Abstract
Prior research documents the almost universal preference for schools that are “convenient”. Drawing on longitudinal interview data gathered from 36 urban parents, I argue parents’ preference for “convenient” schools is more complex than previously understood. Conceptions of geography used by policy makers do not adequately capture the ways in which parents think about geography. Instead of thinking about school as solely a location one must travel to, parents’ preferences for schools are informed by space and place-based notions of geography. Parents’ geographic preferences connect to larger, more deeply held ideas about parenting, family life, identity, child development, and one’s place in the larger stratified society. Further, these preferences do not exist in a vacuum. Parents’ geographic preferences have implications for the resources parents’ must activate in order to make certain schools possible. Geographic preferences also compete with other school preferences. This paper shows how notions of space and place shape the schools parents choose as well as the schools they are willing to consider. The study describes a fuller, more accurate portrayal of parents’ thinking. It also draws attention to the ways in which existing historical and social contexts influence parents’ understandings of choice policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armor D., Peiser B. (1997). Competition in education: A case study of interdistrict choice. Boston: Pioneer Institute
Arsen, D., Plank, D., Sykes, G. (1999). School choice policies in Michigan: The rules matter. East Lansing, MI: The Education Policy Center at Michigan State University
Asimov, N. (2003, October 9). Few parents seize chance to transfer schools ‘No Child Left Behind’ made offer mandatory. The San Francisco Chronicle, p. A1
Bell, C. (2005). All choices created equal?: How good parents select failing schools. National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College, New York, NY. Available: http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/OP106.pdf
Blank R. K., Levine R. E., Steel L. (1996). After 15 years: Magnet schools in urban education. In Fuller B., Elmore R. F., Orfield G. (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 154–172). New York: Teachers College Press
Bourdieu P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bourdieu P., Wacquant L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
Buendia E., Ares N., Juarez B., Peercy M. (2004). The geographies of difference: The production of the east side, west side, and central city school. American Educational Research Journal, 41(4), 833–863
Butler T., Robson G. (2003). Plotting the middle classes: Gentrification and circuits of education in London. Housing Studies, 18(1), 5–28
Cobb C., & Glass, G. (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools, Education Policy Analysis Archives (Vol. 7)
Cremin L. A. (1982). American education: The national experience, 1783–1876. New York: Harper and Row
David M., West A., Ribbens J. (1994). Mother’s intuition? Choosing secondary schools. London: The Falmer Press
Figlio D. N., & Lucas M.E. (2000). What’s in a grade? School report cards and house prices. Unpublished manuscript, Cambridge, MA
Fine M. (1993). [Ap] parent involvement. Equity and Choice, 9(3), 4–8
Fiske E. B., Ladd H. F. (2000). When schools compete: A cautionary tale. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute Press
Gewirtz S., Ball S.J., Bowe R. (1995). Markets, choice, and equity in education. Buckingham, England: Open University Press
Gill B. P., Timpane P. M., Ross K. E., Brewer, D. J. (2001). Rhetoric versus reality: What we know and what we need to know about vouchers and charter schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand
Glaser B., Strauss A. (1979). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine
Glatter R., Woods P., & Bagley C. (Eds). (1997). Choice and diversity in schooling: Perspectives and prospects. London: Routledge
Glomm G., Harris D., Lo T.-F. (2005). Charter school location. Economics of Education Review, 24, 451–457
Goldring E., Cohen-Vogel L., Smrekar C., Taylor C. (2006). Schooling closer to home: Desegregation policy and neighborhood contexts. American Journal of Education, 112, 335–362
Gulson K. N. (2005). Renovating educational identities: Policy, space and urban renewal. Journal of Education Policy, 20(2), 141–158
Gupta, R. (2004, July 20). Few in Martin take advantage of options under U.S. school law. Palm Beach Post, p. 1B
Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Holme J. J. (2002). Buying homes, buying schools: School choice and the social construction of school quality. Harvard Educational Review, 72(2), 177–207
Horvat E. M., Weininger E. B., Lareau A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relationship between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351
Lefebvre H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing
Lubienski C. (2005). School choice as a civil right: District responses to competition and equal educational opportunity. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38, 331–341
Massey, D. (1994). Space, place, and gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
McCulloch G. (1992). Constructing the community: Secondary schools and their neighborhoods in 20th century Auckland. The Australian Journal of Education, 36(2), 143–155
Miles M. B., Huberman A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Reay D. (1996). Contextualising choice: Social power and parental involvement. British Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 581–596
Saporito S., Sohoni D. (2006). Coloring outside the lines: Racial segregation in public schools and their attendance boundaries. Sociology of Education, 79, 81–105 (April)
Schleef D. (2000). “That’s a good question!”: Exploring motivations for law and business school choice. Sociology of Education, 73(3), 155–174
Schneider M., Buckley J. (2002). What do parents want from schools? Evidence from the internet. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 133–144
Schneider M., Teske P., Marschall M. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Swartz D. (1997). Culture and power: The sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Theobald R. (2005). School Choice in Colorado springs: The relationship between parenal decisions, location and neighbourhood characteristics. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 14(2), 92–111
Tuan Y.-F. (1997). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
Welch S., Combs M., Sigelman L., Bledsoe T. (1997). Race or place? Emerging public perceptions on urban education. PS: Political Science and Politics, 30(3), 454–458
Wells A. S. (1996). African-American students’ view of school choice. In Fuller B., Elmore R.F., Orfield G. (Eds), Who chooses? Who looses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 29–45). New York: Teachers College Press
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, C.A. Space and Place: Urban Parents’ Geographical Preferences for Schools. Urban Rev 39, 375–404 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0059-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-007-0059-5