Abstract
Differences in species composition across ecological communities are the result of multiple interacting mechanisms. Gradient analysis has been perhaps the most widely used statistical framework in describing how ecological communities vary in space, and aiding in determining the causes underlying these patterns. Direct gradient analysis allows the use of predictors such as environmental factors and spatial descriptors to directly estimate their contributions in explaining common and independent patterns of species distributions. In recent years, ecologists have started to explore how evolutionary history is associated with community patterns given the observation that species that share a common phylogenetic history tend also to have similar niches. Although ecological phylogenetics is among the fastest-growing fields in ecology, gradient analysis has not yet been fully integrated in this field. In this paper, we show and adapt the versatility of gradient analysis in describing and interpreting patterns of ecological communities based on their patterns of phylogenetic structure. Describing phylogenetic patterns across communities presents additional challenges regarding statistical inference in contrast to classic direct gradient analysis that are described and tackled here. We investigate the performance of our phylogenetic gradient analysis frameworks using simulations and provide a detailed example using a grassland community dataset.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown JH (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Brown JH, Ernest SKM, Parody JM, Haskell JP (2001) Regulation of diversity: maintenance of species richness in changing environments. Oecologia 126:321–332
Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715
Chiu C, Jost L, Chao A (2014) Phylogenetic beta diversity, similarity, and differentiation measures based on Hill numbers. Ecol Monogr 84:21–44
Connor EF, Simberloff D (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology 60:1132–1140
Connor EF, Collins MD, Simberloff D (2013) The checkered history of checkerboard distributions. Ecology 94:2403–2414
Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard, Belknap
Diniz-Filho JAF, Sant’Ana CER, Bini LM (1998) An eigenvector method for estimating phylogenetic inertia. Evolution 52:1247–1262
Diniz-filho JAF, Rangel TF, Santos T, Bini LM (2012) Exploring patterns of interespecific variation in quantitative traits using sequential phylogenetic eigenvector regressions. Evolution 66:1079–1090
Dray S, Legendre P (2008) Testing the species traits-environment relationships: the fourth-corner problem revisited. Ecology 89:3400–3412
Dray S, Pélissier R, Couteron P, Fortin M-J, Legendre P, Peres-Neto P-R, Bellier E, Bivand R, Blanchet F-G, De Caceres M, Dufour A-B, Heegaard E, Jombart T, Munoz F, Oksanen J, Thioulouse J, Wagner H-H (2012) Community ecology in the age of multivariate multiscale spatial analysis. Ecol Monog 82:257–275
Dray S, Choler P, Dolédec S, Peres-Neto PR, Thuiller W, Pavoine S, ter Braak CJF (2014) Combining the fourth-corner and the RLQ methods for assessing trait responses to environmental variation. Ecology 95:14–21
Duarte LDS, Prieto PV, Pillar VDP (2012) Assessing spatial and environmental drivers of phylogenetic structure in Brazilian Araucaria forests. Ecography 35:952–960
Emerson BC, Gillespie RG (2008) Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23:619–630
Fine P, Kembel SW (2011) Phylogenetic community structure and phylogenetic turnover across space and edaphic gradients in western Amazonian tree communities. Ecography 34:552–565
Gaston KJ (2000) Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227
Goodall DW (1954) Objective methods fir the classification of vegetations. III. an essay in the use of factor analysis. Aust J Bot 2:304–324
Graham CH, Fine PVA (2008) Phylogenetic beta diversity: linking ecological and evolutionary processes across space in time. Ecol Lett 11:1265–1277
Graham CH, Parra JL, Rahbek C, McGuire JA (2009) Phylogenetic structure in tropical hummingbird com- munities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19673–19678
Guénard G, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2013) Phylogenetic eigenvector maps (PEM): a framework to model and predict species traits. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1120–1131
Haddad NM, Holyoak M, Mata TM, Davies KF, Melbourne BA, Preston K (2008) Species’ traits predict the effects of disturbance and productivity on diversity. Ecol Lett 11:348–356
Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (2005). A framework for large-scale community ecology. Metacommunities: spatial dynamics and ecological communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Keddy PA (1992) Assembly and response rules: two goals for predictive community ecology. J Veg Sci 2:157–164
Kembel SW (2009) Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecol Lett 12:949–960
Kembel SW, Cahill JF (2011) Independent evolution of leaf and root traits within and among temperate grassland plant communities. PLoS One 6:e19992
Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WL, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464
Kraft N, ornwell W, Webb C, Ackerly D (2007) Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. Am Nat 170:271–283
Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Williams NSG, Garden D, Dorrough J, Berman S, Quétier F, Thébault A, Bonis A (2008) Assessing functional diversity in the field—methodology matters! Funct Ecol 22:134–147
Legendre P, Anderson MJ (1999) Distance-based redundancy analysis: testing multi-species responses in multi-factorial ecological experiments. Ecol Monogr 69:1–24
Legendre P, Galzin R, HarmelinVivien ML (1997) Relating behavior to habitat: solutions to the fourth-corner problem. Ecology 78:547–562
Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto PR (2005) Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol Monog 75:435–450
Leibold MA, Economo EP, Peres-Neto PR (2010) Metacommunity phylogenetics: separating the roles of environmental filters and historical biogeography. Ecol Lett 13:1290–1299
Martins E (1995) Phylogenies and comparative data, a microevolutionary perspective. Philos T R Soc B 349:85–91
McArdle BH, Anderson MJ (2001) Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82:290–297
McGill B, Enquist BJ, Weiher E, Westoby M (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends Ecol Evol 21:178–185
Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290
Pavoine S, Ricotta C (2014) Functional and phylogenetic similarity among communities. Methods Ecol Evol 5:666–675
Pavoine S, Vela E, Gachet S, de Bélair G, Bonsall MB (2011) Linking patterns in phylogeny, traits, abiotic variables and space : a novel approach to linking environmental filtering and plant community assembly. J Ecol 99:165–175
Pearse IS, Hipp AL (2009) Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43:18097–18102
Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P (2010) Estimating and controlling for spatial autocorrelation in the study of ecological communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:174–184
Peres-Neto PR, Leibold MA, Dray S (2012) Assessing the effects of spatial contingency and environmental filtering on metacommunity phylogenetics. Ecology 93:S14–S30
Rabosky DL (2006) Likelihood methods for detecting temporal shifts in diversification rates. Evolution 60:1152–1164
Revell LJ (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol Evol 3:217–223
Revell LJ, Collar DC (2009) Phylogenetic analysis of the evolutionary correlation using likelihood. Evolution 63:1090–1100
Shmida A, Wilson MV (1985) Biological determinants of species diversity. J Biogr 12(1):20
ter Braak CJF (1986) Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector method for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67:1167–1179
ter Braak CJF, Cormont A, Dray S (2012) Improved testing of species traits–environment relationships in the fourth-corner problem. Ecology 93:1525–1526
van den Wollenberg AL (1977) Redundancy analysis. An alternative for canonical correlation analysis. Psychometrika 42:207–219
Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505
Whitakker RH (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol Rev 49:207–264
Wieher E, Keddy P (1999) Ecological assembly rules: perspectives, advances, retreats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgments
This work was partially funded by the National Sciences and Engineering Reearch Council of Canada and the Canada Research Chairs Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. R. Minchin and J. Oksanen.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peres-Neto, P.R., Kembel, S.W. Phylogenetic gradient analysis: environmental drivers of phylogenetic variation across ecological communities. Plant Ecol 216, 709–724 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0405-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0405-0