 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liston-Heyes, C., & Liu, G. (2010). Cause-related marketing in the retail and finance sectors: An exploratory study of the determinants of cause selection and nonprofit alliances. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusted, J., & O’Gorman, J. (2010). The impact of new labour’s modernisation agenda on the English grass-roots football workforce. Managing Leisure, 15(1/2), 140–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellor, G. (2008). The Janus-faced sport: English football, community and the legacy of the ‘third way’. Soccer and Society, 9(3), 313–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Voluntary Organisations. (2009). The state and the voluntary sector: Recent trends in government funding and public service delivery. London: National Council for Voluntary Organisations.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Voluntary Organisations. (2011). Charity forecast: A quarterly survey of sector leaders, December 2011. London: National Council for Voluntary Organisations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ning, C., Hu, Y., & Zhang, B. (2006). Mechanisms of obtaining corporate competitive advantage by collaborating with nonprofit organizations. Studies in Science of Science, 24(3), 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health, 31(4), 391–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, C., & Harris, M. (2008). Corporate responsibility, ethics and strategic HRM in Aston Centre for Human Resources. In Strategic human resource management: Building research based practice (pp. 296–326). London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M. J., & Speed, R. (2001). Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing: Complementaries and conflicts. European Journal of Marketing, 35(11/12), 1361–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M. (Ed.). (2007). Understanding the mixed economy of welfare. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh, R. (2010, October 20). Spending review 2010: Key points at a glance. The Guardian.

  • Rogers, S. (2010, October 19). Comprehensive spending review: What is the £83 bn? The Guardian.

  • Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1996). The crisis of the nonprofit sector and the challenge of renewal. National Civic Review, 85(4), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. (1999). The non-profit sector at a crossroads: The case of America. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 10(1), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, M. (2011, August 2). Council’s cuts to 2,200 charities undermine Big Society. The Times.

  • Seitanidi, M., & Ryan, A. (2007). A critical review of forms of corporate community involvement: From philanthropy to partnerships. International Journal of Non-profit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 12(3), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W., & Parker, B. (2005). Cross-sector partnerships to address social issues: Challenges to theory and practice. Journal of Management, 31(6), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sesnan, M. (2001). Greenwich Leisure Limited—the ‘third way’: From cuts and closures to expansion and success. Journal of Leisure Property, 1(3), 220–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, S., & Allen, J. B. (2009). “To be a business and to keep our humanity”: A critical management studies analysis of the relationship between a funder and nonprofit community organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 20(1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staples, C. (2004). What does corporate social responsibility mean for charitable fundraising in the UK? International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 9(2), 154–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J. (2007). The mixed economy of welfare in historical context. In M. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the mixed economy of welfare (pp. 26–40). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struthers, M. (2004). Supporting financial vibrancy in the quest for sustainability in the not-for-profit sector. The Philanthropist, 19(4), 241–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. L., Mullen, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (2010). Increased word-of-mouth via strategic cause-related marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(1), 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, F. (2005). Idealistic and pragmatic versions of the discourse of partnership. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1169–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. (1988). Building successful partnerships (pp. 17–23). Summer: Sloan Management Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. (2009). Corporate social responsibility through sport: The community sports trust model as a CSR delivery agency. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 35, 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G., & Chadwick, S. (2009). Corporate citizenship in football: Delivering strategic benefits through stakeholder engagement. Management Decision, 47(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment: Drivers of tri-sector partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(1), 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warneke, K. (2005). Keeping tabs at the Ronald McDonald house in Omaha: How a nonprofit garnered press attention. Public Relations Tactics, 12(8), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (Ed.). (1998). To profit or not to profit. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., & Hung, J. (2008). A performance evaluation model of CRM on non-profit organisations. Total Quality Management, 19(4), 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, N. (2011, August 3). The Big Society is dying the death of a thousand cuts. The Times.

  • Young, N., & Salamon, L. (2002). Commercialization, social ventures and for-profit competition. In L. Salamon (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 122–140). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R., Wilsker, A. L., & Grinsfelder, M. C. (2010). Understanding the determinants of nonprofit income portfolios. Voluntary Sector Review, 1(2), 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zappala, G., & Lyons, M. (2006). Factors associated with fundraising dependency among nonprofit organisations in Australia. Journal of Social Issues, 41(4), 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoff Walters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bingham, T., Walters, G. Financial Sustainability Within UK Charities: Community Sport Trusts and Corporate Social Responsibility Partnerships. Voluntas 24, 606–629 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9275-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9275-z

Keywords

Navigation